7: Conclusion: Contradictions and Alternatives to Data Commodification

Publication Date:
16 Jul 2021
Pages:
157–176
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529212389.ch007
Restricted access
Rights and permissions Cite this chapter
Buy article/chapter (GBP  £20.00)

The capitalist mode of production in which digital monopolies dominate as the most valuable companies is filled with contradictions. New material for commodification and capital accumulation is surface and background data, collected and processed from web search, social networking, cloud computing, apps, and other products and services. Much of the economic processes follow a familiar story in the history of capitalist development. Monopolies, seen by mainstream economics as nothing but aberrations from perfect competition, are, in fact, regularly occurring phenomena in the history of capitalism (Foster & McChesney, 2012; Harvey, 2014; Christophers, 2016). Yet, ‘perfect monopolies’ are equally hard to find as ‘perfect competition’ since there is almost never a single seller of a commodity in the market. Nonetheless, whether we talk about oil companies, banks, airlines, pharmaceutical companies, retailers, car manufacturers, or digital services, capital always has a tendency for concentration and centralization.

It is partially an economic process driven by the need to reduce uncertainties of competition, secure growth, maintain profit rates, control and exploit labour, and harness efficiencies of scale and scope. It is also a legal process since the state(s) organize market conditions for the exchange of commodities and boundaries for capital accumulation, expansion, and reproduction. Commodification of data requires multiple legal and regulatory interventions, primarily through privatization of scientific and technical discoveries, which is evident in the rise of intellectual property rights. Privatization of knowledge leads to private appropriation of wealth from technological innovation, usually funded in the early stages by massive public investments.

  • Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. MIT Press.

  • Ackerman S.A., & Rushe D. (2014). Microsoft, Facebook, Google and Yahoo release US surveillance requests. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/03/microsoft-facebook-google-yahoo-fisa-surveillance-requests

  • Agger, B. (1976). Marcuse & Habermas on new science. Polity, 9(2), 158–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234393

  • AI Now Institute. (2018). Algorithmic Accountability Policy Toolkit. AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/aap-toolkit.pdf

  • Albritton, R. (2003). Superseding Lukács: A contribution to the theory of subjectivity. In R. Albritton & J. Simoulidis (Eds), New Dialectics and Political Economy (pp 60–77). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Allmer, T. (2012). Towards a Critical Theory of Surveillance in Informational Capitalism. Peter Land.

  • Al-Rayes, H.T. (2012). Studying main differences between Android and Linux operating systems. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Sciences, 12(5), 46–9.

  • Althusser, L. (2014). On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Verso.

  • Amazon Workers and Supporters. (2018, 20 June). ‘Stop Treating Us Like Dogs!’: Worker Resistance at Amazon in Poland. Pluto Press. www.plutobooks.com/blog/worker-resistance-amazon-poland/

  • Amin, S. (2010). The Law of Worldwide Value. Monthly Review Press.

  • Amoore, L., & Piotukh, V. (2015). Life beyond big data: Governing with little analytics. Economy and Society, 44(3), 341–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1043793

  • Ananny, M. (2016). Toward an ethics of algorithms: Convening, observation, probability, and timeliness. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915606523

  • Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645

  • Andrejevic, M. (2002). The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 230–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180216561

  • Arthur, C. (2012). Digital Wars: Apple, Google, Microsoft and the Battle for the Internet. Kogan Page.

  • Asay, M. (2005). Open Source and the commodity urge: Disruptive models for a disruptive development process. In C. DiBona, M. Stone, & D. Cooper (Eds), Open Sources 2.0: The Continuing Evolution (pp 103–19). O’Reilly Media.

  • Backhaus, H.G. (1980). On the dialectics of the value-form. Thesis Eleven, 1(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551368000100108

  • Baker, C.E. (1992). Advertising and a democratic press. University of Pennsylvania Law, 140(6), 2097–43.

  • Baker, D., Jayadev, A., & Stiglitz, J. (2017). Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Development: A Better Set of Approaches for the 21st Century. AccessIBSA.

  • Banaji, J. (2010). Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation. Brill Academic Publishers.

  • Baran, P. (1973). The Political Economy of Growth. Penguin Books.

  • Baran, P., & Sweezy, P. (1968). Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. Modern Reader Paperbacks.

  • Baran, P., & Sweezy, P. (2013a). The quality of monopoly capitalist society: Culture and communications. Monthly Review, 65(3), 43–64.

  • Baran, P., & Sweezy, P. (2013b). Theses on advertising. Monthly Review, 65(3), 34–42.

  • Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439609526455

  • Barclay, W.J., & Stengel, M. (1975). Surplus and surplus value. Review of Radical Political Economics, 7(4), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/048661347500700404

  • Barron, A. (2013). Free software production as critical social practice. Economy and Society, 42(4), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2013.791510

  • BBC News. (2017). Google News Boss: “We Don’t Produce Media.” BBC News. www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-41251246/google-news-boss-we-re-not-a-media-company

  • Bellofiore, R., & Riva, T.R. (2015). The Neue Marx-Lektüre. Putting the critique of political economy back into the critique of society. Radical Philosophy, 189, 24–36.

  • Berry, D.M. (2008). Copy, Rip, Burn: The Politics of Copyleft and Open Source: The Politics of Open Source. Pluto Press.

  • Bhattacharya, T. (Ed.). (2017). Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentring Oppression. Pluto Press.

  • Bidet, J. (2007). New interpretations of capital. In S. Kouvelakis & J. Bidet (Eds), & G. Elliott (Trans.), Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism (pp 369–83). Brill.

  • Bilić, P. (2016). Search algorithms, hidden labour and information control. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171665215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716652159

  • Bilić, P. & Primorac, J. (2018). The digital advertising gap and the online news industry in Croatia. Media Studies, 9(18), 62–80.

  • Bilić, P. & Prug, T. (2020). Google’s post-IPO development: Risks, rewards, and shareholder value. Internet Histories. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2020.1864959

  • Birkinbine, B.J. (2015). Conflict in the commons: Towards a political economy of corporate involvement in free and Open Source Software. The Political Economy of Communication, 2(2), 3–19.

  • Bogenschneider, B., & Heilmeier, R. (2016). Google’s “Alphabet soup” in Delaware. Houston Business and Tax Law Journal, 16(1), 31.

  • Bohn, D. (2020, 14 January). Google to ‘Phase Out’ Third-party Cookies in Chrome, but Not for Two Years. The Verge. www.theverge.com/2020/1/14/21064698/google-third-party-cookies-chrome-two-years-privacy-safari-firefox

  • Bonefeld, W. (2014). Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason. Bloomsbury 3PL.

  • Bork, R.H. (1966). Legislative intent and the policy of the Sherman Act. Journal of Law and Economics, 9, 7–48.

  • Bork, R.H. (1993). The Antitrust Paradox (2nd edn). Free Press.

  • Bork, R.H., & Sidak, J.G. (2012). What does the Chicago School teach about internet search and the antitrust treatment of Google? Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 8(4), 663–700. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhs031

  • Borodovsky, L. (2020, 22 June). Stock market continues to ignore looming US political risks. The Wall Street Journal.

  • boyd, danah m., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878

  • boyd, danah m., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (1977). Media imperialism: Towards an international framework for the analysis of media systems. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds), Mass Communication and Society (pp 116–35). Edward Arnold.

