6:
This chapter explores the practice of branding at a startup accelerator, connecting the concept to orders of worth in entrepreneurship. Drawing on the Communicative Theory of the Firm (CTF), it emphasizes the significance of the multiple and competing logics that underpin evaluations of value in the context of new firms’ emergence. The chapter examines practices of valorizing the technologically cool, mentorship, and funding in the accelerator’s efforts to launch startups. The accelerator’s branding practices influenced the startups’ authoritative texts and, in turn, their purposes and their wanting. The chapter underscores that such branding practices hinder the startups’ heterarchy: the accelerator’s branding practices narrowed the evaluative criteria to which the startups could appeal, limiting their potential for profitability.
-
Abbott, A. (2014). The problem of excess. Sociological Theory, 32, 1–26.
-
Abboud, L. (2021, 18 January). Activist fund Bluebell Capital takes aim at Danone. Financial Times . Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/2df158fb-357a-499a-b51c-025b4f1d5c97
-
Aghion, P., & Tirole, J. (1997). Formal and real authority in organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 1–29.
-
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18, 83–104.
-
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–95.
-
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. A. (2006). Critical theory and postmodern approaches to organizational studies. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 255–83.
-
Alvesson, M., & Roberston, M. (2006). The best and the brightest: The construction, significance and effects of elite identities in consulting firms. Organization, 13, 195–224.
-
Ambrosini, V., & Altintas, G. (2019). Dynamic managerial capabilities. In D. D. Bergh (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedias of Business and Management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 1–17.
-
Andrejevic, M. (2013). Estranged free labor. In T. Scholz (Ed.), Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge, pp 149–64.
-
Aplin, L. M. (2019). Culture and cultural evolution in birds: A review of the evidence. Animal Behaviour, 147, 179–87.
-
Appels, M. (2023). CEO sociopolitical activism as a signal of authentic leadership to prospective employees. Journal of Management, 49(8), 2727–65.
-
Argenti, P. A. (2022). Integrating multiple voices when crafting a corporate brand narrative. In O. Iglesias, N. Ind, & M. Schultz (Eds), The Routledge Companion to Corporate Branding. London: Routledge, pp 1–22.
-
Armstrong, B. (2020, 27 September). Coinbase is a mission focused company. The Coinbase Blog (Vol. 2021). San Francisco: Coinbase, Inc.
-
Arrow, K. (1999). Foreword. In G. Carroll & D. J. Teece (Eds), Firms, Markets, and Hierarchies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp vi–vii.
-
Arvidsson, A. (2005). Brands: A critical perspective. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 235–58.
-
Arvidsson, A., & Colleoni, E. (2012). Value in informational capitalism and on the internet. The Information Society, 28(3), 135–50.
-
Arvidsson, A., & Peitersen, N. (2013). The Ethical Economy: Rebuilding Value After the Crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Ashcraft, K. L. (2021). Communication as constitutive transmission? An encounter with affect. Communication Theory, 21(4), 571–92.
-
Ashcraft, K. L. (2022). Wronged and Dangerous: Viral Masculinity and the Populist Pandemic. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.
-
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: ‘Materializing’ organizational communication. In A. Brief & J. Walsh (Eds), The Academy of Management Annals (Vol. 3). New York: Routledge, pp 1–64.
-
Axley, S. R. (1996). Communication at Work: Management and the Communication-Intensive Organization. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
-
B Corporation (2022a, 3 May). A blueprint for racial equity in business: building a just future together. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caKyj12rAvU
-
B Corporation (2022b, 18 March). Behind the B: What it means to be a B Corp. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRLnW3WbtCE
-
B Lab (2021, 2 June). State of the B: Uniting around our Theory of Change. [Zoom Presentation]. Retrieved from https://zoom.us/rec/play/66yvdbKeRCqWwRruEcJ0d1keFb1ng4Suo7NsctmwSD62KHmaUCgyzFni74f66yfaMcP413aQrHqRkRIH.CLmupQvofO9R17ru?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=IMiTsgEgRWGB7JFcVKtvVA.1622658975486.9f75232a4024185108d27ac2dc05a40c&_x_zm_rhtaid=503
-
B Lab (2023a). About B Corp certification: Measuring a company’s entire social and environmental impact. Retrieved from https://www.bcorporation.net/en-us/certification/
-
B Lab (2023b). About B Lab: B Lab is the nonprofit network transforming the global economy to benefit all people, communities, and the planet. Retrieved from https://www.bcorporation.net/en-us/movement/about-b-lab
-
B Lab (2023c). Theory of change: Imagine a world where all stakeholders – not just shareholders – are valued and prioritized. Retrieved from https://www.bcorporation.net/en-us/movement/theory-of-change
-
Baars, G., & Spicer, A. (Eds) (2017). The Corporation: A Critical, Multi-disciplinary Handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bakker, K. (2022). How to speak honeybee. NOEMA. Retrieved from https://www.noemamag.com/how-to-speak-honeybee/
-
Barad, K. (2003). Posthuman performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28, 801–31.
