2: The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Responses from Southeast Asia

Author:
Restricted access
Rights and permissions Cite this chapter

This chapter examines extant understandings of sovereignty as responsibility, beginning with the idea of sovereign responsibility as conceptualised by Francis Deng and his collaborators, who contend that sovereignty can no longer be seen as a protection against interference, but as a charge of responsibility where the state is accountable to both domestic and external constituencies. The understanding is foundational to the thinking behind the 2001 International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) report, which introduced the responsibility to protect (R2P) with the aim to popularise the concept of humanitarian intervention and democracy-restoring intervention. Since its endorsement by the United Nations, the R2P has evolved through efforts by the UN and others to enhance, operationalise as well as to implement it in actual crisis situations – with varying degrees of success and in some instances not without controversy. The chapter discusses the relevance of the sovereignty as responsibility idea to Southeast Asia. It also examines the existing academic and policy debate over the R2P and its relevance to international security and sovereign responsibility, as well as its ambivalent reception in Southeast Asia.

  • Acharya, A. (1990) A survey of military cooperation among the ASEAN states: Bilateralism or alliance? Occasional Paper 14, Toronto, ON: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, York University.

  • Acharya, A. (1991) ‘The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: Security community or defence community?’, Pacific Affairs, 64(2): 159–78.

  • Acharya, A. (1992) ‘Regional military–security cooperation in the third world: A conceptual analysis of the relevance and limitations of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations)’, Journal of Peace Research, 29(1): 7–21.

  • Acharya, A. (1994) ‘Preventive diplomacy: Issues and institutions in the Asia Pacific region’, Paper presented to the Eighth Asia-Pacific Roundtable, Kuala Lumpur, 6–8 June, http://www.amitavacharya.com/sites/default/files/Preventive%20Diplomacy.pdf

  • Acharya, A. (1997) ‘Ideas, identity, and institution-building: From the “ASEAN Way” to the “Asia-Pacific way”’, The Pacific Review, 10(3): 319–46.

  • Acharya, A. (1998) ‘Culture, security, multilateralism: The “ASEAN way” and regional order’, Contemporary Security Policy, 19(1): 55–84.

  • Acharya, A. (2001) Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Acharya, A. (2003a) ‘Democratisation and the prospects for participatory regionalism in Southeast Asia’, Third World Quarterly, 24(2): 375–90.

  • Acharya, A. (2003b) ‘Regional institutions and Asian security order: Norms, power, and prospects for peaceful change’, in M. Alagappa (ed) Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 210–40.

  • Acharya, A. (2004) ‘How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localisation and institutional change in Asian regionalism’, International Organization, 58(2): 239–75.

  • Acharya, A. (2009) Whose ideas matter? Agency and power in Asian regionalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Acharya, A. (2015) ‘The responsibility to protect and a theory of norm circulation’, in R. Thakur and W. Maley (eds) Theorizing the Responsibility to Protect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–77.

  • Adams, S. (2013) ‘Remarks at the UN General Assembly’s interactive dialogue on “responsibility to protect: state responsibility and prevention”’, 11 September, http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/global-centre-for-r2p-statement-at-2013-interactive-dialogue-1.pdf

  • Adams, S. (2015) Failure to protect: Syria and the UN security council, Occasional Paper Series 5, March, New York: Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect.

  • Agence France Presse (2001) ‘Singapore rejects selfish image, sees itself as an equal’, Agence France Presse, 26 January, http://www.singapore-window.org/sw01/010126af.htm

  • Ahn, D. (2003) WTO settlements in East Asia, NBER Working Paper 10178, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Ainley, K. (2006) Rethinking agency and responsibility in contemporary international political theory (PhD dissertation), October, London: London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London.

  • Alagappa, M. (ed) (1995) Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The quest for moral authority, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Alexandra, L. (2012) ‘Indonesia and the responsibility to protect’, The Pacific Review, 25(1): 51–74.

  • Allison, G. (2017) ‘Heresy to say great powers don’t bow to tribunals on Law of the Sea?’, The Straits Times, 16 July, http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/heresy-to-say-great-powers-dont-bow-to-international-courts

  • Anderlini, J., Feng, W. and Mitchell, T. (2017) ‘Xi Jinping delivers robust defence of globalisation at Davos’, Financial Times, 17 January, https://www.ft.com/content/67ec2ec0-dca2-11e6-9d7c-be108f1c1dce

  • Angell, N. (1911) The great illusion: A study of the relation of military power to national advantage, London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

  • Annan, K. (2001) ‘Kofi Annan – Nobel Lecture’, Nobelprize.org, 10 December, https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2001/annan-lecture.html

  • Anwar, D.F. (2000) ‘National vs. regional resilience? An Indonesian perspective’, in D. Da Cunha (ed) Southeast Asian Perspectives on Security, Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, pp. 81–97.

  • Anwar, D.F. (2017) ‘Indonesia, ASEAN and regional stability’, Inaugural Lecture as a Member of the Social Science Commission of the Indonesian Academy of Sciences, 26 February.

  • APHR (2016) ‘ASEAN MPs: Action must follow Sunnylands commitments’, ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR), 18 February, http://aseanmp.org/2016/02/18/action-must-follow-sunnylands-commitments/

  • Archard, D. (1996) ‘Should nationalists be communitarians?’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 13(2): 215–20.

  • Armstrong, C. (2012) Global distributive justice: An introduction, Cambridge University Press.

  • Arsana, I.M.A. (2008) ‘Singapore gets Pedra Branca: What’s next?’ The Jakarta Post, 24 June, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2008/06/24/singapore-gets-pedra-branca-what039s-next.html

  • Arshad, A. (2016) ‘Marina Bay rocket attack plot from Batam “not to be taken lightly”’, The Straits Times, 6 August, http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/rocket-attack-plot-not-to-be-taken-lightly

  • ASEAN (1997) ‘Opening statement by foreign minister Shunmugam Jayakumar of Singapore’, Presented at the ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, Subang Jaya, Malaysia, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 24 May, http://www.aseansec.org/4002.htm

  • ASEAN (2003) ‘Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II)’, 7 October, http://www.aseansec.org/15159.htm

  • ASEAN (2006a) ‘Joint press release of the inaugural ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting, Kuala Lumpur, 9 May’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, http://www.aseansec.org/18412.htm

  • ASEAN (2006b) ‘Report of the eminent persons group of the ASEAN charter’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 26 December, http://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/19247.pdf

  • ASEAN (2007a) ‘ADMM-Plus concept paper’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 14 November, http://www.aseansec.org/21216.pdf

  • ASEAN (2007b) ‘Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 20 November, http://www.aseansec.org/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf

  • ASEAN (2009a) ‘Concept paper on ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus (ADMM-Plus): Principles for membership’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 26 February, http://www.aseansec.org/18471-e.pdf

  • ASEAN (2009b) ‘Cha-Am Hua Hin declaration on the intergovernmental commission on human rights’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 23 October, http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/research/Philippines/Cha-Am%20Hua%20Hin%20Declaration%20of%20the%20AICHR.pdf

  • ASEAN (2009c) ‘Terms of reference of ASEAN intergovernmental Commission on human rights’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, October, http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/research/Philippines/Terms%20of%20Reference%20for%20the%20ASEAN%20Inter-Governmental%20CHR.pdf

  • ASEAN (2010a) ‘Myanmar: ASEAN SG thanks friends and partners for post-Nargis support’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 27 August, https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/myanmar-asean-sg-thanks-friends-and-partners-post-nargis-support

  • ASEAN (2010b) ‘Message from the secretary-general of ASEAN, H.E. Dr Surin Pitsuwan, for the “Realising human security in Asia” symposium at the University of Tokyo’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 23 February, http://asean.org/?static_post=message-from-the-secretary-general-of-asean-he-dr-surin-pitsuwan-for-the-realizing-human-security-in-asia-symposium-at-the-university-of-tokyo

  • ASEAN (2011a) ‘Joint declaration of the ASEAN defence ministers on strengthening defence cooperation of ASEAN in the global community to face new challenges’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 19 May, http://www.aseansec.org/26304.htm

  • ASEAN (2011b) ‘ASEAN defence ministers meeting wraps up’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 19 May, http://admm.org.vn/sites/eng/Pages/aseandefenseministersmeetingwrapsup-nd-14814.html?cid=229

  • ASEAN (2011c) ‘Surin to Thailand and Cambodia: “Let ASEAN help mediate soonest”’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 5 February, http://asean.org/surin-to-thailand-and-cambodia-let-asean-help-mediate-soonest/

  • ASEAN (2013) ‘Inaugural ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus maritime security field training exercise’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 1 November, https://admm.asean.org/index.php/admm-news.html

  • ASEAN (2015) ‘ASEAN defence cooperation progresses towards the realisation of an ASEAN community 2015’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 17 March, https://admm.asean.org/index.php/admm-news.html

  • ASEAN (2016a) ‘ASEAN celebrates a decade of defence cooperation’. Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 27 May, https://admm.asean.org/index.php/admm-news.html

  • ASEAN (2016b) ‘Joint statement on the application of the code for unplanned encounters at sea in the South China Sea’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 7 September, https://www.asean2016.gov.la/kcfinder/upload/files/Joint%20Statement%20on%20the%20Application%20of%20the%20Code%20for%20Unplanned%20Encounters%20at%20Sea%20in%20the%20South%20China%20Sea.pdf

  • ASEAN (2016c) ‘Terms of reference: ASEAN militaries ready group on humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (AMRG on HADR)’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 22 April, http://mod.gov.la/10thADMM/assets/4.7.1-tor-on-amrg-as-of-20160422.pdf

  • ASEAN (2017) ‘Press release: AHA Centre facilitates humanitarian assistance between Singapore and Myanmar for displaced communities in Rakhine state;, AHA Centre, 14 December, https://ahacentre.org/press-release/press-release-aha-centre-facilitates-humanitarian-assistance-between-singapore-and-myanmar-for-displaced-communities-in-rakhine-state/

  • ASEAN (nd) ‘Concept paper for the establishment of an ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, http://www.aseansec.org/19892.htm

  • Ashworth, L.M. (2006) ‘Where are the idealists in interwar international relations?’, Review of International Studies, 32(2): 291–308.

  • Asplund, A. (2012) ‘ASEAN’s democracy deficit and the protection of human rights’, East Asia Forum, 17 November, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/11/17/aseans-democracy-deficit-and-the-protection-of-human-rights/

  • Asplund, A. (2014) ‘ASEAN intergovernmental commission on human rights: Civil society organizations’ limited influence on ASEAN’, Journal of Asian Public Policy, 7(2): 191–9.

  • Au Yong, J. (2016) ‘“JI, not ISIS, is bigger threat” to South-east Asia’, The Straits Times, 29 April, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/ji-not-isis-is-bigger-threat-to-south-east-asia

  • Axworthy, L. and Rock, A. (2009) ‘R2P: A new and unfinished agenda’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1): 54–69.

  • Badescu, C.G. (2011) Humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect: Security and human rights, London: Routledge.

  • Badescu, C.G. and Bergholm, L. (2009) ‘The responsibility to protect and the conflict in Darfur: The big let-down’, Security Dialogue, 40(3): 287–309.

  • Badhwar, N.K. (1996) ‘Moral agency, commitment and impartiality.’, in E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller, Jr and J. Paul (eds) The Communitarian Challenge to Liberalism, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.

  • Bahler, B. (2014) ‘Emmanuel Levinas, radical orthodoxy, and an ontology of originary peace’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 42(3): 516–39.

  • Bajora, J. (2011) ‘Libya and the responsibility to protect’, Analysis Brief (Council on Foreign Relations), 24 March, http://www.cfr.org/libya/libya-responsibility-protect/p24480

  • Balch, A. (2016) Immigration and the state: Fear, greed and hospitality, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Baldino, D. and Carr, A. (2016) ‘Defence diplomacy and the Australian defence force: Smokescreen or strategy?’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(2): 139–58.

  • Baldwin, D.A. (1995) ‘Review: Security studies and the end of the cold war’, World Politics, 48(1): 117–41.

  • Baldwin, K. (2009) ‘ASEAN finds new purpose with Cyclone Nargis response’, AlertNet (Thomson Reuters Foundation), 1 May, http://www.alertnet.org/db/an_art/55076/2009/04/1–125433–1.htm

  • Bamidele, S. (2017) ‘Regional approaches to crisis response, the African Union (AU) intervention in African states: How viable is it?’, India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 73(1): 114–28.

  • Bandoro, B. (2004) ‘Undesirable consequences of an ASEAN peacekeeping force’, The Jakarta Post, 2 March.

  • Bardhan, P. (2017) ‘Understanding populist challenges to the liberal order’, Boston Review, 11 May, http://bostonreview.net/class-inequality/pranab-bardhan-understanding-populist-challenges-liberal-order

  • Baring, E. (2018) ‘Levinas and Derrida’, in M.L. Morgan (ed) The Oxford handbook of Levinas, published online January. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190455934.013.24.

  • Barr, M.D. (2000) ‘Lee Kuan Yew and the “Asian values” debate’, Asian Studies Review, 24(3): 309–34.

  • Barry, B.M. (1995) Justice as impartiality, Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press.

  • Barton, G. (2014) ‘The Gülen movement, Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama: Progressive Islamic thought, religious philanthropy and civil society in Turkey and Indonesia’, Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 25(3): 287–301.

  • Bauer, R. (2017) ‘Building capacity vs. building capability: Why development needs “systems Thinking”’, The World Bank, 16 May, https://blogs.worldbank.org/publicsphere/building-capacity-vs-building-capability-why-development-needs-systems-thinking

  • BBC News (2003) ‘S Koreans charged over summit cash’, BBC News, 25 June, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3018874.stm

  • BBC News (2015) ‘Arctic Sunrise case: Russia ordered to pay damages’, BBC News, 24 August, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34045493

  • Beardsworth, R. (2013) Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Beeson, M. (2003) ASEAN plus three and the rise of reactionary regionalism’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(2): 251–68.

  • Beitz, C.R. (1979) Political theory and international relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Beitz, C.R. (1999) ‘Social and cosmopolitan liberalism’, International Affairs, 75(3): 515–29.

  • Beitz, C.R. (2009) ‘The moral standing of states revisited’, Ethics & International Affairs, 23(4): 325–47.

  • Bélanger, L. and Fontaine-Skronski, K. (2012) ‘“Legalisation” in international relations: A conceptual analysis’, Social Science Information, 51(2): 238–62.

  • Bell, D.A. (2006) Beyond liberal democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Bell, N. (2018) ‘In the face, a right is there: Arendt, Levinas and the phenomenology of the rights of man’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 49(4): 291–307.

  • Bellamy, A.J. (2005) ‘Responsibility to protect or trojan horse? The crisis in Darfur and humanitarian intervention after Iraq’, Ethics & International Affairs, 19(2): 31–54.