  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (2006). Cyberspace, globalization and empire. Global Media and Communication, 2(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766506061815

  • Boyle, J. (2003). The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 33–74. JSTOR.

  • Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (25th anniversary ed). Monthly Review Press.

  • Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998, 14 April). The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference (WWW 1998), Brisbane, Australia.

  • Brown, V.F. (1987). The incompatibility of copyright and computer software: An economic evaluation and a proposal for a marketplace solution comment. North Carolina Law Review, 66(5), 977–1022.

  • Bryan, D., Rafferty, M., & Wigan, D. (2017). Capital unchained: Finance, intangible assets and the double life of capital in the offshore world. Review of International Political Economy, 24(1), 56–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1262446

  • Bunn, D., Asen, E., & Enache, C. (2020). Digital Taxation around the World. Tax Foundation.

  • Burnette, E. (2008, 4 June). Patrick Brady dissects Android. ZDNet. www.zdnet.com/article/patrick-brady-dissects-android/

  • Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171562251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

  • Cadwalladr, C., & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018, 17 March). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election

  • Candemir, Y., & Çelebi, D. (2017). An inquiry into the analysis of the transport and logistics sectors’ role in economic development. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4692–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.317

  • Caraway, B. (2011). Audience labor in the new media environment: A Marxian revisiting of the audience commodity. Media, Culture & Society, 33(5), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711404463

  • Carchedi, G. (2009). The fallacies of ‘new dialectics’ and value form theory. Historical Materialism, 17(1), 145–69.

  • Castillo, M. (2018, 11 April). Zuckerberg Tells Congress Facebook Is Not a Media Company: ‘I Consider Us to Be a Technology Company’. CNBC. www.cnbc.com/2018/04/11/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-is-a-technology-company-not-media-company.html

  • Castner, M. (1997). Copyright law: The software user interface student comment. Adelphia Law Journal, 12, 33–92.

  • Cavallone, E. (2020). Tech Giants Are Serious about Lobbying in Brussels. Euronews. www.euronews.com/2020/01/14/tech-giants-are-serious -about-lobbying-in-brussels

  • CB Insights. (2019). Visualizing Tech Giants’ Billion-Dollar Acquisitions. CB Insights Research. www.cbinsights.com/research/tech-giants-billion-dollar-acquisitions-infographic/

  • Chattopadhyay, P. (2012). Competition. In B. Fine & A. Saad-Filho (Eds), The Elgar Companion to Marxist Economics. Edward Elgar.

  • Chavern, D. (2020, 19 April). Opinion: Google and Facebook must pay for local journalism. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2020/04/19/opinion/coronavirus-newspapers-journalism.html

  • Chen, S. (2009). To surpass or to conform: What are public licenses for. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2009(1), 107–40.

  • Chertkovskaya, E., Paulsson, A., & Barca, S. (Eds). (2019). Towards a Political Economy of Degrowth. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

  • Chopra, S., & Dexter, S.D. (2008). Decoding Liberation: The Promise of Free and Open Source Software. Routledge.

  • Christophers, B. (2016). The Great Leveler: Capitalism and Competition in the Court of Law. Harvard University Press.

  • Clarke, S. (1991). Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology: From Adam Smith to Max Weber (2nd edn). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Cockshott, P. (2013). Heinrich’s idea of abstract labour. Critique, 41(2), 287–97.

  • Cohen, J.E. (2017). Law for the platform economy. U.C. Davis Law Review, 51, 133.

  • Couldry, N., & Turow, J. (2014). Advertising, big data, and the clearance of the public realm: Marketers’ new approaches to the content subsidy. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1710–26.

  • Court of Justice of the European Union. (2010). Press Release No 32/10: Judgement in Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08, Google France and Google Inc. Et al V Louis Vuitton Malletier et alhttps://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/CJE_10_32

  • Coyle, D. (2017a). The future of the national accounts: Statistics and the democratic conversation. Review of Income and Wealth, 63(s2), S223–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12333

  • Coyle, D. (2017b). The political economy of national statistics. In K. Hamilton & C. Hepburn (Eds), National Wealth: What Is Missing, Why It Matters. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803720.003.0002

  • Cremer, J., de Monjoye, Y.A., & Schweitzer, H. (2019). Competition Policy for the Digital Era. European Commission.

  • Dafermos, G., & Söderberg, J. (2009). The hacker movement as a continuation of labour struggle. Capital & Class, 33(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680909700104

  • Davis, J.B. (1992). The Economic Surplus in Advanced Economies. Edward Elgar.

  • Davis, L., & Orhangazi, Ö. (2019). Competition and monopoly in the US economy: What do industrial concentration data tell? Political Economy Research Institute, 68.

  • Dawson, M., & Foster, J.B. (1991). The tendency of the surplus to rise, 1963–1988. Monthly Review, 43(4), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-043-04-1991-08_4

  • Dellinger, A.J. (2019). How the Biggest Tech Companies Spent Half a Billion Dollars Lobbying Congress. Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/ajdellinger/2019/04/30/how-the-biggest-tech-companies-spent-half-a-billion-dollars-lobbying-congress/

  • Department of Justice. (2020). Justice Department Sues Monopolist Google for Violating Antitrust Laws. www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-monopolist-google-violating-antitrust-laws

  • Desrosières, A. (2010). The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning (C. Naish, Trans.; New edn). Harvard University Press.

  • Detter, D., & Fölster, S. (2018). Unlocking public wealth. Finance and Development, 55(1). www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2018/03/detter.htm

  • Devine, K.L. (2008). Preserving competition in multi-sided innovative markets: How do you solve a problem like Google. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 10(1), 61.

  • Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Algorithmic accountability: Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976411

  • DiEM25. (2019). Technological Sovereignty: Democratising Technology and Innovation (No. 2; Green Paper). DiEM25.

  • Domazet, M., Rilović, A., Ančić, B., Andersen, B., Richardson, L., Brajdić Vuković, M., Pungas, L., & Medak, T. (2020). Mental models of sustainability: The degrowth doughnut model. In Encyclopedia of the World’s Biomes (pp 276–86). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.12143-8

  • Donders, K., & Pauwels, C. (2008). Does EU policy challenge the digital future of public service broadcasting? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(3), 295–311.

  • Dourish, P. (2016). Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 205395171666512. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716665128

  • Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding Media Economics. SAGE.

  • Drahos, P. (2016). A Philosophy of Intellectual Property (1st edn). Routledge.

  • Durand, C., & Gueuder, M. (2018). The profit–investment nexus in an era of financialisation, globalisation and monopolisation: A profit-centred perspective. Review of Political Economy, 30(2), 126–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2018.1457211

  • Dusollier, S. (2002). Open source of copyleft: Authorship reconsidered. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 26(Issues 3 + 4), 281–96.

  • Dyer-Witheford, N. (2015). Cyber-proletariat: Global Labour in the Digital Vortex. Between the Lines; Pluto Press.

  • Elbe, I. (2013, October). Between Marx, Marxism, and Marxisms: Ways of reading Marx’s theory. Viewpoint Magazine. https://viewpointmag.com/2013/10/21/between-marx-marxism-and-marxisms-ways-of-reading-marxs-theory/

  • Elbe, I. (2018). Helmut Reichelt and the new reading of Marx. In B. Best, W. Bonefeld, & C. O’Kane (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory (Vol. 1, pp 367–85). SAGE.