-
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Barad, K. (2012). Nature’s queer performativity. Women, Gender and Research, 1–2, 25–53.
-
Barber, G. (Producer). (2020, 5 October). The turmoil over ‘Black Lives Matter’ and political speech at Coinbase. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/turmoil-black-lives-matter-political-speech-coinbase/
-
Barendt, E. (1997). Is there a United Kingdom constitution? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 17(1), 137–46.
-
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
-
Barney, J. (1996). The resource-based theory of the firm. Organization Science, 7, 469.
-
Barney, J., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
Barrett, L. F. (2017). How Emotions are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
-
Basque, J., Bencherki, N., & Kuhn, T. (Eds) (2022). The Routledge Handbook of the Communicative Constitution of Organization. New York: Routledge.
-
Bayart, J.-F. (2000). Africa in the world: A history of extraversion. African Affairs, 9, 217–67.
-
Bean, H., & Buikema, R. J. (2015). Deconstituting al-Qa’ida: CCO theory and the decline and dissolution of hidden organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(4), 512–38.
-
Beckert, J. (2021). The firm as an engine of imagination: Organizational prospection and the making of economic futures. Organization Theory, 2, 1–21.
-
Beery, S., Mennel, J., & Mitchell, K. (2022). C-suite insights: How purpose delivers value in every function and for the enterprise. Deloitte. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/how-purpose-delivers-value.html
-
Bencherki, N., & Snack, J. P. (2016). Contributorship and partial inclusion: A communicative perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(3), 279–304.
-
Bencherki, N., & Bourgoin, A. (2019). Property and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(4), 497–513.
-
Bencherki, N., & Elmholdt, K. T. (2022). The organization’s synaptic mode of existence: How a hospital merger is many things at once. Organization, 29(4), 521–43.
-
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Bennis, W. G., Berkowitz, N., Affinito, M., & Malone, M. (1958). Authority, power, and the ability to influence. Human Relations, 11, 143–55.
-
Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: MacMillan.
-
Bernthal, B. (2016). Investment accelerators. Stanford Journal of Law, Business, & Finance, 21(2), 139–91.
-
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. New York: Guilford Press.
-
Beunza, D., & Stark, D. (2004). How to recognize opportunities: Heterarchical search in a trading room. In K. K. Cetina & A. Preda (Eds), The Sociology of Financial Markets. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 84–101.
-
Bhagat, S., & Hubbard, G. (2022). Rule of law and purpose of the corporation. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(1), 10–26.
-
Blagoev, B., Costas, J., & Kärreman, D. (2019). ‘We are all herd animals’: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces. Organization, 26(6), 894–916.
-
Blake, R. (1999). Jardine Matheson: Traders of the Far East. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
-
Blaschke, S., Frost, J., & Hattke, F. (2014). Towards a micro foundation of leadership, governance, and management in universities. Higher Education, 68, 711–32.
-
Blok, A. (2015). Attachments to the common-place: pragmatic sociology and the aesthetic cosmopolitics of eco-house design in Kyoto, Japan. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 2(2), 122–45.
-
Boatright, J. R. (1996). Business ethics and the theory of the firm. American Business Law Journal, 34, 217–38.
-
Boivin, G., Brummans, B. H. J. M., & Barker, J. (2017). The institutionalization of CCO scholarship: Trends from 2000 to 2015. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 331–55.
-
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism (G. Elliott, Trans.). London: Verso.
-
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1991/2006). On Justification: Economies of Worth (C. Porter, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood, pp 241–58.
