7: Safeguarding Property-as-Capital

Author:
Paddy Ireland
Publication Date:
31 Jul 2024
Pages:
185–221
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529235807.ch007
Restricted access
Rights and permissions Cite this chapter
Buy article/chapter (
GBP  £20.00
)

This chapter explores the historical and material conditions of existence of the modern conception of property as private property and thing-ownership, linking them to the rise of capitalist social relations. It moves on to look at what an empirically grounded analysis of any specific set of empirically existing property/property institutions would involve, and at the role of law in constituting and safeguarding modern property and property rights. In this context, it focuses in particular on the intangible financial property forms that are now central to wealth and power, and whose value is based on expectations about future revenues. Against this backdrop, it explores the policy prioritisation of investor protection, the rise of the ‘new constitutionalism’ and ‘derisking’, the impact of these phenomena on democracy, and the gulf between neoliberal rhetoric and neoliberal practice.

  • Adams H C, Public Debts: a study in the science of finance, New York: Appleton (1887).

  • Adkins L, Cooper M, and Konings M, ‘Class in the 21st Century: asset inflation and the new logic of inequality’, 53 Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, pp. 548–572 (2021).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Adkins L, ‘How Wealth Inequalities are Made: an interview with Céline Bessière and Sibylle Gollac’, 38 Australian Feminist Studies, pp.1–16 (2023).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Adler D and Ahumada J, ‘Why is Biden Endorsing Corporate Colonialism in Honduras?’, LPE Blog, 11/12/23.

  • Albert M, ‘The Howey test turns 64’, 2 William & Mary Business Law Review, pp. 1–50 (2011).

  • Alchian A and Demsetz H, ‘Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization’, 62 American Economic Review, pp. 777–795 (1972).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alexander G, Commodity and Propriety: competing visions of property in American legal thought, Chicago: Chicago University Press (1997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alexander G, ‘Property as a Fundamental Constitutional Right? The German Example’, 88 Cornell Law Review, pp. 733–778 (2003).

  • Alexander G, ‘The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property’, 94 Cornell Law Review, pp. 745–819 (2009).

  • Alexander G, Peñalver E, Singer J W and Underkuffler L, ‘A Statement of Progressive Property’, Cornell Law Faculty Publications, Paper 11 (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alschuler A, ‘Rediscovering Blackstone’, 145 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, pp. 1–55 (1996).

  • Alvaredo F, Atkinson A B, and Morelli S, ‘The Challenge of measuring UK wealth inequality in the 2000s’, LSE International Inequalities Institute, Working Paper 4 (December 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alvaredo F, Garbini B, and Piketty T, ‘On the Share of Inheritance in Aggregate Wealth’, 84 Economica, pp. 239–260 (2017).

  • Anderson E, Private Government: how employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it), Princeton: Princeton University Press (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Angus I, ‘The Meaning of So-called Primitive Accumulation’, 74 Monthly Review, (April 2023).

  • Appadurai A, ‘Afterword: the dreamwork of capitalism’, 35 Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, pp. 481–85 (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Applebaum E and Batt R, Private Equity at Work, New York: Russell Sage (2014).

  • Arbogast T, ‘Who are These Bond Vigilantes Anyway? The Political Economy of Sovereign Debt Ownership in the Eurozone’, MpIfG Discussion Paper 20/2 (2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Aristotle, Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press (revised ed. 2009).

  • Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press (revised ed. 2009).

  • Atiyah P S A, The Rise & Fall of Freedom of Contract, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1979).

  • Atkinson A B, ‘Wealth and Inheritance in Britain from 1896 to the Present’, 16 Journal of Economic Inequality, pp. 137–169 (2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Austin J, Lectures on Jurisprudence, volume 2, London: John Murray (4th ed., ed Robert Campbell, 1873).

  • Aylmer G E, ‘The Meaning and Definition of “Property” in Seventeenth-Century England’, 86 Past and Present, pp. 87–97 (1980).

  • Babie P A, ‘A Great Exploitation: the true legacy of property – a review essay’, 31 International Journal of the Semiotics of Law, pp. 977–993 (2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Backus M et al, ‘Common Ownership in America, 1980–2017’, 13 American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, pp. 273–308 (2021).

  • Baines J and Hager S, ‘From Passive Owners to Planet Savers? Asset Managers, Carbon Majors and the Limits of Sustainable Finance’, 27 Competition and Change, pp. 449–471 (2023).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Baker J H, An Introduction to English Legal History, Oxford: Oxford University Press (5th ed., 2019).

  • Banaji J, Theory as History: essays on modes of production and exploitation, Leiden: Brill (2010).

  • Banaji J, A Brief History of Commercial Capitalism, Haymarket: Chicago (2019).

  • Banner S, American Property, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (2011).

  • Barker T, ‘Some Questions about Political Capitalism’, 140/41 New Left Review, pp. 35–51 (March–June 2023).

  • Baron J, ‘The Contested Commitments of Property’, 61 Hastings Law Journal, pp. 917–967 (2010).

  • Becker L, ‘Too Much Property’, 21 Philosophy & Public Affairs, pp. 196–206 (1992).

  • Beckert J, Imagined Futures: fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (2016).