  • Elken-Koren, N. (2011). Tailoring copyright to social production copyright culture, copyright history. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 12(1), 309–48.

  • European Commission. (2015). COM(2015) 192 final: A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0192

  • European Commission. (2016). Press Release – State Aid: Ireland Gave Illegal Tax Benefits to Apple Worth up to €13 Billion. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_16_2923

  • European Commission. (2017a). Antitrust: Commission Fines Google €2.42 Billion [Text]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_1784

  • European Commission. (2017b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: A Fair and Efficient Tax System in the European Union for the Digital Single Market. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017DC0547

  • European Commission. (2017c, 20 September). Fair Taxation of the Digital Economy [Text]. Taxation and Customs Union – European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/company-tax/fair-taxation-digital-economy_en

  • European Commission. (2018a). Press Release – Antitrust: Commission Fines Google €4.34 Billion for Illegal Practices Regarding Android Mobile Devices to Strengthen Dominance of Google’s Search Engine. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4581_en.htm

  • European Commission. (2018b). Proposal for a Council Directive Laying Down Rules Relating to the Corporate Taxation of a Significant Digital Presence. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018PC0147

  • European Commission. (2018c). Proposal for a Council Directive on the Common System of a Digital Services Tax on Revenues Resulting from the Provision of Certain Digital Services. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A148%3AFIN

  • European Commission. (2019). Antitrust: Google Fined €1.49 Billion for Online Advertising Abuse [Text]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_1770

  • European Parliament. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, 119, 1–88.

  • European Political Strategy Centre. (2019). Rethinking Strategic Autonomy in the Digital Age. European Commission.

  • Ezrachi, A., & Stucke, M.E. (2016a). Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-driven Economy. Harvard University Press.

  • Ezrachi, A., & Stucke, M.E. (2016b). Virtual competition. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 7(9), 585–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpw083

  • Fannin, R. (2018). China’s bat won’t battle the fangs in the US anytime soon. Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/rebeccafannin/2018/05/21/dont-count-on-chinas-baidu-alibaba-tencent-to-go-mainstream-in-the-u-s/

  • Feenberg, A. (1996). Marcuse or Habermas: Two critiques of technology. Inquiry, 39(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749608602407

  • Feenberg, A. (2010). Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. MIT Press.

  • Feenberg, A. (2014). The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukacs, and the Frankfurt School. Verso.

  • Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Harvard University Press.

  • Fisher, E. (2010). Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age: The Spirit of Networks. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Fisher, E. (2012). How less alienation creates more exploitation: Audience labour on social network sites. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10(2), 171–83. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i2.392

  • Forbes. (2019). The World’s Most Valuable Brands. Forbes. www.forbes.com/powerful-brands/list/

  • Foster, J.B. (2014a). The Theory of Monopoly Capitalism: An Elaboration of Marxian Political Economy. Monthly Review Press.

  • Foster, J.B. (Ed.). (2014b). The Baran Marcuse correspondence. Monthly Review, 65(10). https://monthlyreview.org/commentary/baran-marcuse-correspondence/

  • Foster, J.B. (2016). Monopoly capital at the half-century mark. Monthly Review, 68(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-068-03-2016-07_1

  • Foster, J.B., & McChesney, R.W. (2012). The Endless Crisis: How Monopoly-Finance Capital Produces Stagnation and Upheaval from the USA to China. Monthly Review Press.

  • Foster, J.B., & McChesney, R.W. (2014). Surveillance capitalism: Monopoly-finance capital, the military-industrial complex, and the digital age. Monthly Review, 66(3). https://monthlyreview.org/2014/07/01/surveillance-capitalism/

  • Foster, J.B., McChesney, R., & Jonna, J. (2011). Monopoly and competition in twenty-first century capitalism. Monthly Review, 62(11), 1–39.

  • Foster, J.B., Clark, B., & Michael, Y. (2018). Notes from the editors. Monthly Review, 70(2). https://monthlyreview.org/2018/06/01/mr-070-02-2018-06_0/

  • Franek, K. (2019). How Google Maps Makes Money: With Visuals and Revenue Estimate. www.kamilfranek.com/how-google-maps-makes-money/

  • Frankel, S.J., & Forrest, E. (2018). Essay: What remains of fair use for software after Oracle v. Google. New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 8(2), 310–23.

  • Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.

  • FTC. (2012, 10 August). FTC Approves Final Settlement with Facebook. Federal Trade Commission. www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2012/08/ftc-approves-final-settlement-facebook

  • FTC. (2019a). FTC’s $5 Billion Facebook Settlement: Record-breaking and History-making. Federal Trade Commission. www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2019/07/ftcs-5-billion-facebook-settlement-record-breaking-history

  • FTC. (2019b, 24 July). FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook. Federal Trade Commission. www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-imposes-5-billion-penalty-sweeping-new-privacy-restrictions

  • Fuchs, C. (2008). Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. Routledge.

  • Fuchs, C. (2010). Labor in informational capitalism and on the internet. The Information Society, 26(3), 179–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972241003712215

  • Fuchs, C. (2014a). Dallas Smythe reloaded: Critical media and communication studies today. In L. McGuigan & V. Manzerolle (Eds), The Audience Commodity in a Digital Age: Revisiting Critical Theory of Commercial Media (pp 267–88). Peter Lang. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/8yq8x/dallas-smythe-reloaded-critical-media-and-communication-studies-today

  • Fuchs, C. (2014b). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Fuchs, C. (2015). Dallas Smythe today – The audience commodity, the digital labour debate, Marxist political economy and critical theory. Prolegomena to a digital labour theory of value. In C. Fuchs & V. Mosco (Eds), Marx and the Political Economy of the Media (pp 522–99). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291416_019

  • Fuchs, C. (2017). Towards Marxian internet studies. In C. Fuchs & V. Mosco (Eds), Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism (pp 22–67). Haymarket Books.

  • Fuchs, C., & Fisher, E. (Eds). (2015). Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Fuller, R.A. (1982). Algorithm patentability after Diamond v. Diehr. Indiana Law Review, 15, 713–32.

  • Furman, J., Coyle, D., Fletcher, A., McAuley, D., & Mardsen, P. (2019). Unlocking Digital Competition: Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel. UK Government.

  • Gandesha, S. (2018). Totality and technological form. In B. Best, W. Bonefeld, & C. O’Kane (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory (Vol. 2, pp 642–60). SAGE.

  • Gandy, Jr., O.H. (1993). The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information. Westview Press.

  • Gates, B. (1976, 3 February). An Open Letter to Hobbyists. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/surf/072397mind-letter.html

  • Gehl, R.W. (2011). The archive and the processor: The internal logic of Web 2.0. New Media & Society, 13(8), 1228–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811401735

  • General Court of the European Union. (2020). Press Release No. 90/20: The General Court of the European Union Annuls the Decision Taken by the Commission Regarding Irish Tax Rulings in Favour of Apple. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7052/en/?annee=2020

  • Geringer, S. (2020). National digital taxes: Lessons from Europe. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 1–19.

  • Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738

  • Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P.J. Boczkowski, & K.A. Foot (Eds), Media Technologies (pp 167–94). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009

  • Glick, M. (2019). Antitrust and economic history: The historic failure of the Chicago School of antitrust. The Antitrust Bulletin, 64(3), 295–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X19863586

  • Goldman, R., Gabriel, R.P., & Meyer, C. (2005). Innovation Happens Elsewhere: Open Source as Business Strategy (1st edn). Morgan Kaufmann.

