1:
This chapter sets out the approach taken in the book, arguing for the need to explore the actual, multiple and diverse practices of planning and the similarly diverse working lives of professional planners. It introduces key changes in the environments in which planners work, including privatisation and the growth of private-sector work as well as linked initiatives to bring commercial logics into the realm of planning. It sets out debates on the purpose of planning and the public interest before outlining the ethnographic approach to data collection in the four case-study organisations.
-
Abram, S. (2004) ‘Personality and professionalism in a Norwegian district council’, Planning Theory, 3(1): 21–40.
-
Alvesson, M. (2011) Management of Knowledge-Intensive Companies, Berlin: De Gruyter.
-
Amin-Smith, N., Phillips, D. and Simpson, P. (2016) Real-Terms Change in Local Government Service Spending by LA Decile of Grant Dependence, 2009–10 to 2016–17, England, Scotland and Wales, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
-
Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C. and Robson, K. (2000) ‘In the name of the client: the service ethic in two professional services firms’, Human Relations, 53(9): 1151–74.
-
Annink, A. and den Dulk, L. (2012) ‘Autonomy: the panacea for self-employed women’s work-life balance?’, Community, Work & Family, 15(4): 383–402.
-
Auty, S. (1996) ‘Designing and testing a resource-based method for setting professional fees’, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 13(2): 71–92.
-
Back, L. (2014) ‘Journeying through words: Les Back reflects on writing with Thomas Yarrow: Writers on writing’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 20(4): 766–70.
-
Barrett, S. and Fudge, C. (1981) Policy and Action: Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy, London: Methuen.
-
Baum, H. (2015) ‘Planning with half a mind: why planners resist emotion’, Planning Theory & Practice, 16(4): 498–516.
-
Beauregard, R.A. (1998) ‘Writing the planner’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(2): 93–101.
-
Beauregard, R.A. (2015) Planning Matter: Acting with Things, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Bickenbach, J. and Hendler, S. (1994) ‘The moral mandate of the planning profession’, in H. Thomas (ed), Values and Planning, Aldershot: Avebury, pp 162–77.
-
Bicquelet-Lock, A., Divine, J. and Crabb, B. (2020) Women and Planning: an Analysis of Gender Related Barriers to Professional Advancement, London: RTPI.
-
Blackman, D. (2021) ‘The most in-demand skills in planning’, Planning, Autumn: 24–7.
-
Booth, P. (2003) Planning By Consent: the Origins and Nature of British Developmental Control, London: Routledge.
-
Booth, R. (2020) ‘Revealed: London councils take funds from developers to pay for planning guidelines’, The Guardian, [online] 23 August, Available from: www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/aug/23/revealed-councils-accept-payments-from-developers-to-fund-planning-guidelines [Accessed 26 April 2022].
-
Boxall, P. and Macky, K. (2014) ‘High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being’, Work, Employment and Society, 28(6): 963–84.
-
Brand, C. (2021) ‘Obsessing over electric cars is impeding the race to net zero: more active travel is essential’, Our Research: True Planet, [blog] 14 June, Available from: www.research.ox.ac.uk/article/2021-06-14-obsessing-over-electric-cars-is-impeding-the-race-to-net-zero-more-active-travel-is-essential [Accessed 26 April 2022].
-
Brewer, J. (2004) ‘Ethnography’, in C. Cassell and G. Symon (eds) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, London: Sage, pp 312–22.
-
Brindley, T., Rydin, Y. and Stoker, G. (1996) Remaking Planning: The Politics of Urban Change, London: Routledge.
-
Campbell, H. and Marshall, R. (1998) ‘Acting on principle: dilemmas in planning practice’, Planning Practice & Research, 13(2): 117–28.
-
Campbell, H. and Marshall, R. (2002) ‘Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning’, Planning Theory, 1(2): 163–87.
-
Carmona, M. and Sieh, L. (2004) Measuring Quality in Planning: Managing the Performance Process, London: Spon Press.
-
Chapman, K., Tait, M. and Inch, A. (2020) ‘The dangers of data’, Town and Country Planning, 89(9/10): 307–11.
-
Chan, J.K.H. and Protzen, J.P. (2018) ‘Between conflict and consensus: searching for an ethical compromise in planning’, Planning Theory, 17(2): 170–89.