  • Bellamy, A.J. (2006) ‘Whither the responsibility to protect? Humanitarian intervention and the 2005 world summit’, Ethics & International Affairs, 20(2): 143–69.

  • Bellamy, A.J. (2010) ‘The responsibility to protect—Five years on’, Ethics & International Affairs, 24(2): 143–69.

  • Bellamy, A.J. (2015) The responsibility to protect: A defence, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Bellamy, A.J., and Davies, S.E. (2009) ‘The responsibility to protect in the Asia-Pacific region’, Security Dialogue, 40(6): 547–74.

  • Bellamy, A.J. and Beeson, M. (2010) ‘The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Can ASEAN reconcile humanitarianism and sovereignty?’, Asian Security, 6(3): 262–79.

  • Bellamy, A.J. and Drummond, C. (2011) ‘The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Between noninterference and sovereignty as responsibility’, The Pacific Review, 24(2): 179–200.

  • Bello, W. (2018) ‘Counterrevolution, the countryside and the middle classes: Lessons from five countries’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1): 21–58.

  • Bergo, B. (2013) Levinas between ethics and politics: For the beauty that adorns the earth, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

  • Bergsten, C.F. (1997) Open regionalism, Part 3 of Working Papers on Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation 57, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

  • Bernard-Donals, M. (2007) ‘In memoriam: Levinas, the holocaust, and the immemorial’, Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 40(3): 1–16.

  • Bernasconi, R. (1999) ‘The third party: Levinas on the intersection of the ethical and the political’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 30(1): 76–87.

  • Bernasconi, R. (2002) ‘What is the question to which “substitution” is the answer?’, in S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) The Cambridge companion to Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 234–51.

  • Bernasconi, R. (2003) ‘Justice without ethics: Neither the condition nor the outcome of ethics’, in J.D. Culler (ed) Deconstruction: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies, volume 4, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 312–24.

  • Bernstein, R.K. (2002) ‘Evil and the temptation of theodicy’, in S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) The Cambridge companion to Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 252–67.

  • Bielek-Robson, A. (2015) ‘The thanatic strain: Kojève and Rosenzweig as two readers of Hegel’, Journal of Cultural Research, 19(3): 274–90.

  • Biersteker, T. and Weber, C. (1996) ‘The social construction of state sovereignty’, in T. Biersteker and C. Weber (eds) State sovereignty as social construct, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–21.

  • Blaxland, J. and Claxton, K. (2014) ‘HADR – time to lift our game?’ The Strategist, 11 September, https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/hadr-time-to-lift-our-game/

  • Boey, D. (2005) Reaching out: Operation Flying Eagle – SAF humanitarian assistance after the tsunami, Singapore: SNP Editions.

  • Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2012) ‘From Europeanization to diffusion: Introduction’, West European Politics, 35(1): 1–19.

  • Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992) An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peace-making and peace-keeping, New York: The United Nations.

  • Bricmont, J. (2007) Humanitarian imperialism: Using human rights to sell war, English edition, New York: Monthly Review Press.

  • Brooks, A.C. (2017) ‘Don’t shun conservative professors’, The New York Times International Edition, 16–17 September: 10.

  • Brown, C. (2007) ‘Liberalism and the globalisation of ethics’, in W. M. Sullivan and W. Kymlicka (eds) The globalisation of ethics: Religious and secular perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–70

  • Brown, G.W. (2009) Grounding cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Brown, J. (2017) ‘The triumph of transactionalism’, Bertelsmann Foundation, 7 February, https://www.bfna.org/research/bbrief-the-triumph-of-transactionalism-america-first-and-europes-new-strategic-reality/

  • Brown, P. (2016) ‘Thailand, Philippines witnessing reversals of people power: Patrick Brown’, CBC News, 5 August, http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/thailand-philippines-people-power-1.3707890

  • Burke, E. (1967) Reflections on the revolution in France, London: Dent.

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (1998) ‘Mechanisms of dispute settlement: The ASEAN experience’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 20(1): 38–66.

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2005) Regional security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN way, Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2012) ‘The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Opening up spaces for advancing human security’, The Pacific Review, 25(1): 113–34.

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. and Chng, B. (2009) ‘Cyclones and humanitarian crises: Pushing the limits of R2P in Southeast Asia’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(2): 135–55.

  • Caballero-Anthony, M., Acharya, A. and Emmers, R. (eds) (2006) Non-traditional security in Asia: Dilemmas in securitization, London: Routledge.

  • Cahill, K. M. (1996) Preventive diplomacy: Stopping wars before they start, New York: Basic Books.

  • Campbell, D. (1993) Politics without principle: Sovereignty, ethics, and the narratives of the Gulf War, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

  • Campbell, D. (1994) ‘The deterritorialisation of responsibility: Levinas, Derrida, and ethics after the end of philosophy’, Alternatives, 19(4): 455–84.

  • Campbell, D. (1998) National deconstruction: Violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Capie, D. (2012) ‘The responsibility to protect norm in Southeast Asia: Framing, resistance and the localisation myth’, The Pacific Review, 25(1): 75–93.

  • Capie, D. and Evans, P. (2007) The Asia-Pacific security lexicon, updated second edition. Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.

  • Capie, D. and Taylor, B. (2010) ‘The Shangri-La dialogue and the institutionalisation of defence diplomacy in Asia’, The Pacific Review, 26(3): 359–76.

  • Caputo, J.D. (1993) Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction, Bloomington, ID: Indiana University Press.

  • Caputo, J.D. (1997) ‘Community without community’, in J.D. Caputo (ed) Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida, New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 106–24.

  • Caputo, J.D. (2003a) ‘The journal of philosophy & scripture: A prologue’, Journal of Philosophy & Scripture, 1(1): 1.

  • Caputo, J.D. (2003b) ‘Without sovereignty, without being: Unconditionality, the coming God and Derrida’s democracy to come’, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 4(3): 9–29.

  • Carnine, J. (2015) ‘The impact on national identity of transnational relationships during international student mobility’, Journal of International Mobility, 1(3): 11–30.

  • Caro, J.M. (2017) ‘More killed under Duterte than Marcos, says human rights group’, Business World, 31 July, http://bworldonline.com/killed-duterte-marcos-says-human-rights-group/

  • Case, W. (2009) ‘Low-quality democracy and varied authoritarianism: Elites and regimes in Southeast Asia today’, The Pacific Review, 22(3): 255–69.

  • Case, W. (2013) Contemporary authoritarianism in Southeast Asia: Structures, institutions and agency, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Case, W. (ed) (2015) Routledge handbook of Southeast Asian democratisation, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Casla, K. (2014) ‘International liberalism and R2P: Have liberalists given up on the ICC?’, Normative Power Europe, 20 March, http://normativepower.ideasoneurope.eu/2014/03/20/international-liberalism-and-r2p-have-liberalists-given-up-on-the-icc/

  • CCTV America (2016) ‘Chinese legal experts refute Philippine claim in South China Sea’, 7 May, http://www.cctv-america.com/2016/05/07/chinese-legal-experts-refute-philippine-claim-in-south-china-sea

  • Chalermpalanupap, T. and Thazur, M. (2017) ‘Famous last words by an ASEAN giant’, in ASEAN Focus (special issue on ‘ASEAN 1967–2017: Celebrating Five Decades of Regional Cooperation’), 7/2017, December. Singapore: ASEAN Studies Centre, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, pp. 12–13.

  • Chalier, C. (2002) ‘Levinas and the Talmud’, in S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) The Cambridge companion to Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–18.

  • Chalk, P., Rabasa, A., Rosenau, W. and Piggott, L. (2009) The evolving terrorist threat to Southeast Asia: A net assessment, Santa Monica, CA: National Defense Research Institute, RAND Corporation.

  • Chandler, D. (2002) From Kosovo to Kabul: Human rights and international intervention, London: Pluto.

  • Chandler, D. (2004) ‘The responsibility to protect? Imposing the “liberal peace”’, International Peacekeeping, 11(1): 59–81.

  • Chandler, D. (2009) ‘Unravelling the paradox of “the responsibility to protect”’, Irish Studies in International Affairs, 20: 27–39.

  • Chandler, D. (2015) ‘The R2P is dead, long live the R2P: The successful separation of military intervention from the responsibility to protect’, International Peacekeeping, 22(1): 1–5.

  • Chang, J.Y. and Chong, A. (2016) ‘Security competition by proxy: Asia Pacific interstate rivalry in the aftermath of the MH370 incident’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 28(1): 75–98.

  • Chang, Y., Chu, Y.-H. and Tsai, F. (2005) ‘Confucianism and democratic values in three Chinese societies’, Issues & Studies, 41(4): 1–33.

  • Channel News Asia (2016) ‘Member states mark 10th anniversary of Malacca Straits Patrol’, Channel News Asia, 21 April, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/member-states-mark-10th-anniversary-of-malacca-straits-patrol-8068218

  • Channel News Asia (2017) ‘Singapore offers SAF assistance to help Philippines fight terrorism’, Channel News Asia, 19 July, http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-offers-saf-assistance-to-help-philippines-fight-9044142

  • Channel News Asia (2018) ‘Myanmar’s Suu Kyi pressed on Rohingya crisis at ASEAN summit’, Channel News Asia, 18 March, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/myanmar-s-suu-kyi-pressed-on-rohingya-crisis-at-asean-summit-10054104

  • Chatterjee, P. (1986) Nationalist thought and the colonial world: A derivative discourse, London: Zed.

  • Chelvan, V.P. (2016) ‘4 radicalised Bangladeshi men jailed for 2–5 years for financing terrorism’, Channel News Asia, 12 July, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/4-radicalised-bangladeshi-men-jailed-for-2-5-years-for-financing-7982850

  • Cheong, D. (2017) ‘Malaysia’s fresh challenge on Pedra Branca “without merit”: MFA’, The Straits Times, 2 July, http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/fresh-challenge-on-pedra-branca-without-merit-mfa

  • Chesterman, S. (2001) Just war or just peace? Humanitarian intervention and international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chew, A. (2017) ‘Notorious Abu Sayyaf sub-commander touted as future emir of Islamic State in Southeast Asia’, Channel News Asia, 17 October, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/abu-sayyaf-future-emir-islamic-state-southeast-asia-9318990

  • Chin, J. (2014) ‘“Rule of law” or “rule by law”? In China, a preposition makes all the difference’, The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/10/20/rule-of-law-or-rule-by-law-in-china-a-preposition-makes-all-the-difference/

  • Chin, K.W. (1997) ‘ASEAN: The long road to “one Southeast Asia”’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 5(1): 1–19.

  • Chong, A. and Lee, I.W. (2018) ‘Asia’s security competition by proxy: Competitive HADR as a respectable arena?’, n A. Chong (ed) International security in the Asia-Pacific: Transcending ASEAN towards transitional polycentrism, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 377–400.

  • Chong, Z.L. (2014) ‘Manpower minister Tan Chuan-Jin shares stories from his visit to Banda Aceh 10 years after it was hit by tsunami’, The Straits Times, 25 November, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/manpower-minister-tan-chuan-jin-shares-stories-from-his-visit-to-banda-aceh-10-years

  • Chow, J. (2014) ‘Regional disaster centre starts work to sharpen military response’, The Straits Times, 12 September, http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/regional-disaster-centre-starts-work-to-sharpen-military-response

  • Chua, B.H. (1995) Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Chua, B.H. (1998) ‘Asian values: Restraining the logic of capitalism?’, Social Semiotics, 2/3: 215–26.

  • Chua, B.H. (2004) ‘Communitarian politics in Asia’, in B.H. Chua (ed) Communitarian Politics in Asia, London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 1–24.

  • Cini, M. (2007) European Union politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Clark, D. (2004) ‘In Darfur, the UN veto is proving as deadly as the gun’, The Guardian, 14 August, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/aug/14/foreignpolicy.sudan

  • Clark, I. (2005) Legitimacy in international society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cleemput, G.V. (1995) ‘Clarifying nationalism, chauvinism, and ethnic imperialism’, International Journal on World Peace, 12(1): 59–97.

  • CNN (2011) ‘ASEAN pushes Thailand-Cambodia talks to resolve temple dispute’, CNN, 8 February, http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/02/08/cambodia.thailand.violence/index.html

  • Cochrane, J. and Fuller, T. (2016) ‘Jakarta attack raises fears of ISIS’ spread in Southeast Asia’, The New York Times, 13 January, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/15/world/asia/jakarta-explosion.html

  • Cohen, J.L. (2006) ‘Sovereign equality vs. imperial right: The battle over the “new world order”’, Constellations, 13(4): 485–506.

  • Colson, D.A. (2003) ‘Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia)’, The American Journal of International Law, 97(2): 398–406.

  • Compton, R. (2000) East Asian democratisation: Impact of globalisation, culture, and economy, New York: Praeger.

  • Connolly, W.E. (1991a) ‘Democracy and territoriality’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20(3): 463–84.

  • Connolly, W.E. (1991b) Identity/difference: Democratic negotiations of political paradox. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Connolly, W.E. (1993a) The Augustinian imperative: A reflection on the politics of morality, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Connolly, W.E. (1993b) Political theory and modernity, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Cornell, D. (2016) The philosophy of the limit, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Corthay, E. (2016) ‘The ASEAN doctrine of non-interference in light of the fundamental principle of non-intervention’, Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 17(2): 1–41.

  • Critchley, S. (1999a) ‘The original traumatism: Levinas and psychoanalysis’, in R. Kearney and M. Dooley (eds) Questioning ethics: Contemporary debates in philosophy, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 230–42.

  • Critchley, S. (1999b) The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas, second edition, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

  • Critchley, S. (2002) ‘Introduction’, in S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.

  • CRS (2016) ‘Learning briefs from CRS’s response, recovery and resilience (R3) programme’, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) Learning Briefs, 12 July, https://www.crs.org/our-work-overseas/research-publications/learning-briefs-crs’s-response-recovery-and-resilience-r3

  • CSCAP (2010) Final report of the CSCAP study group on the responsibility to protect (RtoP): First meeting, 26–27 February, http://www.cicp.org.kh/download/asean-isis%20and%20cscap/CSCAP%20RtoP%20Study%20Group%20-%20First%20Meeting%20Final%20Report.pdf

  • Cunliffe, P. (2014) ‘The responsibility to protect and the new liberal dystopianism’, E-International Relations, 16 February, http://www.e-ir.info/2014/02/16/the-responsibility-to-protect-and-the-new-liberal-dystopianism/

  • Cunliffe, P. (2016) ‘From ISIS to ICISS: A critical return to the responsibility to protect report’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2): 233–47.

  • Cunliffe, P. (2017) ‘The doctrine of the “responsibility to protect” as a practice of political exceptionalism’, European Journal of International Relations, 23(2): 466–86.