  • Google Inc. (2003). Google Acquires Applied Semantics. http://googlepress.blogspot.com/2004/04/google-acquires-applied-semantics.html

  • Graham, M., & Woodcok, J. (2018). Towards a fairer platform economy: Introducing the Fairwork Foundation. Alternate Routes, 29, 242–53.

  • Gratz, J., & Lemley, M.A. (2017). Platforms and interoperability in Oracle v. Google special issue: Software interface copyright. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Harvard JOLT), 31(Special Issue), 603–14.

  • Greenstein, S.M. (2015). How the Internet Became Commercial: Innovation, Privatization, and the Birth of a New Network. Princeton University Press.

  • Habermas, J. (1987). Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Polity Press.

  • Hamilton, K., & Banco Mundial. (2006). Where Is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the 21st Century. World Bank.

  • Hands, D.W. (2014). Paul Samuelson and revealed preference theory. History of Political Economy, 46(1), 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2398939

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard University Press.

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. Hamish Hamilton.

  • Hardy, J. (2014). Critical Political Economy of the Media. Routledge.

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Verso.

  • Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. Oxford University Press.

  • Haskel, J., & Westlake, S. (2018). Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy.

  • Hein, E. (2014). Distribution and Growth after Keynes: A Post-Keynesian Guide. Edward Elgar.

  • Heinrich, M. (2007). Invaders from Marx: On the uses of Marxian theory, and the difficulties of a contemporary reading. Left Curve, 31, 83–8.

  • Heinrich, M. (2009). Reconstruction or deconstruction? Methodological controversies about value and capital, and new insights from the critical edition. In Riccardo Bellofiore & R. Fineschi (Eds), Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives after the Critical Edition (pp 72–98). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Heinrich, M. (2012). An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital (A. Locascio, Trans.). Monthly Review Press.

  • Helft, M. (2008, 10 August). Is Google a media company? The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/technology/11google.html

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2010). User-generated content, free labour and the cultural industries. Ephemera, 10(3/4), 267–84.

  • Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the New Commons (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1356835). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1356835

  • Hilferding, R. (2005). Finance Capital: A Study in the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development (1st edn). Routledge.

  • Hillis, K., Petit, M., & Jarrett, K. (2013). Google and the Culture of Search. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Himmelweit, S. (1998). Mode of production. In T. Bottomore, L. Harris, V.G. Kiernan, & R. Miliband (Eds), A Dictionary of Marxist Thought (2nd edn, pp 379–81). Blackwell Publishing Limited.

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford University Press.

  • Hornborg, A. (2014). Technology as fetish: Marx, Latour, and the cultural foundations of capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(4), 119–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413488960

  • Hubbard, J. (2004). Open Source to the core. Queue, 2(3), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/1005062.1005064

  • Hudis, P. (2013). Marx’s Concept of Alternatives to Capitalism. Haymarket Books.

  • Huws, U. (2013). Working online, living offline: Labour in the internet age. Work, Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 7(1), 1–11.

  • Huws, U. (2019). Labour in Contemporary Capitalism: What Next? Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52042-5

  • Huws, U. (2020). Reinventing the Welfare State. Pluto Press. www.plutobooks.com/9780745341842/reinventing-the-welfare-state

  • IAB. (2019). AdEx Benchmark 2018. Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) Europe.

  • Internet Live Stats. (2020). 1 Second – Internet Live Stats. www.internetlivestats.com/one-second/

  • Introna, L.D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16, 169–85.

  • Irani, L. (2015). The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5), 720–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511926

  • Ivanovski, A., & McIntosh, B. (2019). EU Tax Policy Report, January – June 2019. CFE Tax Advisers Europe.

  • Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in their Place. Penn State University Press.

  • Jessop, R. (1990). Mode of production. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds), The New Palgrave: Marxian Economics (pp 289–96). Macmillan.

  • Jhally, S., & Livant, B. (1986). Watching as working: The valorization of audience consciousness. Journal of Communication, 36(3), 124–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01442.x

  • Jin, D.Y. (2015). Digital Platforms, Imperialism, and Political Culture. Routledge.

  • Johnson, L. (2002). Creating the software industry-recollections of software company founders of the 1960s. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 24(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/85.988576

  • Jullien, N., & Zimmermann, J.B. (2011). Floss firms, users and communities: A viable match? Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 7(1), 31–53.

  • Kang, C., & Frenkel, S. (2018, 4 April). Facebook says Cambridge Analytica harvested data of up to 87 million users. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/technology/mark-zuckerberg-testify-congress.html

  • Kayser-Brill, N. (2020). Ten Years on, Search Auto-complete Still Suggests Slander and Disinformation. AlgorithmWatch. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/story/auto-completion-disinformation/

  • Keen, S. (2011). Debunking Economics – Revised and Expanded Edition: The Naked Emperor Dethroned? (Revised, expanded edn). Zed Books.

  • Kelly, K. (1998). New Rules for the New Economy (1st edn). Viking.

  • Khan, L.M. (2016). Amazon’s antitrust paradox. Yale Law Journal, 126, 710–805.

  • Kicillof, A., & Starosta, G. (2007). On materiality and social form: A political critique of Rubin’s value-form theory. Historical Materialism, 15(3), 9–43. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920607X225852

  • Kincaid, J. (2007). Production vs. realisation: A critique of fine and Saad-Filho on value theory. Historical Materialism, 15(4), 137–65.

  • King, J.E. (2012). The Microfoundations Delusion: Metaphor and Dogma in the History of Macroeconomics. Edward Elgar.

  • Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 205395171452848. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481

  • Kolasky, W.J. (2004). What is competition? A comparison of US and European perspectives. The Antitrust Bulletin, 49(1–2), 39.

  • Krishnamurthy, S. (2005). An analysis of Open Source business models. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S.A. Hissam, & K.R. Lakhani (Eds), Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (pp 279–96). MIT Press.

  • Lakhani, K.R., & Wolf, R.G. (2003). Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects (http://ssrn.com/paper=443040) [MIT Sloan Working Paper].

  • Lazonick, W. (2014). Profits without Prosperity: How Stock Buybacks Manipulate the Market, and Leave Most Americans Worse Off. www.ineteconomics.org/research/research-papers/profits-without-prosperity-how-stock-buybacks-manipulate-the-market-and-leave-most-americans-worse-off

  • Lazonick, W., & Mazzucato, M. (2013). The risk-reward nexus in the innovation-inequality relationship: Who takes the risks? Who gets the rewards? Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 1093–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt019

  • Lazonick, W., Mazzucato, M., & Tulum, Ö. (2013). Apple’s changing business model: What should the world’s richest company do with all those profits? Accounting Forum, 37(4), 249–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.07.002

  • Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial labour. In P. Virno & M. Hardt (Eds), Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics (pp 132–47). University of Minnesota Press.

  • Lebowitz, M. (2010). The Socialist Alternative: Real Human Development. Monthly Review Press.

  • Lee, F., & Björklund Larsen, L. (2019). How should we theorize algorithms? Five ideal types in analyzing algorithmic normativities. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 205395171986734. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719867349

  • Lee, M. (2011). Google ads and the blindspot debate. Media, Culture & Society, 33(3), 433–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710394902

  • Lee, M. (2019). Alphabet: The Becoming of Google. Routledge.