  • Bentham J, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1876 [1780], from the revised ed. 1823).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bentham J, ‘Defence of Usury’, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, volume 3, New York: Russell & Russell (1962 [1787]).

  • Berle A and Means G, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Macmillan (1932) / New York: Harcourt Brace (revised ed. 1967).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Berle A, ‘Corporate Devices for Diluting Stock Participations’, 31 Columbia Law Review, pp. 1239–1265 (1931).

  • Berle A, ‘For Whom Corporate Managers are Trustees’, 45 Harvard Law Review, pp. 1365–1372 (1932).

  • Berle A, ‘Modern Functions of the Corporate System’, 62 Columbia Law Review, pp. 433–449 (1962).

  • Bessière C and Gollac S, The Gender of Capital: how families perpetuate wealth inequality, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (2023).

  • Bhandar B, Colonial Lives of Property: law, land and racial regimes of ownership, Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press (2018).

  • Black S et al, ‘Poor Little Rich Kids? The role of nature versus nurture in wealth and other economic outcomes and behaviors’, NBER Working Paper No 21409 (2015, revised 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • BlackRock, 2022 Voting Spotlight, BlackRock Investment Stewardship (2022), blackrock.com/stewardship

  • Blackstone W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Books I-IV, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (general ed Wilfred Prest, 2016 [1765–69]).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Blaufarb R, The Great Demarcation: the French revolution and the invention of modern property, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2016).

  • Bloch M, Feudal Society, London: Routledge (2014 [1940])

  • Bodenheimer E, ‘Modern Analytical Jurisprudence and the Limits of its Usefulness’, 104 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, pp. 1080–1086 (1956).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boeger N and Villiers C (eds), Shaping the Corporate Landscape: towards corporate reform and enterprise diversity, London: Bloomsbury (2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bonetti A, ‘Housing as an Asset Class, Italian Edition’, Italics, 24/9/21.

  • Bouckaert B, ‘What is Property?’, 13 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, pp. 475–816 (1990).

  • Bourdieu P, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1977)

  • Boyle J, ‘Enclosing the Genome: what the squabbles over genetic patents could teach us’, in H Tavani (ed.), Ethics, Computing and Genomics, Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett, pp. 255–278 (2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bracha O, Owning Ideas: a history of Anglo-American intellectual property, JD Thesis, Harvard Law School (2005).

  • Brandeis L, ‘Business - a profession’, System (October 1912), later republished in L Brandeis, Business - a profession, Boston: Small Maynard (1914).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Braudel F, The Wheels of Commerce, London: Collins (1983 [1979]).

  • Braun B, ‘Asset Manager Capitalism as a Corporate Governance Regime’, in J Hacker et al (eds), The American Political Economy, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 270–294 (2021).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Braun B, ‘Exit, Control and Politics: structural power and corporate governance under asset manager capitalism’, 50 Politics and Society, pp. 630–654 (2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brenner R, ‘The Origins of Capitalist Development: a critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’, 104 New Left Review, pp. 25–92 (July–August 1977).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brenner R, ‘Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe’, 70 Past and Present, pp. 30–75 (1977), reprinted in T H Aston and C H E Philip (eds), The Brenner Debate, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–63 (1985).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brenner R, ‘The Agrarian Roots of Modern Capitalism’, 97 Past and Present, pp. 16–113 (1982), reprinted in T H Aston and C H E Philip (eds), The Brenner Debate, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213–327 (1985).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brenner R, ‘Ellen Meiksins Wood (1942-2016)’, https://solidarity-us.org/atc/181/p4598/.

  • Brenner R, ‘Escalating Plunder’, 123 New Left Review, pp. 5–27 (May–June 2020).

  • Brenner R, ‘From Capitalism to Feudalism? Predation, decline and the transformation of US politics’, lecture delivered at University of Massuchusetts, 27/4/21, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZJ-Bz4U4As

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brick H, Transcending Capitalism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press (2006).

  • Bricker J et al, ‘Changes in US Family Finances from 2010 to 2013: evidence from the survey of consumer finances’, 100 Federal Reserve Bulletin (September 2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Burgin A, The Great Persuasion, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (2012).

  • Burrough B and Helyar J, Barbarians at the Gate, New York: Harper & Row (1989).

  • Cabrelli D, ‘Addressing the Falling Labour share in the UK and beyond’, 27 Edinburgh Law Review, pp. 1–33 (2023).

  • Campbell D, ‘The Role of Monitoring and Morality in Company Law’, 7 Australian Journal of Corporate Law, pp. 343–365 (1997).

  • Cannan E, ‘Early History of the Term Capital’, 35 Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 469–481 (1921).

  • Canterbery E R, Wall Street Capitalism: the theory of the bondholding class, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing (2000).

  • Caves R, ‘Mergers, Takeovers, and Economic Efficiency: foresight vs hindsight’, 7 International Journal of Industrial Organisation, pp. 151–174 (1989).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chadwick A, ‘Capital without Capitalism? Or capitalism without determinism?’, 30 Social and Legal Studies, pp. 302–311 (2021).

  • Chang H-J, Kicking Away the Ladder, London: Anthem (2003).

  • Chang H-J, Bad Samaritans, New York: Random House (2007).