  • Dancel, R. (2017a) ‘Framework of South China Sea code skirts thorny issues with China’, The Straits Times, 3 August, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/framework-of-south-china-sea-code-skirts-thorny-issues-with-china

  • Dancel, R. (2017b) ‘Singapore offers drones, urban warfare training grounds, aid to help Philippines fight militants in Marawi’, The Straits Times, 19 July, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/singapore-offers-saf-assistance-to-philippines-in-fight-against-terrorism

  • Dang, T.T.H. (2008) Examining the engagement between civil society and ASEAN in the ASEAN charter process, Munich: GRIN Verlag.

  • Dauphinee, E. (2009) ‘Emmanuel Levinas’, in J. Edkins and N. Vaughn-Williams (eds) Critical Theorists and International Relations, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 235–45.

  • Davies, M. (2013) ‘The ASEAN synthesis: Human rights, nonintervention, and the ASEAN human rights declaration’, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 14(2): 51–58.

  • Davies, M. (2014a) ‘An agreement to disagree: The ASEAN human rights declaration and the absence of regional identity in Southeast Asia’, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 33(3): 107–29.

  • Davies, M. (2014b) ‘States of compliance? Global human rights treaties and ASEAN member states’, Journal of Human Rights, 13(4): 414–33.

  • Davies, M. (2017) ‘Is ASEAN a newfound voice for the Rohingya?’, East Asia Forum, 28 March, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/03/28/rohingya-a-threat-to-asean-stability/

  • Davis, C. (1996) Levinas: An introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • de Cuellar, J.P. (1991) Report of the secretary-general on the work of the organisation, New York: United Nations.

  • Delhom, P. (2008) ‘Necessity and the legitimacy of the state’, in J. Hansel (ed) Levinas in Jerusalem: Phenomenology, ethics, politics, aesthetics, New York: Springer, pp. 75–90.

  • Delingpole, J. (2011) ‘Communitarianism is a freedom-hating totalitarian philosophy like any other’, The Spectator, 25 June, https://www.spectator.co.uk/2011/06/communitarianism-is-a-freedomhating-totalitarian-philosophy-like-any-other/

  • deLisle, J. (2000) ‘China’s approach to international law: A historical perspective’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 94, 5–8 April: 267–75.

  • Deng, F.M. (1995) ‘Frontiers of sovereignty: A framework of protection, assistance, and development for the internally displaced’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 8(2): 249–86.

  • Deng, F. (2010) Idealism and realism: Negotiating sovereignty in divided nations, The 2010 Dag Hammarskjöld Lecture, Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.

  • Deng, F.M., Kimaro, S., Lyons, T., Rothchild, D. and Zartman, I. W. (1996) Sovereignty as responsibility: Conflict management in Africa, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

  • Der Derian, J. (1991) On diplomacy: A genealogy of western estrangement, Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Derrida, J. (1992a) ‘Forces of law: The mystical foundations of authority’, in D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld and D.G. Carlson (eds) Deconstruction and the possibility of justice, New York: Routledge, pp. 3–67.

  • Derrida, J. (1992b) Of grammatology, ed. and trans. G.C. Spivak, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

  • Derrida, J. (1995) The gift of death, trans. D. Wills, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Derrida, J. (1997) Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida, ed. J.D. Caputo, New York: Fordham University Press.

  • Derrida, J. (1980) Writing and difference, trans. A. Bass, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Derrida, J. (1999) Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas, trans. P.-A. Brault and M. Naas, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Derrida, J. (2001) On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness, eds. S. Critchley and R. Kearney and trans. M. Dooley, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Derrida, J. (2002) ‘Hostipitality’, in G. Anidjar (ed) Acts of Religion, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 356–420.

  • Derrida, J. (2017) Given time: I. counterfeit money, trans. P. Kamuf. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Desker, B. (2008) ‘Is the ASEAN charter necessary?’, RSIS Commentaries, CO08077, 17 July, http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/Perspective/RSIS0772008.pdf

  • Dewitt, D. and Hernandez, C.G. (eds) (2003) Development and security in Southeast Asia, Farnham: Ashgate.

  • Djani, D.T. (2009) ‘A long journey’, in T. Koh, R.G. Manalo and W. Woon (eds) The making of the ASEAN charter, Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 137–50.

  • Doherty, B. (2018) ‘Displaced Rohingya children left in limbo by refugee crisis’, The Guardian, 31 January, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/01/devoid-of-hope-displaced-rohingya-children-are-vulnerable-to-trafficking-and-radicalisation

  • Doppelt, G. (1978) ‘Walzer’s theory of morality in international relations’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(1): 3–26.

  • Doty, R.L. (1997) ‘Aporia: A critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in international relations theory’, European Journal of International Relations, 3(3): 365–92.

  • Doty, R.L. (2006) ‘Fronteras Compasivas and the ethics of unconditional hospitality’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35(1): 53–74.

  • Doukhan, A. (2010) ‘From exile to hospitality: A key to the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas’, Philosophy Today, 54(3): 235–46.

  • Dreisbach, K. (2004) ‘Between SEATO and ASEAN: The United States and the regional organisation of Southeast Asia’, in M. Frey, R.W. Pruessen, and T.Y. Tan (eds) The transformation of Southeast Asia: International perspectives on decolonisation, Singapore: Singapore University Press, pp. 241–56.

  • Drezner, D.W. (2006) ‘Pirates of the Malacca Strait: Lloyd’s curse’, Foreign Policy, 8 August, https://foreignpolicy.com/2006/08/08/pirates-of-the-malacca-strait-lloyds-curse/

  • Drezner, D.W. (2010) ‘Afterword: Is historical institutionalism bunk?’, Review of International Political Economy, 17(4): 791–804.

  • Drichel, S. (2012) ‘Face to face with the other other: Levinas versus the postcolonial’, Levinas Studies, 7(1): 21–42.

  • Duffield, M. (2010) ‘The liberal way of development and the development-security impasse: Exploring the global life-chance divide’, Security Dialogue, 41(1): 53–76.

  • Eaton, S. and Stubbs, R. (2006) ‘Is ASEAN powerful? Neo-realist versus constructivist approaches to power in Southeast Asia’, The Pacific Review, 19(2): 135–55.

  • Economist, The (2007) ‘The saffron revolution’, The Economist, 27 September, https://www.economist.com/node/9867036

  • Economist, The (2017) ‘South-East Asia’s future looks prosperous but illiberal’, The Economist, 22 July, https://www.economist.com/news/asia/21725168-democracy-losing-ground-even-region-grows-richer-south-east-asias-future-looks-prosperous

  • Edge, L. (2015) ‘Eastphalian sovereignty: East Asia’s principle of the status quo’, Paper prepared for ISA Global South Singapore 2015, http://web.isanet.org/Web/Conferences/GSCIS%20Singapore%202015/Archive/08a10d5a-07b9-45e9-9e7a-1f0fa1d19400.pdf

  • Eisenstadt, O. and Katz, C.E. (2016) ‘The faceless Palestinian: A history of an error’, Telos, 174: 9–32.

  • Elshtain, J.B. (1981) Public man, private woman: Women in social and political thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Elshtain, J.B. (1995) Democracy on trial, New York: Basic Books.

  • Emmers, R. (2001) ‘The influence of the balance of power factor within the ASEAN Regional Forum’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 23(2): 275–91.

  • Emmers, R. (2009a) Geopolitics and maritime territorial disputes in East Asia, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Emmers, R. (2009b) ‘Comprehensive security and resilience in Southeast Asia: ASEAN’s approach to terrorism’, The Pacific Review, 22(2): 159–77.

  • Emmers, R. (2012) ‘The Five Power Defence Arrangements and defence diplomacy in Southeast Asia’, Asian Security, 8(3): 271–86.

  • Emmers, R. (2017a) ‘ASEAN minus x: Should this formula be extended?’, RSIS Commentaries, CO17199, 24 October, https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/cms/co17199-asean-minus-x-should-this-formula-be-extended/#.Ws1_4k0h33g

  • Emmers, R. (2017b) ‘Enduring mistrust and conflict management in Southeast Asia: An assessment of ASEAN as a security community’, TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 5(1): 75–97.

  • Emmers, R. and Tan, S.S. (2011) ‘The ASEAN Regional Forum and preventive diplomacy: Built to fail?’, Asian Security, 7(1): 44–60.

  • Emmerson, D.K. (2005) ‘Security, community, and democracy in Southeast Asia: Analysing ASEAN’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6(2): 165–85.

  • Emmerson, D.K. (2007) ‘Challenging ASEAN: A “topological” view’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(3): 424–46.

  • Emmerson, D.K. (2012) ‘ASEAN stumbles in Phnom Penh’, East Asia Forum, 23 July, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/07/23/asean-stumbles-in-phnom-penh-2/

  • Emmerson, D.K. (2013) ‘Kishore’s world’, Journal of Democracy, 24(3): 166–74.

  • Etzioni, A. (2006a) ‘Sovereignty as responsibility’, Orbis, 50(1): 71–85.

  • Etzioni, A. (2006b) ‘A neo-communitarian approach to international relations: Rights and the good’, Human Rights Review, 7(4): 69–80.

  • Evans, G. (2004) ‘When is it right to fight?’, Survival, 46(3): 59–82.

  • Evans, G. (2007) ‘Gareth Evans offers five thoughts for policymakers on R2P’, International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect (ICRtoP), 13 April, http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/component/content/article/35-r2pcs-topics/932-gareth-evans-offers-five-thoughts-for-policy-makers-on-r2p

  • Evensky, J. (1993) ‘Retrospectives: Ethics and the invisible hand’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (2): 197–205.

  • Ewing-Chow, M. and Losari, J.J. (2015) ‘Which is to be the master? Extra-arbitral interpretive procedures for IIAs’, in J.E. Kalicki and A. Joubin-Bret (eds) Reshaping the investor-state dispute settlement system: Journeys for the 21st century, Leiden: Hotei Publishing, 91–114.

  • Fain, H. (1987) Normative politics and the community of nations, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

  • Fake, S. and Funk, K. (2009) ‘R2P: Disciplining the mice, freeing the lions’, FPIP (Foreign Policy in Focus), 23 March, http://www.fpif.org/articles/r2p_disciplining_the_mice_freeing_the_lions

  • Fan, L. and Krebs, H. (2014) Regional organisations and humanitarian action: The case of ASEAN, Working Paper, London: Humanitarian Policy Group.

  • Farer, T.J. (2003) ‘Humanitarian intervention before and after 9/11: Legality and legitimacy’, in J.L. Holzgrefe and R.O. Keohane (eds) Humanitarian intervention: Ethical, legal, and political dilemmas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–89.

  • Fealy, G. (2017) ‘The battle for Marawi and ISIS in Southeast Asia’, The Strategist, 23 August. Barton, ACT: Australian Strategic Policy Institute, https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/battle-marawi-isis-southeast-asia/

  • Feindouno, S., Goujon, M. and Wagner, L. (2016) Internal violence index: A composite and quantitative measure of internal violence and crime in developing countries, Working Paper 151. Clermont-Ferrand: Foundation for Studies and Researchers on International Development (FERDI).

  • Filipovic, Z. (2011) ‘Introduction to Emmanuel Levinas: “After you, sir!”’ Moderna språk, 1: 58–73.

  • Financial Times (2018) ‘China’s protectionism comes home to roost’, Financial Times, 4 January, https://www.ft.com/content/14196546-f098-11e7-ac08-07c3086a2625

  • Finnemore, M. (2004) The purpose of intervention: Changing beliefs about the use of force, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Fioretos, O. (2011) ‘Historical institutionalism in international relations’, International Organization, 65(2): 367–99.

  • Focarelli, C. (2008) ‘The responsibility to protect doctrine and humanitarian intervention: Too many ambiguities for a working doctrine’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 13(2): 191–213.

  • Franck, T.M. (2001) ‘Are human rights universal?’ Foreign Affairs, 80(1): 191–204.

  • Franco, J.S. (2013) ‘Malaysia: Unsung hero of the Philippine peace process’, Asian Security, 9(3): 211–30.

  • Franke, M.N. (2000) ‘Refusing an ethical approach to world politics in favour of political ethics’, European Journal of International Relations, 6(3): 307–33.

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992) The end of history and the last man, London: Penguin.

  • Gao, C. (2017) ‘China and ASEAN aim for first joint maritime exercise’, The Diplomat, 26 October, https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/china-and-asean-aim-for-first-joint-maritime-exercise/

  • Gauthier, D. (1986) Morals by agreement, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Gehrke, P.J. (2010) ‘Being for the other-to-the-other: Justice and communication in Levinasian ethics’, Review of Communication, 10(1): 5–19.

  • George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2004) Case studies and theory development in the social sciences, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • George, J. (1995) ‘Realist “ethics”, international relations, and post-modernism: Thinking beyond the egoism-anarchy thematic’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24(2): 195–223.

  • Gifkins, J. (2016) ‘R2P in the UN security council: Darfur, Libya and beyond’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2): 148–65.

  • Gill, B., Green, M., Tsuji, K. and Watts, W. (2009) Strategic views on Asian regionalism: Survey, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

  • Ginty, R.M. (2012) ‘Routine peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding’, Cooperation and Conflict, 47(3): 287–308.

  • Glanville, L. (2016) ‘Does R2P matter? Interpreting the impact of a norm’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2): 184–99.

  • Goh, G. (2003) ‘The “ASEAN way”: Nonintervention and ASEAN’s role in conflict management’, Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, 3(1): 113–18.

  • Goldberg, J. (2008) Liberal fascism: The secret history of the American left from Mussolini to the politics of meaning, New York: Doubleday.

  • Goldman, K. (2005) ‘Appropriateness and consequences: The logic of neo-institutionalism’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18(1): 35–52.

  • Goodhart, M. and Taninchev, S.B. (2011) ‘The new sovereigntist challenge for global governance: Democracy without sovereignty’, International Studies Quarterly, 55(4): 1047–68.

  • Gorener, A.S. (2002) ‘Revisiting political realism: Is there room for moral considerations?’, International Studies, 39(2): 183–90.