  • Lenfant, J.-S. (2012). Indifference curves and the ordinalist revolution. History of Political Economy, 44(1), 113–55. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-1504077

  • Lenin, V.I. (1999). Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. Resistance Books.

  • Leslie, S.W. (2000). The biggest ‘angel’ of them all: The military and the making of Silicon Valley. In M. Kenney (Ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region (pp 48–67). Stanford University Press.

  • Levy, S. (2010). Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution – 25th Anniversary Edition (1st edn). O’Reilly Media.

  • Letter from Apple Inc. For the Record (2020). Testimony of Apple Inc. https://judiciary.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=2386

  • Lewin, S.B. (1996). Economics and psychology: Lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1293–323.

  • Lexchin, J. (2018). The pharmaceutical industry in contemporary capitalism. Monthly Review, 69(10). https://monthlyreview.org/2018/03/01/the-pharmaceutical-industry-in-contemporary-capitalism/

  • Linden, M. van der, & Hubmann, G. (2018). Introduction. In Marx’s Capital: An Unfinishable Project? (Vol. 159, pp 1–30). Brill. https://brill.com/abstract/book/edcoll/9789004367159/BP97815292123891.xml

  • Lipietz, A. (1987). Mirages and Miracles: The Crisis in Global Fordism. Verso.

  • Livant, B. (1979). The audience commodity: On the ‘blindspot’ debate. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 3(1), 91–117.

  • Lomas, N. (2020). EU digs in on digital tax plan, after US quits talks. TechCrunch. https://social.techcrunch.com/2020/06/18/eu-digs-in-on-digital-tax-plan-after-us-quits-talks/

  • Lotz, C. (2018). The culture industry. In B. Best, W. Bonefeld, & C. O’Kane (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory (Vol. 2, pp 973–87). SAGE.

  • Luchetta, G. (2014). Is the Google platform a two-sided market? Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 10(1), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht026

  • Lukács, G. (1972). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. MIT Press.

  • Lund, A., & Zukerfeld, M. (2020). Corporate Capitalism’s Use of Openness: Profit for Free? Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28219-6

  • Lunden, I. (2018). Amazon’s share of the US e-commerce market is now 49%, or 5% of all retail spend. TechCrunch. http://social.techcrunch.com/2018/07/13/amazons-share-of-the-us-e-commerce-market-is-now-49-or-5-of-all-retail-spend/

  • Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance after September 11. Polity Press.

  • Lyon, D. (2005). Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Automated Discrimination. Taylor and Francis.

  • Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 205395171454186. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861

  • MacKenzie, D. (2017). A material political economy: Automated trading desk and price prediction in high-frequency trading. Social Studies of Science, 47(2), 172–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716676900

  • Magdoff, H. (1969). The Age of Imperialism. Monthly Review Press.

  • Magdoff, H., & Sweezy, P. (1987). Stagnation and the Financial Explosion. Monthly Review Press.

  • Mager, A. (2012). Algorithmic ideology: How capitalist society shapes search engines. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 769–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.676056

  • Mandel, E. (1976). Late Capitalism. NLB.

  • Marcuse, H. (1971). An Essay on Liberation. Beacon Press.

  • Marcuse, H. (1998). Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse. Technology, War, and Fascism Volume 1 Volume 1 (D. Kellner, Ed.). Routledge.

  • Marcuse, H. (2007). One-dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Routledge.

  • Marcuse, H. (2009). Negations. MayFlyBooks.

  • Marr, B. (2018). How much data do we create every day? The mind-blowing stats everyone should read. Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/05/21/how-much-data-do-we-create-every-day-the-mind-blowing-stats-everyone-should-read/

  • Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. Data & Society Research Institute.

  • Marx, K. (1846). Letter from Marx to Pavel Vasilyevich Annenko. In Collected Works: Letters, 1844–51 (Vol. 38, pp 95–106). International Publishers. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1846/letters/46_12_28.htm

  • Marx, K. (1859). A contribution to the critique of political economy. Part One. In Collected Works: 1857–1861 (Vol. 29, pp 257–421). Lawrence & Wishart.

  • Marx, K. (1861). Economic manuscript of 1861–63, Notebooks 1–7. In Collected Works: Marx 1861–3 (Vol. 30). Lawrence & Wishart.

  • Marx, K. (1963). Theories of Surplus Value (S. Ryazaskaya, Ed.; E. Burns, Trans.; Vol. 1). Progress Publishers.

  • Marx, K. (1967). Capital (Vol. 1). Progress Publishers.

  • Marx, K. (1976). Capital (Vol. 1). Penguin.

  • Marx, K. (1978). Capital (D. Fernbach, Trans.; 2nd edn, Vol. 2). Penguin.

  • Marx, K. (1981). Capital (Vol. 3). Penguin.

  • Marx, K. (1987). Collected Works: Marx 1857–61 (Vol. 28). Lawrence & Wishart.

  • Marx, K. (1996). Capital: Vol. 1. Lawrence & Wishart.

  • Marx, K. (1998). Capital: Vol. 3. Lawrence & Wishart.

  • Marx, K. (2010). Collected Works: Capital Volume I (Vol. 35). Lawrence & Wishart.

  • Marx, K. (2015). Marx’s Economic Manuscript of 1864–1865 (F. Moseley, Ed.). Brill.

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1974). The German Ideology, Part One. Lawrence & Wishart.

  • Mattick, Jr., P. (1998). Economic form and social reproduction: On the place of ‘Book II’ in Marx’s critique of political economy. In C.J. Arthur & G. Reuten (Eds), The Circulation of Capital: Essays on Volume Two of Marx’s Capital (pp 17–32). Macmillan.

  • May, C. (2000). A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures? Routledge.

  • Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2014). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think Cover. Eamon Dolan/Mariner Books.

  • Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Myths in Risk and Innovation. Anthem Press.

  • Mazzucato, M. (2015). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths (Revised). Public Affairs.

  • Mazzucato, M. (2018a). The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. Allen Lane.

  • Mazzucato, M. (2018b). The entrepreneurial state: Socializing both risks and rewards. Real-World Economics Review, 84, 17.

  • McChesney, R.W. (2013). Digital Disconnect. The New Press.

  • McCue, T.J. (2018). SEO Industry Approaching $80 Billion But All You Want Is More Web Traffic. Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/tjmccue/2018/07/30/seo-industry-approaching-80-billion-but-all-you-want-is-more-web-traffic/

  • McStay, A. (2016). Digital Advertising. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Medak, T. (2013, 28 April). Reconsidering Economics, Struggles and Autonomy in the Digital Commons. DPU May Day School, Ljubljana, Slovenia. http://tom.medak.click/posts/commons/

  • Medak, T. (2017). Technologies for an Ecological Transition: A Faustian Bargain? [Working Paper]. Institute For Political Ecology, Zagreb.

  • Medak, T., & Mars, M. (2019). System of a takedown: Control and de-commodification in the circuits of academic publishing. In A. Lison (Ed.), Archives (pp 47–68). University of Minnesota Press and Meson Press.

  • Meehan, E.R. (1984). Ratings and the institutional approach: A third answer to the commodity question. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(2), 216–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038409360032

  • Menell, P.S. (2016). API copyrightability Bleak House: Unraveling and repairing the Oracle v. Google jurisdictional mess. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 31(3), 1515–96.