-
Bourgoin, A., Bencherki, N., & Faraj, S. (2020). ‘And who are you?’ A performative perspective on authority in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1134–65.
-
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds) (2018). Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge.
-
Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance, 14(6), 577–93.
-
Brooks, D. (2012, 13 April). Sam Spade at Starbucks. New York Times, p A31. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/13/opinion/brooks-sam-spade-at-starbucks.html
-
Brown, T. M. (2023, 22 October). Look who’s on the scent: Corporations you might not expect are commissioning their own signature fragrances. New York Times, p BU8.
-
Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2007). Death by document: Tracing the agency of a text. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 711–27.
-
Brummans, B. H. J. M. (Ed.) (2018). The Agency of Organizing: Perspectives and Case Studies. New York: Routledge.
-
Brummans, B. H. J. M., Cooren, F., Robichaud, D., & Taylor, J. R. (2014). Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Communication (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage, pp 173–94.
-
Bruni, F., & Douthat, R. (Producers) (2020, 13 August). The argument. Is individualism America’s religion? New York Times . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/13/opinion/the-argument-coronavirus-catholic-covid.html?
-
Bruton, G. D., Pryor, C., & Cerecedo Lopez, J. A. (in press). Lean start-up in settings of impoverishment: The implications of the context for theory. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/01492063231204869
-
Çalişkan, K., & Callon, M. (2010). Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39, 1–32.
-
Callon, M. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp 311–57.
-
Callon, M. (2017). Afterword: The devices of attachment. In F. Cochoy, J. Deville, & L. McFall (Eds), Markets and the Arts of Attachment. London: Routledge, pp 180–95.
-
Cameron, K. (1980). Critical questions in assessing organizational effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 66–80.
-
Cameron, K. S. (1984). The effectiveness of ineffectiveness. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI, pp 270–95.
-
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539–53.
-
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Chaparro, F. (2020, 29 September). Coinbase offers exit package for employees not comfortable with its mission. The Block. Retrieved from https://www.theblock.co/post/79247/coinbase-offers-exit-package-for-employees-not-comfortable-with-its-mission
-
Chertkovskaya, E., & Paulsson, A. (2021). Countering corporate violence: Degrowth, ecosocialism and organising beyond the destructive forces of capitalism. Organization, 28(3), 405–25.
-
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20, 372–93.
-
Ciepley, D. (2013). Beyond public and private: Toward a political theory of the corporation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 139–58.
-
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.
-
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1–44.
-
Coase, R. H. (1988). The nature of the firm: Origin. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4, 3–47.
-
Cochoy, F., Trompette, P., & Araujo, L. (2016). From market agencements to market agencing: An introduction. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19, 3–16.
-
Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap … And Others Don’t. New York: HarperCollins.
-
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds) (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Cooper, R. (1986). Organization/disorganization. Social Science Information, 25, 299–335.
-
Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62, 1–20.
-
Cooren, F. (2016). Ethics for dummies: Ventriloquism and responsibility. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 24, 17–30.
-
Cooren, F. (2018). Acting for, with, and through: A relational perspective on agency in MSF’s organizing. In B. H. J. M. Brummans (Ed.), The Agency of Organizing: Perspectives and Case Studies. New York: Routledge, pp 142–69.
-
Cooren, F. (2020). A communicative constitutive perspective on corporate social responsibility: Ventriloquism, undecidability, and surprisability. Business and Society, 59(1), 175–97.
-
Cooren, F., & Sandler, S. (2014). Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin. Communication Theory, 24, 225–44.
-
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organization, and organizing: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32, 1149–70.
-
Cornelissen, J. P., & Kafouros, M. (2008). Metaphors and theory building in organization theory: What determines the impact of a metaphor on theory? British Journal of Management, 19, 365–79.
-
Cornelissen, J. P., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J. G. F., & Werner, M. D. (2021). Building character: The formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1294–330.
-
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (2021). Corporate stakeholders, corporate valuation and ESG. European Financial Management, 27, 196–207.
-
Costas, J., & Kärreman, D. (2013). Conscience as control: Managing employees through CSR. Organization, 20(3), 394–415.
-
Cowling, K., & Sugden, R. (1998). The essence of the modern corporation: Markets, strategic decision-making and the theory of the firm. The Manchester School, 66(1), 59–86.
