11: Administrative Violence: First-Instance Decision Making in Sexual Diversity Asylum Claims

Author:
Restricted access
Rights and permissions Cite this chapter

This chapter seeks to challenge the focus on precedent in traditional public law study and scholarship. Instead, it argues for the importance of first-instance decision making to understanding the operation of administrative law. In order to build on the existing administrative justice literature, it puts forward a framework of administrative violence which can be used to understand the traumatic experience to which some claimants are subjected when making a first-instance claim. Using the case study of asylum claims by sexually diverse claimants, the chapter argues that greater attention should be paid to how decisions are made at first instance.

  • Adebisi, F. (2020) ‘Decolonising the Law School’, Law Teacher, 54(4): 471577.

  • Cullen, A. (2021) ‘Decolonizing Public Law’, in D. Tran (ed) Decolonizing University Teaching and Learning: An Entry Model for Grappling with Complexities, London: Bloomsbury, 13943.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jivraj, S. (2020) ‘Decolonising the Academy – Between a Rock and a Hard Place’, Interventions, 22(4): 55273.

  • El-Enany, N. (2020) (B)ordering Britain: Law, Race and Empire, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Lino, D. (2016) ‘Albert Venn Dicey and the Constitutional Theory of Empire’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 36(4): 75180.

  • Prabhat, D. (2020) ‘Unequal Citizenship and Subjecthood: A Rose by Any Other Name ... ?’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 71(2): 17591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott, P.F. (2020) ‘The Constitutional Legacies of Empire’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 71(2): 99330.

  • De Mars, S. and O’Donoghue, A. (2021) ‘Beyond Matryoshka Governance in the Twenty-First Century: The Curious Case of Northern Ireland’, in O. Doyle, A. McHarg and J. Murkens (eds) The Brexit Challenge for Ireland and the United Kingdom: Constitutions under Pressure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6485.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grez Hidalgo, P., de Londras, F. and Lock, D. (2022), ‘Parliament, the Pandemic, and Constitutional Principle in the United Kingdom: A Study of the Coronavirus Act 2020’, Modern Law Review, 85(6): 1463503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Horne, A., Thompson, L. and Yong, B. (eds) (2022) Parliament and the Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.

  • McEwen, N., Kenny, M., Sheldon, J. and Brown Swan, C. (2020) ‘Intergovernmental Relations in the UK: Time for a Radical Overhaul?’, Political Quarterly, 91(3): 63240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunter, R. and Rackley, E. (eds) (2022) Justice for Everyone: The Jurisprudence and Legal Lives of Brenda Hale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lammasniemi, L. (2017) ‘Welfare, Anti-austerity and Gender: New Territory and New Sources of Hostility for the Human Rights Act’, in F. Cowell (ed) Critically Examining the Case against the 1998 Human Rights Act, Abingdon: Routledge, 15165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Brien, C. (2019) ‘What Is the Point of Social Security? Discriminatory and Damaging Effects of the Two-Child Limit Justified by the “Lottery of Birth”’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 41(4): 47982.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Atrey, S. (2021) ‘Structural Racism and Race Discrimination’, Current Legal Problems, 74(1): 134.

  • Bowling, B. and Westenra, S. (2018) ‘Racism, Immigration, and Policing’, in M. Bosworth, A. Parmar and Y. Vasquez (eds) Race, Criminal Justice, and Migration Control: Enforcing the Boundaries of Belonging, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • El-Enany, N. (2020), Bordering Britain: Law, Race and Empire, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Olatokun, M.A. (2021) ‘Does the Law Think That Black Lives Matter? A Reflection upon the Role of the Public Sector Equality Duty in Promoting Racial Equality before the Law’, Theory and Practice of Legislation, 9(1): 8395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lawson, A. and Orchard. M. (2021) ‘The Anticipatory Reasonable Adjustment Duty: Removing the Blockages?’, Cambridge Law Journal, 80(2): 30837.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Machin, R. (2017), ‘Made to Measure? An Analysis of the Transition from Disability Living Allowance to Personal Independence Payment’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(4): 43553.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McColgan, A. (2015) ‘Litigating the Public Sector Equality Duty: The Story So Far’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 35(3): 45385.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cowan, D. (2019), ‘Reducing Homelessness or Re-ordering the Deckchairs?’, Modern Law Review, 82(1): 10528.

  • Meers, J. (2022) ‘The “Cumulative Impact” Problem in Social Welfare: Some Legal, Policy and Theoretical Solutions’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 44(1): 4264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simpson, M., McKeever, G. and Fitzpatrick, C. (2023) ‘Legal Protection against Destitution in the UK: The Case for a Right to a Subsistence Minimum’, Modern Law Review 86(2): 46597.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 505 212 41
Full Text Views 3 1 0
PDF Downloads 3 2 0

Altmetrics