  • Gorman, D. (2012) The emergence of international society in the 1920s, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Graham, E. (2013) ‘Super-typhoon Haiyan: ASEAN’s Katrina moment?’, PacNet, 82, 20 November, https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/Pac1382.pdf

  • Gray, J. (1995) Liberalism, second edition, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Greene, M. and Kelemen, P.D. (2016) ‘Europe’s failed refugee policy’, Foreign Affairs, 28 June, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2016-06-28/europes-failed-refugee-policy

  • Greer, A. and Watson, Z. (2017) ‘How to counter terrorism in Southeast Asia’, The Diplomat, 17 August, https://thediplomat.com/2016/08/how-to-counter-terrorism-in-southeast-asia/

  • Griffith, J. (2018) ‘Has the Rohingya crisis “changed” Myanmar’s Aung San Suu Kyi?’, CNN, 26 January, https://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/26/asia/aung-san-suu-kyi-myanmar-rohingya-intl/index.html

  • Groves, S. (2008) ‘The US should reject the UN “responsibility to protect” doctrine’, The Heritage Foundation, 1 May, https://www.heritage.org/report/the-us-should-reject-the-un-responsibility-protect-doctrine

  • Guiang, G. (2017) ‘Are minilaterals the future of ASEAN security?’, East Asia Forum, 30 September, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/09/30/are-minilaterals-the-future-of-asean-security/#more-89218

  • Guzzini, S. and Leander, A. (2001) ‘A social theory for international relations: An appraisal of Alexander Wendt’s theoretical and disciplinary synthesis’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 4(4): 316–38.

  • Gvosdev, N.K. (2005) ‘Communitarian realism’, American Behavioral Scientist, 48(12): 1591–1606.

  • Haacke, J. (1999) ‘The concept of flexible engagement and the practice of enhanced interaction: Intramural challenges to the “ASEAN way”’, The Pacific Review, 12(4): 581–611.

  • Haacke, J. (2009a) ‘Myanmar, the responsibility to protect and the need for practical assistance’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(2): 156–84.

  • Haacke, J. (2009b) ‘The ASEAN Regional Forum: From dialogue to practical security cooperation?’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3): 427–49.

  • Haas, M. (1989) The Asian way to peace: A story of regional cooperation, New York: Praeger.

  • Hader, L. (2017) ‘The limits of Trump’s transactional foreign policy’, The National Interest, 2 January, https://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-limits-trumps-transactional-foreign-policy-18898

  • Hallie, P. (1979) Lest innocent blood be shed, New York: Harper and Row.

  • Hallie, P. (1981) ‘From cruelty to goodness’, The Hastings Center Report, 11(3): 23–28.

  • Hallie, P. (1997) Tales of good and evil, help and harm, New York: Harper Collins.

  • Hamidi, A.Z. (2010) ‘Introduction: ASEAN defense industry collaboration’, Zulfaqar: Jurnal Asia Pertahanan Keselamatan, 1(1): 1–4.

  • Handelman, S. (1990) Facing the other: Levinas, Perelman and Rosenzweig’, Religion & Literature, 22(2/3): 61–84.

  • Hanggi, H. (1991) ASEAN and the ZOPFAN concept, Pacific Strategic Papers, Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.

  • Hardin, R. (1982) Collective action, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.

  • Hassan, M.J. (2013) ‘Trust-building in Southeast Asia: What made it possible?’, Global Asia, 8(3): 52–56.

  • Heidegger, M. (2010) Being and time: A revised edition of the Stambaugh translation, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

  • Hehir, A. (2016) ‘Assessing the influence of the responsibility to protect on the UN security council during the Arab spring’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2): 166–83.

  • Hehir, A. and Pattison, J. (2016) ‘Introduction: The responsibility to protect after the Arab spring’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2): 141–47.

  • Henkin, L. (1999) ‘Kosovo and the law of “humanitarian intervention”’, American Journal of International Law, 93(4): 824–48.

  • Heydarian, R.J. (2017) ‘ASEAN needs to move to minilateralism’, East Asia Forum, 5 December, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/12/05/asean-needs-to-move-to-minilateralism/

  • Hiebert, M. (2013) ‘Thailand, Cambodia spar at UN court over Preah Vihear temple’, CSIS, 23 April, https://www.csis.org/analysis/thailand-cambodia-spar-un-court-over-preah-vihear-temple

  • Higgott, R. and Nesadurai, H.S. (2002) Rethinking the Southeast Asian development model (SEADM): Bringing ethical and governance questions in, CDGR Working Paper 92/02, February, Coventry: Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick.

  • Hill, H. and Menon, J. (2012) ‘Asia’s new financial safety net: Is the Chiang Mai Initiative designed not to be used?’, Vox, 25 July, https://voxeu.org/article/chiang-mai-initiative-designed-not-be-used

  • Ho, J.H. (2009) ‘Southeast Asian SLOC security’, in S. Wu and K. Zou (eds) Maritime security in the South China Sea: Regional implications and international cooperation, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 157–76.

  • Hoang, A.T. (1994) ‘Vietnam’s membership in ASEAN: Economic, political and security implications’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 16(3): 259–73.

  • Holda, M. (2017) ‘The demand of the other in Paul Ricœur’s philosophical hermeneutics’, logos i ethos, 22: 71–88.

  • Holden, T. (2011) Levinas, messianism and parody, London: Continuum.

  • Hong, J. (2017) ‘Rohingya issue shines spotlight on Malaysia’s refugee policies’, Asia Times, 26 September, https://www.asiatimes.com/2017/09/opinion/rohingya-issue-shines-spotlight-malaysias-refugee-policies/

  • Hood, S. (1998) ‘The myth of Asian-style democracy’, Asian Survey, 38(9): 853–66.

  • Hook, G.D., Gilson, J., Hughes, C.W. and Dobson, H. (2001) Japan’s international relations: Politics, economics, and security, 2nd edition, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Hoon, C.Y. (2004) ‘Revisiting the Asian values argument used by Asian political leaders and its validity’, Indonesian Quarterly, 32(2): 154–74.

  • Hsu, L. (nd) ‘Application of WTO in ASEAN’, ASEAN Law Association, http://www.aseanlawassociation.org/docs/w7_sing.pdf

  • Huan, A. and Emmers, R. (2016) ‘What explains the success of preventive diplomacy in Southeast Asia?’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 28(5): 1–17.

  • Huang, Y. (1998) ‘Charles Taylor’s transcendental arguments for liberal communitarianism’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 24(4): 79–106.

  • Hund, M. (2003) ‘ASEAN plus three: Towards a new age of pan-East Asian regionalism? A skeptic’s appraisal’, The Pacific Review, 16(3): 383–417.

  • Hurrell, A. (1990) ‘Kant and the Kantian paradigm in international relations’, Review of International Studies, 16(3): 183–205.

  • Hussain, Z. (2014) ‘Singapore, Indonesia sign treaty on maritime borders in eastern Singapore strait’, The Straits Times, 3 September, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/singapore-indonesia-sign-treaty-on-maritime-borders-in-eastern-singapore-strait

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996) The clash of civilisations and the remaking of world order, New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • Hutchings, K. (1999) ‘Feminist politics and cosmopolitan citizenship’, in K. Hutchings and E. Dannreuther (eds) Cosmopolitan Citizenship, London: Macmillan, pp. 120–42.

  • Ibrahim, A. (1996) The Asian renaissance, Singapore and Kuala Lumpur: Times Books International.

  • ICISS (2001) The responsibility to protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Centre.

  • ICJ (2002) Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia v Malaysia): Judgement, ICJ Reports, The Hague: International Court of Justice (ICJ).

  • ICJ (2008) Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia v Singapore): Judgment, ICJ Reports, The Hague: International Court of Justice (ICJ).

  • ICJ (2013) Request for interpretation of the judgment of 15 June 1962 in the case concerning the temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand) (Cambodia v. Thailand): Judgment, ICJ Reports, The Hague: International Court of Justice (ICJ).

  • IICK (2000) Kosovo report: Conflict, international response, lessons learned, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the Independent International Commission on Kosovo (IICK).

  • IISS (2008) Report of the Shangri-La dialogue: The 7th IISS Asia security summit, Singapore, 30 May – 1 June. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).

  • IISS (2010) ‘Humanitarian and disaster relief in the Asia-Pacific: Dato’ Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’, Shangri-La Dialogue 2010 Fourth Plenary Session, 6 June, https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri-la-dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2010-0a26/fourth-plenary-session-ee00/ahmad-zahid-hamidi-6c4b

  • Ikenberry, G.J. (2014) ‘Review of Liberal internationalism: Theory, history, practice, by Beate Jahn’, Foreign Affairs, 93(5), https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2014-08-18/liberal-internationalism-theory-history-practice

  • Im, H.B. (2004) ‘Faltering democratic consolidation in South Korea’, Democratization, 11(5): 179–97.

  • Inquirer (2017) ‘Asean stands by Suu Kyi regarding Rohingya crisis’, Inquirer, 14 November, http://globalnation.inquirer.net/162339/asean-stands-suu-kyi-regarding-rohingya-crisis

  • Ionescu, A. (2017) The memorial ethics of Libeskind’s Berlin Jewish Museum, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • IPAC (2015) The expanding role of the Indonesian military, IPAC Report 19, 25 May, Jakarta: Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (IPAC).

  • IPAC (2017) Marawi, the ‘East Asia waliyah’ and Indonesia, IPAC Report 38, 21 July, Jakarta: Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (IPAC).

  • Irigaray, L. (1991) ‘Questions to Emmanuel Levinas: On the divinity of love’, in R. Bernasconi and S. Critchley (eds) Re-Reading Levinas, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 109–18.

  • Jackson, R.H. (1993) Quasi-states: Sovereignty, international relations and the third world, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Jackson, R.H. (1999) ‘Sovereignty in world politics: A glance at the conceptual and historical landscape’, Political Studies, 47(3): 431–56.

  • Jackson, R.H. and Rosberg, C.G. (1986) ‘Sovereignty and underdevelopment: Juridical statehood in the African crisis’, The Journal of Modern African Studies, 24(1): 1–31.

  • Jacques, J. (2016) ‘Where nothing happened: The experience of war captivity and Levinas’s concept of the “there is”’, Social and Legal Studies, 26(2): 230–48.

  • Jaipragas, B. (2018) ‘Malaysia plans Malaysian island on Middle Rocks near Singapore’, South China Morning Post, 30 May, http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2148524/malaysias-mahathir-build-island-middle-rocks-near-singapore

  • Jakarta Post, The (2009) ‘TNI moves to secure Ambalat’, The Jakarta Post, 31 May http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/05/31/tni-moves-secure-ambalat.html

  • Jayakumar, S. and Koh, T. (2009) Pedra Branca: The road to the world court, Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.

  • Jenko, L.K. (2010) ‘“Rule by man” and “rule by law” in early republican China: Contributions to a theoretical debate’, The Journal of Asian Studies, 69(1): 181–203.

  • Jetschke, A. and Murray, P. (2012) ‘Diffusing regional integration: The EU and Southeast Asia’, West European Politics, 35(1): 174–91.

  • Jiang, Y. (2010) ‘Response and responsibility: China in East Asian financial cooperation’, The Pacific Review, 23(5): 603–23.

  • Joffe, J. (2018) ‘The greatest miscalculation of Merkel’s career’, The Straits Times, 23 June: A34.

  • Johnston, A.I. (2008) Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Jonas, H. (1996) ‘Matter, mind, and creation: Cosmological evidence and cosmogonic speculation’, in L. Vogel (ed) Mortality and morality: A search for the good after Auschwitz, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 165–97.

  • Jones, D.M. and Smith, M.L.R. (2002) ‘ASEAN’s imitation community’, Orbis, 46(1): 93–109.

  • Jones, D.M. and Smith, M.L.R. (2007) ‘Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian regional order’, International Security, 32(1): 148–84.

  • Jones, L. (2009) ASEAN and the norm of noninterference in Southeast Asia: A quest for social order, Nuffield College Politics Group Working Paper, March, Oxford: Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

  • Jones, L. (2010) ‘ASEAN’s unchanged melody? The theory and practice of nonintervention in Southeast Asia’, The Pacific Review, 23(3): 479–502.

  • Jones, L. (2012) ASEAN, sovereignty and intervention in Southeast Asia, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Jordaan, E. (2009) ‘Cosmopolitanism, freedom, and indifference: A Levinasian view’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 34(1): 83–106.

  • Junk, J. (2016) ‘Testing boundaries: Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar and the scope of R2P’, Global Society, 30(1): 78–93.

  • Kahler, M. (2000) ‘Legalisation as strategy: The Asia-Pacific case’, International Organization, 54(3): 549–71.

  • Kaiman, J. (2017) ‘Asia is turning its back on democracy, and some say Trump isn’t helping’, Los Angeles Times, 3 November, http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-trump-bump-20171103-story.html

  • Kassim, Y.R. (2005) ‘ASEAN cohesion: Making sense of Indonesian reactions to bilateral disputes’, RSIS Commentaries, CO05015, 6 April, http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/Perspective/IDSS152005.pdf

  • Kassim, Y.R. (2011) ‘ASEAN community: Losing grip over Vision 2015?’, RSIS Commentaries, CO11087, 2 June, https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/1559-asean-community-losing-grip-o/#.Ww6TbC-p28U

  • Katsumata, H. (2009) ‘ASEAN and human rights: Resisting Western pressure or emulating the West?’, The Pacific Review, 22(5): 619–37.

  • Katzenstein, P.J. (1996) ‘Introduction: Asian regionalism in comparative perspective’, in P.J. Katzenstein and T. Shiraishi (eds) Network power: Japan and Asia, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–44.

  • Kausikan, B. (1993) ‘Asia’s different standards’, Foreign Policy, 92: 24–41.

  • Kausikan, B. (2014) ‘The roots of strategic distrust: the US, China, Japan and Asean in East Asia’, The Straits Times, 18 November, http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/the-roots-of-strategic-distrust-the-us-china-japan-and-asean-in-east-asia

  • Kelsall, M.S. (2009) ‘The new ASEAN intergovernmental commission on human rights: Toothless tiger or tentative first step?’, Asia Pacific Issues, 90, September, Honolulu, HI: East-West Center, pp. 1–8, https://www.eastwestcenter.org/system/tdf/private/api090.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=32360

  • Keohane, R.O. (1986) ‘Reciprocity in international relations’, International Organization, 40(1): 1–27.

  • Keohane, R.O. (2006) ‘Lilliputians’ dilemmas: Small states in international politics’, in J. Beyer, C. Ingebritsen, S. Gstohl and I.B. Neumann (eds) Small states in international relations, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, pp. 55–76.

  • Kersten, M. (2015) ‘The responsibility to protect doctrine is faltering. Here’s why’, The Washington Post, 8 December, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/12/08/the-responsibility-to-protect-doctrine-is-failing-heres-why/?utm_term=.69f92eba59bc

  • Ketcham, R. (2004) The idea of democracy in the modern era, Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.

  • Khong, Y.F. (1997) ‘Making bricks without straw in the Asia Pacific?’, The Pacific Review, 10(2): 289–300.

  • Koh, T. (2009a) Rudd’s reckless regional rush, The Australian, 18 December, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/rudds-reckless-regional-rush/news-story/69b186cd010b73769b0ab32f8f82b299

  • Koh, T. (2009b) ‘The negotiating process’, in T. Koh, R.G. Manalo and W. Woon (eds) The making of the ASEAN charter, Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 47–84.