  • Menke, C. (2020). Critique of Rights (C. Turner, Trans.; 1st edn). Polity.

  • Milios, J., Dimoulis, D., & Economakis, G. (2002). Karl Marx and the Classics: An Essay on Value Crises and the Capitalist Mode of Production (illustrated edn). Ashgate Publishing Limited.

  • Miller, T., & Maxwell, R. (2017). Apple Inc. In B. Birkinbine, R. Gomez, & J. Wasko (Eds), Global Media Giants (pp 369–82). Routledge.

  • Mirowski, P., & Hands, W. (1998). A paradox of budgets: The postwar stabilization of American neoclassical demand theory. In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism (pp 260–89). Duke University.

  • Mischel, L., & Wolfe, J. (2019). CEO Compensation Has Grown 940% since 1978: Typical Worker Compensation Has Risen only 12% during That Time. Economic Policy Institute. www.epi.org/publication/ceo-compensation-2018/

  • Mittelstadt, B.D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 1–21.

  • Montalban, M., Frigant, V., & Jullien, B. (2019). Platform economy as a new form of capitalism: A Régulationist research programme. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(4), 805–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez017

  • Mosco, V. (2004). The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. MIT Press.

  • Mosco, V. (2014). To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. Paradigm Publishers.

  • Moss, D.L. (2019). The Record of Weak US: Merger Enforcement in Big Tech. American Antitrust Institute.

  • Moulier-Boutang, Y. (2011). Cognitive Capitalism. Polity Press.

  • Moz. (2020). Google Algorithm Update History. Moz. https://moz.com/google-algorithm-change

  • Murdock, G. (1997). Blindspots about Western Marxism: A reply to Dallas Smythe. In P. Golding & G. Murdock (Eds), The Political Economy of Media. Volume 1 (pp 465–75). Edward Elgar.

  • Murdock, G., & Golding, P. (2016). Political economy and media production: A reply to Dwyer. Media, Culture & Society, 38(5), 763–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716655094

  • Murdock, I. (2005). Open Source and the commoditization of software. In C. DiBona, M. Stone, & D. Cooper (Eds), Open Sources 2.0: The Continuing Evolution (pp 91–102). O’Reilly Media.

  • Murray, P. (1988). Marx’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge. Humanities Press International.

  • Murray, P. (1997). Redoubled empiricism: The place of social form and formal causality in Marxian theory. In New Investigations of Marx’s Method (pp 38–65). Humanities Press.

  • Murray, P. (1998). Beyond the ‘commerce and industry’ picture of capital. In C.J. Arthur & G. Reuten (Eds), The Circulation of Capital: Essays on Volume Two of Marx’s Capital (pp 33–66). Macmillan.

  • Murray, P. (2000). Marx’s ‘Truly social’ labour theory of value: Part I, abstract labour in Marxian value theory. Historical Materialism, 6(1), 27–66. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920600100414551

  • Murray, P. (2002a). The illusion of the economic. The Trinity formula and the ‘religion of everyday life’. In M. Campbell & G. Reuten (Eds), The Culmination of Capital: Essays on Volume Three of Marx’s Capital (pp 246–72). Palgrave.

  • Murray, P. (2002b). Reply to Geert Reuten. Historical Materialism, 10(1), 155–76. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920602760231695

  • Murray, P. (2005). The new giant’s staircase. Historical Materialism, 13(2), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206054127228

  • Murray, P. (2016). The Mismeasure of Wealth (Lam edn). BRILL.

  • Murray, P. (2018). Critical theory and the critique of political economy: From critical political economy to the critique of political economy. In B. Best, W. Bonefeld, & C. O’Kane (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory (Vol. 2, pp 764–82). SAGE.

  • Murray, P., & Badeen, D. (2016). A Marxian critique of neoclassical economics’ reliance on shadows of capital’s constitutive social forms. Crisis and Critique, 3(3), 8–28.

  • Murschetz, P.C. (2020). State aid for independent news journalism in the public interest? A critical debate of government funding models and principles, the market failure paradigm, and policy efficacy. Digital Journalism, 1–20.

  • Myers, B.A. (1998). A brief history of human-computer interaction technology. Interactions, 5(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/274430.274436

  • Nakamura, A.O., & Nakamura, L.I. (2015, 17 April). The System of National Accounts and Alternative Economic Perspectives. IARIW-OECD Special Conference: ‘W(h)ither the SNA?,’ Paris. http://iariw.org/papers/2015/nakamura.pdf

  • Nakamura, L. (2010). Intangible assets and national income accounting. Review of Income and Wealth, 56(1). http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1630588

  • Nakamura, L. (2015). Advertising, intangible assets, and unpriced entertainment. In A. Bounfour & T. Miyagawa (Eds), Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance (pp 11–26). Springer International Publishing.

  • Nakamura, L., Samuels, J., & Soloveichik, R. (2017). Measuring the ‘free’ digital economy within the GDP and productivity accounts. In Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers (DP-2017-03; Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence Discussion Papers). Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence. https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/escoed/escoe-dp-2017-03.html

  • Net Market Share. (2020). Operating System Market Share. https://netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share

  • Neustar. (2018). AdAge: Marketing Fact Pack 2019.

  • Newman, J.M. (2015). Anti-trust in zero-price markets: Foundations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 164(1), 149–206.

  • Newman, J.M. (2018). The myth of free. George Washington Law Review, 86(2), 513–86.

  • Newman, J.M. (2019). Antitrust in digital markets. Vanderbilt Law Review, 72(5), 1497–562.

  • Niels, G., & ten Kate, A. (2004). Introduction: Antitrust in the US and the EU – Converging or diverging paths? The Antitrust Bulletin, 49(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X0404900101

  • Nuss, S. (2006, 30 September). Property and Public Goods in View of Copyright and Copyleft. Value, Property, Public Goods, and Labour in Digitalized Capitalism, Thessaloniki, Greece. http://wbk.in-berlin.de/wp_nuss/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/thessal_input.pdf

  • Nuss, S., & Heinrich, M. (2001, April). Warum Freie Software dem Kapitalismus nicht viel anhaben kann. First Oekonux Conference, Dortmund, Germany. http://erste.oekonux-konferenz.de/dokumentation/texte/nuss.html

  • Nuss, S., & Stallman, R. (2005, 7 September). Paper ‘Digital Property’ by Sabine Nuss – Response to Stallman (Letter to oekonux). www.oekonux.org/list-en/archive/msg02796.html

  • OECD. (2009). System of National Accounts 2008. OECD.

  • OECD. (2014). Understanding National Accounts: Second Edition: 2014 (2nd revised edn). OECD.

  • Olsen, E.K. (2009). Social ontology and the origins of mode of production theory. Rethinking Marxism, 21(2), 177–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690902743096

  • Olsen, E.K. (2017). Productive and unproductive labor. In D. Brennan, D. Kristjanson-Gural, C.P. Mulder, & E.K. Olsen (Eds), Routledge Handbook of Marxian Economics (1st edn, pp 122–34). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774206-12

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html

  • Orhangazi, Ö. (2008). Financialisation and capital accumulation in the non-financial corporate sector: A theoretical and empirical investigation on the US economy: 1973–2003. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(6), 863–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben009

  • Orhangazi, Ö. (2018). The role of intangible assets in explaining the investment–profit puzzle. Cambridge Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey046

  • Pagano, U. (2014). The crisis of intellectual monopoly capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(6), 1409–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu025

  • Pagano, U., & Rossi, M.A. (2009). The crash of the knowledge economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4), 665–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep033

  • Papadimitriou, S., & Moussiades, L. (2018). Mac OS versus FreeBSD: A comparative evaluation. Computer, 51(2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.1451648

  • Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Books.