  • Chayes A, ‘The Modern Corporation and the Rule of Law’, in Edward Mason (ed.), The Corporation in Modern Society, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1959), reprinted New York: Atheneum, pp. 25–45 (1966).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cheffins B, Company Law: theory, structure and operation, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1997).

  • Chiapello E, ‘Accounting and the birth of the notion of capitalism’, 18 Critical Perspectives on Accounting, pp. 263–296 (2007).

  • Christodoulidis E and Goldoni M, ‘Marxism and the political economy of law’, in E Christodoulidis, R Dukes and M Goldoni (eds), Research Handbook on Critical Legal Theory, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 95–113 (2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Christophers B, The New Enclosure: the appropriation of public land in neoliberal Britain, London: Verso (2018).

  • Christophers B, Rentier Capitalism, London: Verso (2020).

  • Claassen R and Katz L, ‘Property: authority without office?’, 3 Journal of Law and Political Economy, pp. 570–575 (2023).

  • Coase R, ‘The Nature of the Firm’, 4 Economica, pp. 386–405 (1937).

  • Code civil des Français, Paris: Imprimerie de la République (1804).

  • Cohen M, ‘Property and Sovereignty’, 13 Cornell Law Quarterly, pp. 8–30 (1927).

  • Colliot-Thélène C, ‘Afterword’ to I I Rubin, A History of Economic Thought, London: Ink Links, pp. 385–429 (1979).

  • Commons J R, The Distribution of Wealth, London: Macmillan (1893).

  • Conaghan J, ‘The Essence of Rape’, 39 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 151–82 (2019).

  • Corbin A, ‘Taxation of Seats on the Stock Exchange’, 31 Yale Law Journal, pp. 429–431 (1922).

  • Cornwell J, ‘MacIntyre on Money’, Prospect Magazine, November 2010.

  • Credit Suisse Research Institute, Global Wealth Report 2021, www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/global-wealth-report.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC), The Great Train Robbery: rail privatisation and after, Manchester: CRESC (2013).

  • Crosland A, ‘The Transition from Capitalism’, in D Reisman (ed.), Democratic Socialism in Britain, volume 9, London: Routledge, pp. 33–68 (1951).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Crosland A, The Future of Socialism, London: Jonathan Cape (1956).

  • Dagan H, ‘The Craft of Property’, 91 California Law Review, pp. 1517–1571 (2003).

  • Dagan H, ‘Autonomy and Property’, in H Dagan and B Zipursky (eds), Research Handbook on Private Law Theory, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 185–202 (2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dagan H, A Liberal Theory of Property, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2021).

  • Dallas L, and Barry J, ‘Long-term shareholders and time-phased voting’, 40 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, pp. 541–646 (2016).

  • Daugareilh I et al, ‘The Platform Economy and Social Law: key issues in comparative perspective’, ETUI Research Paper – Working Paper 2019.10 (2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Daunton M, ‘Open Fields and Enclosure: the demise of commonality’, in M Daunton, Progress and Poverty: an economic and social history of Britain, 1700-1850, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davies J H, ‘Keynes on the Socialization of Investment’, 19 International Journal of Social Economics, pp. 150–163 (1992).

  • Davies M, ‘Review of J E Penner, The Idea of Property in Law’, 7 Social and Legal Studies, pp. 577–580 (1998).

  • Davies M, Property, London: Routledge-Cavendish (2007).

  • Deakin S, ‘The Coming Transformation of Shareholder Value’, 13 Corporate Governance; An International Review, pp. 11–18 (2005).

  • Deakin S, Gindis D, Hodgson G, Kainan H and Pistor K, ‘Legal Institutionalism: capitalism and the constitutive role of law’, 45 Journal of Comparative Economics, pp. 188–200 (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Deazley R, ‘The Myth of Copyright at Common Law ’, 62 Cambridge Law Journal, pp. 106–133 (2003).

  • Deazley R, ‘Commentary on Hinton v Donaldson’ and ‘Commentary on Donaldson v Becket’ in L Bently and M Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright, 1450-1900, http://www.copyrighthistory.org

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • de Soto H, The Mystery of Capital, London: Black Swan (2001).

  • Dickerson A P et al, ‘Short Termism and Underinvestment in Financial Systems’, 58 Manchester School, pp. 351–367 (1995).

  • Dickerson A P et al, ‘The Impact of Acquisitions on Company Performance’, 49 Oxford Economic Papers 344 (1997).

  • Dickerson A P et al, ‘Takeover Risk and Dividend Strategy: a study of UK firms’, 46 Journal of Industrial Economics, pp. 281–300 (1998).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dickinson H T, ‘Review Article: comments on William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England’, 104 History, pp. 710–728 (2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dickson, P G M, The Financial Revolution in England, London: Macmillan (1967).

  • Dimick M, ‘Without Remainder: law and the constitution of economy and society’, Legal Form Forum, 11/7/2022.

  • Dimick M, ‘Is Capitalism a Thing?’, LPE Blog, 23/10/23.

  • Dimoulis D, and Milios J, ‘Commodity Fetishism vs Capital Fetishism’, 12 Historical Materialism, pp. 3–42 (2004).