  • Koh, T. (2009c) ‘ASEAN charter at one: A thriving tiger cub’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 16 December, http://www.asean.org/documents/091216-ASEC-Policy-Forum.pdf

  • Koh, T. (2017) ‘Maritime boundary conciliation between Timor-Leste and Australia: A success story’, Tembusu College, 19 September, https://tembusu.nus.edu.sg/index.php/news/2017/by-prof-tommy-koh-maritime-boundary-conciliation-between-timor-leste-and-australia-a-success-story

  • Koh, T. and Hao, D.P. (2016) ‘The Asian way to settle disputes’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy, 1(1): 5–10.

  • Koh, V. and Cheng, K. (2018) ‘Infrastructure protection bill passed in parliament’, Today, 29 January, https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/infrastructure-protection-bill-passed-parliament

  • Kor, K.B. (2016a) ‘China, Asean agree to examine S’pore proposal on South China Sea’, The Straits Times, 2 March, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-asean-agree-to-examine-spore-proposal-on-south-china-sea

  • Kor, K.B. (2016b) ‘Singapore needs to be strong advocate of rules-based world order, says Ong Ye Kung’, The Straits Times, 11 October, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/singapore-needs-to-be-strong-advocate-of-rules-based-world-order-says-ong-ye-kung

  • Koskenniemi, M. (1989) From apology to utopia: The structure of international legal argument, Helsinki: Lakimiesliiton Kustannus.

  • Kraft, H. (2012) ‘RtoP by increments: The AICHR and localising the responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia’, The Pacific Review, 25(1): 27–49.

  • Kraisoraphong, K. (2012) ‘Thailand and the responsibility to protect’, The Pacific Review, 25(1): 1–25.

  • Kranrattanasuit, N. (2014) ASEAN and human trafficking: Case studies of Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Krasner, S.D. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Krebs, R.R. (2017) ‘Nationalism makes for bad foreign policy’, Foreign Affairs, 29 May, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2017-05-29/nationalism-makes-bad-foreign-policy

  • Kristol, I. (1999) Neoconservatism: The autobiography of an idea, Chicago, IL: Elephant Paperbacks.

  • Krizan, M. (1997) ‘Communitarianism, Charles Taylor, and the postcommunist transition’, Politička misao, 34(5): 152–70.

  • Kuntjoro, I.A. and Jamil. S. (2010) ‘Strengthening RI’s disaster preparedness’, The Jakarta Post, 4 November, http://www.thejakartapost.com/print/286877

  • Kurlander, E. (2009) Living with Hitler: Liberal democrats in the third reich, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Kurlantzick, J. (2017) ‘Southeast Asia in the age of Trump’, Aspenia online, 6 August, https://www.aspeninstitute.it/aspenia-online/article/southeast-asia-age-trump

  • Kymlicka, W. (1988) ‘Liberalism and communitarianism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 18(2): 181–204.

  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics, London: Verso.

  • Laïdi, Z. (1998) A world without meaning: The crisis of meaning in international politics, trans. J. Burnham and J. Toulon, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Lakoff, S. (1998) ‘Tocqueville, Burke, and the origins of liberal conservatism’, The Review of Politics, 60(3): 435–64.

  • Lanham, A. (2018) ‘How to abolish war’, The New Republic, 2 January, https://newrepublic.com/article/146453/abolish-war

  • Lasswell, H.D. (1936) Politics: Who gets what, when, how, London and New York: Whittlesey House, McGraw-Hill.

  • Lawton, P.N. Jr. (1976) ‘Love and justice: Levinas’ reading of Buber’, Philosophy Today, 20(1): 77–83.

  • Lee, M.R. (2008) ‘Rebranding responsibility to protect, Gareth Evans says Somalia’s not covered’, Inner City Press, 17 September, http://www.innercitypress.com/r2p1evans091708.html

  • Leifer, M. (1989) ASEAN and the security of South-East Asia, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Leifer, M. (1996) The ASEAN regional forum: Extending ASEAN’s model of security, Adelphi Paper 302. London: Oxford University Press for International Institute for Strategic Studies

  • Leung, A.K.-Y. and Cohen, D. (2011) ‘Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honour, face, and dignity cultures’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3): 507–26.

  • Levinas, E. (1969) Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority, trans. A. Lingis, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

  • Levinas, E. (1988a) ‘The paradox of morality’, in R. Bernasconi and D. Wood (eds) The provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the other, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 168–80.

  • Levinas, E. (1988b) ‘Useless suffering’, in R. Bernasconi and D. Wood (eds) The provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the other, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 156–66.

  • Levinas, E. (1989) ‘Ethics as first philosophy’, in S. Hand (ed) The Levinas reader, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 75–87

  • Levinas, E. (1990) Nine Talmudic readings, trans. with intro. A. Aronowicz, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

  • Levinas, E. (1991) Otherwise than being or beyond essence, trans. A. Lingis, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Levinas, E. (1996a) ‘Transcendence and height’, in in A.T. Peperzak, S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 11–32.

  • Levinas, E. (1996b) ‘Is ontology fundamental?’, in A.T. Peperzak, S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–10.

  • Levinas, E. (1997) Difficult freedom: Essays on Judaism, trans. S. Hand, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

  • Levinas, E. (1998) Of God who comes to mind, trans. B. Bergo, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Levinas, E. (2000) Ethique et infini, Paris: Le livre de poche.

  • Levinas, E. (2003) Humanism of the other, trans. N. Poller with intro. R.A. Cohen, Urbana and Chicago, IL: Illinois University Press.

  • Levinas, E. and Kearney, R. (1986) ‘Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas’, In R.A. Cohen (ed) Face to face with Levinas, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 13–34.

  • Levinas, E. and Hand, S. (1990) ‘Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism’, Critical Inquiry, 17(1): 62–71.

  • Leviter, L. (2010) ‘The ASEAN charter: ASEAN’s failure or member failure?’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 43(159): 159–210.

  • Li, M. (2014) ‘Managing security in the South China Sea: From DOC to COC’, Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia 15 (March), https://kyotoreview.org/issue-15/managing-security-in-the-south-china-sea-from-doc-to-coc/

  • Lieberthal, K. and Wang, J. (2012) Addressing U.S.-China strategic distrust, John L. Thornton China Center Monograph Series 4, March, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

  • Lim, I. (2005) ‘Credible deterrence: Reviewing discourse & reframing the SAF to deal with full spectrum threat complex’, Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 31(3), https://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/journals/2005/v31n3/features/feature2.html

  • Lim, Y.L. (2017a) ‘Singapore and China to deepen defence ties with more bilateral exercises’, The Straits Times, 22 September, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/singapore-and-china-reaffirm-commitment-to-deepen-defence-ties

  • Lim, Y.L. (2017b) ‘Singapore and China to deepen defence ties cooperation’, The Straits Times, 23 September, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/spore-and-china-to-deepen-defence-ties-cooperation

  • Lindner, W. and Bachtiger, A. (2005) ‘What drives democratisation in Asia and Africa?’, European Journal of Political Research, 44: 861–80.

  • Ling, L.M., and Shih, C.-Y. (1998) ‘Confucianism with a liberal face: The meaning of democratic politics in postcolonial Taiwan’, The Review of Politics, 60(1): 55–82.

  • Linklater, A. (1990) Beyond realism and marxism: Critical theory and international relations, New York: Springer.

  • Linklater, A. (2001) ‘Citizenship, humanity, and cosmopolitan harm conventions’, International Political Science Review, 22(3): 261–77.

  • Liow, J.C. (2016a) ‘ISIS in the Pacific: Assessing terrorism in Southeast Asia and the threat to the homeland’, Testimony before the US House Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, 27 April, https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/isis-in-the-pacific-assessing-terrorism-in-southeast-asia-and-the-threat-to-the-homeland/

  • Liow, J.Y. (2016b) ‘The ISIS threat to Southeast Asia: An assessment’, RSIS Commentaries, CO16099, 29 April, https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/co16099-the-isis-threat-to-southeast-asia-an-assessment/#.WmWdGiOp1PM

  • Liow, J.C. (2018) ‘Shifting sands of terrorism in South-east Asia’, The Straits Times, 10 February, https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/shifting-sands-of-terrorism-in-south-east-asia

  • Lipscy, P.Y. (2003) ‘Japan’s Asian monetary fund proposal’, Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, 1(3): 93–104.

  • Loh, D. (2005) ‘SAF team sails home after completing Meulaboh relief work’, Channel News Asia, 23 January.

  • Loh, D.M.H. (2016) ‘ASEAN’s norm adherence and its unintended consequences in HADR and SAR operations’, The Pacific Review, 29(4): 549–72.

  • Loo, B. and Ho, J. (2005) ‘SAF proves capable as humanitarian force: Diverse skills and mutual trust clear the way in tsunami-hit Aceh’, The Straits Times, 1 February: 23.

  • Lopes, D.B. (2017) ‘Asia’s exceptional neoliberalism’, The Diplomat, 7 August, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/asias-exceptional-neoliberalism/

  • Lopez, G. (2012) ‘Southeast Asia’s illiberal regimes’, New Mandela, 25 June, http://www.newmandala.org/southeast-asias-illiberal-regimes/

  • Louie, S. (2014) ‘Asian shame and honour: A cultural conundrum and case study’, Psychology Today, 29 June, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/minority-report/201406/asian-shame-and-honor

  • Luck, E.C. (2008) ‘The United Nations and the responsibility to protect’, Stanley Foundation Policy Analysis Brief, August, https://www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/pab/LuckPAB808.pdf

  • Luck, E.C. (2009) ‘Sovereignty, choice, and the responsibility to protect’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1): 10–21.

  • Luck, E.C. (2015) ‘R2P at ten: A new mindset for a new era?’, Global Governance, 21(4): 499–504.

  • Lund, M.S. (1996) Preventing violent conflict: A strategy for preventive diplomacy, Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.

  • Lynch, C. (2010) ‘The 10 worst UN Security Council resolutions ever’, Foreign Policy, 21 May, http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/05/21/the-10-worst-u-n-security-council-resolutions-ever-2/

  • Mabera, F. and Spies, Y. (2016) ‘How well does R2P travel beyond the west?’, in A. J. Bellamy and T. Dunne (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 208–26.

  • Mack, M. (2003) ‘Franz Rosenzweig’s and Emmanuel Levinas’s critique of German idealism’s pseudotheology’, The Journal of Religion, 83(1): 56–78.

  • Mahapatra, C. (1990) American role in the origin and growth of ASEAN, New Delhi: ABC Publishing House.

  • Mahbubani, K. (1992) ‘The west and the rest’, National Interest, 28: 3–12.

  • Mahbubani, K. (2013) The great convergence: Asia, the west, and the logic of one world, New York: Public Affairs.

  • Maintem, J. (2017) ‘Militants fighting in Marawi using gov’t-owned guns, says Army exec’, Philippine Daily Inquirer, 15 September, http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/930750/militants-fighting-in-marawi-using-govt-owned-guns-says-army-exec#ixzz57Bm8OLWr

  • Malik, M. (2018) ‘Rohingya crisis: Time for Asean to act’, Today, 21 January, https://www.todayonline.com/commentary/rohingya-crisis-time-asean-act

  • Manderson, D. (2006) Proximity, Levinas, and the soul of law, Montreal, QB and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s Press.

  • Mansfield, E.D. and Snyder, J. (1995) ‘Democratisation and the danger of war’, International Security, 20(1): 5–38.

  • Mao, X. (2014) ‘Utopia in Levinas: Null-site as reduction from said to saying, from politics to ethics’, Azimuth, 2(3): 123–38.

  • Maoz, Z. (1998) ‘Realist and cultural critiques of the democratic peace: A theoretical and empirical re-assessment’, Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations, 24(1): 3–89.

  • Marshall, J.M. (2003) ‘Remaking the world: Bush and the neoconservatives’, Foreign Affairs, 82(6): 142–46.

  • Marzuki, K.I. (2017) ‘Indonesia-Singapore relations: The next 50 years’, RSIS Commentaries, CO17154, 25 August, https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/co17154-indonesia-singapore-relations-the-next-50-years/#.W0RbqU0nb3g

  • Mattangkilang, T. (2013) ‘Ambalat border dispute ignored for joint Indonesia/Malaysia exploration efforts’, Jakarta Globe, 17 June, http://jakartaglobe.beritasatu.com/news/border-dispute-ignored-for-joint-exploration-efforts-2/

  • Mauss, M. (1990) The gift:The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies, trans. W.D. Halls, London and New York: Routledge.

  • McCabe, R.C. (2017) Modern maritime piracy: Genesis, evolution and responses, London and New York: Routledge.

  • McCarthy, S. (2009) ‘Chartering a new direction? Burma and the Evolution of human rights in ASEAN’, Asian Affairs: An American Review, 36(3): 157–75.

  • Meitzner, M. (ed) (2012) The Political resurgence of the military in Southeast Asia: Conflict and leadership, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Melander, E., Pettersson, T. and Themnér, L. (2016) ‘Organized violence, 1989–2015’, Journal of Peace Research, 53(5): 727–42.

  • Menon, R. (2016) The conceit of humanitarian intervention, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Merrill, J.G. (2003) ‘Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia v Malaysia), merits, judgment of 17 December 2002’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52(3): 797–802.

  • MFA China (2014) ‘Position paper of the government of the People’s Republic of China on the matter of jurisdiction in the South China Sea arbitration initiated by the Republic of the Philippines’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China, 7 December, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1217147.shtml

  • MFA Singapore (2007a) ‘Transcript of reply by Singapore foreign minister George Yeo to questions in Parliament (on Myanmar)’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore, 22 October, http://www.mfa.com.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/washington/newsroom/press_statements/2007/200710/press_200710_02.html

  • MFA Singapore (2007b) ‘Statement by ASEAN chair, Singapore’s minister for foreign affairs George Yeo in New York, 27 September 2007’, Embassy of the Republic of Singapore in Washington, D, 27 September, https://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/washington/newsroom/press_statements/2007/200709/press_200709_03.html

  • MFA Singapore (2011) ‘Remarks by minister for foreign affairs George Yeo and his reply to the supplementary questions in parliament during the committee of supply (CoS) debate’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore, 3 March, http://app.mfa.gov.sg/2006/press/view_press.asp?post_id=6820

  • MFA Singapore (2017) ‘MFA press release: Minister for foreign affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan’s written reply to the parliamentary questions, 2 and 3 October 2017’, Permanent Mission of the Republic of Singapore to Geneva, 2–3 October, https://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/geneva/press_statements_speeches/2017/201710/press_201710030.html

  • Miller, A. (2017) ‘Levinas: Ethics or mystification?’ Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(2): 524–37.