-
Cherry, G.E. (1974) The Evolution of British Town Planning: A History of Town Planning in the United Kingdom During the 20th Century and of the Royal Town Planning Institute, 1914–74, Leighton Buzzard: Leonard Hill Books.
-
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997) The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare, London: Sage.
-
Clifford, B. (2012) ‘Planning in an age of customers: British local authority practitioners, identity and reactions to public sector reform’, Town Planning Review, 83(5): 553–74.
-
Clifford, B. (2018) ‘Freedom of information request to support Work Package 2: Charting outsourcing in UK public planning’, Working in the Public Interest, [online], Available from: sites.google.com/sheffield.ac.uk/witpi/research/foi?authuser=0 [Accessed 8 August 2022].
-
Clifford, B., Ferm, J., Livingstone, N. and Canelas, P. (2019) Understanding the Impacts of Deregulation in Planning: Turning Offices into Homes?, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Clifford, B., Canelas, P., Dunning, R., Ferm, J., Livingstone, N. and Lord, A. (2020) Research into the Quality Standard of Homes Delivered through Change of Use Permitted Development Rights, London: MHCLG.
-
Climate Change Committee (2016) ‘Fifth carbon budget infographic’, Climate Change Committee, [blog] 20 July, Available from: www.theccc.org.uk/2016/07/20/fifth-carbon-budget-infographic/ [Accessed 26 April 2022].
-
Colenutt, B. (2020) The Property Lobby: The Hidden Reality Behind the Housing Crisis, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Connected Places Catapult (2020) Transforming the Digital Architecture of Planning, London: Connected Places Catapult.
-
Davoudi, S. and Strange, I. (2009) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, London: Routledge.
-
Deal, T. and Kennedy, A. (1982) Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Organizational Life, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
-
Dewar, D. (2020) ‘The planning consultancy market report 2020: overview’, Planning, Autumn: 17–19.
-
Duneier, M. (2001) Sidewalk, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
-
Durning, B., Carpenter, J., Glasson, J. and Watson, G.B. (2010) ‘The spiral of knowledge development: professional knowledge development in planning’, Planning Practice & Research, 25(4): 497–516.
-
Erickson, K.C. and Stull, D.D. (1998) Doing Team Ethnography: Warnings and Advice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Etzioni, A. (1969) The Semi-professions and their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers, New York: Free Press.
-
Evans, B. (1993) ‘Why we no longer need a town planning profession’, Planning Practice & Research, 8(1): 9–15.
-
Evetts, J. (2011) ‘A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities’, Current Sociology, 59(4): 406–22.
-
Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. and Pettigrew, A. (1996) The New Public Management in Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Ferm, J. and Raco, M. (2020) ‘Viability planning, value capture and the geographies of market-led planning reform in England’, Planning Theory & Practice, 21(2): 218–35.
-
Fincham, R., Clark, T., Handley, K. and Sturdy, A. (2008) ‘Knowledge narratives and heterogeneity in management consultancy and business services’, in D. Muzio, S. Ackroyd and J.-F. Chanlat (eds) Redirections in the Study of Expert Labour: Established Professions and New Expert Occupations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 183–203.
-
Fisher, M. (2009) Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?, Winchester: Zero Books.
-
Fleming, P. and Spicer, A. (2003) ‘Working at a cynical distance: implications for power, subjectivity and resistance’, Organization, 10(1): 157–79.
-
Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Forester, J. (2021) ‘Our curious silence about kindness in planning: challenges of addressing vulnerability and suffering’, Planning Theory, 20(1): 63–83.
-
Forester, J. and Kilgore, A. (2020) ‘Dancing around male violence: the all too ordinary backstory to Barshefsky’s extra-ordinary practice’, Negotiation Journal, 36(2): 189–91.
-
Frank, A.I. (2007) ‘Entrepreneurship and enterprise skills: a missing element of planning education?’, Planning Practice & Research, 22(4): 635–48.
-
Friedson, E. (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic, Cambridge: Polity.
-
Furbey, R., Reid, B. and Cole, I. (2001) ‘Housing professionalism in the United Kingdom: the final curtain or a new age?’, Housing, Theory, and Society, 18(1–2): 36–49.
-
Gardner, A. (2017) ‘Big change, little change? Punctuation, increments and multi-layer institutional change for English local authorities under austerity’, Local Government Studies, 43(2): 150–69.
