This chapter provides an overview of common data collection tools to introduce the reader to the wide range of possibilities. A description of each data collection tool is provided along with design tips. The further reading section provides the reader with additional resources to follow up on any tools that are of interest. Attention is drawn to the data collection tools that are particularly good at promoting participation. The chapter highlights potential tensions in who decides on the data collection tools and the amount of knowledge or ‘training’ co-researchers may need in order to do so.
Aked, J., Marks, N., Cordon, C. and Thompson, S. (2008) Five Ways to Well-being, London: New Economics Foundation.
Aldridge, J. (2016) Participatory Research. Working with Vulnerable Groups in Research and Practice, Bristol: Policy Press.
Banks, S. and Brydon-Miller, M. (2018) Ethics in Participatory Research for Health and Wellbeing, Abingdon: Routledge.
Bell, P. (2000) ‘Content analysis of visual images’, in T. Van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds) The Handbook of Visual Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 10–34.
The Community Alliance for Research and Engagement (2021) ‘Beyond scientific publication: strategies for disseminating research findings’, Available at: https://www.idaea.csic.es/sites/default/files/CARE-Beyond-Scientific-Publication-Strategies-for-Disseminating-Research-Findings.pdf
Cook, T. (2009) ‘The purpose of mess in action research: Building rigour though a messy turn’, Educational Action Research, 17: 277–91, doi:10.1080/09650790902914241
Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald, S. and Meagher, A. (2007) ‘Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: recommendations for institutional review boards’, Journal of Urban Health, 84(4): 478–93, doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7
Grint, K. (2008) ‘Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: the role of leadership’, Stockport: BAMM Publications.
Lundy, P. and McGovern, M. (2006) ‘The ethics of silence. Action research, community ‘truth telling’ and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland’, Action Research, 4(1): 49–64.
Maguire, P. (2014) ‘Feminist Participatory Research’, in A. Jaggar (ed.) Just Methods – An Interdisciplinary Feminist Reader, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 417–31.
Mannay, D. (2016) Visual, Narrative and Creative Research Methods, London: Routledge.
Maynard, L. and Stuart, K. (2018) Promoting Young People’s Wellbeing Through Empowerment and Agency: A Critical Framework for Practice, London: Routledge.
National Institute for Health Research (2021) ‘Payment guidance for researchers and professionals’, Available at: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/payment-guidance-for-researchers-and-professionals/27392
Office for National Statistics (2021) ‘Surveys using our four personal well-being Questions’, Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/methodologies/surveysusingthe4officefornationalstatisticspersonalwellbeingquestions
Schubotz, D. (2019) ‘Participatory action research’, in P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. Sakshaug, and R. Williams (eds), SAGE Research Methods Foundations, London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036
Springett, J., Atkey, K., Kongats, K., Zulla, R. and Wilkins, E. (2016) ‘Conceptualizing quality in participatory health research: a phenomenographic inquiry’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum: Qualitative Social Research], 17(2): https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2568
Statista (2020) ‘Annual per capita tea consumption worldwide’, Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/507950/global-per-capita-tea-consumption-by-country/
Stuart, K., Maynard, L. and Rouncefield, C. (2015) Evaluation Practice for Projects with Young People: Creative Research Methods, London: Sage.
|May 2022 onwards||Past Year||Past 30 Days|
|Full Text Views||0||0||0|