  • Parkhurst, B. (2019). Digital information and value: A response to Jakob Rigi. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 17(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v17i1.1078

  • Parry, G., Newnes, L., & Huang, X. (2011). Goods, products and services. In M. Macintyre, G. Parry, & J. Angelis (Eds), Service Design and Delivery (pp 19–29). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8321-3_2

  • Pashukanis, E., & Milovanovic, D. (2001). The General Theory of Law and Marxism (1st edn). Transaction Publishers.

  • Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.

  • Paul, S. (2019). Antitrust as allocator of coordination rights. UCLA Law Review, 67(2), 4–64.

  • Pistor, K. (2019). The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton University Press.

  • Pitts, F.H. (2017). Critiquing Capitalism Today: New Ways to Read Marx. Springer International Publishing.

  • Postone, M. (1996). Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.

  • Postone, M. (2003). Lukács and the dialectical critique of capitalism. In R. Albritton & J. Simoulidis (Eds), New Dialectics and Political Economy (pp 78–100). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Prado, J. (2018). Prospects for organizing the tech industry. Notes from Below. https://notesfrombelow.org/article/prospects-for-organizing-the-tech-industry

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2018). IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report: 2017 Full Year Results. www.iab.com/topics/ad-revenue/

  • Prug, T. (2014). Hacking the Economy and the State: Towards an Egalitarian and Participatory Conception of Production and Allocation [PhD Thesis, Queen Mary, University of London]. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/11751

  • Prug, T., & Bilić, P. (2021). Work now, profit later: AI between capital, labour, and regulation. In P. Moore & J. Woodcock (Eds), Augmented Exploitation: Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work. Pluto Press.

  • Qiu, J.L. (2016). Goodby iSLave: A Manifesto for Digital Abolition. University of Illinois Press.

  • Reuten, G. (1988). Value as social form. In M. Williams (Ed.), Value, Social Form and the State (pp 42–61). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Reuten, G. (2000). The interconnection of systematic dialectics and historical materialism. Historical Materialism, 7(1), 137–65. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920600100414669

  • Reuten, G. (2003). Karl Marx: His work and the major changes in its interpretation. In A Companion to the History of Economic Thought (p 148166). Blackwell.

  • Reuten, G., & Williams, M. (1989). Value Form and the State: The Tendencies of Accumulation and the Determination of Economic Policy in Capitalist Society. Routledge.

  • Reuters Institute. (2019). Digital News Report 2018. University of Oxford, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2018/

  • Richter, F. (2020). Amazon Leads $100 Billion Cloud Market. Statista Infographics. www.statista.com/chart/18819/worldwide-market-share-of-leading-cloud-infrastructure-service-providers/

  • Rieder, B., & Sire, G. (2014). Conflicts of interest and incentives to bias: A microeconomic critique of Google’s tangled position on the Web. New Media & Society, 16(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813481195

  • Rigi, J., & Prey, R. (2015). Value, rent, and the political economy of social media. The Information Society, 31(5), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1069769

  • Roberts, S.T. (2016). Commercial content moderation: Digital labourers’ dirty work. Media Studies Publications, 12. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/commpub/12

  • Roberts, S.T. (2018). Digital detritus: ‘Error” and the logic of opacity in social media content moderation. First Monday, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i3.8283

  • Robinson, B. (2015). With a different Marx: Value and the contradictions of Web 2.0 capitalism. The Information Society, 31(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.977634

  • Rochet, J.C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212

  • Roth, R. (2009). Karl Marx’s original manuscripts in the Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA): Another view on capital. In Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives after the Critical Edition (pp 27–49). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Roth, R. (2010). Marx on technical change in the critical edition. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(5), 1223–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2010.522239

  • Rotta, T., & Teixeira, R. (2019). The commodification of knowledge and information. In M. Vidal, T. Smith, T. Rotta, & P. Prew (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx (pp 378–400). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695545.013.23

  • Rubin, I.I. (1973). Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value (M. Samardžija & F. Perlman, Trans.; 3rd edn). Black Rose Books.

  • Saad-Filho, A. (2002). The Value of Marx: Political Economy for Contemporary Capitalism. Pluto Press.

  • Schiller, H.I. (1976). Communication and cultural domination. International Journal of Politics, 5(4), 1–127.

  • Schiller, H.I. (1989). Culture Inc.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression. Oxford University Press.

  • Schiller, H.I. (1991). Not yet the post-imperialist era. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039109366777

  • Schmelzer, M. (2016). The Hegemony of Growth: The OECD and the Making of the Economic Growth Paradigm. Cambridge University Press.

  • Schmidt, E. (2008, 14 September). A Note to Google Users on Net Neutrality. https://web.archive.org/web/20080914170535/http://www.google.com/help/netneutrality_letter.html

  • Scholz, T. (Ed.). (2013). Digital Labour: The Internet as Playground and Factory. Routledge.

  • Scola, N. (2020). Inside the Ad Boycott That Has Facebook on the Defensive. POLITICO. www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/07/03/activists-advertising-boycott-facebook-348528

  • Scott Morton, F., Bouvier, P., Ezrachi, A., Julien, B., Katz, R., Kimmelman, G., Melamed, A.D., & Morgenstern, J. (2019). Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms: Market Structure and Antitrust Subcommittee. Stigler Center for the Study of Economy and the State. https://research.chicagobooth.edu/stigler/media/news/committee-on-digital-platforms-final-report

  • Seetharaman, J.H. and D. (2020, 26 May). Facebook executives shut down efforts to make the site less divisive. Wall Street Journal. www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-it-encourages-division-top-executives-nixed-solutions-11590507499

  • Sell, S.K. (2003). Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights (Illustrated edn). Cambridge University Press.

  • Shalal, A. (2020, 10 July). EU urges US to return to negotiations at OECD on digital taxes. Reuters. www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-france-eu-idUSKBN24B2EV

  • Smith, F., & Woods, L. (2005). A distinction without a difference: Exploring the boundary between goods and services in the World Trade Organization and the European Union. Columbia Journal of European Law, 12(1), 1–52.

  • Smith, J. (2015). Imperialism in the twenty-first century. Monthly Review, 67(3), 82–97.

  • Smith, T. (1997). Marx’s theory of social forms and Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programs. In F. Moseley & M. Campbell (Eds), New Investigations of Marx’s Method (pp 176–98). Humanities Press.

  • Smith, T. (1998). The capital/consumer relation in lean production: The continued relevance of Volume Two of Capital. In C.J. Arthur & G. Reuten (Eds), The Circulation of Capital: Essays on Volume Two of Marx’s Capital (pp 67–94). Macmillan.

  • Smith, T. (2010). Technological change in capitalism: Some Marxian themes. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 203–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep048

  • Smith, T. (2013). The ‘general intellect’ in the Grundrisse and beyond. Historical Materialism, 21(4), 235–55. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341321

  • Smyrnaios, N. (2018). Internet Oligopoly: The Corporate Takeover of Our Digital World. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787691971

  • Smythe, D.W. (1977). Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism. CTheory, 1(3), 1–27.