-
Garsten, C. and Nyqvist, A. (2013) Organisational Anthropology: Doing Ethnography in and Among Complex Organisations, London: Pluto Press.
-
Geertz, C. (2000) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books.
-
Gerard Forsey, M. (2010) ‘Ethnography as participant listening’, Ethnography, 11(4): 558–72.
-
Glasson, B. and Booth, P. (1992) ‘Negotiation and delay in the development control process: case studies in Yorkshire and Humberside’, The Town Planning Review, 63(1): 63–78.
-
Goodman, R. (1972) After the Planners, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
-
Grange, K. (2013) ‘Shaping acting space: in search of a new political awareness among local authority planners’, Planning Theory, 12(3): 225–43.
-
Grange, K. (2017) ‘Planners – a silenced profession? The politicisation of planning and the need for fearless speech’, Planning Theory, 16(3): 275–95.
-
Gray, M. and Barford, A. (2018) ‘The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, 11(3): 541–63.
-
Green, F. (2004) ‘Why has work effort become more intense?’, Industrial Relations, 43(4): 709–41.
-
Gunn, S. (2019) ‘Planning professionalism in the face of technocracy: ethics, values and practices’, in M. Raco and F. Savini (eds) Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy Are Shaping Contemporary Cities, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 127–38.
-
Gunn, S. and Hillier, J. (2014) ‘When uncertainty is interpreted as risk: an analysis of tensions relating to spatial planning reform in England’, Planning Practice and Research, 29(1): 56–74.
-
Haas, P.M. (1992) ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization, 46(1): 1–35.
-
Hall, D. and Leach, S. (2000) ‘The changing nature of local labour politics’, in G. Stoker (ed) The New Politics of British Local Governance, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp 150–65.
-
Hall, P. (2013) Good Cities, Better Lives: How Europe Discovered the Lost Art of Urbanism, London: Taylor & Francis.
-
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice (3rd edn), London: Routledge.
-
Harris, N. and Thomas, H. (2011) ‘Clients, customers and consumers: a framework for exploring the user-experience of the planning service’, Planning Theory & Practice, 12(2): 249–68.
-
Hatherley, O. (2010) A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain, London: Verso.
-
Healey, P. (1992) ‘A planner’s day: knowledge and action in communicative practice’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1): 9–20.
-
Healey, P. (2010) Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty-First Century, London: Bloomsbury.
-
Healey, P. and Underwood, J. (1978) Professional Ideals and Planning Practice: A Report on Research into Planners’ Ideas in Practice in London Borough Planning Departments, Oxford: Pergamon.
-
Hickman, H., McClymont, K. and Sheppard, A. (2021) Planners of the Future: Expectations, Motivations, and Experiences: A Snapshot from 2019–2020, London/Bristol: RTPI/UWE.
-
Historic England (2018) Tenth Report on Local Authority Staff Resources, London: Historic England.
-
Hochschild, A. (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, New York: Metropolitan Books.
-
Hochschild, A. (2008) ‘On the edge of the time bind: time and market culture’, in C. Warhurst, D.R. Eikhof and A. Haunschild (eds) Work Less, Live More? Critical Analysis of the Work-Life Boundary, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 80–91.
-
Hoggett, P. (2006) ‘Conflict, ambivalence, and the contested purpose of public organizations’, Human Relations, 59(2): 175–94.
-
Howe, E. (1994) Acting on Ethics in City Planning, New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
-
Imrie, R. and Thomas, H. (1992) ‘The wrong side of the tracks: a case study of local economic regeneration in Britain’, Policy & Politics, 20(3): 213–26.
-
Inch, A. (2010) ‘Culture change as identity regulation: the micro-politics of producing spatial planners in England’, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3): 359–74.
-
Inch, A. and Shepherd, E. (2020) ‘Thinking conjunctively about ideology, housing and English planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, 19(1): 59–79.
-
Inch, A., Wargent, M. and Tait, M. (2022) ‘Serving the public interest? Towards a history of private sector planning expertise in England’, Planning Perspectives. DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2022.2063165.
-
Jackson, J. (2020) ‘What do mid-career Melbourne planners profess?’, International Planning Studies, 25(4): 393–408.
-
Johnson, T.J. (1972) Professions and Power, London: Macmillan
-
Kenny, T. (2019) Resourcing Public Planning, London: RTPI.