-
Cronkhite, G. (1984). Ferment in the field: Communications scholars address critical issues and research tasks of the discipline. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(4), 468–73.
-
Crumley, C. (2015). Heterarchy. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (Eds), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp 1–14.
-
Cruz, J. M., & Sodeke, C. U. (2021). Debunking Eurocentrism in organizational communication theory: Liquidities in postcolonial contexts. Communication Theory, 31(3), 528–48.
-
Cunliffe, A. L. (2022). Must I grow a pair of balls to theorize about theory in organization and management studies? Organization Theory, 3, 1–28.
-
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
-
Czarniawska, B. (2008). A Theory of Organizing. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
-
Davis, G. F. (2016a). Can an economy survive without corporations? Technology and robust organizational alternatives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 129–40.
-
Davis, G. F. (2016b). Organization theory and the dilemmas of a post-corporate economy. In J. Gehman, M. Lounsbury, & R. Greenwood (Eds), How Institutions Matter! (Vol. 48B). New York: Emerald Group Publishing, pp 311–22.
-
Davis, G. F. (2016c). The Vanishing American Corporation: Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy. New York: Berrett-Koehler.
-
Davis, G. F. (2021a). Are corporations inevitably evil? A research agenda for B academics. Paper presented at the B Academics Research Conference, online. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDzv03v3OoQ
-
Davis, G. F. (2021b). Corporate purpose needs democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 902–13.
-
Davis, G. F., & Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science, 16, 332–43.
-
Davis, G. F., & White, C. J. (2015). The new face of corporate activism. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13(4), 2–7.
-
Davis, G. F., & Kim, S. (2017). The corporation in sociology. In G. Baars & A. Spicer (Eds), The Corporation: A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp 97–110.
-
Davis, G. F., & DeWitt, T. (2021). Organization theory and the resource-based view of the firm: The great divide. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1684–97.
-
Dawson, V. R. (2017). Communicative theory of the firm. In C. R. Scott & L. Lewis (Eds), The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication. New York: Wiley, pp 1–7.
-
Dawson, V. R., & Bencherki, N. (2022). Federal employees or rogue rangers: Sharing and resisting organizational authority through Twitter communication practices. Human Relations, 75(11), 2091–121.
-
de Botton, A. (2009). The Pleasures and Sorrows of Work. New York: Pantheon.
-
De Kosnik, A. (2013). Fandom as free labor. In T. Scholz (Ed.), Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge, pp 98–111.
-
de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30, 225–63.
-
Deakin, S. (2017). The corporation in legal studies. In G. Baars & A. Spicer (Eds), The Corporation: A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp 47–63.
-
Dean, J. (2005). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics, 1, 51–74.
-
Deetz, S., & Simpson, J. L. (2004). Critical organizational dialogue: Open formation and the demand of ‘otherness’. In R. Anderson, L. Baxter, & L. Cissna (Eds), Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 141–58.
-
Dekker, E., & Kuchar, P. (2021). Heterarchy. In A. Marciano & G. B. Ramello (Eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. New York: Springer, pp 1–5.
-
Delaware Code Annual, Title 8, § 1: General Corporation Law (amended 2019–2020). Retrieved from https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/index.html
-
Del Fa, S., & Vásquez, C. (2020). Existing through differentiation: A Derridean approach to alternative organizations. M@n@gement, 22(4), 559–83.
-
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
-
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
-
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (R. Hurley, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-
Denrell, J. (2005). Should we be impressed with high performance? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 292–8.
-
Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2015). Tracing and theorizing ethics in entrepreneurship: Toward a critical hermeneutics of imagination In A. Pullen & C. Rhodes (Eds), The Routledge Companion to ethics, politics and organizations (pp 231–48). London: Routledge.
-
Dobusch, L., & Schoeneborn, D. (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of Anonymous. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 1005–35.
-
Dobusch, L., & Kapeller, J. (2018). Open strategy-making with crowds and communities: Comparing Wikimedia and Creative Commons. Long Range Planning, 51(4), 561–79.
-
Dosi, G., & Teece, D. (1998). Organizational competencies and the boundaries of the firm. In R. Arena & C. Longhi (Eds), Markets and Organizations. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp 281–301.