  • Di Muzio T, ‘Towards a Genealogy of the New Constitutionalism’, in S Gill and A C Cutler (eds), New Constitutionalism and World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–94 (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • di Robilant A, ‘Property: a bundle of sticks or a tree?’, 66 Vanderbilt Law Review, pp. 869–932 (2013).

  • di Robilant A and Syed T, ‘Property’s Building Blocks: Hohfeld in Europe and beyond’, in S Balganesh, T Sichelman and H Smith (eds), Wesley Hohfeld a Century Later, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–257 (2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dodd E M, ‘For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?’, 45 Harvard Law Review, pp. 1145–1163 (1932).

  • Dodd E M, ‘Is the Effective Enforcement of the Fiduciary Duties of Corporate Managers Practicable?’, 2 University of Chicago Law Review, pp. 194–207 (1935).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Domhoff G W, ‘Wealth, Income and Power’, whorulesamerica.ucsc.edu/power/wealth.html

  • Douglas S and McFarlane B, ‘Defining Property Rights’, in J E Penner and H Smith (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–243 (2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Douglas W O, ‘Protecting the Investor’, 23 The Yale Review, pp. 522–533 (1934).

  • Douglas W O, Democracy and Finance, New Haven: Yale University Press (1940).

  • Duménil G and Lévy D ‘Costs and Benefits of Neoliberalism: a class analysis’, in G Epstein (ed.), Financialization and The World Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 17–45 (2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Durand C, Fictitious Capital, London: Verso (2017).

  • Durand C, Techno-féodalisme, Paris: Zones (2020).

  • Durbin E, The Politics of Democratic Socialism, London: Routledge (1940).

  • Eagleton T, ‘Utopia and its Opposites’, Socialist Register, pp. 31–40 (2000).

  • Easterbook F and Fischel D, ‘The Proper Role of a Target’s Management in Responding to a Tender Offer’, 94 Harvard Law Review, pp. 1161–1204 (1981).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Easterbrook F and Fischel D, ‘Voting in Corporate Law’ (1983) 26 Journal of Law and Economics, pp. 395–427 (1983).

  • Easterbrook F and Fischel D, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1991).

  • Egan M, ‘US billionaires have become $565 richer during the pandemic’, CNN Business, 4/6/2020.

  • Egan M, ‘US Billionaires have grown $1.1 trillion richer during the pandemic’, CNN Business, 26/1/2021.

  • Ellickson R, ‘Two Cheers for the Bundle-of-Sticks Metaphor, Three Cheers for Merrill and Smith’, 8 Econ Journal Watch, pp. 215–222 (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Epstein G (ed.), Financialization and The World Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (2005).

  • Epstein G, ‘Introduction’, in G Epstein (ed.), Financialization and The World Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–16 (2005).

  • Epstein G and Jayadev A, ‘The Rise of Rentier Incomes in OECD Countries’, in G Epstein (ed.), Financialization and The World Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 46–76 (2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Epstein R, Takings: private property and the power of eminent domain, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1985).

  • Epstein R, ‘The Assault that Failed: the progressive critique of laissez faire’ 97 Michigan Law Review, pp. 1697–1721 (1999).

  • Epstein R, ‘Bundle-of-Rights Theory as a Bulwark Against Statist Conceptions of Private Property’, 8 Econ Journal Watch, pp. 223–235 (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ely R T, ‘Political Economy’ in Richard T Ely (ed.), Political Economy, Political Science and Sociology, Chicago: University Association, pp. 3–39 (1899).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Erturk I et al, ‘General Introduction’ in I Erturk et al (eds), Financialization at Work, London: Routledge, pp. 1–43 (2008).

  • Fama E, ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’, 88 Journal of Political Economy, pp. 288–307 (1980).

  • Fancy T, ‘ESG and sustainability investing are deadly distractions in the climate crisis’, Climate and Capital Media, 20/8/21

  • Fancy T, The Secret Diary of a Sustainable Investor, August 2021, https://medium.com/@sosofancy/the-secret-diary-of-a-sustainable-investor-part-1-70b6987fa139

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fetter F, ‘Clark’s Reformulation of the Capital Concept’, in F Fetter (ed.), Capital, Interest and Rent, Kansas City: Sheed Andrews & McMeel, pp. 119–142 (1977 [1927]).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fetter F, ‘Capital’, in E Seligman and A Johnson (eds), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, volume 3, New York: Macmillan, pp. 187–190 (1930).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fetter F, ‘Reformulation of the Concepts of Capital and income in Economics and Accounting’, 12 The Accounting Review, pp. 3–12 (1937).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fichtner J, ‘The Rise of Institutional Investors’, in Mader et al (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Financialization, London: Routledge, pp. 265–275 (2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fichtner J et al, ‘The New Permanent Universal Owners’, 49 Economy & Society, pp. 493–515 (2020).

  • Fischel D, ‘The Corporate Governance Movement’, 35 Vanderbilt Law Review, pp. 1259–1292 (1982).

  • Flannigan R, ‘Shareholder Fiduciary Accountability’, Journal of Business Law, pp. 1–30 (2014).

  • Folkman P et al, ‘Working for Themselves? Capital market intermediaries and present day capitalism’, 49 Business History, pp. 552–572 (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fox A, Beyond Contract, London: Faber & Faber (1974).

