Written by leading experts from across Europe, this book provides a grounded exploration of innovation in the practice, research and education of social work. It focuses on the role of participation, collaboration and co-creation as key drivers of social innovation within these fields, providing practical examples of social entrepreneurship, people-centred design and participatory led innovation.
The positive outcomes of local social innovations are analysed in the wider European framework, with reflections and recommendations for advancing innovation in policy, service provision, education and research.
Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4): 216–24.
Ayling, R. and Cattermole, M. (2010) Practical Approaches to Improving Productivity Through Personalisation in Adult Social Care, Egham: Social Care Institute for Excellence, https://www.puttingpeoplefirst.org.uk/_library/Practical_Approaches_doc.pdf.
Beresford, P. (2008) What future for care?, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, https://shapingourlives.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/JRFViewpointonCarebyPeterBeresford.pdf.
Bevir, M., Needham, C. and Waring, J. (2019) Inside co-production: ruling, resistance, and practice, Soc. Policy Admin. 2019; 53: 197–202.
Bovaird, T. (2007) Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services, Public Administration Review, 67(5): 846–60.
Brandsen, T., Steen, T. and Verschuere, B. (2018) Co-creation and co-production in public services: urgent issues in practice and research, in T. Brandsen, T. Steen and B. Verschuere (eds) Co-production and Co-creation: Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp 3–8.
Chesbrough, H. (2011) Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era, New York: Wiley.
Claassen, R. (2016) Capabilities in a Just Society: A Theory of Navigational Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Claassen, R. and Düwell, M. (2013) The foundations of capability theory: comparing Nussbaum and Gewirth, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16(3): 493–510.
Cottam, H. (2018) Radical Help: How We Can Remake the Relationships Between Us and Revolutionise the Welfare State, London: Virago.
Csoba, J. and Sipos, F. (2022) Politically-driven public administration or co-creation? On the possibility of modernizing public services in rural Hungary, Public Money & Management, 42(5): 314–22.
Curley, M. (2016) Twelve principles for Open Innovation 2.0, Nature, 533(7603): 314–16.
DHSC (2023) Care and Support Statutory Guidance, London: Department of Health and Social Care.
Dudau, A., Glennon, R. and Verschuere, B. (2019) Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services, Public Management Review, 21(11): 1577–94.
EESC (European Economic and Social Committee) (2022) Co-creation of services of general interest as a contribution to a more participative democracy in the EU, EESC, https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-information-reports/opinions/co-creation-services-general-interest-contribution-more-participative-democracy-eu.
Evers, A. and Brandsen, T. (2016) Social innovations as messages: democratic experimentation in local welfare systems, in T. Bransden, S. Cattacin, A. Evers and A. Zimmer (eds) Social Innovations in the Urban Context, Cham: Springer, pp 161–80.
Fox, A. (2018) A New Health and Care System: Escaping the Invisible Asylum, Bristol: Policy Press.
Fox, C.,Baines, S., Wilson, R., Jalonen, H., Aflaki, I., Prandini, R., et al (2021) A New Agenda for Co-creating Public Services, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167842.pdf.
Gewirth, A. (1978) Reason and Morality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gewirth, A. (1996) Community of Rights, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glasby, J., Le Grand, J. and Duffy, S. (2009) A healthy choice? Direct payments and healthcare in the English NHS, Policy & Politics, 37(4): 481–97.
Gray, M. (2011) Back to basics: a critique of the strengths perspective in social work, Families in Society, 92(1): 5–11.
Hartley, J. (2014) Eight and a half propositions to stimulate frugal innovation, Public Money & Management, 34(3): 227–32.
Hood, C. (1991) A public management for all seasons?, Public Administration, 69(3): 3–19.
Hood, C. (1998) The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hutton, C. and Waters, J. (2009) Evaluation: In Control’s Second Phase, London: In Control.
IFSW and IASSW (International Federation of Social Workers and International Association of Schools of Social Work) (2014) International definition of social work, International Federation of Social Workers, July, https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/.
Kangro, K. and Lepik, K.L. (2022) Co-creating public services in social hackathons: adapting the original hackathon concept, Public Money & Management, 42(5): 341–8.
Leadbeater, C. (2004) Personalisation through Participation: A New Script for Public Services, London: Demos.
Liedtka, J. (2018) Why design thinking works, Harvard Business Review, 2018(09/10): 72–9.