-
Dosi, G., Faillo, M., & Marengo, L. (2008). Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: An introduction. Organization Studies, 29, 1165–85.
-
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
-
Drucker, P. F. (1946). The Concept of the Corporation. New York: The New American Library.
-
Dutta, M. J., & Elers, S. (2020). Public relations, indigeneity and colonization: Indigenous resistance as dialogic anchor. Public Relations Review, 46, 1–9.
-
Ehrnström-Fuentes, M., & Böhm, S. (2023). The political ontology of corporate social responsibility: Obscuring the pluriverse in place. Journal of Business Ethics, 185, 245–61.
-
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.
-
Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: The Free Press.
-
Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14, 5–26.
-
Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2024). Performing Organizational Paradoxes. New York: Routledge.
-
Farrington, A. (2002). Trading Places: The East India Company and Asia 1600–1834. London: The British Library.
-
Feld, B. (2012). Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City. New York: Wiley.
-
Fergnani, A. (2022). Corporate foresight: A new frontier for strategy and management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(2), 820–44.
-
Finn, E. (2017). What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Fiol, C. M. (2001). Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27, 691–9.
-
Fisch, J. E., & Solomon, S. (2021). Should corporations have purpose? Texas Law Review, 99(7), 1309–46.
-
Fleming, P. (2012). The birth of biocracy. In T. Diefenbach & R. Todnem (Eds), Reinventing Hierarchy and Bureaucracy: From the Bureau to Network Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 35). Bingley, UK: Emerald, pp 205–7.
-
Fligstein, N., & Freeland, R. (1995). Theoretical and comparative perspectives on corporate organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 21–43.
-
Flyverbom, M., & Garsten, C. (2021). Anticipation and organization: seeing, knowing and governing futures. Organization Theory, 2, 1–25.
-
Follett, M. P. (1940). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett (E. M. Fox & L. Urwick Eds). London: Pitman Publishing.
-
Ford, J., & Harding, N. (2004). We went looking for an organization but could find only the metaphysics of its presence. Sociology, 38, 815–30.
-
Fortado, B. (1994). Informal supervisory social control strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 31(2), 251–74.
-
Foss, N. (1999). Research in the strategic theory of the firm: ‘isolationism’ and ‘integrationism’. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 725–55.
-
Foss, N., & Linder, S. (2017). The changing nature of the corporation and the economic theory of the firm. In T. Clarke, J. O’Brien, & C. R. T. O’Kelley (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Corporation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 539–62.
-
Foucault, M. (1977). Language, Counter-memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
-
Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53, 7–32.
-
Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2017). Sociology and the New Materialism: Theory, Research, Action. London: SAGE.
-
Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On Bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757–70.
-
Freiling, J. (2004). A competence-based theory of the firm. Management Revue, 15, 27–52.
-
French, P. A. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 207–15.
-
French, P. A. (2017). The diachronic moral responsibility of firms In E. W. Orts & N. C. Smith (Eds), The Moral Responsibility of Firms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 53–65.
-
Friedman, M. (1970, 13 September). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, pp SM17–SM21.
-
Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and Capitalism: A Critical Theory. London: Westminster Press.
-
Furedi, F. (2013). Authority: A Sociological History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
-
Gabriel, Y. (1998). Psychoanalytic contributions to the study of the emotional life of organizations. Administration & Society, 30, 291–314.
-
Gaither, B. M., & Austin, L. (2023). Corporate social advocacy. In A. O’Connor (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility Communication. New York: Routledge, pp 177–90.
-
Gallup (2022). Force for Good Report. Retrieved from https://www.bentley.edu/files/gallup/Bentley-Gallup_Force_for_Good_Report_final.pdf
-
Ganesh, S., & Wang, Y. (2015). An eventful view of organizations. Communication Research and Practice, 1, 375–87.
-
Gartenberg, C., & Zenger, T. (2023). the firm as a subsociety: purpose, justice, and the theory of the firm. Organization Science, 34(5), 1965–80.
-
Garud, R., & Gehman, J. (2019). Performativity: Not a destination but an ongoing journey. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 679–84.
-
Gehman, J., Grimes, M. G., & Cao, K. (2019). Why we care about certified B Corporations: From valuing growth to certifying values practices. Academy of Management Perspectives, 5(1), 97–101.