  • Miller, J.B., Morini, D., Ordaniel, J. and Sun, M. (2016) ‘ASEAN needs to re-think its approach to preventive diplomacy’, East Asia Forum, 13 April, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/20160406001245680547-minihighres.jpg

  • Min, A.K. (1998) ‘Toward a dialectic of totality and infinity: Reflections on Emmanuel Levinas’, The Journal of Religion, 78(4): 571–92.

  • MINDEF Brunei (2010) ‘7th ASEAN Chiefs of Defence Forces Informal Meeting (ACDFIM)’, Ministry of Defence, Brunei Darussalam, 26 March, http://www.mindef.gov.bn/MOD_Brunei2/index.php/news-mainmenu2-92/670-7th-asean-chiefs-of-defense-forces-informal-meeting-acdfim

  • MINDEF Brunei (2012) ‘9th ACDFIM concludes in Cambodia’, Ministry of Defence, Brunei Darussalam, 29 March, http://www.mindef.gov.bn/MOD2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1277:9th-acdfim-concludes-in-cambodia&catid=1:news&Itemid=70

  • MINDEF Singapore (2007) ‘Singapore hosts second ASEAN Defense Ministers’ Meeting’, Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 14 November, http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/mindef_websites/topics/admm/media_release/14nov07_nr.html

  • MINDEF Singapore (2011) ‘Singapore and Indonesia co-host first ASEAN militaries’ humanitarian assistance and disaster relief exercise’, Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 12 July, http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/2011/jul/12jul11_nr.html

  • MINDEF Singapore (2012) ‘Joint declaration of the ASEAN defence ministers on enhancing ASEAN unity for a harmonised and secure community’ (Joint Declaration by 6th ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting). Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 29 May, http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/2012/may/29may12_nr/29may12_fs.html

  • MINDEF Singapore (2015) ‘Dr Ng Urges ADMM-Plus to abide by common principles and norms, and to foster mutual trust’, Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 4 November, https://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/press_room/official_releases/nr/2015/nov/04nov15_nr.html#.WbO__sap0dU

  • MINDEF Singapore (2018a) ‘Dr Ng: Productive ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting (ADMM) Retreat and ASEAN-China Defence Ministers’ Informal Meeting’, Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 7 February, https://www.mindef.gov.sg/web/portal/mindef/news-and-events/latest-releases/article-detail/2018/february/07feb18_nr2

  • MINDEF Singapore (2018b) ‘Joint statement of the 15th ASEAN Chiefs of Defence Forces’ Informal Meeting’, Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 8 March, https://www.mindef.gov.sg/web/portal/mindef/news-and-events/latest-releases/article-detail/2018/march/08mar18_js

  • MINDEF Singapore (2018c) ‘Chairman’s statement of the 5th ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus (Admm-Plus)’, Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 20 October, https://www.mindef.gov.sg/web/portal/mindef/news-and-events/latest-releases/article-detail/2018/october/20oct18_speech

  • MINDEF Singapore (2018d) ‘Dr Ng: Significant progress made at 12th ADMM and 5th ADMM-Plus’, Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 20 October, https://www.mindef.gov.sg/web/portal/mindef/news-and-events/latest-releases/article-detail/2018/october/20oct18_nr3

  • Miyake, K. (2019) ‘What does the “Indo-Pacific strategy” mean?’ The Japan Times, 11 March, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2019/03/11/commentary/japan-commentary/indo-pacific-strategy-mean/#.XLQDlTAzb3g

  • MOD Thailand (2009) ‘ASEAN defence ministers’ meeting 2009, Pattaya, Thailand, 25–26 February’, Ministry of Defence, Thailand, http://www1.mod.go.th/admm/en/

  • Moller, K. (1988) ‘Cambodia and Burma: The ASEAN way ends here’, Asian Survey, 38(12): 1087–104.

  • Morgan, M.L. (2011) The Cambridge introduction to Emmanuel Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Morgenbesser, L. and Pepinsky, T.B. (2018) ‘Elections as causes of democratisation: Southeast Asia in comparative perspective’, Comparative Political Studies, article first published online on 27 February, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758763.

  • Morkevičius, V. (2018) Realist ethics: Just war traditions as power politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Morris, J. (2016) ‘The responsibility to protect and the use of force: Remaking the procrustean bed?’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2): 200–15.

  • Moses, J. (2013) ‘Sovereignty as irresponsibility? A realist critique of the responsibility to protect’, Review of International Studies, 39(1): 113–35.

  • Muravchik, J. (2007) ‘The past, the present, and future of neoconservatism’, Commentary, 1 October, https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-past-present-and-future-of-neoconservatism/

  • Murray, D. (2005) Neoconservatism: Why we need it, London: The Social Affairs Unit.

  • Mylonas, H. and Kuo, K. (2017) ‘Nationalism and foreign policy’, Politics (Oxford Research Encyclopedias, September, DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.452.

  • Nagan, W.P. and Hammer, C. (2004) ‘The changing character of sovereignty in international law and international relations’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43(141): 141–87.

  • Nair, D. (2009) ‘Regionalism in the Asia Pacific/East Asia: A frustrated regionalism?’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 31(1): 110–42.

  • Naldi, G.J. (2014) ‘The ASEAN protocol on dispute settlement mechanisms: An appraisal’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 5(1): 105–38.

  • Nance, M. (2012) ‘Kantian right and the categorical imperative: Response to Willaschek’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 20(4): 541–56.

  • Nardin, T. (1983) Law, morality, and the relations of states, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Narine, S. (2002) ‘ASEAN in the aftermath: The Consequences of the East Asian economic crisis’, Global Governance, 8(2): 179–94.

  • Narine, S. (2012) ‘Asia, ASEAN and the question of sovereignty: The persistence of non-intervention in the Asia-Pacific’, in M. Beeson and R. Stubbs (eds) Routledge handbook on Asian regionalism, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 155–65.

  • Nasir, K.M. and Turner, B. S. (2013) ‘Governing as gardening: Reflections on soft authoritarianism in Singapore’, Citizenship Studies, 17(3/4): 339–52.

  • Nasu, H., McLaughlin, R., Rothwell, D.R. and Tan, S.S. (2019) The legal authority of ASEAN as a security institution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Neher, C.D. (1991) ‘Democratization in Southeast Asia’, Asian Affairs: An American Review, 18(3): 139–52.

  • Neher, C.D. (1994) ‘Asian style democracy’, Asian Survey, 34(11): 949–61.

  • Nesadurai, H.S. and Djiwandono, J.S. (eds) (2009) Southeast Asia in the global economy: Securing competitiveness and social protection, Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.

  • Ng, E. (2017) ‘China upholds rules-based order, says Chinese general in response to US’, Today, 3 June, http://www.todayonline.com/world/china-upholds-rules-based-order-says-chinese-general-response-us

  • Ng, J. (2012) ‘ASEAN human rights declaration: A pragmatic compromise’, RSIS Commentaries, CO12211, 21 November, https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/cms/1873-asean-human-rights-declaration/#.WuKxFE0h33g

  • Ng, K. (2017) ‘Building owners may have to beef up security measures under new bill’, Today, 11 September, http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/more-stringent-security-requirements-buildings-essential-services-iconic-infrastructure

  • Ngu, R. (2017) ‘A cry for help: Malaysia scales up humanitarian aid for Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh’, MIMS, 20 October, https://today.mims.com/a-cry-for-help-malaysia-scales-up-humanitarian-aid-for-rohingya-refugees-in-bangladesh

  • Nguyen, L. (2015) ‘South China Sea: Philippines v. China’, The Diplomat, 27 July, http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/south-china-sea-philippines-v-china/

  • Nguyen, V.T. (2002) ‘Vietnam-ASEAN co-operation after the cold war and the continued search for a theoretical framework’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24(1): 106–20.

  • Nhung, T.B. (2016) ‘Managing anti-China nationalism in Vietnam: Evidence from the media during the 2014 oil rig crisis’, The Pacific Review, 30(2): 169–87.

  • Niebuhr, R. (1932) Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

  • Nix-Stevenson, D. (2013) ‘Human response to natural disasters’, SAGE Open, July-September: 1–12.

  • Nkiwane, T. (2001) ‘Peacekeeping in Africa: Prospects for the future?’, African Journal of Political Science / Revue Africaine de Science Politique, 6(2): 97–108.

  • Nolte, G. (2005) ‘Sovereignty as responsibility?’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 30 March 30–2 April: 389–92.

  • Norman, J. (2014) Edmund Burke: The visionary who invented modern politics, New York: Harper Collins.

  • Nouwen, H.M. (2013) The wounded healer: Ministry in contemporary society, New York: Crown Publishing Group.

  • Oakeshott, M. (1975) On human conduct, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • O’Donnell, G.A. (1994) ‘Delegative democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5(1): 55–69.

  • O’dwyer, S. (2003) ‘Democracy and Confucian values’, Philosophy East and West, 3(1): 39–61.

  • Oksala, J. (2005) Foucault on freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Olson, M. Jr. (1965) The logic of collective action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • O’Neill, J. (1994) ‘Should communitarians be nationalists?’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 11(2): 135–43.

  • Osgood, R.E. (1953) Ideals and self-interest in America’s foreign relations: The great transformation of the twentieth century, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Osman, N. (2009) ‘Talks with Malaysia on Ambalat border dispute to resume in July’, The Jakarta Globe, 16 June, http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/national/talks-with-malaysia-on-ambalat-border-dispute-to-resume-in-july/312607

  • Paipais, V. (2011) ‘Self and other in critical international theory: Assimilation, incommensurability and the paradox of critique’, Review of International Studies, 37(1): 121–40.

  • Palmujoki, E. (2001) Regionalism and globalism in Southeast Asia, Houndmills and New York: Palgrave.

  • Panda, A. (2015) ‘Here’s how Malaysia and Indonesia plan to resolve their territorial disputes’, The Diplomat, 10 February, http://thediplomat.com/2015/02/heres-how-malaysia-and-indonesia-plan-to-resolve-their-territorial-disputes/

  • Parameswaran, P. (2015) ‘The trouble with Indonesia’s new counterterrorism command’, The Diplomat, 11 June, https://thediplomat.com/2015/06/the-trouble-with-indonesias-new-counterterrorism-command/

  • Parameswaran, P. (2018a) ‘A new Philippines naval station in Sulu?’ The Diplomat, 5 March, https://thediplomat.com/2018/03/a-new-philippines-naval-station-in-sulu/

  • Parameswaran, P. (2018b) ‘What’s next for the new ASEAN “Our Eyes” intelligence initiative?’, The Diplomat, 27 January, https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/asean-launches-new-our-eyes-intelligence-initiative/

  • Parameswaran, P. (2018c) ‘Why the first China-ASEAN maritime exercise matters’, The Diplomat, 22 October, https://thediplomat.com/2018/10/why-the-first-china-asean-maritime-exercise-matters/

  • Paris, F. and Ghei, N. (2003) ‘The role of reciprocity in international law’, Cornell International Law Journal, 36(1): 93–123.

  • Paris, R. (2014) ‘The “responsibility to protect” and the structural problems of preventive humanitarian intervention’, International Peacekeeping, 21(5): 569–603.

  • Paris, R. and Sisk, T.D. (eds) (2009) Dilemmas of statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of postwar peace operations, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Patrick, S. (2000) ‘America’s retreat from multilateral engagement’, Current History, 99: 430–39.

  • Patrick, S. (2014) ‘The unruled world: The case for good enough global governance’, Foreign Affairs, 39(1): 58–73.

  • Pattison, J. (2010) Humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect: Who should intervene? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pattison, J. (2011) ‘The ethics of humanitarian intervention in Libya’, Ethics & International Affairs, 25(3): 271–77.

  • Paul, E. (2010) Obstacles to democratisation in Southeast Asia: A study of the nation state, regional and global order, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Paul, R. (2017) ‘Malaysian aid ship to help Rohingyas arrives in Bangladesh’, Reuters, 13 February, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-rohingya-malaysia-bangladesh/malaysian-aid-ship-to-help-rohingyas-arrives-in-bangladesh-idUSKBN15S179

  • Pauker, G.J. (1985) ‘Government responses to armed insurgency in Southeast Asia: A comparative assessment of failures and successes and their likely implications for the future’, The Rand Paper Series P-7081, June, Santa Monica, CA: Research and Development Corporation (RAND).

  • Peou, S. (2002/03) ‘Withering realism? A review of recent security studies on the Asia-Pacific region’, Pacific Affairs, 75(4): 575–84.

  • Peou, S. (2014) ‘The limits and potential of liberal democratisation in Southeast Asia’, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 33(3): 19–47.

  • Peperzak, A.T. (1996) ‘Note to “Is Ontology Fundamental”?’, in A.T. Peperzak, S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds), Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–2.

  • Pepinsky, T. (2017) ‘Democracy isn’t receding in Southeast Asia, authoritarianism is enduring’, East Asia Forum, 4 November, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/11/04/democracy-isnt-receding-in-southeast-asia-authoritarianism-is-enduring/

  • Petty, M. (2012) ‘Rohingya Muslims “persecuted” after Myanmar crackdown: report’, Reuters, 6 August, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-violence-idUSBRE87005A20120801

  • Petz, D. (2014) Strengthening regional and national capacity for disaster risk management: The case for ASEAN, Brookings-LSE Project on Internal Displacement, November, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

  • Pfortmüller, F. (2018) ‘Why communities based on reciprocity are selling themselves short’, Medium, 30 April, https://medium.com/@pforti/the-danger-of-reciprocity-based-communities-d328446c7057

  • Philippine Daily Inquirer (2017) ‘Tunnels reveal terrorists’ ratlike tactics’, Philippine Daily Inquirer, 27 October, http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/940926/tunnels-reveal-terrorists-ratlike-tactics

  • Phillips, T., Holmes, O. and Bowcott, O. (2016) ‘Beijing rejects tribunal’s ruling in South China Sea case’, The Guardian, 12 July, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/12/philippines-wins-south-china-sea-case-against-china

  • Pisanò, A. (2016) ‘Towards an ASEAN human rights mechanism: The ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Women and Children’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(3): 321–42.

  • Plett, B. (2012) ‘Small countries call for more transparency at the United Nations’, BBC News, 19 May, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-18123768

  • Pogge, T. (1999) ‘Human flourishing and universal justice’, Social Philosophy & Policy, 16(1): 333–61.