  • Fracchia J, ‘Marx’s Aufhebung of Philosophy and the Foundations of a Materialist Science of History’, 30 History and Theory, pp.153–179 (1991).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Frank J, ‘Book Review of Berle & Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property’, 43 Yale Law Journal, pp. 989–1000 (1933).

  • Franks J and Mayer C, ‘Hostile Takeovers and the Correction of Managerial Failure’, 40 Journal of Financial Economics, pp. 163–181 (1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Frémeaux N and Leturcq M, ‘Inequalities and the Individualization of Wealth’, 184 Journal of Public Economics, pp. 1–18 (2020).

  • Freyfolge E, ‘Private Ownership and Human Flourishing: an exploratory overview’, 24 Stellenbosch Law Review, pp. 430–454 (2013).

  • Fried B, The Progressive Assault on laissez-Faire: Robert Lee Hale and the first law and economics movement, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1998).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Froud J et al, Financialization and Strategy: narrative and numbers, London: Routledge (2006).

  • Fukuyama F, The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Free Press (1992).

  • Gabor D, ‘The Wall Street Consensus’, 52 Development and Change, pp. 429–459 (2021).

  • Gabor D and Kohl S, My Home is an Asset Class, Greens/EFA (January 2022), https://www.greens-efa.eu/en/article/document/my-home-is-an-asset-class

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gabor D, ‘This economic chaos is a form of class war on the British public’, The Guardian, 6/10/22.

  • George J, A View of the Existing Law Affecting Unincorporated Joint Stock Companies, London: McDowall (1825).

  • Gill S, ‘Globalisation, Market Civilisation and Disciplinary Neoliberalism’, 23 Millennium: Journal of International Studies, pp. 399–423 (1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gill S, ‘New Constitutionalism, Democratisation and Global Political Economy’, 10 Pacifica Review, pp. 23–38 (1998).

  • Gill S and Cutler A C, ‘General Introduction’ to S Gill and A C Cutler (eds), New Constitutionalism and World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–19 (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Golland A et al, ‘Proxy Voting for the Earth System: institutional shareholder governance of global tipping elements’ (2022), https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067103 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4067103

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gordon J N, ‘The Rise of Independent Directors in the United States, 1950-2005’, 59 Stanford Law Review, pp. 1465–1568 (2007).

  • Gordon R W, ‘Paradoxical Property’, in John Brewer and Susan Staves (eds), Early Modern Conceptions of Property, London : Routledge, pp. 95–110 (1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gower L C B, ‘Corporate Control: the battle for the Berkeley’, 68 Harvard Law Review, pp. 1176–1193 (1955).

  • Gower L C B, ‘Review of F Emerson & F Latcham, Shareholder Democracy’, 68 Harvard Law Review, pp. 922–928 (1955).

  • Gower L C B, Principles of Modern Company Law, London: Stevens/Sweet and Maxwell (3rd ed., 1969; 4th ed., 1979; 6th ed., 1997).

  • Goyder G, The Responsible Company, Oxford: Blackwell (1961).

  • Graham N, Lawscape: property, environment, law, Abingdon: Routledge-Glasshouse (2011).

  • Graham N, ‘Dephysicalised Property and Shadow Lands’, in R Bartel and J Carter (eds), Handbook on Space, Place and Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 281–291 (2021).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gray K, ‘Property in Thin Air’, 50 Cambridge Law Journal, pp. 252–307 (1991).

  • Getzler J, ‘Theories of Property and Economic development’, 26 Journal of Interdisciplinary History, pp. 639–669 (1996).

  • Graziadei M, ‘The Structure of Property Ownership and the Common Law/Civil Law Divide’, in M Graziadei and L Smith (eds), Comparative Property Law, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, pp. 71–99 (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Greer A, Property and Dispossession, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2018).

  • Grewal D S, ‘The Laws of Capitalism’, Book Review of Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty First Century, 128 Harvard Law Review, pp. 626–667 (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Grewal D S and Britton-Purdy J, ‘Liberalism, Property and the Means of Production’, LPE Blog, 25/1/2021

  • Grey T C, ‘The Disintegration of Property’, 22 Nomos, pp. 69–85 (1980).

  • Gutiérrez G and Philippon T, ‘Investmentless Growth’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Fall, 2017).

  • Hager S B, Public Debt, Ownership and Power, PhD, Toronto: York University (2013).

  • Hager S B, ‘What Happened to the Bondholding Class? Public debt, power and the top one per cent’, 19 New Political Economy, pp. 155–182 (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hager S B, ‘Corporate Ownership of the Public Debt: mapping the new aristocracy of finance’, 13 Socio-Economic Review, pp. 505–523 (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hager S B, ‘Public Debt as Corporate Power’, Working Papers on Capital as Power (2015).

  • Hager S B, Public Debt, Inequality and Power, Oakland: University of California Press (2016).

  • Hager S B, ‘The Rise of the American Bondholding Class’, Roar Magazine (2016), https://roarmag.org/magazine/sandy-hager-public-debt-bondholding-class/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hale R L, ‘Law-Making by Unofficial Minorities’, 20 Columbia Law Review, pp. 451–456 (1920).