-
Gehman, J., Sharma, G., & Beveridge, A. (2022). Theorizing institutional entrepreneuring: Arborescent and rhizomatic assembling. Organization Studies, 43(2), 289–310.
-
George, G., Haas, M. R., McGahan, A. M., Schillebeeckx, S. J. D., & Tracey, P. (2023). Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1841–69.
-
Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M., & Barrett, F. J. (2005). Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse. London: Sage, pp 39–59.
-
Gerlitz, C. (2017). Interfacing attachments: The multivalence of brands. In F. Cochoy, J. Deville, & L. McFall (Eds), Markets and the Arts of Attachment. London: Routledge, pp 72–88.
-
Gherardi, S. (2016). To start practice theorizing anew: The contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness. Organization, 23, 680–98.
-
Ghosal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 13–47.
-
Gilbert, J. C. (2018, 30 August). Are B Corps an elite charade for changing the world? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaycoengilbert/2018/2008/2030/are-b-corps-an-elite-charade-for-changing-the-world-part-2011/?sh=192315747151
-
Gilman, G. (1962). An inquiry into the nature and use of authority. In M. Haire (Ed.), Organizational Theory in Industrial Practice. New York: Wiley, pp 105–42.
-
Girard, M., & Stark, D. (2003). Heterarchies of value in Manhattan-based new media firms. Theory Culture & Society, 20(3), 77–105.
-
Glasgow Caledonian New York College (2022). B Lab and the purpose of the corporation. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDpz88tisI
-
Golant, B. D., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective. Organization Studies, 28, 1149–67.
-
Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2015). Introduction: What is strategy as practice? In D. Golosorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp 1–29.
-
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2015). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 440–63.
-
Góral, A. (2023). Women in public cultural organizations and their professional paths strategies: A rhizomatic approach. Gender, Work, and Organization, 30(3), 937–56.
-
Gourevitch, P. A., & Shinn, J. J. (2005). Political Power and Corporate Control: The New Global Politics of Corporate Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Grandori, A. (2022). A rightholding perspective on the firm and principled governance: 10 memos. In M. Pirson, D. M. Wasieleski, & E. Steckler (Eds), Alternative Theories of the Firm. New York: Routledge, pp 56–71.
-
Grant, R. A. (2019). Contemporary Strategy Analysis (10th ed.). New York: Wiley.
-
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–22.
-
Grattarola, A., Gond, J.-P., & Haefliger, S. (2024). Traduttore, traditore?: Gains and losses from the translation of the economies of worth. International Journal of Management Reviews, 26, 137–59. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12344
-
Greenfield, K. (2007). The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Grimes, A. J. (1978). Authority, power, influence and social control: A theoretical synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 3, 724–35.
-
Grossberg, L. (1982). Does communication theory need intersubjectivity? Toward an immanent philosophy of interpersonal relations. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp 171–205.
-
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691–719.
-
Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–93.
-
Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Hallen, B. L., Cohen, S. L., & Bingham, C. B. (2020). Do accelerators work? If so, how? Organization Science, 31(2), 378–414.
-
Hanlon, G., & Fleming, P. (2009). Updating the critical perspective on corporate social responsibility. Sociology Compass, 3(6), 937–48.
-
Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
-
Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1119–58.
-
Heiland, H., & Schaupp, S. (2021). Breaking digital atomization: Resistant cultures of solidarity in platform-based courier work In P. V. Moore & J. Woodcock (Eds), Augmented Exploitation. Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work. London: Pluto Press, pp 138–48.
-
Heller, M. A., & Salzman, J. (2021). Mine!: How the Hidden Rules of Ownership Control our Lives. New York: Doubleday.
-
Henisz, W. J. (2023). The value of organizational purpose. Strategy Science, 8(2), 159–69.
-
Heracleous, L. (2004). Boundaries in the study of organization. Human Relations, 57, 95–103.
-
Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 755–78.
-
Hernes, T. (2003). Enabling and constraining properties of organizational boundaries. In T. Hernes & N. Paulsen (Eds), Managing Boundaries in Organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 35–54.
-
Heugens, P. (2005). A neo-Weberian theory of the firm. Organization Studies, 26, 547–67.
-
Hill, D. W. (2015). The Pathology of Communicative Capitalism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Hill, D. W. (2021). Trajectories in platform capitalism. Mobilities, 16(4), 569–83.