  • Smythe, D.W. (2005). On the audience commodity and its work. In M.G. Durham & D.M. Kellner (Eds), Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks (1st edn, pp 230–56). Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Social Prosperity Network, & Institute for Global Prosperity. (2017). Social Prosperity for the Future: A Proposal for Universal Basic Services. Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London.

  • Söderberg, J. (2007). Hacking Capitalism: The Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Movement. Routledge.

  • Sohn-Rethel, A. (1978). Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology. Macmillan.

  • Sonnemaker, T. (2020). Mark Zuckerberg Reportedly Said Facebook is ‘Not Gonna Change’ in Response to a Boycott by More Than 500 Advertisers over the Company’s Hate-speech Policies. Business Insider. www.businessinsider.com/zuckerberg-facebook-not-gonna-change-due-to-advertising-boycott-report-2020-7

  • Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.

  • Srnicek, N. (2018). Platform monopolies and the political economy of AI. In J. McDonnell (Ed.), Economics for the Many (pp 152–63). Verso.

  • Stallman, R. (2001). The History of the GPL. GNU Project. www.gnu.org/copyleft/

  • Stallman, R. (2018). What Is Copyleft? GNU Project. www.gnu.org/copyleft/

  • StatCounter. (2020a). Mobile Vendor Market Share Worldwide. StatCounter Global Stats. https://gs.statcounter.com/vendor-market-share/mobile

  • StatCounter. (2020b). Search Engine Market Share Worldwide. StatCounter Global Stats. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share

  • StatCounter. (2020c). Social Media Stats Worldwide. StatCounter Global Stats. https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats

  • Statista. (2020). Facebook users worldwide 2020. Statista. www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/

  • Stigler, G.J. (1957). Perfect competition, historically contemplated. Journal of Political Economy, 65(1), 1–17.

  • Stop Hate for Profit. (2020). Stop hate for profit. www.stophateforprofit.org

  • Story, L., & Helft, M. (2007, 14 April). Google buys DoubleClick for $3.1 billion. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2007/04/14/technology/14DoubleClick.html

  • Su, J. (2014). Google Profits Billions with Motorola Sale to Lenovo, Keeps Patents. Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/jeanbaptiste/2014/01/29/google-profits-billions-with-motorola-sale-to-lenovo-keeps-patents/

  • Surette, S. (2018). Perks of the job. Notes from Below. https://notesfrombelow.org/article/perks-of-the-job

  • Sweezy, P. (1994). The triumph of financial capital. Monthly Review, 46(2). https://monthlyreview.org/1994/06/01/the-triumph-of-financial-capital/

  • Syll, L.P. (2016). When the model becomes the message – a critique of Rodrik. Real-World Economics Review, 74, 139–55.

  • Tech Workers Coalition. (2018). Tech workers, platform workers, and workers’ inquiry. Notes from Below. https://notesfrombelow.org/article/tech-workers-platform-workers-and-workers-inquiry

  • Teixeira, R.A., & Rotta, T.N. (2012). Valueless knowledge-commodities and financialization: Productive and financial dimensions of capital autonomization. Review of Radical Political Economics, 44(4), 448–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613411434387

  • Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.

  • Testimony of David Chavern, President and CEO News Media Alliance (2019). Testimony of David Chavern. www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/109616/witnesses/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-ChavernD-20190611.pdf

  • The Economist. (2017, 6 May). The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data. The Economist. www.economist.com/leaders/2017/05/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-resource-is-no-longer-oil-but-data

  • Thompson, P. (2013). Financialization and the workplace: Extending and applying the disconnected capitalism thesis. Work, Employment and Society, 27(3), 472–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013479827

  • TruePublica. (2019, 10 July). Personal data – The skyscraper of data you knew nothing about. TruePublica. https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/personal-data-the-skyscraper-of-data-you-knew-nothing-about/

  • Turow, J. (2011). The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth. Yale University Press.

  • van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford University Press.

  • van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776

  • van Dijck, J., de Waal, M., & Poell, T. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.

  • Vanoli, A. (2017). The future of the SNA in a broad information system perspective. Review of Income and Wealth, 63(s2), S238–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12332

  • Vercellone, C. (2007). From formal subsumption to general intellect: Elements for a Marxist reading of the thesis of cognitive capitalism. Historical Materialism, 15(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920607X171681

  • von Lohmann, F. (2017). The new wave: Copyright and software interfaces in the wake of Oracle v. Google Special issue: Software interface copyright. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Harvard JOLT), 31(Special Issue), 517–34.

  • vpnMentor. (2019). The Real Influencers: Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and Microsoft have Spent $582 Million Lobbying Congress since 2005. www.vpnmentor.com/blog/big-tech-lobbying-report/

  • Waddell, K. (2016, 19 January). Why Google Quit China – And Why It’s Heading Back. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/01/why-google-quit-china-and-why-its-heading-back/424482/

  • Wei, X., & Heinrich, M. (2011). The interpretation of capital: An interview with Michael Heinrich. World Review of Political Economy, 2(4), 708–28.

  • Whittaker, M., Crawford, K., Reisman, D., & Schultz, J. (2018). Algorithmic Impact Assessments: A Practical Framework for Public Agency Accountability. AI Now Institute.

  • Wiggershaus, R. (1995). The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance. MIT Press.

  • Williams, A. (2020, 10 July). US threatens $1.3bn worth of French goods with 25% tariff. The Financial Times. www.ft.com/content/f51be172-746f-48f2-9b9d-ac782b707c76

  • Williams, S. (2002). Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman’s Crusade for Free Software. O’Reilly Media.

  • WIPO. (2003). Patentability of Computer Software and Business Methods. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China and the World Intellectual Property Organization.

  • Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2020). The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction. Polity.

  • World Bank. (2019). World Development Indicators Database. https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf

  • Wright, I. (2018). Silicon Valley startups: Being evil, again and again. Notes from Below. https://notesfrombelow.org/article/silicon-valley-startups-doing-evil-again-and-again

  • Written Testimony of David Heinemeier Hansson, CTO & Cofounder, Basecamp (2020). Testimony of David Heinemeier Hansen. https://judiciary.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=2386

  • Wu, T. (2018). The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. Columbia Global Reports.

  • Zeichick, A. (2008). How Facebook Works. MIT Technology Review. www.technologyreview.com/s/410312/how-facebook-works/

  • Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5

  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (1st edn). PublicAffairs.

  • Zukerfeld, M. (2017). The tale of the snake and the elephant: Intellectual property expansion under informational capitalism. The Information Society, 33(5), 243–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1354107

  • Zwick, D., & Denegri Knott, J. (2009). Manufacturing customers: The database as new means of production. Journal of Consumer Culture, 9(2), 221–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509104375

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 75 66 13
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0

Altmetrics

You are not currently authorised to access the full text of this chapter or article.
Access options
To access the full chapter or article then please choose one of the options below.
Purchase
Pay to access content (PDF download and unlimited online access)
Buy article/chapter (GBP  £20.00)

Click here to view Terms and Conditions

Other access options
Redeem Token
Institutional Login
Log in via Open Athens or Shibboleth. Please contact your librarian if you need any help.
Login with Institutional Access
Personal Login
Login to your BUP account with your individual credentials.
Login with BUP account

Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here