  • Pohl, C.D. (1999) Making room: Recovering hospitality as a Christian tradition, Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

  • Polanyi, K. (2001) The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time, second edition, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

  • Pongsudhirak, T. (2017) ‘Cambodia leads way as S-E Asia takes authoritarian route’, Today, 25 September, https://www.todayonline.com/commentary/cambodia-leads-way-s-e-asia-takes-authoritarian-route

  • Pushpanathan, S. (2010) ‘Opinion: No place for passive regionalism in ASEAN’, The Jakarta Post, 7 April, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2010/04/07/no-place-passive-regionalism-asean.html

  • Puspitaningtyas, Y. (2017) ‘Resolving the Rohingya crisis the Asean way: The Jakarta Post columnist’, The Straits Times, 7 September, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/resolving-the-rohingya-crisis-the-asean-way-the-jakarta-post-columnist

  • Putnam, H. (2002) ‘Levinas and Judaism’, in S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) The Cambridge companion to Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–62.

  • Pye, L. (1997) Asian power and politics: The cultural dimension of authority, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Rahardja, S. and Patunru, A. (2015) ‘Trade protectionism in Indonesia: Bad times and bad policy’, Lowy Analyses, 30 July, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/trade-protectionism-indonesia-bad-times-and-bad-policy

  • Ramakrishna, K. (2005) ‘“The Southeast Asian approach’ to counter-terrorism: Learning from Indonesia and Malaysia’, The Journal of Conflict Studies, 25(1), https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/jcs/article/view/189/333

  • Ramakrishna, K. and Tan, S.S. (eds) (2003) After Bali: The threat of terrorism in Southeast Asia, Singapore: World Scientific.

  • Reus-Smit, C. (2001) ‘Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty’, Review of International Studies, 27(4): 519–38.

  • Richmond, O.P. (2006) ‘The problem of peace: understanding the “liberal peace”’, Conflict, Security & Development, 6(3): 291–314.

  • Richmond, O.P. (2009) ‘A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday’, Review of International Studies, 35: 557–80.

  • Richmond, O.P. (2010) ‘Resistance and the post-liberal peace’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38(3): 665–92.

  • Ricoeur, P. (1992) Oneself as another, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Ricoeur, P. (2005) The course of recognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Rogin, J. (2012) ‘Why didn’t the Chinese show up for Shangri-la?’, Foreign Policy, 1 June, https:// foreignpolicy.com/2012/06/01/why- didnt-the-chinese-show-up-for-shangri-la/

  • Rosato, S. (2003) ‘The flawed logic of democratic peace theory’, American Political Science Review, 97(4): 585–602.

  • Rose, G. (1992) The broken middle: Out of our ancient society, Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Rosenstock-Huessy, E. (1949) ‘Lecture 4 (19 May)’, Universal history, vol. 2, Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College, pp. 1–26.

  • Rosker, J.A. (2016) ‘Modern Confucianism and the concept of “Asian values”’, Asian Studies, 4(1): 153–64.

  • Rotberg, R. (2011) ‘Failed states, collapsed states, and weak states: Causes and indicators’, Wilson Center Project on Leadership and Building State Capacity, 7 July, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/statefailureandstateweaknessinatimeofterror.pdf

  • Rotberg, R. (2004) When states fail: Causes and consequences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Rothwell, D.R. (2018) ‘Australia and Timor Leste settle maritime boundary after 45 years of bickering’, The Conversation, 7 March, http://theconversation.com/australia-and-timor-leste-settle-maritime-boundary-after-45-years-of-bickering-92834

  • Roy, D. (1994) ‘Singapore, China, and the “soft authoritarian” challenge’, Asian Survey, 34(3): 231–42.

  • RSIS (2010a) Report of the regional consultation on the responsibility to protect (RtoP), organised by the RSIS Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies, 8–9 April. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University.

  • RSIS (2010b) Report of the policy roundtable on civilian protection: Issues and challenges, 9 February, funded by the Australian Responsibility to Protect Fund and the MacArthur Foundation Asia Security Initiative, Singapore: Centre for Non-traditional Security Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University.

  • Said, E.W. (1986) ‘Michael Walzer’s “Exodus and Revolution”: A Canaanite reading’, Grand Street, 5(2): 86–106.

  • Salleh, N.M. (2017) ‘Religious Rehabilitation Group adapts to combat evolving terror threat’, The Straits Times, 19 January, https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/singapolitics/religious-rehabilitation-group-adapts-to-combat-evolving-terror-threat

  • Sathasivam, S.K. (nd) ‘Defence diplomacy as significant instrument for enhancing the concept of deterrence in national defence policy’, https://www.scribd.com/document/61350593/Defence-Diplomacy

  • Savransky, R. (2017) ‘McCain takes on Tillerson’s “transactional” foreign policy’, The Hill, 8 May, http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/332341-mccain-pushes-back-on-tillerson-we-must-support-human-rights

  • Scanlon, T.M. (1998) What we owe to each other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Schiff, B.N. (2008) Building the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schneewind, J.B. (1993) ‘Kant and natural law ethics’, Ethics, 104(1): 53–74.

  • Schwarzenbach, S.A. (1991) ‘Rawls, Hegel, and communitarianism’, Political Theory, 19(4): 539–71.

  • Severino, R.C. (2001) ‘Will ASEAN be like the EU?’, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 23 March, http://www.aseansec.org/3112.htm

  • Severino, R.C. (2006) Southeast Asia in search of an ASEAN community: Insights from the former ASEAN secretary-general, Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.

  • Severino, R.C. (2007) ‘ASEAN beyond forty: Towards political and economic integration’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(3): 406–23.

  • Severino, R.C. (2009) The ASEAN Regional Forum, Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.

  • Shafie, M.G. (1982) Malaysia: International relations, Kuala Lumpur: Creative Enterprises.

  • Shapiro, M.J. (1999) ‘The ethics of encounter: Unreading, unmapping the imperium’, in D. Campbell and M.J. Shapiro (eds) Moral spaces: Rethinking ethics and world politics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 57–91.

  • Shepherd, A. (2014) The gift of the other: Levinas, Derrida, and a theology of hospitality, Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.

  • Shin, D.C. (2008) ‘The third wave in East Asia: Comparative and dynamic perspectives’, An Asian Barometer Conference on ‘The State of Democratic Governance in Asia’, 20–21 June, Taipei, http://asianbarometer.org/publications//479279b295fb71f1f9f78688b6f0a565.pdf

  • Shoji, T. (2013) ‘ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting (ADMM) and ADMM Plus: A Japanese perspective’, NIDS Journal of Defense and Security, 14: 3–17.

  • Shue, H. (1980) Basic rights: Subsistence, affluence, and US foreign policy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Simm, G. (2018) ‘Disaster response in Southeast Asia: The ASEAN agreement on disaster response and emergency management’, Asian Journal of International Law, 8(1): 116–42.

  • Simon, S.W. (1992) ‘The regionalisation of defence in Southeast Asia’, The Pacific Review, 5(2): 112–24.

  • Simon, S.W. (2006) ‘Realism and regionalism in Southeast Asia: The ARF and the war on terror’, in J.C. Liow and R. Emmers (eds) Order and security in Southeast Asia: Essays in memory of Michael Leifer, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 93–109.

  • Simmons, W.P. (1999) ‘The third: Levinas’ theoretical move from an-archical ethics to the realm of justice and politics’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 25(6): 83–104.

  • Singh, B. (2018) ‘Southeast Asian jihadi leaders in the post-Marawi era’, RSIS Commentaries, CO18007, 16 January, http://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CO18007.pdf

  • Singh, H. (1997) ‘Vietnam and ASEAN: The politics of accommodation’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 51(2): 215–29.

  • Singh, J. (2015) ‘Katibah Nusantara: Islamic State’s Malay archipelago combat unit’, RSIS Commentaries, CO15126, 26 May, https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/icpvtr/co15126-katibah-nusantara-islamic-states-malay-archipelago-combat-unit/#.WmWZWyOp2b8

  • Singh, M. (2011) ‘ASEAN must do more to boost competitiveness: Surin’, Business Times, 2 June, http://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/aci/wp-content/…/20110602_ACR_Launch-Business_Times.pdf

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2002) ‘The future of law: Protecting the rights of civilians’, Harvard International Review, 24(1) 6 May, http://hir.harvard.edu/article/?a=973

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2004) A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

  • Slaughter, A.-M. and Burke-White, W. (2002) ‘An international constitutional moment’, Harvard International Law Journal, 43(1): 1–21.

  • Smith, K. (2016) ‘South Africa and the responsibility to protect: From champion to sceptic’, International Relations, 30(3): 391–405.

  • Sokheng, V. (2013) ‘Thai and Cambodian rulers agree to civility’, The Phnom Penh Post, 18 June, http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/thai-and-cambodian-rulers-agree-civility

  • Spargo, R.C. (2006) Vigilant memory: Emmanuel Levinas, the holocaust, and the unjust death, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Spiro, P.J. (2000) ‘The new sovereigntists: American exceptionalism and its false prophets’, Foreign Affairs, 79(6): 9–15.

  • Stahn, C. (2007) ‘Responsibility to protect: Political rhetoric or emerging legal norm?’ American Journal of International Law, 101(1): 199–20.

  • Stashwick, S. (2017) ‘US Navy reports on collisions in Pacific – the USS John S. McCain’, The Diplomat, 20 November, https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/us-navy-reports-on-collisions-in-pacific-the-uss-john-s-mccain/

  • Steele, P. (2013) ‘Disaster preparedness: lessons from cyclone Nargis’, The Guardian, 16 July, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2013/jul/16/cyclone-nargis-burma-disaster-relief-aid

  • Stein, J.G. (1991) ‘Reassurance in international conflict management’, Political Science Quarterly, 106(3): 431–51.

  • Steiner, D. (2001) ‘Levinas’ ethical interruption of reciprocity’, Salmagundi, 130/131: 120–42.

  • Stevens, H. (2008) ‘Another kind of crusader state? Obama as global meliorist’, World Politics Review, 5 May, https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trend-lines/2062/another-kind-of-crusader-state-obama-as-global-meliorist

  • Storey, I. (2009) ‘Maritime security in Southeast Asia: Two cheers for regional cooperation’, in D. Singh (ed) Southeast Asian Affairs 2009, Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, pp. 36–58.

  • Storey, I. (2017) ‘Assessing the ASEAN-China framework for the code of conduct for the South China Sea’, Perspective, 62, 8 August. Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2017_62.pdf

  • Straits Times, The (2007) ‘Straits Times’ interview with Singapore foreign minister George Yeo’, The Straits Times, 2–3 October, http://app.mfa.gov.sg/pr/read_content.asp?View,8389

  • Straits Times, The (2015a) ‘Emergency hotline set up for Asean defence ministers’, The Straits Times, 3 November, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/emergency-hotline-set-up-for-asean-defence-ministers

  • Straits Times, The (2015b) ‘Indonesia’s Nahdlatul Ulama leads charge against ISIS’, The Straits Times, 28 November, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/indonesias-nahdlatul-ulama-leads-charge-against-isis

  • Straits Times, The (2017a) ‘Singapore urges calm from all sides in Myanmar conflict, offers to work with Asean to provide humanitarian aid’, The Straits Times, 8 September, http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/singapore-says-ready-to-work-with-myanmar-to-restore-peace-and-stability-in-rakhine-state

  • Straits Times, The (2017b) ‘Asean, China to formally endorse South China Sea code of conduct framework’, The Straits Times, 1 August, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/asean-china-to-formally-endorse-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct-framework

  • Straits Times, The (2017c) ‘Malaysian teacher Mahmud Ahmad seen as new “emir” of pro-ISIS militants in South-east Asia’, The Straits Times, 16 October, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/malaysian-teacher-mahmud-ahmad-seen-as-new-emir-of-pro-isis-militants-in-south-east

  • Straits Times, The (2017d) ‘Indonesia proposes “mini-Interpol” plan to boost Asean counter-terrorism efforts’, The Straits Times, 24 October, http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/indonesia-proposes-mini-interpol-plan-to-boost-asean-counter-terrorism-efforts

  • Straits Times, The (2018) ‘Another former S Korean president lands in prison’, The Straits Times, 24 March, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/another-former-s-korean-president-lands-in-prison

  • Stubbs, R. (1992) ‘Subregional security cooperation in ASEAN: Military and economic imperatives and political obstacles’, Asian Survey, 32(5): 397–410.

  • Stubbs, R. (2002) ‘ASEAN plus three: Emerging East Asian regionalism?’ Asian Survey, 42(3): 440–55.

  • Stuenkel, O. (2012) ‘Is R2P a western idea?’, Post-Western World, 30 November, http://www.postwesternworld.com/2012/11/30/is-r2p-a-western-idea

  • Suganami, H. (2010) ‘The English school in a nutshell’, Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, 9: 15–28.

  • Sukma, R. (2012) ‘The ASEAN political and security community (APSC): Opportunities and constraints for the R2P in Southeast Asia’, The Pacific Review, 25(1): 135–52.

  • Sussangkarn, C. (2010) The Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization: Origin, development and outlook, Governance Working Papers 22821, July. Canberra, ACT: East Asian Bureau of Economic Research, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University.

  • Sussangkarn, C. (2017) ‘Does the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization make a difference?’, East Asia Forum, 21 May, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/05/31/does-the-chiang-mai-initiative-multilateralisation-make-a-difference/

  • Talentino, A.K. (2005) Military intervention after the cold war: The evolution of theory and practice, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

  • Tan, C.K. (2017) ‘Cracks appear in ASEAN over Rohingya crisis’, Nikkei Asian Review, 25 September, https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-Relations/Cracks-appear-in-ASEAN-over-Rohingya-crisis

  • Tan, E.B. (2017) ‘Mutual trust is central in efforts to counter terrorism’, Today, 24 June, http://www.todayonline.com/commentary/commentary-mutual-trust-central-efforts-counter-terrorism

  • Tan, H.-L. (2011) The ASEAN intergovernmental commission on human rights: Institutionalising human rights in Southeast Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tan, S. (2006) ‘Lévinas and the question of civilisational amity after Sept. 11’, in L.E. Cady and S.W. Simon (eds) Disrupting violence: Religion and conflict in South and Southeast Asia, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 174–93.

  • Tan, S.S. (2011a) ‘Providers not protectors: Institutionalising responsible sovereignty in Southeast Asia’, Asian Security, 7(3): 201–17.

  • Tan, S.S. (2011b) ‘ASEAN Regional Forum at 18: Dealing with regional flashpoints’, East Asia Forum, 22 July, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2011/07/22/asean-regional-forum-at-18-dealing-with-regional-flashpoints/

  • Tan, S.S. (2012a) ‘Towards a “responsibility to provide”: Cultivating an ethic of responsible sovereignty in Southeast Asia’, in A. Francis, V. Popovski and C. Sampford (eds) Norms of protection: Responsibility to protect, protection of civilians and their interaction, Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 249–67.

  • Tan, S.S. (2012b) ‘“Talking their walk”? The evolution of defence regionalism in Southeast Asia’, Asian Security, 8(3): 232–50.