-
Hitt, M. A., Arregle, J. L., & Holmes, R. M. (2021). Strategic management theory in a post-pandemic and non-ergodic world. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 259–64.
-
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
-
Holm, F., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2018). Configuring shared and hierarchical leadership through authoring. Human Relations, 71(5), 692–721.
-
Holmström, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7, 24–52.
-
Hsu, S.-w. (2022). At the critical moment: The rhizomatic organization and ‘Democracy to Come’. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 38(4), 1–12.
-
Huising, R. (2015). To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 263–99.
-
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2000). Is it ethical to use ethics as strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 21–31.
-
Husted, E., Just, S. N., duPlessis, E. M., & Dahlman, S. (2023). The communicative constitution of atomization: Online prepper communities and the crisis of collective action. Journal of Communication, 73(4), 368–81.
-
Hyvärinen, M., Hydén, L.-C., Saarenheimo, M., & Tamboukou, M. (2010). Beyond narrative coherence: An introduction. In M. Hyvärinen, L.-C. Hydén, M. Saarenheimo, & M. Tamboukou (Eds), Beyond Narrative Coherence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp 1–15.
-
Iglesias, O., & Bonet, E. (2012). Persuasive brand management: How managers can influence brand meaning when they are losing control over it. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(2), 251–64.
-
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
-
Illouz, E. (2018). Introduction: Emodities or the making of emotional commodities. In E. Illouz (Ed.), Emotions as Commodities: Capitalism, Consumption and Authenticity. New York: Routledge, pp 1–30.
-
Illouz, E., & Benger Alaluf, Y. (2019). Emotions in consumer studies. In F. F. Wherry & I. Woodward (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Consumption. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 238–52.
-
Jackson, J. P. (2017). Cognitive/evolutionary psychology and the history of racism. Philsophy of Science, 84, 296–314.
-
Jacobs, C. D., Steyaert, C., & Ueberbacher, F. (2013). Anticipating intended users: Prospective sensemaking in technology development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25, 1027–43.
-
Jensen, A. F. (2023). The philosophical history of projectification: The project society. In M. Fred & S. Godenhjelm (Eds), Projectification of Organizations, Governance and Societies: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Implications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp 17–37.
-
Jensen, A., Maagard, C. A., & Rasmussen, R. K. (2017). ‘Speaking through the other’: Countering counter-narratives through stakeholders’ stories. In S. Frandsen, T. Kuhn, & M. W. Lundholt (Eds), Counter-Narratives and Organization. New York: Routledge, pp 83–101.
-
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. The Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–60.
-
Jessop, B. (1992). Fordism and post-Fordism: A critical reformulation. In M. Storper & A. J. Scott (Eds), Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development. London: Routledge, pp 42–62.
-
Jones, L. (2021, 12 November). Shein suppliers’ workers doing 75-hour week, finds probe. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59245708
-
Kahn, W. A., & Kram, K. E. (1994). Authority at work: Internal models and their organizational consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19, 17–50.
-
Karikari, E. (2023). Conceptualizing organization: hybridity and the naturalizing of dis/order. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 18(2), 95–109.
-
Kärreman, D., & Rylander, A. (2008). Managing meaning through branding: The case of a consulting firm. Organization Studies, 29, 103–25.
-
Kazis, S. (2022, 20 January). How fast-fashion giant Shein used big tech to change the way we shop. Vice.com. Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/en/article/93bq7z/how-fast-fashion-giant-shein-used-big-tech-to-change-the-way-we-shop
-
Kelley, L. (2023, 25 October). The murky logic of companies’ Israel-Hamas statements .The Atlantic Daily. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/10/companies-statements-israel-hamas-war/675776/?utm_campaign=atlantic-daily-newsletter&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20231025&utm_term=The+Atlantic+Daily
-
Kjellberg, H. (2017). Acquiring associations: On the unexpected social consequences of possessive relations. In F. Cochoy, J. Deville, & L. McFall (Eds), Markets and the Arts of Attachment. London: Routledge, pp 162–79.
-
Klein, E. (Producer). (2021, 5 February). The Ezra Klein Show. An appalled Republican considers the future of the G.O.P. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/05/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-yuval-levin.html?
-
Kliff, S. (2011, 20 September). The Internet is, in fact, a series of tubes. Washington Post . Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/the-internet-is-in-fact-a-series-of-tubes/2011/09/20/gIQALZwfiK_blog.html
-
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E., & Rabetino, R. (2022). Making connections: Harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 210–32.
-
Korczynski, M., Shire, K., Frenkel, S., & Tam, M. (2000). Service work in consumer capitalism: Customers, control, and contradictions. Work, Employment & Society, 14, 669–87.
-
Kornberger, M. (2010). Brand Society: How Brands Transform Management and Lifestyle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
-
Koschmann, M. (2012). The communicative constitution of collective identity in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 61–89.
-
Koschmann, M., & Burk, N. (2016). Accomplishing authority in collaborative work. Western Journal of Communication, 80, 393–413.
-
Koschmann, M., Kuhn, T., & Pfarrer, M. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37, 332–54.
-
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36, 349–72.
-
Kuhn, T. (2008). A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships. Organization Studies, 29, 1227–54.
-
Kuhn, T. (2017a). Developing a communicative imagination under contemporary capitalism: The domain of organizational communication as a mode of explanation. Management Communication Quarterly, 31, 116–22.
-
Kuhn, T. (2017b). Communicatively constituting organizational unfolding through counter-narrative. In S. Frandsen, T. Kuhn, & M. Lundholt (Eds), Counter-Narratives and Organization. New York: Routledge, pp 17–42.
-
Kuhn, T. (2021). (Re)moving blinders: Communication-as-constitutive theorizing as provocation to practice-based organization scholarship. Management Learning, 52(1), 109–21.
-
Kuhn, T. (2022). What are corporations for?: Contemporary capitalism, authority, and a communicative theory of the firm. In M. Pirson, D. M. Wasieleski, & E. Steckler (Eds), Alternative Theories of the Firm. New York: Routledge, pp 120–50.
-
Kuhn, T., & Deetz, S. A. (2008). Critical theory and corporate social responsibility: Can/should we get beyond cynical reasoning? In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 173–96.
-
Kuhn, T., & Jackson, M. (2008). Accomplishing knowledge: A framework for investigating knowing in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 454–85.
-
Kuhn, T., & Burk, N. (2014). Spatial design as sociomaterial practice: A (dis)organizing perspective on communicative constitution. In F. Cooren, E. Vaara, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds), Language and Communication at Work: Discourse, Narrativity, and Organizing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 149–74.
-
Kuhn, T., & Putnam, L. L. (2014). Discourse and communication. In P. Adler, P. DuGay, G. Morgan, & M. Reed (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 414–46.
-
Kuhn, T., & Rennstam, J. (2016). Expertise as a practical accomplishment among objects and values. In J. Treem & P. Leonardi (Eds), Where Is Expertise?: Communication and Organizing in the Information Age. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 25–43.
-
Kuhn, T., Ashcraft, K. L., & Cooren, F. (2017). The Work of Communication: Relational Perspectives on Working and Organizing in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
-
Kurie, P. (2018). In Chocolate We Trust: The Hershey Company Town Unwrapped. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Laapotti, T., & Raappana, M. (2022). Algorithms and organizing. Human Communication Research, 48(3), 491–515.
-
Land, C., & Taylor, S. (2010). Surf’s up: Work, life, balance and brand in a new age capitalist organization. Sociology, 44, 395–413.
-
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
Law, J. (2002). Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Lazonick, W., & O’Sullivan, M. (2000). Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29, 13–35.
-
Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (2000). Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to the Study and Practice of Public Relations .Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
-
Lee, J. Y., Bansal, P., & Barbosa, A. M. (2023). Seeing beyond the here and now: How corporate purpose combats corporate myopia. Strategy Science, 8(2), 302–10.
-
Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23, 59–76.
-
Leonardi, P. M., & Treem, J. W. (2020). Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organization Studies, 41, 1601–25.
-
Lincoln, B. (1994). Authority: Construction and corrosion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Linstead, S., & Thanem, T. (2007). Multiplicity, virtuality, and organization: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze. Organization Studies, 28, 1483–501.
-
Llewellyn, N., & Hindmarsh, J. (2013). The order problem: Inference and interactive service work. Human Relations, 66, 1401–26.
-
Lo, D.