-
Killian, J. and Pretty, D. (2008) The Killian Pretty Review: Planning applications – a Faster and More Responsive System: Final Report, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
-
Kirk, J. and Vasconcelos, A. (2003) ‘Management consultancies and technology consultancies in a converging market: a knowledge management perspective’, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1): 33–46.
-
Kitchen, T. (1997) People, Politics, Policies and Plans: The City Planning Process in Contemporary Britain, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
-
Koolmees, T. and Majoor, S. (2019) ‘Local government in the face of crisis: changing public management of urban projects in Amsterdam’, in M. Raco and F. Savini (eds) Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy are Shaping Contemporary Cities, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 59–75.
-
Kunda, G. (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
-
Lamb, W.F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J.T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., et al (2020) ‘Discourses of climate delay’, Global Sustainability, 3: 1–5.
-
Land, C. and Taylor, S. (2010) ‘Surf’s up: work, life, balance and brand in a new age capitalist organization’, Sociology, 44(3): 395–413.
-
Laurian, L. and Inch, A. (2019) ‘On time and planning: opening futures by cultivating a “sense of now”’, Journal of Planning Literature, 34(3): 267–85.
-
Layard, A. (2019) ‘Planning by numbers: affordable housing and viability in England’, in M. Raco and F. Savini (eds) Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy are Shaping Contemporary Cities, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 213–24.
-
Leach, S., Stewart, J. and Jones, G. (2017) Centralisation, Devolution and the Future of Local Government in England, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Lennon, M. (2017) ‘On “the subject” of planning’s public interest’, Planning Theory 16(2): 150–68.
-
Letwin, O. (2018) Independent Review of Build Out: Final Report, London: MHCLG.
-
Levi-Faur, D. (2005) ‘The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1): 12–32.
-
Levi-Faur, D. (2009) ‘Regulatory capitalism and the reassertion of the public interest’, Policy & Society, 27(3): 181–91.
-
Lindblom, C.E. (1959) ‘The science of “muddling through”’, Public Administration Review, 19(2): 79–88.
-
Lindgren, M. and Packendorff, J. (2006) ‘What’s new in new forms of organizing? On the construction of gender in project-based work’, Journal of Management Studies, 43(4): 841–66.
-
Linovski, O. (2017) ‘Pro bono practices and government agencies’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2): 180–82.
-
Linovski, O. (2019) ‘Shifting agendas: private consultants and public planning policy’, Urban Affairs Review, 55(6): 1666–701.
-
Linovski, O. (2021) ‘The value of planning: views from management consultants’, Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi-org.libproxy.ncl.ac.uk/10.1177/0739456X211051420
-
Loh, C.G. and Arroyo, R.L. (2017) ‘Special ethical considerations for planners in private practice’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2): 168–79.
-
Loh, C.G. and Norton, R.K. (2013) ‘Planning consultants and local planning: roles and values’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(2): 138–47.
-
Lundin, R.A. and Söderholm, A. (1998) ‘Conceptualising a projectified society: discussion of an eco-institutional approach to a theory on temporary organizations’, in R.A. Lundin and C. Midler (eds) Projects as Arenas for Renewal and Learning Processes, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 13–23.
-
Lyles, W., White, S.S. and Lavelle, B.D. (2018) ‘The prospect of compassionate planning’, Journal of Planning Literature, 33(3): 247–66.
-
Mack, J. and Herzfeld, M. (2020) Life Among Urban Planners: Practice, Professionalism, and Expertise in the Making of the City, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Madell, A., McNally, D., McClymont, K., Beebeejaun, Y. and Mathijssen, B. (2021) ‘Intersections of (infra)structural violence and cultural inclusion: the geopolitics of minority cemeteries and crematoria provision’, Transactions, 46(3): 675–88.
-
Majoor, S. (2018) ‘Coping with ambiguity: an urban megaproject ethnography’, Progress in Planning, 120: 1–28.
-
Manning, P. and Van Maanen, J. (1978) Policing: A View from the Street, Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company.
-
Mäntysalo, R. and Saglie, I.-L. (2010) ‘Private influence preceding public involvement: strategies for legitimizing preliminary partnership arrangements in urban housing planning in Norway and Finland’, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3): 317–38.