  • Hale R L, ‘Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State’, 38 Political Science Quarterly, pp. 470–94 (1923).

  • Hale R L, ‘Economics and Law’, in W Ogburn and A Goldenweiser (eds), The Social Sciences and their Interrelations, London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 131–142 (1927).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hale R L, ‘Bargaining, Duress and Economic Liberty’, 43 Columbia Law Review, pp. 603–628 (1943).

  • Hallowell A I, ‘The Nature and Function of Property as a Social Institution’, 1 Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, pp. 115–39 (1943).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hann C M, ‘Introduction: the embeddedness of property’, in C M Hann (ed.), Property Relations: renewing the anthropological tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–40 (1988).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hann C M, ‘The Tragedy of the Privates? Post-socialist property relations in anthropological perspective’, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Working Papers, No 2 (2000).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hann C M, ‘The State of the Art: a new double movement? Anthropological perspectives on property in the age of neoliberalism’, 5 Socio-Economic Review, pp. 287–318 (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hansmann H and Kraakman R, ‘The Essential Role of Organizational Law’, 110 Yale Law Journal, pp. 387–440 (2000).

  • Hansmann H, Kraakman R and Squire R, ‘Law and the Rise of the Firm’, 119 Harvard Law Review, pp. 1333–1403 (1996).

  • Hansmann H and Kraakman R, ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’, 89 Georgetown Law Journal, pp. 439–468 (2001).

  • Harding L, ‘As Donald Trump made clear, smart businesses know only idiots pay taxes’, The Guardian, 16/10/2016.

  • Harris J W, Property and Justice, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1996).

  • Harris J W, ‘Reason or Mumbo Jumbo: the common law’s approach to property’, 117 Proceedings of the British Academy, pp. 445–475 (2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harris J W, ‘The Elusiveness of Property’, 48 Scandinavian Studies of Law, pp. 123–131 (2005).

  • Hart H L A, ‘Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence’ in Hart, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 21–48 (1983 [1953]).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hart H L A, The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1961).

  • Hart H L A and Honore A M, Causation in Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1959).

  • Harris R, Industrializing English Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2000).

  • Harvey D, The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2003).

  • Harvey D, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2005).

  • Harvey D, The Enigma of Capital, London: Profile Books (2010).

  • Harvey D, ‘History versus Theory: a commentary on Marx’s method in Capital ’, 20 Historical Materialism, pp. 3–38 (2012).

  • Hawley J and Williams A, ‘The Emergence of Universal Owners’, 43 Challenge, pp. 43–61 (July-August 2000).

  • Heller M, ‘The Boundaries of Property’, 108 Yale Law Journal, pp. 1163–1223 (1999).

  • Henwood D, Wall Street, London: Verso (1997).

  • Herman S, ‘The Uses and Abuses of Roman Law Texts’, 29 American Journal of Comparative Law, pp. 671–690 (1981).

  • Hilferding R, Finance Capital, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1981 [1910]).

  • Hirschl R, ‘The Political Origins of the New Constitutionalism’, 11 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, pp. 71–108 (2004).

  • Hirschl R, Towards Juristocracy: the origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism, Boston: Harvard University Press (2004).

  • Hodgson G and Callinicos A, ‘Institutionalism versus Marxism: perspectives for social science – a debate between Geoffrey Hodgson and Alex Callinicos’, University of Hertfordshire Working Papers (2001).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hodgson G, ‘Frank A Fetter (1863-1949): Capital (1930)’, 4 Journal of Institutional Economics, pp. 127–137 (2008).

  • Hodgson G, Conceptualising Capitalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2015).

  • Hodgson G, ‘Conceptualising Capitalism: a summary’, 20 Competition and Change, pp. 37–52 (2016).

  • Hohfeld W, ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’, 23 Yale Law Journal, pp. 16–59 (1913).

  • Hohfeld W, ‘Fundamental Judicial Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’, 26 Yale Law Journal, pp. 710–770 (1917).

  • Honoré A M, ‘Ownership’, in A G Guest (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–147 (1961).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Honoré A M, ‘Property and Ownership: marginal comments’, in T Endicott et al (eds), Properties of Law: essays in honour of Jim Harris, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–137 (2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Holdsworth W S, ‘The History of the Treatment of Choses in Action by the Common Law’, 33 Harvard Law Review, pp. 997–1030 (1920).

  • Holdsworth W S, A History of English Law, London: Methuen (1922-38)

  • Hoppit J, ‘Attitudes to Credit in Britain, 1680-1790’, 33 Historical Journal, pp. 305–322 (1990).

  • Hunter R, ‘Critical Legal Studies and Marx’s Critique: a reappraisal’, 31 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, pp. 389–412 (2021).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hutchinson A, ‘Razzle Dazzle’, 1 Jurispridence, pp. 39–61 (2010).

  • ILO and OECD, The Labour Share in G20 Economies, G20 Employment Working Group (2015), https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/employment-and-social-policy/The-Labour-Share-in-G20-Economies.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ireland P, ‘The Rise of the Limited Liability Company’, 12 International Journal of the Sociology of Law, pp. 239–60 (1984).

  • Ireland P, ‘Capitalism without the Capitalist: the joint stock company share and the emergence of the modern doctrine of separate corporate personality’, 17 Journal of Legal History, pp. 41–73 (1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ireland P, ‘History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism’, 65 Modern Law Review, pp. 120–140 (2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ireland P, ‘Property and Contract in Contemporary Corporate Theory’, 23 Legal Studies, pp. 453–509 (2003).

  • Ireland P, ‘Limited Liability, Shareholder Rights, and the Problem of Corporate Irresponsibility’, 34 Cambridge Journal of Economics, pp. 837–856 (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ireland P, ‘Law and the Neoliberal Vision: financial property, pension privatization and the ownership society’, 62 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, pp. 1–32 (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ireland P, ‘The Corporation and the New Aristocracy of Finance’, in J-P Robe, A Lyon-Caen and S Vernac (eds), Multinationals and the Constitutionalization of the World-Power System, London: Routledge, pp. 53–105 (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ireland P, ‘Corporate Schizophrenia: the institutional origins of corporate social irresponsibility’, in N Boeger and C Villiers (eds), Shaping the Corporate Landscape: towards corporate reform and enterprise diversity, Oxford: Hart, pp. 13–39 (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ireland P, ‘Making Sense of Contemporary Capitalism using Company Law’, 33 Australian Journal of Corporate Law, pp. 379–401 (2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ireland P and Meng G, ‘Post-Capitalist Property’, 46 Economy and Society, pp. 369–397 (2017).

  • Jensen M, ‘Eclipse of the Public Corporation’, 89 Harvard Business Review, pp. 61–75 (September–October 1989).

  • Jensen M and Meckling W, ‘Theory of the Firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure’, 3 Journal of Financial Economics, pp. 305–360 (1976).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jensen M and Ruback R, ‘Market for Corporate Control: the scientific evidence’, 11 Journal of Financial Economics, pp. 5–50 (1983).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jessop B, ‘Knowledge as a Fictitious Commodity: insights and limits of a Polanyian perspective’, in A Buğra and K Ağartan (eds), Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century: market economy as a political project, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 115–134 (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Johnston N, ‘The History of the Parliamentary Franchise’, House of Commons Library, Research Paper 13/14 (2013).

  • Katz L, ‘Exclusion and Exclusivity in Property Law’, 58 University of Toronto Law Journal, pp. 275–315 (2008).

  • Kay J, ‘Forty Years of taxing on UK runways’, Financial Times 4/1/11.

  • Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long Term Decision Making (Final Report, July 2012).

  • Kennedy D, ‘The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries’, 28 Buffalo Law Review, pp. 209–382 (1979).

  • Kennedy D, ‘The Role of Law in Economic Thought: essays on the fetishism of commodities’, 34 American University Law Review, pp. 939–1001 (1985).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kennedy D, ‘The Stakes of Law; or Hale and Foucault!’, 4 Legal Studies Forum, pp. 327–366 (1991).

  • Kennedy D, A Critique of Adjudication, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1997).

  • Kennedy M, Interest and Inflation Free Money, British Columbia: New Society Publishers (revised ed. 1995 [1987]).

  • Kershaw D, Principles of Takeover Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2016).

  • Keynes J M, The End of Laissez-Faire, Amherst: Prometheus Books (2004 [1926]).

  • Keynes J M, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), reprinted in E Johnson and D Moggridge (eds), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, volume 7, London: Macmillan (1973[1936]).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Khurana R, From Higher Aims to Hired Hands, Princeton: Princeton University Press (2007).

  • Kim J, ‘Propertization: the process by which financial corporate power has risen and collapsed’, 1 Review of Capital as Power, pp. 58–82 (2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • King B E, ‘The Basic Concept of Professor Hart’s Jurisprudence’, 21 Cambridge Law Journal, pp. 270–303 (1963).

  • Klein D and Robinson J, ‘Property: a bundle of rights? Prologue to the property symposium’, 8 Econ Journal Watch, pp. 193–204 (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koffler J S, ‘Capital in Hell: Dante’s lessons on usury’, 32 Rutgers Law Review, pp. 609–660 (1979).

  • Kotz D M, Bank Control of Large Corporations in the United States, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press (1978).

  • Kraakman R et al (eds), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: a comparative and functional approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2004).

  • Krätke M R, ‘The Political Economy of (Public and Private) Debt’, Workshop on Debt, University of Lancaster, https://www.academia.edu/5550526/Political_economy_of_public_debt

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kukk M et al, ‘The Gender Wealth Gap in Europe’, 69 Review of Income and Wealth, pp. 289–317 (2023).

  • Lacey N, ‘Analytical Jurisprudence versus descriptive sociology revisited’ (2006), 84 Texas Law Review, pp. 945–982 (2006).

  • Lacey N, ‘Jurisprudence, History, and the Institutional Quality of Law’, 101 Virginia Law Review, pp. 919–45 (2015).

  • Lametti D, ‘The Concept of Property: relations through objects of social wealth’, 53 University of Toronto Law Journal, pp. 325–378 (2003).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Landes E and Posner R, ‘The Economics of the Baby Shortage’, 7 Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 323–348 (1976).

  • Laski H, A Grammar of Politics, London: Allen & Unwin (1925).

  • Lawson F H and Rudden B, Law of Property, Oxford: Oxford University Press (3rd ed., 2002).

  • Lazonick W, ‘Controlling the Market for Corporate Control: the historical significance of managerial capitalism’, 1 Industrial & Corporate Change, pp. 445–488 (1992).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lazonick W and O’Sullivan M, ‘Maximizing Shareholder Value: a new ideology for corporate governance’, 29 Economy and Society, pp. 13–35 (2000).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lazzarato M, Governing by Debt, Cambridge: MIT Press (2015).

  • Leacock E, ‘The Montagnais-Naskapi of the Labrador Peninsula’, in R Bruce Morrison and C Roderick Wilson (eds), Native Peoples: the Canadian experience, Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, pp. 140–171 (1986).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lehavi A, The Construction of Property, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2013).

  • Levy J, ‘Capital as Process and the History of Capitalism’, 91 Business History Review, pp. 483–510 (2017).

  • Lippman W, Drift and Mastery, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press (1985 [1914]).

  • Lobban M, ‘Legal Theory and Legal History: prospects for a dialogue’, in M Del Mar and M Lobban (eds), Law in Theory and History: new essays on a neglected dialogue, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 3–21 (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Locke J, Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1963, ed P Laslett).

  • Lojkine U, ‘Critical Political Economy beyond the Production/Circulation Dichotomy’, LPE Blog, 17/5/2021.

  • Lowie R, Primitive Society, New York: Boni & Liveright (1920).

  • Lowie R, ‘Incorporeal Property in Primitive Society’, 37 Yale Law Journal, pp. 551–563 (1928).

  • Macfarlane A, The Origins of English Individualism, Oxford: Blackwell (1978).

  • Maddison J, ‘Property’, National Gazette, (March 29, 1792), reprinted in Marvin Meyers (ed.), The Mind of the Founder, Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill (1973).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • MacLeod H D, Principles of Economical Philosophy, London: Longmans, Green Reader & Dyer (2nd ed., 1872).

  • Macleod H D, The Theory of Credit, London: Longmans, Green & Co (1889).

  • MacPherson C B, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1962).

  • Maine H, Ancient Law, London: Dent (1917 [1861]).

  • Malcolmson R, Life and Labour in England, 1700-80, London: Hutchinson (1981).

  • Manne H, ‘Book Review of Richard Eells, Corporation Giving in a Free Society’, 24 University of Chicago Law Review, pp. 194–202 (1956).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Manne H, ‘The “Higher Criticism” of the Modern Corporation’, 62 Columbia Law Review, pp. 399–432 (1962).

  • Manne H, ‘Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control’, 73 Journal of Political Economy, pp. 110–120 (1965).

  • Manne H, Insider Trading and the Stock Market, New York: Free Press (1966).

  • Manne H, ‘Our Two Corporation Systems: law and economics’, 53 Virginia Law Review, pp. 259–284 (1967).

  • Manne H (ed.), Economic Policy and the Regulation of Corporate Securities: a symposium, Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (1969).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Manning B, ‘Review of J.A. Livingston, The American Stockholder ’, 67 Yale Law Journal, pp. 1477–1496 (1958).

  • Manning S, ‘Britain’s colonial shame’, Independent, 24/2/13.

  • Mark G, ‘The Personification of the Business Corporation in American Law’, 54 University of Chicago Law Review, pp. 1441–1483 (1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marx K, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, London: Lawrence & Wishart (ed Dirk Struik) 1970 [1844]).

  • Marx K, The Poverty of Philosophy, Moscow: Progress (1955 [1847])

  • Marx K, Wage Labour and Capital, Moscow: Progress (1974 [1847]).

  • Marx K, Grundrisse, (Penguin ed. 1973 [1857–8], with a foreword by Martin Nicholas).

  • Marx K, Capital, volume 1, London: Lawrence and Wishart (1954 [1867]).

  • Marx K, Capital, volume 2, London: Lawrence and Wishart (1956 [1885]).

  • Marx K, Capital, volume 3, London: Lawrence and Wishart (1959 [1894]).

  • Mason E, ‘Introduction’, in E Mason (ed.), The Corporation in Modern Society, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1959), reprinted New York: Atheneum, pp. 1–24 (1966).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mayer C, Firm Commitment, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2013).

  • Mayer J, Dark Money, New York: Doubleday (2016).

  • Mazzucato M, The Entrepreneurial State, New York: Anthem (2013).

  • Mazzucato M, ‘Preventing Digital Feudalism’, Project Syndicate, 2/10/19, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/platform-economy-digital-feudalism.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meriküll J et al, ‘What Explains the Gender Gap in Wealth?’, 19 Review of Economics of the Household, pp. 501–547 (2021).

  • Merrill T, ‘Property and the Right to Exclude’, 77 Nebraska Law Review, pp. 730–755 (1998).

  • Merrill T, ‘The Property Prism’, 8 Econ Watch Journal, pp. 247–254 (2011).

  • Merrill T, ‘The Property Strategy’, 160 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, pp. 2061–2095 (2012).

  • Merrill T, ‘Possession as a Natural Right’, 9 New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, pp. 345–374 (2015).