  • Tan, S.S. (2013a) ‘Herding cats: The role of persuasion in political change and continuity in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13(2): 233–65.

  • Tan, S.S. (2013b) The making of the Asia Pacific: Knowledge brokers and the politics of representation, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Tan, S.S. (2015) ‘Claims of Asean disunity at summit unfounded’, The Straits Times, 26 November, http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/claims-of-asean-disunity-at-summit-unfounded

  • Tan, S.S. (2016) ‘The ADMM-Plus: Regionalism that works?’, Asia Policy, 22: 70–75.

  • Tan, S.S. (2017a) ‘Providing for the other: Rethinking sovereignty and responsibility in Southeast Asia’, Critical Studies on Security, 5(3): 270–86.

  • Tan, S.S. (2017b) ‘A tale of two institutions: The ARF, ADMM-Plus and security regionalism in the Asia Pacific’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(2): 259–64.

  • Tan, S.S. (2017c) ‘Tan, ‘Rethinking “ASEAN centrality” in the regional governance of East Asia’, Singapore Economic Review, 62(3): 721–40.

  • Tan, S.S. (2018a) ‘In defence of ADMM+’, East Asia Forum Quarterly, 10(1), 30 April, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2018/04/30/in-defence-of-admm/

  • Tan, S.S. (2018b) ‘The ADMM and ADMM-Plus: Regional security mechanisms that work?’, Asia-Pacific Regional Security Assessment 2018, London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, pp. 165–75.

  • Tan, S.S. (2018c) ‘Sending in the cavalry: The growing militarisation of counterterrorism in Southeast Asia’, PRISM (The Journal of Complex Operations), 7(4), 8 November, https://cco.ndu.edu/News/Article/1682045/sending-in-the-cavalry-the-growing-militarization-of-counterterrorism-in-southe/

  • Tan, S.S. (2018d) ‘Singapore paving the way for greater regional security’, The Straits Times, 23 February, p. A21.

  • Tan, S.S. and Nasu, H. (2016) ‘ASEAN and the development of counter-terrorism law and policy in Southeast Asia’, UNSW Law Journal, 39(3): 1219–238.

  • Tan, S.S. and Ramakrishna, K. (2004) ‘Interstate and intrastate dynamics in Southeast Asia’s war on terror’, The SAIS Review of International Affairs, 24(1): 91–105.

  • Tan, S.C. and Tsjeng, Z.H. (2017) Track II network of ASEAN defence and security institutions (NADI): Commemorating 10 Years of NADI, Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University.

  • Tatransky, T. (2008) ‘A reciprocal asymmetry? Levinas’ ethics reconsidered’, Ethical Perspectives, 15(3): 293–307.

  • TEISS (2018) ‘R3: Resilience, response & recovery 2017’, TEISS, https://teiss.co.uk/events/r3-resilience-response-recovery-2018/

  • Teo, C.H. (2008) ‘Plenary speech by minister for defence Teo Chee Hean at the Shangri-La dialogue 2008’, Singapore Ministry of Defence, 1 June, http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/resources/speeches/2008/01jun08_speech.html

  • Teo, J. (2018) ‘Building resilience, reaffirming commitment’, Cyber Pioneer, 1 January, https://www.mindef.gov.sg/oms/imindef/resourcelibrary/cyberpioneer/topics/articles/features/2018/jan18_cs.html

  • Thakur, R. (2003) ‘It’s time to redefine a “just war”’, UNU Update, 27, September-October, http://update.unu.edu/archive/issue27_2.htm

  • Thakur, R. (2004) ‘Developing countries and the intervention-sovereignty debate’, in R.M. Price and M.W. Zacher (eds) The United Nations and global security, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 194–208.

  • Thakur, R. (2015) ‘R2P’s “structural” problems: A reply to Roland Paris’, International Peacekeeping, 22(1): 11–25.

  • Thakur, R. (2016) ‘The responsibility to protect at 15’, International Affairs, 92(2): 415–34.

  • Thakur, R. and Weiss, T.G. (2009) ‘R2P: From idea to norm – and action?’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1): 22–53.

  • Thayer, C.A. (2010) ‘Background briefing: 7th ASEAN chiefs of defence force informal meeting, 7 April’, Thayer Consultancy Brief, 7 April, http://www.scribd.com/doc/29566086/Thayer-ASEAN-Chiefs-of-Defense-Force-Meeting

  • Thayer, C.A. (2012) ‘Shangri-La dialogue: The ghost of China past’, Thayer Consultancy Brief, 2 June, http://www.scribd.com/doc/95615220/Thayer-Shangri-La-Dialogue-The-Ghost-of-China-Past

  • Today (2014) ‘Former ISD chief opens up on Mas Selamat’s escape’, Today, 23 January, https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/former-isd-chief-opens-mas-selamats-escape

  • Today (2016a) ‘Singapore urges respect for court ruling on South China Sea’, Today, 12 July, http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/singapore-south-china-sea-ruling-reaction

  • Today (2016b) ‘Chinese social users lash out at Singapore over S. China Sea dispute’, Today, 23 August, http://www.m.todayonline.com/chinaindia/china/chinese-social-media-users-lash-pit-at-sungapore-over-s-china-sea-dispute

  • Torode, G. (2016) ‘Chinese coast guard involved in most South China Sea clashes: research’, South China Morning Post, 7 September, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-china-coastguard-idUSKCN11C2LA

  • Torode, G. and Martina, M. (2014) ‘Search for MH370 reveals a military vulnerability for China’, Reuters, 23 April, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-navy/search-for-mh370-reveals-a-military-vulnerability-for-china-idUSBREA3L1P120140422

  • Tow, W.T. (2001) Asia-Pacific security relations: Seeking convergent security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tseng, H.Z. (2017) ‘The case for making ADMM-Plus an annual meeting’, The Diplomat, 2 August, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/the-case-for-making-admm-plus-an-annual-meeting/

  • Tu, W.-M. (ed) (1996) Confucian traditions in East Asian modernity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • UN (2005) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly: 60/1, 2005 World Summit Outcome, United Nations General Assembly A/RES/60/1, 24 October, http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan021752.pdf

  • UN (2006a) UN Security Council resolution 1674, United Nations Security Council S/RES/1674, 28 April, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/331/99/PDF/N0633199.pdf?OpenElement

  • UN (2006b) Protection of civilians in armed conflict, Resolution 1764 (2006) adopted by the United Nations Security Council, S/RES/1674 (2006), 28 April, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/331/99/PDF/N0633199.pdf?OpenElement

  • UN (2009) Implementing the responsibility to protect, Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations A/63/677, 12 January, http://globalr2p.org/pdf/SGR2PEng.pdf

  • UN (2013) ‘UN court rules for Cambodia in Preah Vihear temple dispute with Thailand’, UN News Centre, 11 November, http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=46461#.V2jTW00kqM8

  • UN (2017) Myanmar: Humanitarian Bulletin 3, 23 September – 13 November. New York: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

  • US Department of State (1994) ‘Chairman’s statement: The first ASEAN Regional Forum ministerial meeting, Bangkok, Thailand, 25 July 1994’, https://2001–2009.state.gov/t/ac/csbm/rd/4377.htm

  • Valencia, M.J. (2017) ‘A South China Sea code of conduct? Don’t get your hopes up’, The Diplomat, 30 May, https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/a-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct-dont-get-your-hopes-up/

  • Valevicius, A. (1988) From the other to the totally other: The religious philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas, New York: Peter Lang.

  • Vandevelde, T. (1997) ‘Communitarianism and patriotism’, Ethical Perspectives, 4(2): 180–90.

  • Vatikiotis, M. (2017) ‘Southeast Asia’s democratic deficit’, The Strategist, 15 June, https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/southeast-asias-democratic-deficit/

  • Vidmar-Horvat, K. (2013) ‘A wandering paradigm, or is cosmopolitanism good for women?’, QJB: Querelles. Jahrbuch für Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, 16 (28 January), http://www.querelles.de/index.php/qjb/article/view/3/5

  • Voice of Vietnam (2010) ‘ADMM retreat held in Hanoi’, The Voice of Vietnam, 11 October, http://en.baomoi.com/Home/world/english.vovnews.vn/ADMM-Retreat-held-in-Hanoi/71631.epi

  • Voice of Vietnam (2016) ‘ASEAN affirms commitment to universal periodic review mechanism’, The Voice of Vietnam, 24 September, http://english.vov.vn/world/asean-affirms-commitment-to-universal-periodic-review-mechanism-331962.vov

  • Volkmann, R. (2008) ‘Why does ASEAN need a charter? Pushing actors and their national interests’, ASIEN, 109: 78–87.

  • Waever, O. (1998) ‘The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations’, International Organization, 52(4): 686–727.

  • Waldenfels, B. (2002) ‘Levinas and the face of the other’, in S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) The Cambridge companion to Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–81.

  • Walker, R.J. (1993) Inside/outside: International relations as political theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wallenfang, D. (2016) ‘Levinas and Marion on law and freedom: Toward a new dialectical theology of justice’, Pacifica: Australasian Theological Studies, 29(1): 71–98.

  • Walter, A. and Zhang, X. (eds) (2012) East Asian capitalism: Diversity, continuity, and change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Walzer, M. (1977) Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations, New York: Basic Books.

  • Walzer, M. (1980) ‘The moral standing of states: A response to four critics’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 9(3): 209–29.

  • Walzer, M. (1984a) ‘Liberalism and the art of separation’, Political Theory, 12(3): 315–30.

  • Walzer, M. (1984b) Exodus and revolution, New York: Basic Books.

  • Wang, S.-S. (2016) ‘Nuclear disaster in Taiwan: A multidimensional security challenge’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 28(3): 289–305.

  • Warner, D. (1993) ‘An ethic of responsibility in international relations and the limits of responsibility/community’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 18(4): 431–52.

  • Warner, D. (1996) ‘Levinas, Buber and the concept of otherness in international relations: A reply to David Campbell’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 25(1): 111–28.

  • Warner, D. (1999) ‘Searching for responsibility/community in international relations’, in D. Campbell and M. J. Shapiro (eds) Moral spaces: Rethinking ethics and world politics, London and Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–28.

  • Washington Times, The (2017) ‘The latest: Indonesia sends 34 tons of aid for Rohingya’, The Washington Times, 12 September, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/12/the-latest-indonesia-sends-34-tons-of-aid-for-rohi/

  • Weber, C. (1995) Simulating sovereignty: Intervention, the state and symbolic exchange, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Weber, M. (1946) ‘Politics as a vocation’, in H. Gerth and C.W. Mills (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–129.

  • Wee, C.W.-L. (2007) The Asian modern: Culture, capitalist development, Singapore, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Weiss, T.G. (2004) ‘The sunset of humanitarian intervention? The responsibility to protect in a unipolar era’, Security Dialogue, 35(2): 135–53.

  • Weiss, T.G. (2006) ‘R2P after 9/11 and the world summit’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 24(3): 741–60.

  • Weiss, T. (2007) Humanitarian intervention, Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics’, International Organization, 46(2): 391–425.

  • Wendt, A. (1994) ‘Collective identity formation and the international state’, The American Political Science Review, 88(2): 384–96.

  • Western, J. and Goldstein, J.S. (2011) ‘Humanitarian intervention comes of age: Lessons from Somalia to Libya’, Foreign Affairs, 90(6): 48–59.

  • Westphal, M. (1999) ‘Of God who comes to mind, by Emmanuel Levinas’, Modern Theology, 15(4): 522–24.

  • Wheeler, N.J. (2000) Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Wheeler, N.J. (2001) ‘Legitimating humanitarian intervention: Principles and procedures’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 2(2): 550–67.

  • Wheeler, N.J. and Bellamy, A.J. (2005) ‘Humanitarian intervention in world politics’, in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds) The globalization of world politics, 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 510–25.

  • Wiener, J. and Schrire, R.A. (2010) ‘International relations’, in P. Bilgin, P.D. Williams, M. Sekiguchi, J.K. Galbraith, S.T. Inayatullah, J. Wiener, R.A. Schrire and I.L. Murphy (eds) Global security and international political economy, vol. II, London: EOLSS for UNESCO, pp. 347–79.

  • Wight, M. (1960) ‘Why is there no international theory?’, International Relations, 2(35): 35–48.

  • Wihardja, M.M. (2011) ‘Second-generation reform in Asia’, East Asia Forum, 18 August, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2011/08/18/second-generation-reforms-the-key-to-deeper-regional-cooperation/

  • Willaschek, M. (2009) ‘Right and coercion: Can Kant’s conception of right be derived from his moral theory?’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 17(1): 49–70.

  • Williams, J. (2016) ‘Pluralism, the English school and the challenge of normative theory’, E-International Relations, 11 February, https://www.e-ir.info/2016/02/11/pluralism-the-english-school-and-the-challenge-of-normative-theory/

  • Williams, P.D. (2009) ‘The responsibility to protect, norm localisation and African international society’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(3): 392–416.

  • Woo, J.-G. (2014) ‘Teaching the unknowable other: Humanism of the other by E. Lévinas and pedagogy of responsivity’, Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(1): 79–88.

  • Woon, W. (2016) The ASEAN charter: A commentary, Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.

  • Wu, S.-S. (2016) ‘Nuclear disaster in Taiwan: A multidimensional security challenge’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 28(3): 289–305.

  • Wyschogrod, E. (1974) Emmanuel Levinas: The problem of ethical metaphysics, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Yong, C. (2018) ‘Singapore takes the hot seat: Steering Asean amid challenges’, The Straits Times, 14 January, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/taking-the-hot-seat-steering-asean-amid-challenges

  • Yuzawa, T. (2006) ‘The evolution of preventive diplomacy in the ASEAN Regional Forum: Problems and prospects.’, Asian Survey, 46(5): 785–804.

  • Zaborowski, H. (2000) ‘On freedom and responsibility: Remarks on Sartre, Levinas and Derrida’, HeyJ, 41: 47–65.

  • Zakaria, F. (1994) ‘Culture is destiny: A conversation with Lee Kuan Yew’, Foreign Affairs, 73(2): 109–26.

  • Zeck, Z. (2014) ‘Southeast Asia retreats from democracy’, The Diplomat, 29 May, https://thediplomat.com/2014/05/southeast-asia-retreats-from-democracy/

  • Zin, M. and Joseph, B. (2012) ‘The opening in Burma: The democrats’ opportunity, Journal of Democracy, 23(4): 104–19.

  • Zlomislic, M. (2007) Jacques Derrida’s aporetic ethics, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

  • Zwingel, S. (2012) ‘How do norms travel? Theorising international women’s rights in transnational perspective’, International Studies Quarterly, 56(1): 115–29.

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 248 189 32
Full Text Views 2 0 0
PDF Downloads 2 2 0

Altmetrics