-
Marcuse, P. (1976) ‘Professional ethics and beyond: values in planning’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 42(3): 264–74.
-
Marshall, T. (2021) The Politics and Ideology of Planning, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Mbiba, B. (2003) ‘A clash of time cultures and planning: lessons from Zimbabwe’, Planning Theory & Practice, 4(4): 477–81.
-
McClymont, K. (2006) ‘Ideology, legitimacy and values in practice: reconceptualising professionalism in town planning’, PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
-
McClymont, K. (2014) ‘Stuck in the process, facilitating nothing? Justice, capabilities and planning for value-led outcomes’, Planning Practice & Research, 29(2): 187–201.
-
Mescher, B., Benschop, Y. and Doorewaard, J. (2010) ‘Representations of work–life balance support’, Human Relations, 63(1): 21–39.
-
Metzger, J. and Zakhour, S. (2019) ‘The politics of new urban professions: the case of urban development engineers’, in M. Raco and F. Savini (eds) Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy are Shaping Contemporary Cities, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 181–95.
-
Muhr, S.L. and Kirkegaard, L. (2013) ‘The dream consultant: productive fantasies at work’, Culture and Organization, 19(2): 105–23.
-
Nandhakumar, J. and Jones, M. (2001) ‘Accounting for time: managing time in project-based teamworking’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(3): 193–214.
-
Needham, C.E. (2006) ‘Customer care and the public service ethos’, Public Administration, 84(4): 845–60.
-
Nelson, S. and Neil, R. (2021) ‘Early career planners in a neo-liberal age: experience of working in the south east of England’, Planning Practice & Research, 36(4): 442–55.
-
Nippert-Eng., C. (1996) ‘Calendars and keys: the classification of “home” and “work”’, Sociological Forum, 11(3): 563–82.
-
Othengrafen, F. and Reimer, M. (2013) ‘The embeddedness of planning in cultural contexts: theoretical foundations for the analysis of dynamic planning cultures’, Environment and Planning A, 45(6): 1269–84.
-
Parker, G. and Street, E. (2021) Contemporary Planning Practice: Skills, Specialisms and Knowledges, London: Macmillan Education.
-
Parker, G., Street, E. and Wargent, M. (2018) ‘The rise of the private sector in fragmentary planning in England’, Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5): 734–50.
-
Parker, G., Street, E. and Wargent, M. (2019) ‘Advocates, advisors and scrutineers: the technocracies of private sector planning in England’, in M. Raco and F. Savini (eds) Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy are Shaping Contemporary Cities, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 157–67.
-
Pearson, G. and Rowe, M. (2020) Police Street Powers and Criminal Justice: Regulation and Discretion in a Time of Change, Oxford: Bloomsbury.
-
Pennington, M. (2000) Planning and the Political Market: Public Choice and the Politics of Government Failure, London: Athlone.
-
Perez, F. (2020) ‘An anatomy of failure: planning after the fact in contemporary Bogota’, in J. Mack and M. Herzfeld (eds) Life Among Urban Planners: Practice, Professionalism, and Expertise in the Making of the City, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp 100–18.
-
Phelps, N.A. and Wu, F. (2011) International Perspectives on Suburbanization: a Post-Suburban World?, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Pink, S. (2021) Doing Visual Ethnography, London: Sage.
-
Pratchett, L. and Wingfield, M. (1996) ‘Petty bureaucracy and wooly-minded liberalism? The changing ethos of local government officers’, Public Administration, 74(4): 639–55.
-
Prince, R. (2012) ‘Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance’, Progress in Human Geography, 36(2): 188–203.
-
Raco, M. (2018) ‘Private consultants, planning reform and the marketisation of local government finance’, in J. Ferm and J. Tomaney (eds) Planning Practice: Critical Perspectives from the UK, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 123–37.
-
Raco, M. and Savini, F. (2019) Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy Are Shaping Contemporary Cities, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Reade, E. (1987) British Town and Country Planning, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
-
Rhodes, R.A.W. (2011) Everyday Life in British Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Robertson, M. and Swan, J. (2003) ‘‘Control – what control?’ Culture and ambiguity within a knowledge intensive firm’, Journal of Management Studies, 40(4): 831–58.
-
Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H. and Swan, J. (2003) ‘Knowledge creation in professional service firms: institutional effects’, Organization Studies, 24(6): 831–57.
