Embodiment as a term is becoming widely used in mainstream society, and is generally associated with the physical body in some way. However, the definition of embodiment is more esoteric. It is defined by lexicographers as ‘a tangible or visible form of an idea, quality, or feeling’ (Oxford Dictionary, 2019). As such it has no immediate connection with the physical, lived and experienced body. There are a number of theoretical positions on embodiment, and this has implications for the ways in which it is used to conceptualise lived experience. My position is that embodiment incorporates a conscious self-awareness of the information, sensations, proprioception, images, feelings and emotions that arise from the body and the mind. In this chapter I briefly explore differences of understanding and conceptualisations of embodiment, reflect on how I understand and use the concept of embodiment and embodied and how this in turn impacts on the generation of knowledge and research that gives us an insight into embodied experience. I show how this is particularly relevant for those interested in researching the experiences of those with embodied differences, such as those with disability, chronic illness or neurodivergence.
The term embodiment is contested (Sheets-Johnstone, 2015), and part of the battle of using the word is the need to continuously define and determine what we mean by it. For some sociologists the idea of embodiment relates to how we perform our identity, the clothes we wear, whether we choose to have tattoos, piercings, or the way that we display to others how we choose to identify ourselves within society (Evans et al, 2004).
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 608 | 299 | 40 |
Full Text Views | 36 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Downloads | 29 | 0 | 0 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here