Moulaert, F. and MacCallum, D. (2019) Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Nussbaum, M.C. (1988) Nature, function and capability: Aristotle on political distribution, in J. Annas and R.H. Grimm (eds) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Supplementary Volume, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 145–84.
Oosterlynck, S., Novy, A. and Kazepov, Y. (eds) (2019) Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion: A Critical Appraisal, Bristol: Policy Press.
Osborne, S.P. (2006) The new public governance?, Public Management Review, 8(3): 377–87.
Osborne, S.P. (2010) Introduction: the (new) public governance: a suitable case for treatment?, in S.P. Osborne (ed) The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 1–16.
Osborne, S.P. (2018) From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2): 225–31.
Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z. and Strokosch, K. (2016) Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment?, Public Management Review, 18(5): 639–53.
Osborne, S. and Strokosch, K. (2013) It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives, British Journal of Management, 24: S31–47.
Oughton, E. and Wheelock, J. (2003) A capabilities approach to sustainable household livelihoods, Review of Social Economy, 61(1): 1–22.
Price, A., Ahuja, L., Bramwell, C., Briscoe, S., Shaw, L. and Nunns, M. (2020) Research Evidence on Different Strengths-Based Approaches Within Adult Social Work: A Systematic Review, Health Services and Delivery Research Topic Report, Southampton: National Institute of Health Research, https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2034194.
Rummery, K. (2006) Disabled citizens and social exclusion: the role of direct payments, Policy and Politics, 34(4): 633–50.
Sakellariou, A. (2018) Rapid Evidence Appraisal of the Current State of Co-creation in Ten European Countries, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://storage.googleapis.com/turku-amk/2019/04/rapid-evidence-appraisal-of.pdf.
Sen, A. (1990) Development as capability expansion, in K. Griffin and J. Knight (eds) Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990s, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 41–58.
Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice, London: Allen Lane.
Slay, J. (2011) Budgets and Beyond: Interim Report, London: New Economics Foundation, https://www.scie.org.uk/publications/misc/budgetsandbeyond.pdf.
Steen, T., Brandsen, T. and Verschuere, B. (2018) The dark side of co-creation and co-production: seven evils, in T. Brandsen, T. Steen and B. Verschuere (eds) Co-production and Co-creation: Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp 284–93.
Strokosch, K. and Osborne, S.P. (2018) Literature Review on Public Service Reform Models, Co-VAL Project Reference No. 770356, Deliverable D1.1, https://www.co-val.eu/download/933/.
Strokosch, K. and Osborne, S.P. (2020) Co-experience, coproduction and co-governance: an ecosystem approach to the analysis of value creation, Policy & Politics, 48(3): 425–42.
Timonen, V. and Lolich, L. (2021) SoCaTel White Paper, Project Deliverable D.7.3, https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5d8be332f&appId=PPGMS.
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E. and Røiseland, A. (2019) Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward, Administration & Society, 51(5): 795–825.
Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M. and Tummers, L.G. (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9): 1333–57.
Wilson, R., Cornwell, C., Flanagan, E., Nielsen, N. and Khan, H. (2018) Good and Bad Help: How Purpose and Confidence Transform Lives, London: NESTA.
Alonso, D. (2016) Trabajo social y tecnología: aceptación y uso entre profesores en formación, doctoral thesis, Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/36975/1/T37007.pdf.
Ayuntamiento de Barcelona (2019) Garantizar el envejecimiento activo de la población, https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/personesgrans/es/canal/envelliment-actiu.
CGTS (Consejo General del Trabajo Social) (2022) Innovación Social y Trabajo Social, Madrid: Consejo General del Trabajo Social, https://www.cgtrabajosocial.es/files/637f447d88a95/LIBRO_INNOVACION_SOCIAL_final.pdf.
ESN (European Social Network) (2016) Evidence-Based Social Services: Toolkit for Planning and Evaluating Social Services, Brighton: European Social Network, https://www.esn-eu.org/sites/default/files/publications/ResearchandEvidence_Report__FINAL_1pag.pdf.
ESN (European Social Network) (2021) Transforming Social Services Through Digitalisation, Brussels: European Social Network, https://www.esn-eu.org/publications/transforming-social-services-through-digitalisation.
European Commission (2020) Social Innovation: Inspirational Practices Supporting People Throughout Their Lives, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e33b37ad-3b60-11eb-b27b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
European Commission (2022a) Social Experimentation: A Practical Guide for Project Promoters, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2022b) Scaling Up Social Innovation Toolkit: Seven Steps for Using ESF+, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1f092971-e08c-11ec-a534-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
European Commission (2023) Digital Europe Programme, European Commission, Shaping Europe’s Digital Future, 7 November, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/activities/digital-programme.
Gobierno de Navarra (2020) Claves y Resultados del Modelo de Atención Integrada de ERSISI, Pamplona: ERSISI, https://ersisi.navarra.es/documents/5014040/0/1-Claves-resultados-modelo-atencion-integrada-ERSISI-EN.pdf.
Grupo Alter, Universidad Pública de Navarra (2021) Resultados de la evaluación de impacto del proyecto ERSISI: actualización a doce meses de finalizada la intervención, Pamplona: ERSISI, https://ersisi.navarra.es/documents/5014040/0/Informe+ERSISI+2021.pdf/8e13c395-0b4c-4e67-019c-812bc641d973?t=1639120452212.
I-Social Foundation (2022) Innovación tecnológica y servicios sociales, November, Barcelona: Fundación iSocial, https://isocial.cat/es/formulario-innovacion-tecnologica-y-servicios-sociales/.
Krasadakis, G. (2020) The importance of novelty for innovation, Medium, 17 May, https://medium.com/innovation-machine/how-important-is-novelty-for-innovation-f29ecf665a2b.
LGA (Local Government Association) (nd) Towards a sustainable adult social care and support system, Local Government Association, https://www.local.gov.uk/about/campaigns/lives-we-want-lead-lga-green-paper-adult-social-care/towards-sustainable-adult-0.
M4Social (2022) ARI II: el nuevo robot social ARI para la atención a las personas mayores, M4Social, 13 April, https://m4social.org/es/ari-ii-el-nuevo-robot-social-ari-para-la-atencion-a-las-personas-mayores/.
McKinsey (2019) How continuous improvement can build a competitive edge, McKinsey & Company, 6 May, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-organization-blog/how-continuous-improvement-can-build-a-competitive-edge.
NASW (National Association of Social Workers) (2021) Code of Ethics, Washington DC: National Association of Social Workers, https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English.
NESTA (2016) Running Randomised Controlled Trials in Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Growth: An Introductory Guide, London: NESTA, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/a_guide_to_rcts_-_igl_09aKzWa.pdf.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2014) Effective Public Investment Across Levels of Government, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/Principles-Public-Investment.pdf.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2022) Modernising Social Services in Spain: Designing a New National Framework, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/4add887d-en.
Oeij, P.R.A., van der Torre, W., Vaas, F. and Dhondt, S. (2019) Understanding social innovation as an innovation process: applying the innovation journey model, Journal of Business Research, 101: 243–54.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) An introduction to scientific realist evaluation, in E. Chelimsky and W.R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 405–18.
What Works Network (2014) What Works? Evidence for Decision Makers, GOV.UK, 25 November, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a824271e5274a2e87dc1fcf/What_works_evidence_for_decision_makers_update_2018_01_12.pdf.
Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1974) Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Baines, S. (2018) Personalisation in probation services: exploring the contributors to a working culture of personalisation, December, CoSIE, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/uploads/2020/03/e248b5de-personalisationinprobationservicedigital-3.pdf.
Bakker-Klein, J. (2019) Anders kijken. Een zoektocht naar responsiviteit in het sociale domein/Changing Perspective: A Quest for Responsiveness in the Social Domain, doctoral thesis, Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
Bihari-Elahi, J. and Burggraaff, W. (eds) (2020) Verandering door actieonderzoek. In stadslabs werken aan nieuwe sociale praktijken, Assen: Koninklijke van Gorcum.
Bradbury, H. (ed.) (2015) The Sage Handbook of Action Research, 3rd edn, London: Sage.
Brandsen, T., Steen, T. and Verschuere, B. (eds) (2018) Co-production and Co-creation Engaging Citizens in Public Services, New York: Routledge.
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bugarszki, Z., Lepik, K., Kangro, K., Medar, M., Amor, K., Medar, M. and Saia, K. (2021) Guideline for Social Hackathon Events, Tallinn: Tallinn University, School of Governance, Law and Society, https://datadoi.ee/bitstream/handle/33/338/Cosie_Guidelines%20.pdf.
CoSIE Consortium (2020a) A Toolkit for Co-creation in Public Services to Accompany the CoSIE Constellations Roadmap to Co-creation, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/uploads/2021/05/03f68026-toolkit-public.pdf.
CoSIE Consortium (2020b) Working with Lived Experience Storytelling as a Tool for Co-creation: Toolkit, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/uploads/2021/05/412fb459-lived_experience_toolkit_final.pdf.
CoSIE Consortium (2020c) Enabling Co-creation Through Twitter: A Guidebook for Research Project Communication, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166753.pdf.
CoSIE Consortium (2020d) Roadmap to Co-creation, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/roadmap/index.html.
European Quality of Life Survey (2016) European Quality of Life Survey 2016, Eurofound, https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/surveys/european-quality-life-surveys-eqls/european-quality-life-survey-2016,
Fox, C., Baines, S., Wilson, R., Jalonen, H., Aflaki, I.N., Prandini, R., et al (2021) A New Agenda for Co-creating Public Services, Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167842.pdf.
Geelhoed, S., Trowbridge, H., Henderson, S. and Wallace-Thompson, L. (2021) Changing the story: an alternative approach to system change in public service innovation, Polish Political Science Review, 9(2): 52–70.
Gilchrist, A. and Taylor, M. (2022) The Short Guide to Community Development, 3rd edn, Bristol: Policy Press.
Greenwood, D. and Levin, M. (2007) Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Habermas, J. (1985) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and Rationalization of Society, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Jalonen, H., Kokkola, J., Laihonen, H., Kirjavainen, H., Kaartemo, V. and Vähämaa, M. (2021) Reaching hard-to-reach people through digital means – citizens as initiators of co-creation in public services, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(7): 799–816.
Jamieson, D. and Martin, M. (2022) Supporting co-creation processes through modelling, Public Money & Management, 42(5): 353–5.
Jamieson, D., Martin, M. and Wilson, R. (2016) COSMOS – The Co-creation Service Modelling System, Geneva: Zenodo, https://zenodo.org/records/4058570.
Kangro, K. and Lepik, K.L. (2022) Co-creating public services in social hackathons: adapting the original hackathon concept, Public Money & Management, 42(5): 341–8.
Nussbaum, M. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Phillips, R. and Pitman, R. (2015) An Introduction to Community Development, 2nd edn, New York: Routledge.
Russell, C. (2020) Rekindling Democracy: A Professional’s Guide to Working in Citizen Space, Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
Russell, C. and McKnight, J. (2021) Looking Back to Look Forward: In Conversation with John McKnight About the Heritage of ABCD and Its Place in the World Today, 3rd edn, independently published.
Sen, A.K. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities, Oxford: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Trowbridge, H. and Willoughby, M. (2020) Connecting voices, challenging perspectives and catalysing change: using storytelling as a tool for co-creation in public services across Europe, in J. Scott (ed) CESCI Cross-Border Review Yearbook 2020, Budapest: Central European Service For Cross-Border Initiatives, pp 59–72, https://budapest.cesci-net.eu/en/cross-border-review-2020/.
Tummers, L. and Karsten, N. (2012) Reflecting on the role of literature in qualitative public administration research: learning from grounded theory, Administration & Society, 44(1): 64–86.
Beresford, P. and Croft, S. (2001) Service users’ knowledges and the social construction of social work, Journal of Social Work, 1(3): 295–316.
Boschma, R. (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies, 3(1): 61–74.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.
Driessens, K. and Lyssens-Danneboom, V. (2022) Involving service users in social work education and research: is this structural social work?, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 224–37.
Driessens, K., Lyssens-Danneboom, V., Peeters, W., Van Geldorp, C., Vandenhende, P., Bloemen, H., et al (2022) Service users as tandem partners in social work education, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 35–48.
Heule, C.,Knutagård, M. and Kristiansen, A. (2022) The gap-mending concept: theory and practice, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 11–22.
Kowalk, H. and Wetterling, J. (2022) Experiences matter equally, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 199–208.
Krumer-Nevo, M. (2020) Radical Hope: Poverty-Aware Practice for Social Work, Bristol: Policy Press.
Levitt, B. and March, J.G. (1988) Organizational learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–38.
Natland, S. (2020) ‘Recently, I have felt like a service user again’: conflicts in collaborative research, a case from Norway, in H. McLaughlin, P. Beresford, C. Cameron, H. Casey, and J. Duffy (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Service User Involvement in Human Services Research and Education, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 467–76.
Natland, S. and Hansen, R. (2016) Conflicts and empowerment – a processual perspective on the development of a partnership, European Journal of Social Work, 20(4): 497–508.
Natland, S., Bjerke, E. and Torstenssen, T.B. (2019) ‘Jeg fikk blankpusset håpet om at jeg hadde en framtid’: Opplevelser av god hjelp i møter med Nav, Fontene forskning, 12(1): 17–29.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P.B. Scott and Gibbons, M.T. (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Parpan-Blaser, A. (2011) Innovation in der Sozialen Arbeit: Zur theoretischen und empirischen Grundlegung eines Konzeptes, Wiesbaden: VS.
Phillips, C. and Shaw, I. (2011) Innovation and the practice of social work research, British Journal of Social Work, 41(4): 609–24.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilken, J.P., Witteveen, E., van Slagmaat, C.,Van Gijzel, S., Knevel, J., Loeffen, T. and Overkamp, E. (2022) Community of development: a model for inclusive learning, research and innovation, in K. Driessens and V. Lyssens-Danneboom (eds) Involving Service Users in Social Work Education, Research and Policy: A Comparative European Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 145–57.
Windrum, P. (2008) Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services, in P. Windrum and P. Koch (eds) Innovation in Public Sector. Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 3–20.
Abma, F.I., Brouwer, S., de Vries, H.J., Arends, I., Robroek, S.J.W., Cuijpers, M.P.J., et al (2016) The capability set for work: development and validation of a new questionnaire, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 42(1): 34–42.
Abma, T.A. and Widdershoven, G.A. (2005) Sharing stories: narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation, Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(1): 90–109.
Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T.N. and Coast, J. (2012) Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A, Quality of Life Research, 21(1): 167–76.
Banerjee, M.M. and Damman, J.L. (2013) The capabilities approach: a framework to understand and enhance TANF recipients’ employability, Journal of Poverty, 17(4): 414–36.
Bonvin, J.M. and Orton, M. (2009) Activation policies and organisational innovation: the added value of the capability approach, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29(11/12): 565–74.
CBS (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek) (2023) Dashboard labour market, https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/visualisaties/dashboard-arbeidsmarkt [accessed 27 January 2023].
Egdell, V. and McQuaid, R. (2016) Supporting disadvantaged young people into work: insights from the capability approach, Social Policy & Administration, 50(1): 1–18.
Eurostat (2023) Unemployment rates, EU and EA, seasonally adjusted January 2008–December 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Unemployment_statistics [accessed 27 January 2023].
Geertz, C. (1973) Thick description: toward an interpretative theory of culture, in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books, pp 3–30.
Hoogenbosch, P. (2019) De Blauwe Wij(k)Economie [The Blue Neighbourhood Economy]. Presentation at Spark Spijkerkwartier Arnhem, June 11.
Kampen, T. and Tonkens, E. (2019) A personalised approach in activation: workfare volunteers’ experiences with activation practitioners, European Journal of Social Work, 22(6): 1038–49.
Nicholls, A., Simon, J. and Gabriel, M. (2015) Introduction: dimensions of social innovation, in A. Nicholls, J. Simon and M. Gabriel (eds) New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 1–26.
Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (eds) (2003) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robertson, P.J. (2015) Towards a capability approach to careers: applying Amartya Sen’s thinking to career guidance and development, International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 15: 75–88.
Van der Haak, P. (2021) BuurtBaanBureau: Theoretisch kader en concept [internal document].
Van der Klink, J.J., Bültmann, U., Burdorf, A., Schaufeli, W.B., Zijlstra, F.R.H., Abma, F.I., et al (2016) Sustainable employability: definition, conceptualization, and implications – a perspective based on the capability approach, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 42(1): 71–9.
Van Echtelt, P., Sadiraj, K., Hoff, S., Muns, S., Karpinska, K., Das, D. and Versantvoort, M. with Putman, L. (2019) Eindevaluatie van de Participatiewet, Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
Von Hippel, E. (1986) Lead users: a source of novel product concepts, Management Science, 32(7): 791–805.
Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J. and Tummers, L.G. (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9): 1333–57.
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 233 | 233 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 1 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Downloads | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here