-
Rydin, Y. (2007) ‘Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory’, Planning Theory, 6(1): 52–68.
-
Sandercock, L. and Attili, G. (2010) ‘Digital ethnography as planning praxis: an experiment with film as social research, community engagement and policy dialogue’, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(1): 23–45.
-
Sandler, J. (2017) ‘Introduction: exploring the boring’, in J. Sandler and R. Thedvall (eds) Meeting Ethnography: Meetings as Key Technologies of Contemporary Governance, Development, and Resistance, New York: Routledge, pp 10–23.
-
Sanyal, B. (2005) Comparative Planning Cultures, New York: Routledge.
-
Sartorio, F.S., Thomas, H. and Harris, N. (2018) ‘Interpreting planners’ talk about change: an exploratory study’, Planning Theory, 17(4): 605–27.
-
Schoneboom, A. and Slade, J. (2020) ‘Question your teaspoons: tea-drinking, coping and commercialisation across three planning organisations’, Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 9(3): 311–26.
-
Schwartzman, H.B. (1989) The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities, New York: Plenum Press.
-
Sehested, K. (2009) ‘Urban planners as network managers and metagovernors’, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(2) 245–63.
-
Slade, D., Gunn, S. and Schoneboom, A. (2019) Serving the Public Interest? The Reorganisation of UK Planning Services in an Age of Reluctant Outsourcing, London: RTPI.
-
Slade, J., Tait, M. and Inch, A. (2021) ‘“We need to put what we do in my dad’s language, in pounds, shillings and pence”: commercialisation and the reshaping of public-sector planning in England’, Urban Studies, 59(2): 397–413.
-
Steele, W. (2009) ‘Australian urban planners: hybrid roles and professional dilemmas?’, Urban Policy and Research, 27(2): 189–203.
-
Suddaby, R., Gendron, Y. and Lam, H. (2009) ‘The organizational context of professionalism in accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3): 409–27.
-
Tait, M. (2011) ‘Trust and the public interest in the micropolitics of planning practice’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(2): 157–71.
-
Tait, M. (2016) ‘Planning and the public interest: still a relevant concept for planners?’, Planning Theory, 15(4): 335–43.
-
Tait, M., Inch, A., Slade, J., Gunn, Z., Vigar, G., Schoneboom, A. and Clifford, B. (2020) What Must Planners Do Differently? Critical Thoughts on the State of Planning, Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
-
Thomas, H. (2002) ‘What future for the RTPI?’, Town and Country Planning, 71(10): 250–51.
-
Thomas, J.C. (2013) ‘Citizen, customer, partner: rethinking the place of the public in public management’, Public Administration Review, 73(6): 786–96.
-
Town and Country Planning Association (2018) Planning 2020: Raynsford Review of Planning in England, London: TCPA.
-
Transport Planning Society (2018) Transport for New Homes: Project Summary and Recommendations, London: Transport for New Homes, Available from: www.transportfornewhomes.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/transport-for-new-homes-summary-web.pdf [Accessed 8 August 2022].
-
Twenge, J.M. (2010) ‘A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2): 201–10.
-
Van Maanen, J. (1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Vickers, S.G. (1968) Value Systems and Social Process, New York: Basic Books.
-
Vigar, G. (2012) ‘Planning and professionalism: knowledge, judgement and expertise in English planning’, Planning Theory, 11(4): 361–78.
-
Vigar, G., Healey, P., Hull, A. and Davoudi, S. (2000) Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain: an Institutionalist Analysis, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
-
Walker, M. (2010) ‘The great inertia sector: a whistleblower’s account of council work where staff pull six-month sickies’, Daily Mail, [online] 26 June, Available from: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1289702/Public-sector-inertia-council-office-employees-month-sickies.html [Accessed 7 July 2022].
-
Watson, T.J. (2000) ‘Making sense of managerial work and organizational research processes with Caroline and Terry’, Organization, 7(3): 489–510.
-
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Willmott, H. (1993) ‘Strength is ignorance: slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organizations’, Journal of Management Studies, 30(4): 515–52.
-
Wynn, A.T. and Rao, A.H. (2020) ‘Failures of flexibility: how perceived control motivates the individualization of work–life conflict’, Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 73(1): 61–90.
-
Yarrow, T. (2019) Architects: Portraits of a Practice, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 21 | 21 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk