PART II:
Written by leading experts from across Europe, this book provides a grounded exploration of innovation in the practice, research and education of social work. It focuses on the role of participation, collaboration and co-creation as key drivers of social innovation within these fields, providing practical examples of social entrepreneurship, people-centred design and participatory led innovation.
The positive outcomes of local social innovations are analysed in the wider European framework, with reflections and recommendations for advancing innovation in policy, service provision, education and research.
-
Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4): 216–24.
-
Ayling, R. and Cattermole, M. (2010) Practical Approaches to Improving Productivity Through Personalisation in Adult Social Care, Egham: Social Care Institute for Excellence, https://www.puttingpeoplefirst.org.uk/_library/Practical_Approaches_doc.pdf.
-
Beresford, P. (2008) What future for care?, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, https://shapingourlives.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/JRFViewpointonCarebyPeterBeresford.pdf.
-
Bevir, M., Needham, C. and Waring, J. (2019) Inside co-production: ruling, resistance, and practice, Soc. Policy Admin. 2019; 53: 197–202.
-
Bovaird, T. (2007) Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services, Public Administration Review, 67(5): 846–60.
-
Brandsen, T., Steen, T. and Verschuere, B. (2018) Co-creation and co-production in public services: urgent issues in practice and research, in T. Brandsen, T. Steen and B. Verschuere (eds) Co-production and Co-creation: Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp 3–8.
-
Chesbrough, H. (2011) Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era, New York: Wiley.
-
Claassen, R. (2016) Capabilities in a Just Society: A Theory of Navigational Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Claassen, R. and Düwell, M. (2013) The foundations of capability theory: comparing Nussbaum and Gewirth, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16(3): 493–510.
-
Cottam, H. (2018) Radical Help: How We Can Remake the Relationships Between Us and Revolutionise the Welfare State, London: Virago.
-
Csoba, J. and Sipos, F. (2022) Politically-driven public administration or co-creation? On the possibility of modernizing public services in rural Hungary, Public Money & Management, 42(5): 314–22.
-
Curley, M. (2016) Twelve principles for Open Innovation 2.0, Nature, 533(7603): 314–16.
-
DHSC (2023) Care and Support Statutory Guidance, London: Department of Health and Social Care.
-
Dudau, A., Glennon, R. and Verschuere, B. (2019) Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services, Public Management Review, 21(11): 1577–94.
-
EESC (European Economic and Social Committee) (2022) Co-creation of services of general interest as a contribution to a more participative democracy in the EU, EESC, https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-information-reports/opinions/co-creation-services-general-interest-contribution-more-participative-democracy-eu.
-
Evers, A. and Brandsen, T. (2016) Social innovations as messages: democratic experimentation in local welfare systems, in T. Bransden, S. Cattacin, A. Evers and A. Zimmer (eds) Social Innovations in the Urban Context, Cham: Springer, pp 161–80.
-
Fox, A. (2018) A New Health and Care System: Escaping the Invisible Asylum, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Fox, C.,Baines, S., Wilson, R., Jalonen, H., Aflaki, I., Prandini, R., et al (2021) A New Agenda for Co-creating Public Services, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167842.pdf.
-
Gewirth, A. (1978) Reason and Morality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Gewirth, A. (1996) Community of Rights, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Glasby, J., Le Grand, J. and Duffy, S. (2009) A healthy choice? Direct payments and healthcare in the English NHS, Policy & Politics, 37(4): 481–97.
-
Gray, M. (2011) Back to basics: a critique of the strengths perspective in social work, Families in Society, 92(1): 5–11.
-
Hartley, J. (2014) Eight and a half propositions to stimulate frugal innovation, Public Money & Management, 34(3): 227–32.
-
Hood, C. (1991) A public management for all seasons?, Public Administration, 69(3): 3–19.
-
Hood, C. (1998) The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Hutton, C. and Waters, J. (2009) Evaluation: In Control’s Second Phase, London: In Control.
-
IFSW and IASSW (International Federation of Social Workers and International Association of Schools of Social Work) (2014) International definition of social work, International Federation of Social Workers, July, https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/.
-
Kangro, K. and Lepik, K.L. (2022) Co-creating public services in social hackathons: adapting the original hackathon concept, Public Money & Management, 42(5): 341–8.
-
Leadbeater, C. (2004) Personalisation through Participation: A New Script for Public Services, London: Demos.
-
Liedtka, J. (2018) Why design thinking works, Harvard Business Review, 2018(09/10): 72–9.
-
Moulaert, F. and MacCallum, D. (2019) Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
-
Nussbaum, M.C. (1988) Nature, function and capability: Aristotle on political distribution, in J. Annas and R.H. Grimm (eds) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Supplementary Volume, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 145–84.
-
Oosterlynck, S., Novy, A. and Kazepov, Y. (eds) (2019) Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion: A Critical Appraisal, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Osborne, S.P. (2006) The new public governance?, Public Management Review, 8(3): 377–87.
-
Osborne, S.P. (2010) Introduction: the (new) public governance: a suitable case for treatment?, in S.P. Osborne (ed) The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 1–16.
-
Osborne, S.P. (2018) From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2): 225–31.
-
Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z. and Strokosch, K. (2016) Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment?, Public Management Review, 18(5): 639–53.
-
Osborne, S. and Strokosch, K. (2013) It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives, British Journal of Management, 24: S31–47.
-
Oughton, E. and Wheelock, J. (2003) A capabilities approach to sustainable household livelihoods, Review of Social Economy, 61(1): 1–22.
-
Price, A., Ahuja, L., Bramwell, C., Briscoe, S., Shaw, L. and Nunns, M. (2020) Research Evidence on Different Strengths-Based Approaches Within Adult Social Work: A Systematic Review, Health Services and Delivery Research Topic Report, Southampton: National Institute of Health Research, https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2034194.
-
Rummery, K. (2006) Disabled citizens and social exclusion: the role of direct payments, Policy and Politics, 34(4): 633–50.
-
Sakellariou, A. (2018) Rapid Evidence Appraisal of the Current State of Co-creation in Ten European Countries, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://storage.googleapis.com/turku-amk/2019/04/rapid-evidence-appraisal-of.pdf.
-
Sen, A. (1990) Development as capability expansion, in K. Griffin and J. Knight (eds) Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990s, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 41–58.
-
Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice, London: Allen Lane.
-
Slay, J. (2011) Budgets and Beyond: Interim Report, London: New Economics Foundation, https://www.scie.org.uk/publications/misc/budgetsandbeyond.pdf.
-
Steen, T., Brandsen, T. and Verschuere, B. (2018) The dark side of co-creation and co-production: seven evils, in T. Brandsen, T. Steen and B. Verschuere (eds) Co-production and Co-creation: Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp 284–93.
-
Strokosch, K. and Osborne, S.P. (2018) Literature Review on Public Service Reform Models, Co-VAL Project Reference No. 770356, Deliverable D1.1, https://www.co-val.eu/download/933/.
-
Strokosch, K. and Osborne, S.P. (2020) Co-experience, coproduction and co-governance: an ecosystem approach to the analysis of value creation, Policy & Politics, 48(3): 425–42.
-
Timonen, V. and Lolich, L. (2021) SoCaTel White Paper, Project Deliverable D.7.3, https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5d8be332f&appId=PPGMS.
-
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E. and Røiseland, A. (2019) Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward, Administration & Society, 51(5): 795–825.
-
Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M. and Tummers, L.G. (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9): 1333–57.
-
Wilson, R., Cornwell, C., Flanagan, E., Nielsen, N. and Khan, H. (2018) Good and Bad Help: How Purpose and Confidence Transform Lives, London: NESTA.
-
Alonso, D. (2016) Trabajo social y tecnología: aceptación y uso entre profesores en formación, doctoral thesis, Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/36975/1/T37007.pdf.
-
Ayuntamiento de Barcelona (2019) Garantizar el envejecimiento activo de la población, https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/personesgrans/es/canal/envelliment-actiu.
-
CGTS (Consejo General del Trabajo Social) (2022) Innovación Social y Trabajo Social, Madrid: Consejo General del Trabajo Social, https://www.cgtrabajosocial.es/files/637f447d88a95/LIBRO_INNOVACION_SOCIAL_final.pdf.
-
ESN (European Social Network) (2016) Evidence-Based Social Services: Toolkit for Planning and Evaluating Social Services, Brighton: European Social Network, https://www.esn-eu.org/sites/default/files/publications/ResearchandEvidence_Report__FINAL_1pag.pdf.
-
ESN (European Social Network) (2021) Transforming Social Services Through Digitalisation, Brussels: European Social Network, https://www.esn-eu.org/publications/transforming-social-services-through-digitalisation.
-
European Commission (2020) Social Innovation: Inspirational Practices Supporting People Throughout Their Lives, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e33b37ad-3b60-11eb-b27b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
-
European Commission (2022a) Social Experimentation: A Practical Guide for Project Promoters, Brussels: European Commission.
-
European Commission (2022b) Scaling Up Social Innovation Toolkit: Seven Steps for Using ESF+, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1f092971-e08c-11ec-a534-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
-
European Commission (2023) Digital Europe Programme, European Commission, Shaping Europe’s Digital Future, 7 November, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/activities/digital-programme.
-
Gobierno de Navarra (2020) Claves y Resultados del Modelo de Atención Integrada de ERSISI, Pamplona: ERSISI, https://ersisi.navarra.es/documents/5014040/0/1-Claves-resultados-modelo-atencion-integrada-ERSISI-EN.pdf.
-
Grupo Alter, Universidad Pública de Navarra (2021) Resultados de la evaluación de impacto del proyecto ERSISI: actualización a doce meses de finalizada la intervención, Pamplona: ERSISI, https://ersisi.navarra.es/documents/5014040/0/Informe+ERSISI+2021.pdf/8e13c395-0b4c-4e67-019c-812bc641d973?t=1639120452212.
-
I-Social Foundation (2022) Innovación tecnológica y servicios sociales, November, Barcelona: Fundación iSocial, https://isocial.cat/es/formulario-innovacion-tecnologica-y-servicios-sociales/.
-
Krasadakis, G. (2020) The importance of novelty for innovation, Medium, 17 May, https://medium.com/innovation-machine/how-important-is-novelty-for-innovation-f29ecf665a2b.
-
LGA (Local Government Association) (nd) Towards a sustainable adult social care and support system, Local Government Association, https://www.local.gov.uk/about/campaigns/lives-we-want-lead-lga-green-paper-adult-social-care/towards-sustainable-adult-0.
-
M4Social (2022) ARI II: el nuevo robot social ARI para la atención a las personas mayores, M4Social, 13 April, https://m4social.org/es/ari-ii-el-nuevo-robot-social-ari-para-la-atencion-a-las-personas-mayores/.
-
McKinsey (2019) How continuous improvement can build a competitive edge, McKinsey & Company, 6 May, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-organization-blog/how-continuous-improvement-can-build-a-competitive-edge.
-
NASW (National Association of Social Workers) (2021) Code of Ethics, Washington DC: National Association of Social Workers, https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English.
-
NESTA (2016) Running Randomised Controlled Trials in Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Growth: An Introductory Guide, London: NESTA, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/a_guide_to_rcts_-_igl_09aKzWa.pdf.
-
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2014) Effective Public Investment Across Levels of Government, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/Principles-Public-Investment.pdf.
-
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2022) Modernising Social Services in Spain: Designing a New National Framework, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/4add887d-en.
-
Oeij, P.R.A., van der Torre, W., Vaas, F. and Dhondt, S. (2019) Understanding social innovation as an innovation process: applying the innovation journey model, Journal of Business Research, 101: 243–54.
-
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) An introduction to scientific realist evaluation, in E. Chelimsky and W.R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 405–18.
-
What Works Network (2014) What Works? Evidence for Decision Makers, GOV.UK, 25 November, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a824271e5274a2e87dc1fcf/What_works_evidence_for_decision_makers_update_2018_01_12.pdf.
-
Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1974) Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-
Baines, S. (2018) Personalisation in probation services: exploring the contributors to a working culture of personalisation, December, CoSIE, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/uploads/2020/03/e248b5de-personalisationinprobationservicedigital-3.pdf.
-
Bakker-Klein, J. (2019) Anders kijken. Een zoektocht naar responsiviteit in het sociale domein/Changing Perspective: A Quest for Responsiveness in the Social Domain, doctoral thesis, Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
-
Bihari-Elahi, J. and Burggraaff, W. (eds) (2020) Verandering door actieonderzoek. In stadslabs werken aan nieuwe sociale praktijken, Assen: Koninklijke van Gorcum.
-
Bradbury, H. (ed.) (2015) The Sage Handbook of Action Research, 3rd edn, London: Sage.
-
Brandsen, T., Steen, T. and Verschuere, B. (eds) (2018) Co-production and Co-creation Engaging Citizens in Public Services, New York: Routledge.
-
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bugarszki, Z., Lepik, K., Kangro, K., Medar, M., Amor, K., Medar, M. and Saia, K. (2021) Guideline for Social Hackathon Events, Tallinn: Tallinn University, School of Governance, Law and Society, https://datadoi.ee/bitstream/handle/33/338/Cosie_Guidelines%20.pdf.
-
CoSIE Consortium (2020a) A Toolkit for Co-creation in Public Services to Accompany the CoSIE Constellations Roadmap to Co-creation, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/uploads/2021/05/03f68026-toolkit-public.pdf.
-
CoSIE Consortium (2020b) Working with Lived Experience Storytelling as a Tool for Co-creation: Toolkit, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/uploads/2021/05/412fb459-lived_experience_toolkit_final.pdf.
-
CoSIE Consortium (2020c) Enabling Co-creation Through Twitter: A Guidebook for Research Project Communication, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166753.pdf.
-
CoSIE Consortium (2020d) Roadmap to Co-creation, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/roadmap/index.html.
-
European Quality of Life Survey (2016) European Quality of Life Survey 2016, Eurofound, https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/surveys/european-quality-life-surveys-eqls/european-quality-life-survey-2016,
-
Fox, C., Baines, S., Wilson, R., Jalonen, H., Aflaki, I.N., Prandini, R., et al (2021) A New Agenda for Co-creating Public Services, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167842.pdf.
-
Geelhoed, S., Trowbridge, H., Henderson, S. and Wallace-Thompson, L. (2021) Changing the story: an alternative approach to system change in public service innovation, Polish Political Science Review, 9(2): 52–70.
-
Gilchrist, A. and Taylor, M. (2022) The Short Guide to Community Development, 3rd edn, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Greenwood, D. and Levin, M. (2007) Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Habermas, J. (1985) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and Rationalization of Society, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
-
Jalonen, H., Kokkola, J., Laihonen, H., Kirjavainen, H., Kaartemo, V. and Vähämaa, M. (2021) Reaching hard-to-reach people through digital means – citizens as initiators of co-creation in public services, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(7): 799–816.
-
Jamieson, D. and Martin, M. (2022) Supporting co-creation processes through modelling, Public Money & Management, 42(5): 353–5.
-
Jamieson, D., Martin, M. and Wilson, R. (2016) COSMOS – The Co-creation Service Modelling System, Geneva: Zenodo, https://zenodo.org/records/4058570.
-
Kangro, K. and Lepik, K.L. (2022) Co-creating public services in social hackathons: adapting the original hackathon concept, Public Money & Management, 42(5): 341–8.
-
Nussbaum, M. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Phillips, R. and Pitman, R. (2015) An Introduction to Community Development, 2nd edn, New York: Routledge.
-
Russell, C. (2020) Rekindling Democracy: A Professional’s Guide to Working in Citizen Space, Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
-
Russell, C. and McKnight, J. (2021) Looking Back to Look Forward: In Conversation with John McKnight About the Heritage of ABCD and Its Place in the World Today, 3rd edn, independently published.
-
Sen, A.K. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities, Oxford: Elsevier Science Publishers.
-
Trowbridge, H. and Willoughby, M. (2020) Connecting voices, challenging perspectives and catalysing change: using storytelling as a tool for co-creation in public services across Europe, in J. Scott (ed) CESCI Cross-Border Review Yearbook 2020, Budapest: Central European Service For Cross-Border Initiatives, pp 59–72, https://budapest.cesci-net.eu/en/cross-border-review-2020/.
-
Tummers, L. and Karsten, N. (2012) Reflecting on the role of literature in qualitative public administration research: learning from grounded theory, Administration & Society, 44(1): 64–86.
-
Beresford, P. and Croft, S. (2001) Service users’ knowledges and the social construction of social work, Journal of Social Work, 1(3): 295–316.
-
Boschma, R. (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies, 3(1): 61–74.
-
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.
-
Driessens, K. and Lyssens-Danneboom, V. (2022) Involving service users in social work education and research: is this structural social work?, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 224–37.
-
Driessens, K., Lyssens-Danneboom, V., Peeters, W., Van Geldorp, C., Vandenhende, P., Bloemen, H., et al (2022) Service users as tandem partners in social work education, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 35–48.
-
Heule, C.,Knutagård, M. and Kristiansen, A. (2022) The gap-mending concept: theory and practice, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 11–22.
-
Kowalk, H. and Wetterling, J. (2022) Experiences matter equally, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 199–208.
-
Krumer-Nevo, M. (2020) Radical Hope: Poverty-Aware Practice for Social Work, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Levitt, B. and March, J.G. (1988) Organizational learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–38.
-
Natland, S. (2020) ‘Recently, I have felt like a service user again’: conflicts in collaborative research, a case from Norway, in H. McLaughlin, P. Beresford, C. Cameron, H. Casey, and J. Duffy (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Service User Involvement in Human Services Research and Education, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 467–76.
-
Natland, S. and Hansen, R. (2016) Conflicts and empowerment – a processual perspective on the development of a partnership, European Journal of Social Work, 20(4): 497–508.
-
Natland, S., Bjerke, E. and Torstenssen, T.B. (2019) ‘Jeg fikk blankpusset håpet om at jeg hadde en framtid’: Opplevelser av god hjelp i møter med Nav, Fontene forskning, 12(1): 17–29.
-
Nowotny, H., Scott, P.B. Scott and Gibbons, M.T. (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Parpan-Blaser, A. (2011) Innovation in der Sozialen Arbeit: Zur theoretischen und empirischen Grundlegung eines Konzeptes, Wiesbaden: VS.
-
Phillips, C. and Shaw, I. (2011) Innovation and the practice of social work research, British Journal of Social Work, 41(4): 609–24.
-
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Wilken, J.P., Witteveen, E., van Slagmaat, C.,Van Gijzel, S., Knevel, J., Loeffen, T. and Overkamp, E. (2022) Community of development: a model for inclusive learning, research and innovation, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 145–57.
-
Windrum, P. (2008) Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services, in P. Windrum and P. Koch (eds) Innovation in Public Sector. Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 3–20.
-
Abma, F.I., Brouwer, S., de Vries, H.J., Arends, I., Robroek, S.J.W., Cuijpers, M.P.J., et al (2016) The capability set for work: development and validation of a new questionnaire, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 42(1): 34–42.
-
Abma, T.A. and Widdershoven, G.A. (2005) Sharing stories: narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation, Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(1): 90–109.
-
Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T.N. and Coast, J. (2012) Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A, Quality of Life Research, 21(1): 167–76.
-
Banerjee, M.M. and Damman, J.L. (2013) The capabilities approach: a framework to understand and enhance TANF recipients’ employability, Journal of Poverty, 17(4): 414–36.
-
Bonvin, J.M. and Orton, M. (2009) Activation policies and organisational innovation: the added value of the capability approach, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29(11/12): 565–74.
-
CBS (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek) (2023) Dashboard labour market, https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/visualisaties/dashboard-arbeidsmarkt [accessed 27 January 2023].
-
Egdell, V. and McQuaid, R. (2016) Supporting disadvantaged young people into work: insights from the capability approach, Social Policy & Administration, 50(1): 1–18.
-
Eurostat (2023) Unemployment rates, EU and EA, seasonally adjusted January 2008–December 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Unemployment_statistics [accessed 27 January 2023].
-
Geertz, C. (1973) Thick description: toward an interpretative theory of culture, in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books, pp 3–30.
-
Hoogenbosch, P. (2019) De Blauwe Wij(k)Economie [The Blue Neighbourhood Economy]. Presentation at Spark Spijkerkwartier Arnhem, June 11.
-
Kampen, T. and Tonkens, E. (2019) A personalised approach in activation: workfare volunteers’ experiences with activation practitioners, European Journal of Social Work, 22(6): 1038–49.
-
Nicholls, A., Simon, J. and Gabriel, M. (2015) Introduction: dimensions of social innovation, in A. Nicholls, J. Simon and M. Gabriel (eds) New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 1–26.
-
Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (eds) (2003) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Robertson, P.J. (2015) Towards a capability approach to careers: applying Amartya Sen’s thinking to career guidance and development, International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 15: 75–88.
-
Van der Haak, P. (2021) BuurtBaanBureau: Theoretisch kader en concept [internal document].
-
Van der Klink, J.J., Bültmann, U., Burdorf, A., Schaufeli, W.B., Zijlstra, F.R.H., Abma, F.I., et al (2016) Sustainable employability: definition, conceptualization, and implications – a perspective based on the capability approach, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 42(1): 71–9.
-
Van Echtelt, P., Sadiraj, K., Hoff, S., Muns, S., Karpinska, K., Das, D. and Versantvoort, M. with Putman, L. (2019) Eindevaluatie van de Participatiewet, Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
-
Von Hippel, E. (1986) Lead users: a source of novel product concepts, Management Science, 32(7): 791–805.
-
Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J. and Tummers, L.G. (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9): 1333–57.
-
De Klerk, M., Gilsing, R. and Timmermans, J. (eds) (2010) Op weg met de Wmo: Evaluatie van de Wet maatschappelijke ondersteuning 2007–2009, Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
-
Dijkhoff, T. (2014) The Dutch Social Support Act in the shadow of the decentralization dream, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36(3): 276–94.
-
Dutch Parliament (2012) Bruggen slaan: Regeerakkoord VVD – PvdA, 29 October, http://www.parlement.com/9291000/d/regeerakkoord2012.pdf.
-
Goossens, W. (2009) Integrale procesbegeleiding van groepen: een basismodel voor groeps- en teamcoaching, Tijdschrift Voor Coaching, 4: 28–31.
-
Jansen, E., Javornik, J., Brummel, A. and Yerkes, M.A. (2021) Central–local tensions in the decentralization of social policies: street-level bureaucrats and social practices in the Netherlands, Social Policy & Administration, 55(7): 1262–75.
-
Jansen, E., Pas, S. van der and Tilma, I. (2020) Sociaal transformeren kan alleen lerend, Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 29(7): 18–24.
-
Kooiman, A., Wilken, J.P., Stam, M., Jansen, E. and Van Biene, M. (2015) Leren transformeren: Hoe faciliteer je praktijkinnovatie in tijden van transitie?, Utrecht: Movisie.
-
Minas, R., Wright, S. and van Berkel, R. (2012) Decentralization and centralization: governing the activation of social assistance recipients in Europe, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(5/6): 286–98.
-
Newman, J. and Tonkens, E. (eds) (2011) Participation, Responsibility and Choice: Summoning the Active Citizen in Western European Welfare States, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
-
Trappenburg, M. and van Beek, G. (2019) ‘My profession is gone’: how social workers experience de-professionalization in the Netherlands, European Journal of Social Work, 22(4): 676–89.
-
van der Steen, M., Peeters, R. and van Twist, M. (2010) De boom en het rizoom: Overheidssturing in een netwerksamenleving, Den Haag: MinVROM.
-
van Doren, D., Driessen, P., Runhaar, H. and Giezen, M. (2020) Learning within local government to promote the scaling-up of low-carbon initiatives: a case study in the City of Copenhagen, Energy Policy, 136: art 111030, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111030
-
Verhoeven, I. and Tonkens, E. (2013) Talking active citizenship: framing welfare state reform in England and the Netherlands, Social Policy and Society, 12(3): 415–26.
-
Wilken, J.P., van Slagmaat, C. and van Gijzel, S. (2013) The best practice unit: a model for learning, research and development, Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 22(2): 131–48.
-
Beckmann, E.A. (2017) Forums, fellowship and wicked problems in teaching, in J. McDonald and A. Cater-Steel (eds) Communities of Practice. Facilitating Social Learning in Higher Education, Singapore: Springer, pp 545–66.
-
Bekker, M. (2020) Groepsdynamica: Werken in en met groepen, 2nd edn, Amsterdam: Boom.
-
Biesta, G.J.J. (2016) The Beautiful Risk of Education, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Bordin, E.S. (1983) A working alliance based model of supervision, Counseling Psychologist, 11(1): 35–42.
-
Bos, J. and Harting, E. (2006) Projectmatig creëren 2.0, revised edn, Schiedam: Scriptum.
-
Bredewold, F., Verplanke, L. and Tonkens, E. (2018) Tussen begrip en vernedering: Sociale Netwerk Versterking in de praktijk, in F. Bredewold, J.W. Duyvendak, T. Kampen, E. Tonkens and L. Verplanke (eds) De verhuizing van de verzorgingsstaat: Hoe de overheid nabij komt, Amsterdam: Tijdschrift voor sociale vraagstukken/Van Gennep, pp 129–57.
-
De Rijk, M. (2018) Zorg en geld: Hoe onbetaalbaar is de verzorgingsstaat?, in F. Bredewold, J.W. Duyvendak, T. Kampen, E. Tonkens and L. Verplanke (eds) De verhuizing van de verzorgingsstaat: Hoe de overheid nabij komt, Amsterdam: Tijdschrift voor sociale vraagstukken/Van Gennep, pp 211–29.
-
De Waal, V. (2018) De opkomst en betekenis van interprofessionele teams: Introductie, in V. de Waal (ed) Interprofessioneel werken en innoveren in teams: Samenwerking in nieuwe praktijken, Bussum: Coutinho, pp 21–44.
-
Emanuel, E.S., Sijbom, R.B.L., Koen, J. and Baas, M. (2022) Learning communities: Een begripsbepaling en verkenning van leerprocessen en kennisbenutting, Gedrag & Organisatie, 35(3): 289–315.
-
European Commission (2013) Social Innovation Research in the European Union: Approaches, Findings and Future Directions – Policy Review, Brussels: European Commission, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/12639.
-
Hoeve, A., Nieuwenhuis, L., Verhoef, M. and Van der Werf, W. (2021) Prepareren voor innoveren: Open eind leeromgevingen als hefboom voor toekomstbestendig beroepsonderwijs, white paper, Arnhem: HAN University of Applied Sciences, https://www.han.nl/onderzoek/lectoraten/lectoraat-responsief-beroepsonderwijs/onze-kennis/211108-whitepaper-prepareren-voor-innoveren.pdf.
-
Kromhout, M., Van Echtelt, P. and Feijten, P. (2020) Sociaal domein op koers? Verwachtingen en resultaten van vijf jaar decentraal beleid, Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, https://www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2020/11/16/sociaal-domein-op-koers.
-
Löhmer, C. and Standhardt, R. (2015) TZI – Die Kunst, sich selbst und eine Gruppe zu leiten: Einführung in die Themenzentriete Interaktion: Mit einem Gespräch zwischen Ruth C. Cohn und Friedemann Schulz von Thun, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
-
Remmerswaal, J. (2013) Handboek groepsdynamica: Een inleiding op theorie en praktijk, Amsterdam: Boom.
-
Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences, 4: 155–69.
-
Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2018) Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness, New York: Guilford Press.
-
Stam, M. and Wilken, J.P. (2015) Zeven principes van transformatieleren, in A. Kooiman, J.P. Wilken, M. Stam, E. Jansen and M. Van Biene (eds) Leren transformeren: Hoe faciliteer je praktijkinnovatie in tijden van transitie?, Utrecht: Movisie, pp 108–24.
-
Stam, M. and Wilken, J.P. (2018) Transformatieleren: Hoe onzeker weten tot innovatie kan leiden, in V. de Waal (ed) Interprofessioneel werken en innoveren in teams: Samenwerking in nieuwe praktijken, Bussum: Coutinho, pp 135–48.
-
Stam, M., Wilken, J.P., Kooiman, A., Jansen, E. and Van Biene, M. (2015) Inleiding: Transformeren kun je leren, in A. Kooiman, J. Wilken, M. Stam, E. Jansen and M. van Biene (eds) Leren transformeren: Hoe faciliteer je praktijkinnovatie in tijden van transitie?, Utrecht: Movisie, pp 3–8.
-
Taylor, M. (2017) Wicked problems and social professional competence, in P. Share, T. Cavaliero and B. McTaggart (eds) Wicked Problems and Young People: Co-creative Teaching for the Social Professions, Sligo: Institute of Technology, pp 9–20.
-
VHSS (Verkenningscommissie Hogere Sociale Studies) (2022) Sociaal in beweging. Empowerment van de sociaal professional als fundament: Advies van de verkenningscommissie Hogere Sociale Studies, Den Haag: Vereniging Hogescholen, https://www.vereniginghogescholen.nl/system/knowledge_base/attachments/files/000/001/340/original/Sociaal_in_beweging_-_Advies_verkenningscie._HSS_-_def..pdf.
-
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
WRR (Wetenschappelijke Raad voor Regeringsbeleid) (2013) Naar een lerende economie, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, https://www.wrr.nl/publicaties/rapporten/2013/11/04/naar-een-lerende-economie.
-
Zestor (2018) Leergemeenschappen van hogescholen met het werkveld, Den Haag: Zestor, https://zestor.nl/leergemeenschappen-van-hogescholen-met-het-werkveld.
-
Albury, D. (2005) Fostering innovation in public service, Public Money & Management, 25(1): 51–6.
-
Chesbrough, H. and Di Minin, A. (2014) Open social innovation, in H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West (eds) New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 169–88.
-
Corbin, J.M. and Strauss, A. (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19(6): 418–27.
-
Driessens, K. and Lyssens-Danneboom, V. (eds) (2022) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Häfeli, C. (2013) Das neue Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht: Eine Zwischenbilanz und Perspektiven, Jusletter, 9 December, https://vbbrb.ch/files/files_vbbrb/newsarchiv/Jusletter_Haefeli_Erwachsenenschutzrecht_Zwischenbilanz_20131209.pdf.
-
Huq, J.L. (2019) Conditioning a professional exchange field for social innovation, Business & Society, 58(5): 1047–82.
-
Hüttemann, M. and Solèr, M. (2018) Zur Relevanz und ‘Relevierung’ von Wissen im Innovationsprozess, in J. Eurich, M. Glatz-Schmallegger and A. Parpan-Blaser (eds) Gestaltung von Innovationen in Organisationen des Sozialwesens, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp 225–51.
-
Inclusion Europe (2017) Information For All: European Standards for Making Information Easy to Read and Understand, Brussels: Inclusion Europe, https://www.inclusion-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/EN_Information_for_all.pdf.
-
Inclusion Europe (n.d.) Do Not Write For Us Without Us: Involving People with Intellectual Disabilities in the Writing of Texts that Are Easy to Read and Understand, Brussels: Inclusion Europe, https://sid-inico.usal.es/idocs/F8/FDO23139/write_for_us.pdf.
-
Jaskyte, K. and Kisieliene, A. (2006) Organizational innovation: a comparison of nonprofit human-service organizations in Lithuania and the United States, International Social Work, 4(2): 165–76.
-
Kellerman, G. (2014) Leichte und Einfache Sprache: Versuch einer Definition, Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ), 64(9/11): 7–10.
-
Lindholm, C. and Vanhatalo, U. (2021) Introduction, in C. Lindholm and U. Vanhatalo (eds) Handbook of Easy Languages in Europe, Berlin: Frank & Timme, pp 11–26.
-
Moore, M.H., Sparrow, M. and Spelman, W. (1997) Innovation in policing: from production line to jobs shops, in A. Altshuler, A. and R.D. Behn (eds) Innovation in American Government, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp 274–98.
-
Nandan, M., Jaskyte, K. and Mandayam, G. (2020) Human centered design as a new approach to creative problem solving: its usefulness and applicability for social work practice, Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 44(4): 310–16.
-
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2013) OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills, Paris: OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en.
-
Parpan-Blaser, A. (2011) Innovation in der Sozialen Arbeit: Zur theoretischen und empirischen Grundlegung eines Konzepts, Wiesbaden: VS.
-
Parpan-Blaser, A. (2018) Organisationen des Sozialwesens als Ort von Innovation, in J. Eurich, M. Glatz-Schmallegger and A. Parpan-Blaser (eds) Gestaltung von Innovationen in Organisationen des Sozialwesens, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp 31–53.
-
Parpan-Blaser, A., Girard-Groeber, S., von Fellenberg, M., Antener, G. and Lichtenauer, A. (2019) Behördenkommunikation leicht verständlich und inhaltlich korrekt, Soziale Sicherheit, 6 September, z /.
-
Parpan-Blaser, A., Girard-Groeber, S., Antener, G., Arn, C., Baumann, R., Caplazi, A., et al (2021) Easy Language in Switzerland, in C. Lindholm and U. Vanhatalo (eds) Handbook of Easy Languages in Europe, Berlin: Frank & Timme, pp 573–622.
-
Schubert, K. (2016) Barriereabbau durch optimierte Kommunikationsmittel: Versuch einer Systematisierung, in N. Mälzer (ed) Barrierefreie Kommunikation – Perspektiven aus Theorie und Praxis, Berlin: Frank & Timme, pp 15–33.
-
Stougaard, M.S. (2021) Co-producing public welfare services with vulnerable citizens: a case study of a Danish-Somali women’s association coproducing crime prevention with the local authorities, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(10): 1389–407.
-
United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, United Nations, https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html.
-
Van Wijk, J.,Zietsma, C.,Dorado, S., de Bakker, F.G.A. and Marti, I. (2018) Social innovation: integrating micro, meso and macro level insights from institutional theory, Business & Society, 58(5): 887–918.
-
Argyle, M. (1996) Subjective well-being, in A. Offer (ed) In Pursuit of the Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp 18–45.
-
Bagnall, A., South, J., Di Martino, S., Southby, K., Pilkington, G., Mitchell, B., et al (2018) A Systematic Review of Interventions to Boost Social Relations Through Improvements in Community Infrastructure (Places and Spaces), London: What Works Centre for Wellbeing.
-
Banks, S., Shevellar, L. and Narayanan, P. (2023) Ethical issues in community development: setting the scene, Community Development Journal, 58(1): 1–18.
-
Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Bromley, E., Gabrielian, S., Brekke, B.,Pahwa, R.,Daly, K.A., Brekke, J.S. and Braslow, J.T. (2013) Experiencing community: perspectives of individuals diagnosed as having serious mental illness, Psychiatric Services, 64(7): 672–9.
-
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant. L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
DeFilippis, J. (2001) The myth of social capital in community development, Housing Policy Debate, 12(4): 781–806.
-
Doroud, N., Fossey, E. and Fortune, T. (2018) Place for being, doing, becoming and belonging: a meta-synthesis exploring the role of place in mental health recovery, Health & Place, 52: 110–20.
-
European Commission (2013) Guide to Social Innovation, February, Brussels: European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/guides/2013/guide-to-social-innovation.
-
Gilchrist, A. (2019) The Well-Connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development, 3rd edn, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Goscha, R.J. (2020) Strengths model case management: moving strengths from concept to action, in: A.N. Mendenhall and M.M. Carney (eds) Rooted in Strengths: Celebrating the Strengths Perspective in Social Work, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Libraries, pp 165–86.
-
Hacker, K. (2013) Community-Based Participatory Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Harrison, E., Quick, A. and Abdallah, S. (eds) (2016) Looking Through the Wellbeing Kaleidoscope: Results from the European Social Survey, London: New Economics Foundation.
-
Harrison, R., Blickem, C., Lamb, J., Kirk, S. and Vassilev, I. (2019) Asset-based community development: narratives, practice, and conditions of possibility – a qualitative study with community practitioners, SAGE Open, 9(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018823081.
-
Helliwell, J., Barrington-Leigh, C.P., Harris, A. and Huang, H. (2009) International Evidence on the Social Context of Well-Being, NBER Working Paper No. 14720, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, https://www.nber.org/papers/w14720.
-
Kramer, J. (2019) Jam Cultures – Over inclusie: meedoen, meepraten, meebeslissen, Deventer: Management Impact.
-
Kretzmann, J. and McKnight, J. (1993) Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community’s Assets, 3rd edn, Chicago: ACTA Publications.
-
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. and Mulgan, G. (2010) The Open Book of Social Innovation, London: Young Foundation and National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
-
Narusson, D. and Wilken, J.P. (2018) Recovery in the community: relational and cultural sensitivity, Journal of Recovery in Mental Health, 2(1): 68–81.
-
Phillipson, C., Allan, G. and Morgan, D. (eds) (2004) Social Networks and Social Exclusion: Sociological and Policy Perspectives, Farnham: Ashgate.
-
Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.
-
Putnam, R.D. (2007) ‘E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century, the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize lecture’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 30: 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
-
Ross, A.,Talmage, C.A. and Searle, M. (2019) Toward a flourishing neighborhood: the association of happiness and sense of community, Applied Research in Quality of Life, 14(5): 1333–52.
-
Harrison, E., Quick, A. and Abdallah, S. (eds) (2016) Looking Through the Wellbeing Kaleidoscope: Results from the European Social Survey, London: New Economics Foundation.
-
Russell, C. (2020) Rekindling Democracy: A Professional’s Guide to Working in Citizen Space, Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
-
Russell, C. and McKnight, J. (2022) The Connected Community: Discovering the Health, Wealth, and Power of Neighborhoods, Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
-
Van Ewijk, D. (2022) Eerst een Thuis, Verbinding en kennisdeling binnen het living lab, Utrecht: Utrecht University of Applied Sciences.
-
Van Ewijk, H. (2010) European Social Policy and Social Work: Citizenship-Based Social Work, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Villamayor-Tomas, S. and García-López, G.A. (2021) Commons movements: old and new trends in rural and urban contexts, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46: 511–43.
-
Ahmad, M., Yaseen, M., and Saqib, S. (2022) Climate change impacts of drought on the livelihood of dryland smallholders: implications of adaptation challenges, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 80(4): art 103210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103210.
-
Alexander, D. (1993) Natural Disasters, New York: Chapman and Hall.
-
Bartoli, A., Stratulis, M. and Pierre, R. (eds) (2022) Out of the Shadows: The Role of Social Workers in Disasters, St Albans: Critical Publishing.
-
BASW (British Association of Social Workers) (2019) CPD Guidance on Social Work Roles Undertaken During Disasters, Birmingham: BASW.
-
BASW (British Association of Social Workers) (2022) Statement on Ukraine, Birmingham: BASW, https://www.basw.co.uk/what-we-do/international-work/war-ukraine#:~:text=We%20stand%20in%20solidarity%20with,page%20for%20our%20latest%20updates.
-
Brundtland, G.H. (1987) Our Common Future. The World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission and Report), New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Chou, W.Y.S. and Budenz, A. (2020) Considering emotion in COVID-19 vaccine communication: addressing vaccine hesitancy and fostering vaccine confidence, Health Communication, 35(14): 1718–22.
-
Cunsolo, A. and Ellis, N. (2018) Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss, Nature Climate Change, 8: 275–81.
-
Cutter, S.L. (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards, Progress in Human Geography, 20: 529–39.
-
de Lange, D. (2018) Building housing on flood plains another sign of growing inequality, The Conversation, 21 August, https://theconversation.com/building-housing-on-flood-plains-another-sign-of-growing-inequality-101552.
-
Dominelli, L. (2012) Green Social Work: From Environmental Crisis to Environmental Justice, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Dominelli, L. (ed) (2018) The Routledge Handbook of Green Social Work, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Dominelli, L. (2023) Social Work During Times of Disaster, London: Routledge.
-
Duffy, J., Campbell, J. and Tosone, C. (2022) International Perspectives on Social Work and Political Conflict, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Henley, J. (2020) Climate crisis could displace 1.2bn people by 2050, report warns, The Guardian, 9 September, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/09/climate-crisis-could-displace-12bn-people-by-2050-report-warns.
-
Homan, J. (2003) The social construction of natural disaster: Egypt and the UK, in M. Pelling (ed) Natural Disaster and Development in a Globalizing World, London: Routledge, pp 141–56.
-
IFRC (International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) (2021) World Disasters Report 2020: Come Heat or High Water – Tackling the Humanitarian Impacts of the Climate Crisis Together, Geneva: IFRC, https://www.ifrc.org/document/world-disasters-report-2020.
-
IFRC (International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) (2022) Pakistan floods: six months on, humanitarian needs remain dire, 13 December, https://www.ifrc.org/article/pakistan-floods-six-months-humanitarian-needs-remain-dire.
-
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Glossary: climate change, https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/glossary/.
-
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2019) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C. Geneva: IPCCC. On https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2022/06/SR15_Full_Report_HR.pdf
-
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Lane, S., Odoni, N., Landstrom, C., Whatmore, S., Ward, N. and Bradley, S. (2011) Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(1): 15–36. On https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227790320_Doing_flood_risk_science_differently_An_experiment_in_radical_scientific_method
-
Manyena, B. (2006) The concept of resilience revisited, Disasters, 30(4): 433–50.
-
Oliver-Smith, A. (2022) The social construction of natural disaster: economic anthropological perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic, Economic Anthropology, 9(1): 167–71.
-
Sasse, G. (2020) War and displacement: the case of Ukraine, Europe-Asia Studies, 72(3): 347–53 .
-
Seifert, R. (1995) Mass rapes in Bosnia-Herzegovina and elsewhere: a pattern of cultural destruction, War Against Women: The Impact of Violence on Gender Relations, Geneva: Swiss Peace Foundation, pp 15–48.
-
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Shabi, R. (2019) How immigration became Britain’s most toxic political issue, The Guardian, 15 November, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/15/how-immigration-became-britains-most-toxic-political-issue.
-
UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) (2022) Ukraine refugee data, portal, https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine.
-
Vickers, T. (2012) Refugees, Capitalism and the British State, Farnham: Ashgate.
-
Vogel, J., Steinberger, J.K., O’Neil, D.W., Lamb, W.F. and Krishnakumar, J. (2021) Socio-economic conditions for satisfying human needs at low energy use: an international analysis of social provisioning, Global Environmental Change, 69: art 102287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102287.
-
Werndl, C. (2016) On defining climate and climate, British Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 67(2): 337–64.
-
WWF (World Wildlife Fund) (2020) Living Planet Report 2020, Geneva: WWF.
-
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997) Gender and Nation, London: Sage.
-
André, I. and Abreu, A. (2006) Dimensões e espaços da inovação social, Finisterra, 41(81): 121–41.
-
Bulkeley, H. (2020a) Nature-based solutions: towards sustainable communities, in T. Wild, T. Freitas and S. Vandewoestijne (eds) Nature-Based Solutions: State of the Art of EU-Funded Projects, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp 157–80.
-
Bulkeley, H. (2020b) Governing NBS: towards transformative action, in T. Wild, T. Freitas and S. Vandewoestijne (eds) Nature-Based Solutions: State of the Art of EU-Funded Projects, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp 181–202.
-
Carter, A. and Roberts, P. (2017) Strategy and partnership in urban regeneration, in P. Roberts, H. Sykes and R. Granger (eds) Urban Regeneration, 2nd edn, London: Sage, pp 44–67.
-
Conserva, A., Farinea, C. and Villodres, R. (eds) (2021) Deliverable D4.1 – New NBS Co-Creation of URBiNAT NBS (live) Catalogue and Toolkit for Healthy Corridor, URBiNAT, https://urbinat.eu/nbs-catalogue/.
-
de Leeuw, E. (2020) One health(y) cities, Cities & Health, 5(S1): S26–S31.
-
Egusquiza, A., Cortese, M. and Perfido, D. (2019) Mapping of innovative governance models to overcome barriers for nature based urban regeneration, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323: art 012081, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012081.
-
European Commission (2016) Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2016–2017: 17. Cross-cutting activities (Focus Areas), Brussels: European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-focus_en.pdf.
-
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Bulkeley, H., Naumann, S., Vojinovic, Z. et al., Nature-based solutions – State of the art in EU-funded projects, Freitas, T. (editor), Vandewoestijne, S. (editor), Wild, T. (editor), Publications Office of the European Union, 2020, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/236007
-
Ferreira, I. (2021) Municipal roadmap for a co-implementation and co-monitoring strategy, in G.C. Moniz (ed) Deliverable D4.3: NBS Implementation Strategy, Part 1 – Introduction, https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/d1v21TEnkiRH9SQHxZf7cmyR.
-
Ferreira, I. (2022) Governance, Citizenship and Participation in Small and Medium-Sized Cities: A Comparative Study Between Portuguese and Canadian Cities, PhD thesis, Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra. https://estudogeral.uc.pt/handle/10316/101712.
-
Ferreira, I., Caitana, B. and Nunes, N. (2022) Policy brief no. 26: Municipal committees to experiment innovative urban governance in nature-based projects, aimed at inclusive urban regeneration, Visby: Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy, https://web.archive.org/web/20220517130551/https://icld.se/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ICLD_Policy-Brief_26-web.pdf.
-
Frantzeskaki, N. (2019) Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities, Environmental Science & Policy, 93: 101–11.
-
Hilding-Hamann, K.E. (2020) Interesting participatory cases [Basecamp blog on URBiNAT’s internal collaborative platform]: Work Package 3 – Citizen Engagement in Support of NBS (unpublished).
-
Jeuken, Y., Breukers, S. and Karababa, E. (2018) Deliverable 5.2: Citizen and Stakeholder Engagement strategies and tools for NBS Implementation, Nature4Cities Project, Brussels: European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5bfd14c11&appId=PPGMS.
-
Moniz, G.C. (2021) The local task forces to co-implement NBS, in G.C. Moniz (ed) Deliverable D4.3: NBS Implementation Strategy, Part 1 – Introduction, https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/d1v21TEnkiRH9SQHxZf7cmyR.
-
Moniz, G.C. and Ferreira, I. (2019) Healthy corridors for inclusive urban regeneration, Rassegna di Architettura e Urbanistica, 54(158): 51–9.
-
Moulaert, F.,MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. and Hamdouch, A. (eds) (2014) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
-
Murray R., Caulier-Grice, J. and Mulgan, G. (2010) The Open Book of Social Innovation, London: Young Foundation and National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
-
Nelson, D.R., Bledsoe, B.P., Ferreira, S. and Nibbelink, N.P. (2020) Challenges to realizing the potential of nature-based solutions, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 45: 49–55.
-
Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T.,Irvine, K.N., Rusch, G.M., Waylen, K.A., Delbaere, B., et al (2017) The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: an interdisciplinary perspective, Science of the Total Environment, 579: 1215–27.
-
NetworkNature (2022) Nature-based solutions task forces, NetworkNature, https://networknature.eu/networknature/nature-based-solutions-task-forces.
-
Nunes, N. and Caitana, B. (2018) The appropriation of citizenship rights in the promotion of social cohesion and urban social innovation, in URBiNAT (ed) Deliverable D1.2: Handbook on the Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of the Project, Coimbra: URBiNAT, Centre for Social Studies of University of Coimbra, https://urbinat.eu/resources/.
-
Nunes, N., Björner, E. and Hilding-Hamann, K.E. (2021) Guidelines for citizen engagement and the co-creation of nature-based solutions: living knowledge in the URBiNAT Project, Sustainability, 13(23): art 13378, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313378.
-
Santos, B. de S. (2018) The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C.A.J.,Smith, A. and Turner, B. (2020) Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1794): art 20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120.
-
Tsenkova, S. (2002) Partnerships in urban regeneration: from ‘top down’ to ‘bottom up approach’, in S. Tsenkova (ed) Urban Regeneration: Learning from the British Experience, Calgary: Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, pp 73–84.
-
UN-Habitat (2022) World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities, Nairobi: United Nations.
-
URBiNAT (2019a) Deliverable D3.1: Strategic Design and Usage of Participatory Solutions and Relevant Digital Tools in Support of NBS Uptake, Aarhus: Danish Technological Institute (DTI). https://urbinat.eu/resources/.
-
URBiNAT (2019b) Deliverable D3.2: Community-Driven Processes to Co-design and Co-implement NBS, Coimbra: URBiNAT, Centre for Social Studies of University of Coimbra (CES-UC), https://urbinat.eu/resources/.
-
URBiNAT (2022) Deliverable 3.6: First Assessment Report On Progress, Results, And Insights For The Combination Of Methods, Citizen Engagement, And Usage Of Digital Tools, Aarhus: DTI – Danish Technological Institute. https://urbinat.eu/resources/.
-
WHO (World Health Organization) (1946) Constitution of the World Health Organization, adopted by the International Health Conference held in New York 1946 and entered into force on 7 April 1948, https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution.
-
WHO (World Health Organization) (2018) Copenhagen Consensus of Mayors: Healthier and Happier Cities for All, Copenhagen: WHO, https://www.who.int/europe/publications/m/item/copenhagen-consensus-of-mayors.-healthier-and-happier-cities-for-all.
-
Wild, T. (2020) Research & innovation priorities in Horizon Europe and beyond, in T. Wild, T. Freitas and S. Vandewoestijne (eds) Nature-Based Solutions: State of the Art of EU-Funded Projects, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp 223–33.
-
Wilding, H., Gould, R., Taylor, J., Sabouraud, A., Saraux-Salaün, P., Papathanasopoulou, D., de Blasio, A., Nagy, Z. and Simos, J. (2017) Healthy cities in Europe: structured, unique, and thoughtful, in E. de Leeuw and J. Simos (eds) Healthy Cities: The Theory, Policy, and Practice of Value-Based Urban Planning, New York: Springer, pp 241–92.
-
Ascoli, U. and Pavolini, E. (eds) (2015) The Italian Welfare State in a European Perspective: A Comparative Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Aviv, I., Gal, J. and Weiss-Gal, I. (2021) Social workers as street-level policy entrepreneurs, Public Administration, 99(3): 454–68.
-
Chow, J.C.C. and Crowe, K. (2005) Community-based research and methods in community practice, in M. Weil (ed) The Handbook of Community Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 604–19.
-
Cersosimo, D. and Viesti, G. (2022) Il welfare italiano da Nord a Sud, in C. Giorgi (ed) Welfare: Attualità e prospettive, Rome: Carocci, pp 307–22.
-
Ferrera, M. (1996) The ‘Southern model’ of welfare in social Europe, Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1): 17–37.
-
Ferrera, M. and Hemerijck, A. (2003) Recalibrating Europe’s welfare regimes, in J. Zeitlin and D.M. Trubek (eds) Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 88–128.
-
Flum, M.R., Siqueira, C.E., DeCaro, A. and Redway, S. (2010) Photovoice in the workplace: a participatory method to give voice to workers to identify health and safety hazards and promote workplace change – a study of university custodians, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 53(11): 1150–8.
-
Gaboardi, M.,Santinello, M., Disperati, F., Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Loubière, S. et al (2022a) Working with people experiencing homelessness in Europe, Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 46(4): 324–45.
-
Gaboardi, M., Santinello, M., Lenzi, M., Disperati, F., Ornelas, J. and Shinn, M. (2022b) Using a modified version of Photovoice in a European cross-national study on homelessness, American Journal of Community Psychology, 70(1/2), 139–52.
-
Goddard, J. and Vallance, P. (2013) The University and the City, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Hupe, P. (ed) (2019) Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Ground Floor of Government in Context, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
-
Istat, Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali, Caritas and fio.PSD (2015) Anno 2014. Persone senza dimora, Available from: https://www.istat.it/it/files//2015/12/Persone_senza_dimora.pdf.
-
Istat (2022a) Rapporto povertà, Anno 2021, Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, https://www.istat.it/it/files//2022/06/Report_Povert%C3%A0_2021_14-06.pdf.
-
Istat (2022b) Popolazione residente e dinamica demografica, Anno 2021, Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, https://www.istat.it/it/files//2022/12/CENSIMENTO-E-DINAMICA-DEMOGRAFICA-2021.pdf.
-
Johnson, A.K. and Cnaan, R.A. (1995) Social work practice with homeless persons: state of the art, Research on Social Work Practice, 5(3): 340–82.
-
Lancione, M., Stefanizzi, A., and Gaboardi, M. (2018) Passive adaptation or active engagement? The challenges of Housing First internationally and in the Italian case, Housing Studies, 33(1): 40–57.
-
Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche sociali (2015) Linee di indirizzo per il contrasto alla grave emarginazione adulta in Italia, Available from: https://www.lavoro.gov.it/temi-e-priorita/poverta-ed-esclusione-sociale/focus-on/Poverta-estreme/Documents/Linee-di-indirizzo-per-il-contrasto-alla-grave-emarginazione-adulta.pdf
-
Minkler, M. and Wallerstein, N. (eds) (2002) Community-Based Participatory Research for Health, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
-
Nicolls, A. and Murdock, A. (eds) (2012) Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Parpan-Blaser, A. and Hüttemann, M. (2010) Key issues and dimensions of innovation in social services and social work, in K. Müller, S.R. Steffen and M. Žák (eds) Social Dimension of Innovation, Prague: Linde, pp 183–94.
-
Parpan-Blaser, A. and Hüttemann, M. (2019) Social innovation in social work, in J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, A. Schröder and M. Zirngiebl (eds) Atlas of Social Innovation: A World of New Practices, Vol 2, Munich: Oekom, pp 80–3.
-
Pascuzzi, E. and Marcello, G. (2020) La riforma mancata: Cronache del ritardo, deficit e tracce di innovazione nel welfare sociale in Calabria, Politiche Sociali / Social Policies, 2020(3): 419–38.
-
Pezzana, P. (2012) Control and contain: a ‘hidden strategy’ where a common strategy is lacking: perspectives from Italy, European Journal of Homelessness, 6(1): 125–41.
-
Rahman, R., Ghesquiere, A., Spector, A.Y., Goldberg, R. and Gonzalez, O.M. (2020) Helping the helpers: a Photovoice study examining burnout and self-care among HIV providers and managers, Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 44(3): 244–65.
-
Simons, H. (2009) Case Study Research in Practice, London: Sage.
-
Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R. and Donohoe, P. (2004) Community-Based Research and Higher Education: Principles and Practices, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-
Wang, C. and Burris, M.A. (1997) Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment, Health Education & Behavior, 24(3): 369–87.
-
Wang, C., Cash, J.L. and Powers, L.S. (2000) Who knows the streets as well as the homeless? Promoting personal and community action through Photovoice, Health Promotion Practice, 1(1): 81–9.
-
Yin, R.K. (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Zufferey, C. (2008) Responses to homelessness in Australian cities: social worker perspectives, Australian Social Work, 61(4): 357–71.
-
Begon, J. (2014) What are adaptive preferences? Exclusion and disability in the capability approach, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 3: 241–57.
-
Boone, K. (2018) Social Work, Poverty and Parity of Participation: A Search for Social Justice, PhD thesis, Ghent: Ghent University Press.
-
Boone, K., Roets, G. and Roose, R. (2019) Sociaal werk als armoedebestrijder, Zoektocht naar een participatieve benadering, Oud-Turnhout: Gompels & Vansina.
-
Bridts, C. and De Pril, L. (2021) De kansendans: Woede over armoede, Antwerp: Halewijn.
-
Budd, C.H., Naastepad, C.W.M. and Van Beers, C. (2015) Introduction: Deliverable D1.1 – Report on Institutions, Social Innovation & System Dynamics from the Perspective of the Marginalised, CRESSI Working Paper 1/2015, https://web.archive.org/web/20161229231848/http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research-projects/CRESSI/docs/CRESSIWorkingPaper1D1.1Chp11Nov182014.pdf.
-
Calnitsky, D. (2018) Structural and Individualistic Theories of Poverty, Sociology Compass Online, 12.
-
Cantillon, B. and Marx, I. (2022) Dienstencheques zijn een perfecte illustratie van hoe verwend onze hogere middenklasse is, Humo, 4920: 25–33.
-
Coene, J.c.s. (2022) Armoede en sociale uitsluiting, Jaarboek 2022, 13-496, Leuven, Acco.
-
Degerickx, H. (2020) Participation of people in poverty in social policy making: a historical study off the rhetoric of self-advocacy organisations, PhD thesis, Ghent: Ghent University.
-
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Freidson, E. (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Herder and Herder.
-
Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Gordts, P. (2022) Professor Griet Roets: ‘Armoede bestrijden? Daar is gewoon te weinig draagvlak voor’, De Morgen, 10 October, https://www.demorgen.be/nieuws/professor-griet-roets-armoede-bestrijden-daar-is-gewoon-onvoldoende-draagvlak-voor~bcc5ff74.
-
Gradener, J. and de Kreek, M. (2019) Negotiating consent in neighbourhood community development work, in S. Banks and P. Westoby (eds) Ethics, Equity and Community Development, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 83–102.
-
Ibrahim, S. (2017) How to build collective capabilities: the 3C-model for grassroots-led development, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2): 197–222.
-
Krumer-Nevo, M. (2015) Poverty-aware social work: a paradigm for social work with people in poverty, British Journal of Social Work, 46(6): 1793–808.
-
Ledwith, M. (2001) Community work as critical pedagogy: re-envisioning Freire and Gramsci, Community Development Journal, 36(3): 171–82.
-
Lister, R. (2004) Poverty, Cambridge: Blackwell/Polity Press.
-
Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political, New York: Simon & Schuster.
-
Rancière, J (2005) La haine contre la démocratie, Paris: La Fabrique.
-
Santkin, J. (1994) Algemeen Verslag over de armoede, Brussels: King Bauduin Foundation.
-
Scott, J.C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, Cambridge, MA: Yale University Press.
-
Schiettecat, T. (2016) Trajectories of Poor Families in Child and Family Social Work, PhD thesis, Ghent: Ghent University.
-
Schiettecat, T. (2019) Hide and seek: political agency of social workers in supporting families living in poverty, British Journal of Social Work, 48(7): 1874–91.
-
Smeyers, T. (2020) Confronterend: 25 jaar oud verslag over de armoede brandend actueel, Sociaal.Net, 22 01 2020.
-
Spierts, M.J.,Cools, P.,Gradener, J. and Raeymaeckers, P. (2021) Democratische professionaliteit in het sociaal werk, in P. Raeymaeckers, J. Gradener, S. van Dam, S.J. Botman, K. Driesens, J. Boxstaens and M. Timions (eds) Denken over Sociaal Werk, Leuven: ACCO, pp 339–60.
-
Van Lancker, W. (2014) Kinderbijslag hervormen in functie van armoedebestrijding, Basis, 14: 8–10.
-
Vranken, J., De Boyser, K. and Dierckx, D. (red) (2004) Armoede en Sociale Uitsluiting, Jaarboek 2004, 13–553, Leuven, Acco.
-
Battilana, J. and Lee, M. (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing: insights from the study of social enterprises, Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 397–441.
-
Bengo, I., Arena, M., Azonne, G. and Calderini, M. (2016) Indicators and metrics for social business: a review of current approaches, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1): 1–24.
-
Bent-Goodley, T.B. (2002) Defining and conceptualizing social work entrepreneurship, Journal of Social Work Education, 38(2): 291–302.
-
Berzin, S.C. (2012) Where is social work in the social entrepreneurship movement?, Social Work, 57(2): 185–8.
-
Biggeri, M., Testi, E. and Bellucci, M. (2017) Enabling ecosystems for social enterprises and social innovation: a capability approach perspective, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2): 299–306.
-
Burfield, E. with Harrison, J.D. (2018) Regulatory Hacking: A Playbook for Startups, New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
-
Cameron, J. (2010) Business as usual or economic innovation? Work, markets and growth in community and social enterprises, Third Sector Review, 16(2): 93–108.
-
Chang, Y., Peng, X. and Liang, C. (2021) Transforming nonprofit organisations into social enterprises: an experience-based follow-up study, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(1): 3–12.
-
Doherty, B., Haugh, H. and Lyon, F. (2014) Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: a review and research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4): 417–36.
-
European Commission (2015) The Social Business Initiative of the European Commission, Ref. Ares(2015)5946494, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/14583.
-
Germak, A.J. and Singh, K.K. (2009) Social entrepreneurship: changing the way social workers do business, Administration in Social Work, 34(1): 79–95.
-
Gidron, B. and Monnickendam-Givon, Y. (2017) A social welfare perspective of market-oriented social enterprises, International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(2): 127–40.
-
Gray, M., Healy, K. and Crofts, P. (2003) Social enterprise: is it the business of social work?, Australian Social Work, 56(2): 141–54.
-
Hagedoorn, J., Haugh, H., Robson, P. and Sugar, K. (2022) Social innovation, goal orientation, and openness: insights from social enterprise hybrids, Small Business Economics, 60(1): 173–98.
-
Holroyde, A. (2020) Sheltered employment and mental health in Britain: Remploy c.1945–1981, in S.J. Taylor and A. Brumby (eds) Healthy Minds in the Twentieth Century: In and Beyond the Asylum, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 113–36.
-
Kitching, J. (2014) Entrepreneurship and Self-Employment by People with Disabilities, OECD Background Paper.
-
Linton, K.F. (2013) Developing a social enterprise as a social worker, Administration in Social Work, 37(5): 458–70.
-
Nandan, M., London, M. and Bent-Goodley, T. (2015) Social workers as social change agents: social innovation, social intrapreneurship, and social entrepreneurship, Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1): 38–56.
-
Neal, A.A. (2015) The intersection of social work and social enterprise, Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 12(2): 1–9.
-
Osborne, S.P. and Brown, L. (2011) Innovation in public services: engaging with risk, Public Money & Management, 31(1): 4–6.
-
Pache, A.C. and Santos, F. (2012) Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics, Academy of Management Journal, 56(4): 972–1001.
-
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N. and James, P. (2015) Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: a systematic review, Group & Organization Management, 40(3): 428–61.
-
Pot, F. and Vaas, F. (2008) Social innovation, the new challenge for Europe, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(6): 468–73.
-
Renn, O. (2017) Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, London: Earthscan.
-
Sepulveda, L. (2015) Social enterprise, a new phenomenon in the field of economic and social welfare?, Social Policy & Administration, 49(7): 842–61.
-
Shier, M.L. and Van-Du, B. (2018) Framing curriculum development in social work education about social enterprises: a scoping literature review, Social Work Education, 37(8): 995–1014.
-
Toros, K.,Kangro, K., Reimann, K., Bugarszki, Z., Sindi, I., Saia, K. and Medar, M. (2022) Co-creation of social services on the example of social hackathon: the case of Estonia, International Social Work, 65(4): 593–606.
-
Amaro, M.I. (2009) Urgências e Emergências do Serviço Social Contemporâneo: Contributos para a discussão dos fundamentos da profissão (Tese de Doutoramento). Lisboa: Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
-
Amaro, M.I. (2015) Urgências e Emergências do Serviço Social: Fundamentos da profissão na contemporaneidade, 2nd edn, Lisbon: Universidade Católica Editora.
-
Audretsch, D.B., Lehmann, E.E. and Plummer, L.A. (2009) Agency and governance in strategic entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1): 149–66.
-
Batista, R. and Thurik, R. (2007) The relationship between entrepreneurship and unemployment: is Portugal an outlier? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74(1): 75–79. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.003.
-
Bent-Goodley, T.B. (2002) Defining and conceptualising social work entrepreneurship, Journal of Social Work Education, 38(2): 291–302.
-
Branco, F. and Amaro, I. (2011) As práticas do ‘Serviço Social activo’ no âmbito das novas tendências da política social: uma perspetiva portuguesa, Serviço Social & Sociedade, 108: 656–79.
-
Campos, A. and Soeiro, J. (2016) A Falácia do Empreendedorismo, Lisbon: Bertrand Editora.
-
Drucker, P.F. (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, New York: Harper Business.
-
EAPN Rede Europeia Anti-Pobreza – Observatório de luta contra a pobreza na cidade de Lisboa (2011) Estratégia Local Integrada Combate à pobreza Lisboa: Roteiro. Lisboa: EAPN.
-
European Commission (2011) Industrial policy: reinforcing competitiveness. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2011) 642 final, 14 October 2011. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0642&from=EN
-
European Commission (2013) Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan. Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe, Brussels: European Commission. LexUriServ.do (europa.eu).
-
European Commission (2018) Proposal for a Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning, Brussels: European Commission, https://www.eumonitor.nl/9353000/1/j4nvgs5kjg27kof_j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vkl58h3b78m1/f=/5464_18.pdf.
-
European Council (2005) Lisbon Strategy, 1–11. Retrieved from http://www.eurocid.pt/pls/wsd/wsdwcot0.detalhe?p_cot_id=1079&p_est_id=5266.
-
European Parliament and Council (2006) Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union (2006/962/EC).
-
EUROSTAT (2013) Estatísticas Taxa de Desemprego 2013. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://www.gee.gov.pt/pt/en/daily-indicators/list-gee-daily-indicators/4555-eurostat-taxa-de-desemprego
-
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2012) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2012 Global Report, Babson Park, MA: Babson College, https://www.gemconsortium.org/report.
-
Jesus, A. (2019) Inovação em Serviço Social: Potencialidades e limites do empreendedorismo (social) como estratégia de integração social, doctoral thesis, Lisbon: ISCTE-IUL.
-
PORDATA (2022) Estatísticas sobre Taxa de Desemprego: total e por grupo etário, Paris: PORDATA. Retrieved from https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Taxa+de+desemprego+total+e+por+grupo+et%C3%A1rio+(percentagem)-553
-
Rodrigues, M.J. (2009) Europe, Globalization and the Lisbon Agenda, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
-
Santos, C.C. and Nunes, V.C. (2013) Desafios da gestão social no serviço social, in C.C. Santos, C.P. Albuquerque and H.N. Almeida (eds) Serviço Social: Mutações e Desafios, Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra, pp 87–102.
-
Saraiva, P.M. (2011) Empreendedorismo: Do conceito à aplicação, da ideia ao negócio, da tecnologia ao valor, 2nd edn, Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra.
-
Tan, N.T. (2004) Social entrepreneurship: challenge for social work in a changing world, Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 14(2): 87–98.
-
Varela, N. (2013) O empreendedorismo na União Europeia: da estratégia de Lisboa à economia do empreendedorismo (Dissertação de mestrado em Políticas de Desenvolvimento dos Recursos Humanos). Lisbon: ISCTE-IUL. Retrieved from https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/7626.
-
Agenda Kaupang (2021) Evaluering av Tøyen Unlimited og partnerskap med Bydel Gamle Oslo, Report number R1021510, https://www.oslo.kommune.no/getfile.php/13449081-1651494125/.
-
Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of community participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216–24.
-
Engebrigtsen Bye, R. (2022) Community based social entrepreneurship contribute to social inclusion: a case study exploring the Unlimited model and the experience of the Unlimiters, Internal Publication, Rosa International.
-
Kania, J. and Kramer, M. (2011) Collective impact, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), https://doi.org/10.48558/5900-KN19.
-
Marano, L. (2023) Guide on Impact Measurement for the NGO Sector, Oslo: Fundraising Norge, https://fundraisingnorge.no/content/uploads/2023/02/Guide-on-Impact-Measurement-for-the-NGO-sector_Eng.pdf.
-
Olesen, E. (2019) NABO – Unges opplevelse av sosial inkludering i Norge, TemaNord, 2019:545, Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd, http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1351893&dswid=-2013.
-
Prilleltensky, I. (2019) Mattering at the intersection of psychology, philosophy, and politics, American Journal of Community Psychology, 65(1/2): 16–34.
-
Prosser, S.D. (2020) Den tredje boligsektor: Hva det kan bli, og hvorfor vi trenger det. A third housing sector in Norway: what it could be and why it is needed. Tidsskrift for boligforskning, 3(3): 180–92.
-
Prosser, S.D. (2022) Håndbok for støttespillere i Norge Unlimited, Kunnskaps- og erfaringsbaserte tips til hvordan man kan støtte lokale ildsjeler gjennom å satse på felleskap og ideelt sosialt entreprenørskap, Oslo: Norge Unlimited, https://norgeunlimited.no/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Ha%CC%8Andbok-for-stottespillere.pdf.
-
Prosser, S. and Pedersen, O. (2019) Håndbok for Norge Unlimited: Hvordan å starte nabolagsinkubator for sosialt entreprenørskap, Oslo: Norge Unlimited.
-
RIPESS (2015) Global Vision for a Social Solidarity Economy: Convergences and Differences in Concepts, Definitions and Frameworks, RIPESS, https://www.ripess.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/RIPESS_Vision-Global_EN.pdf.
-
Rogaland Revisjon (2021) Evaluering av Storhaug Unlimited, Stavanger kommune 2021, [online] Available at: www.rogaland-revisjon.no/Userfiles/Upload/files/Rapport%20RR%202021%20Evaluering%20av%20Storhaug%20Unlimited.pdf.
-
Saarinen, Y. (2019) Vilka ska med? Ungas sociala inkludering i Sverige, Växjö: Myndigheten för ungdoms-och civilsamhällesfrågor.
-
Sacchetti, S. and Campbell, C. (2014) Creating space for communities: social enterprise and the bright side of social capital, Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 3(2): 32–48. DOI: 10.5947/jeod.2014.012
-
Biesta, G.J.J. (2014) The Beautiful Risk of Education, Boulder, CA: Paradigm.
-
Claassen, R. (2018) Capabilities in a Just Society: A Theory of Navigational Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Waldenfels, B. (1991) Der Stachel des Fremden, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 160 | 160 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk