5:
This chapter considers parents’ engagement with the news, as the world in which they are raising children often appears replete with crises, risks, and much fodder for anxiety. The chapter unpacks parents’ negotiations of algorithmic news recommendations using the metaphor of the gateway, where parents’ behaviours as users, work as part of complex and wider aggregated environments, in the generation of fine-tuned and tailored news recommendations in a recursive loop. The chapter speaks of the gateway not as a site where parents’ agency dissipates, or where they are passive recipients of platform power. Instead, the chapter reveals the often fleeting and ephemeral strategies and tactics parents employ to negotiate news recommendations into their everyday parenting journeys. Parents’ practices of negotiating news recommendation algorithms ranged widely between some parents being very aware of algorithmic presence but not necessarily able to articulate its roles, and others actively training and tweaking things, to curate a particular view of the news for themselves. The chapter draws attention particularly to the role of time and the shaping role of children growing up, in terms of the changing rapport between algorithmic news recommendations and parents’ hopes and worries about their children.
-
Ada Lovelace Institute (2018) Accountability of algorithmic decision-making systems, Available from: https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/project/accountability-algorithmic-decision-making-systems/
-
Ada Lovelace Institute (2021) Algorithmic Accountability for the Public Sector, Ada Lovelace Institute: London.
-
Ada Lovelace Institute (2023) What Do the Public Think About AI? Ada Lovelace Institute: London.
-
Airoldi, M., Beraldo, D., and Gandini, A. (2016) Follow the algorithm: an exploratory investigation of music on YouTube, Poetics, 57, 1–13.
-
Aisenbrey, S. and Fasang, A. (2017) The interplay of work and family trajectories over the life course: Germany and the United States in comparison, American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1448–84.
-
Alexander, P.A. (2017) Reflection and reflexivity in practice versus in theory: challenges of conceptualization, complexity, and competence, Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 307–14.
-
AlgorithmWatch (2020) Automating Society Report: 2020, AlgorithmWatch: Berlin.
-
Alper, M. (2019) Future talk: accounting for the technological and other future discourses in daily life, International Journal of Communication, 13, 21.
-
Alper, M. (2023) Kids Across the Spectrums: Growing Up Autistic in the Digital Age, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
-
Alvarado, O., Heuer, H., Vanden Abeele, V., Breiter, A., and Verbert, K. (2020) Middle-aged video consumers’ beliefs about algorithmic recommendations on YouTube, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), 1–24.
-
Amadori, G. and Mascheroni, G. (2024) Situating data relations in the datafied home: a methodological approach, Big Data & Society, 11(1), 20539517241234268.
-
Ananny, M. and Crawford, K. (2018) Seeing without knowing: limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability, New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–89.
-
Andelsman Alvarez, V. and Meleschko, S.K. (2024) Going above and beyond? How parent–daycare mobile communication reconfigures the time and space dimensions of parenting, Mobile Media & Communication, 12(1), 112–30.
-
Anderson, A., Maystre, L., Anderson, I., Mehrotra, R., and Lalmas, M. (2020) Algorithmic effects on the diversity of consumption on spotify, Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, 2155–65.
-
Andrejevic, M. (2017) Data collection without limits: automated policing and the politics of framelessness, in A. Završnik (ed) Big Data, Crime and Social Control, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 93–107.
-
Appadurai, A. (2004) The capacity to aspire: culture and the terms of recognition, Culture and Public Action, 59, 62–3.
-
Arora, P. (2016) Bottom of the data pyramid: big data and the global south. International Journal of Communication, 10, 19.
-
Avery, E.J. and Park, S. (2021) Perceived knowledge as [protective] power: parents’ protective efficacy, information-seeking, and scrutiny during COVID-19, Health Communication, 36(1), 81–8.
-
Ávila, J. and Pandya, J.Z. (2013) Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis: Intersections and Challenges, New York: P. Lang.
-
Baderin, A. (2022) ‘The talk’: risk, racism and family relationships, Political Studies, 00323217221074894.
-
Bagger, C., Einarsson, A.M., Andelsman Alvarez, V., Klausen, M., and Lomborg, S. (2023) Digital resignation and the datafied welfare state, Big Data & Society, 10(2), 20539517231206806.
-
Bakardjieva, M. (2005) Internet society: the internet in everyday life, Internet Society, 1–232.
-
Banaji, S. (2017) Children and Media in India: Narratives of Class, Agency and Social Change, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Bandy, J. and Diakopoulos, N. (2023) Facebook’s news feed algorithm and the 2020 US election, Social Media + Society, 9(3), 20563051231196898.
-
Barassi, V. (2018) The child as datafied citizen: critical questions on data justice in family life, in G. Mascheroni, A. Jorge, and C. Ponte (eds) Digital Parenting: The Challenges for Families in the Digital Age, Gothenburg: NORDICOM, pp 169–77.
-
Barassi, V. (2019) Datafied citizens in the age of coerced digital participation, Sociological Research Online, 24(3), 414–29.
-
Barnes, R. and Potter, A. (2021) Sharenting and parents’ digital literacy: an agenda for future research, Communication Research and Practice, 7(1), 6–20.
-
Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1998) On the way to a post-familial family: from a community of need to elective affinities, Theory, Culture and Society, 15(3–4), 53–70.
-
Beckert, J. and Suckert, L. (2021) The future as a social fact. The analysis of perceptions of the future in sociology, Poetics, 84, 101499.
-
Beckett, C. and Deuze, M. (2016) On the role of emotion in the future of journalism, Social Media + Society, 2(3), 2056305116662395.
-
Beer, D. (2009) Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious, New Media & Society, 11(6), 985–1002.
-
Bhargava, R., Deahl, E., Letouzé, E., Noonan, A., Sangokoya, D., and Shoup, N. (2015) Beyond data literacy: reinventing community engagement and empowerment in the age of data.
-
Bilić, P. (2016) Search algorithms, hidden labour and information control, Big Data & Society, 3(1), 2053951716652159.
-
Bishop, S. (2019) Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip, New Media and Society, 21(11–12), 2589–606.
-
Bishop, S. (2020) Algorithmic experts: selling algorithmic lore on YouTube, Social Media + Society, 6(1), 2056305119897323.
-
Bishop, E.C. and Willis, K. (2014) ‘Without hope everything would be doom and gloom’: young people talk about the importance of hope in their lives, Journal of youth studies, 17(6), 778–93.
-
Blanchard, S.B., Coard, S.I., Hardin, B.J., and Mereoiu, M. (2019) Use of parental racial socialization with African American toddler boys, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 387–400.
-
Blum-Ross, A. and Livingstone, S. (2017) ‘Sharenting,’ parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self, Popular Communication, 15(2), 110–25.
-
Boczkowski, P.J., Mitchelstein, E., and Matassi, M. (2018) ‘News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure’: understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media, New Media & Society, 20(10), 3523–39.
-
Bonini, T. and Treré, E. (2024) Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight Against Platform Power, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
-
boyd, d. and Crawford, K. (2011) Six provocations for big data. A decade in internet time: Symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society, SSRN Electronic Journal, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926431
-
Brooks, R. and Hodkinson, P. (2022) The distribution of ‘educational labour’ in families with equal or primary carer fathers, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(7), 995–1011.
-
Bruns, A. (2019) It’s not the technology, stupid: how the ‘echo chamber’ and ‘filter bubble’ metaphors have failed us. Paper presented at the IAMCR 2019 conference in Madrid, Spain, 7–11 July 2019, Madrid: International Association for Media and Communication Research.
-
Bucher, T. (2012) Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook, New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–80.
-
Bucher, T. (2017) The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms, Information, Communication and Society, 20(1), 30–44.
-
Bucher, T. (2018) If … Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Bucher, T. (2020) The right-time web: theorizing the kairologic of algorithmic media, New Media & Society, 22(9), 1699–714.
-
Büchi, M., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., Tamò-Larrieux, A., and Velidi, S. (2023) Making sense of algorithmic profiling: user perceptions on Facebook, Information, Communication and Society, 26(4), 809–25.
-
Buckingham, D. (1993) Children Talking Television: The Making of Television Literacy, London: Routledge.
-
Buckingham, D. (2006) Media education in the age of digital technology, Comunicação Apresentada, 10.
-
Buckingham, D. (2007) Digital media literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the internet, Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43–55.
-
Buckingham, D. (2010) The future of media literacy in the digital age, Media Education Journal, 47, 3–7.
-
Buckingham, D. (2015) Defining digital literacy: what do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(Jubileumsnummer), 21–35.
-
Buckingham, D. and Sefton-Green, J. (2018) Multimedia education: media literacy in the age of digital culture, in R. Kubey (ed) Media Literacy Around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 285–305.
-
Budd, R. and Kandemir, A. (2018) Using vignettes to explore reality and values with young people, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(2), https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.2.2914
-
Bury, M. (2012) Chronic illness as biographical disruption, in J. Katz, S. Peace, and S. Spurr (eds) Adult Lives: A Life Course Perspective, Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp 48–55.
-
Campana, M., Van den Bossche, A., and Miller, B. (2020) #dadtribe: performing sharenting labour to commercialise involved fatherhood, Journal of Macromarketing, 40(4), 475–91.
-
Caronia, L. (2009) The cultural roots of knowledge vs. the myths underlying the contemporary digital turn in education, in Media Literacy in Europe. Controversies, Challenges and Perspectives, Brussels: Euromeduc, pp 25–33.
-
Charitsis, V. and Lehtiniemi, T. (2023) Data ableism: ability expectations and marginalization in automated societies, Television & New Media, 24(1), 3–18.
-
Charters, E. (2003) The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research: an introduction to think-aloud methods, Brock Education Journal, 12(2).
-
Children’s Coalition for the Online Safety Act (2024) Enforcing the Online Safety Act for Children, London: 5 Rights Foundation.
-
Cino, D. (2022a) Beyond the surface. Sharenting as a source of family quandaries: mapping parents’ social media dilemmas, Western Journal of Communication, 86(1), 128–53.
-
Cino, D. (2022b) Managing sharing is caring: mothers’ social media dilemmas and informal reflective practices on the governance of children’s digital footprints, MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 38(72), 86–106.
-
Coiro, J. (2008) A beginning understanding of the interplay between offline and online reading comprehension when adolescents read for information on the internet. Unpublished dissertation monograph, University of Connecticut.
-
Collins, E.C. and Green, J.L. (1990) Metaphors: the construction of a perspective, Theory Into Practice, 29(2), 71–7.
-
Cooper, S.M., Burnett, M., Johnson, M.S., Brooks, J., Shaheed, J., and McBride, M. (2020) ‘That is why we raise children’: African American fathers’ race-related concerns for their adolescents and parenting strategies, Journal of Adolescence, 82, 67–81.
-
Cotter, K. (2019) Playing the visibility game: how digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram, New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913.
-
Cotter, K. (2024) Practical knowledge of algorithms: the case of BreadTube, New Media & Society, 26(4), 2131–50.
-
Cotter, K. and Reisdorf, B.C. (2020) Algorithmic knowledge gaps: a new horizon of (digital) inequality, International Journal of Communication, 14, 21.
-
Cotter, K.M. (2020) Critical Algorithmic Literacy: Power, Epistemology, and Platforms, East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University.
-
Couldry, N. and Mejias, U.A. (2019) Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject, Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–49.
-
Couldry, N. and Mejias, U.A. (2023) The decolonial turn in data and technology research: what is at stake and where is it heading? Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 786–802.
-
Dahlgren, P.M. (2021) A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure, Nordicom Review, 42(1), 15–33.
-
Das, R. (2011) Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: youthful interpretations of an online genre, European Journal of Communication, 26(4), 343–60.
-
Das, R. (2017) Speaking about birth: visible and silenced narratives in online discussions of childbirth, Social Media + Society, 3(4), 2056305117735753.
-
Das, R. (2019) Early Motherhood in Digital Societies: Ideals, Anxieties and Ties of the Perinatal, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Das, R. (2023) Parents’ understandings of social media algorithms in children’s lives in England: misunderstandings, parked understandings, transactional understandings, and proactive understandings amidst datafication, Journal of Children and Media, 17(4), 506–22.
-
Das, R. (2024a) Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood, The Communication Review, 27(1), 1–31.
-
Das, R. (2024b) Data reflexivity as work-in-progress: a relational, life-course approach to people's encounters with datafication, Convergence. Online First.
-
Das, R. and Graefer, A. (2016) What really makes something ‘offensive’? The Conversation, 2.
-
Das, R. and Hodkinson, P. (2020) Affective coding: strategies of online steganography in fathers’ mental health disclosure, New Media & Society, 22(5), 752–69.
-
Das, R., Chimirri, N., Jorge, A., and Trueltzsch-Wijnen, C. (2023) Parents’ social networks, transitional moments and the shaping role of digital communications: an exploratory study in Austria, Denmark, England and Portugal, Families, Relationships and Societies, 1–18.
-
Das, R., Wong, Y.N., Jones, R., and Jackson, P.J. (2024) How do we speak about algorithms and algorithmic media futures? Using vignettes and scenarios in a citizen council on data-driven media personalisation, New Media & Society, 14614448241232589.
-
Das, R., Boursinou, N., Setty, E., and Roberts, T. (in prep) What does local news have to do with raising children? Four dimensions of engagement with local news from a study on English parents’ news use.
-
Dean, L., Churchill, B., and Ruppanner, L. (2022) The mental load: building a deeper theoretical understanding of how cognitive and emotional labor overload women and mothers, Community, Work & Family, 25(1), 13–29.
-
DeVito, M.A. (2017) From editors to algorithms: a values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed, Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753–73.
-
DeVito, M.A. (2020) Presenting the Self on Unstable Ground: Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to Algorithmic Literacy on Changing Platforms, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University.
-
DeVito, M.A. (2021) Adaptive folk theorization as a path to algorithmic literacy on changing platforms, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–38.
-
DeVito, M.A., Gergle, D., and Birnholtz, J. (2017) ‘Algorithms ruin everything’ #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
-
Dogruel, L. (2021) Folk theories of algorithmic operations during internet use: a mixed methods study, The Information Society, 37(5), 287–98.
-
Dogruel, L., Facciorusso, D., and Stark, B. (2022) ‘I’m still the master of the machine.’ Internet users’ awareness of algorithmic decision-making and their perception of its effect on their autonomy, Information, Communication and Society, 25(9), 1311–32.
-
Doucet, A. (2023) Care is not a tally sheet: rethinking the field of gender divisions of domestic labour with care-centric conceptual narratives, Families, Relationships and Societies, 12(1), 10–30.
-
Draper, N.A. and Turow, J. (2019) The corporate cultivation of digital resignation, New Media & Society, 21(8), 1824–39.
-
Duffy, B.E. and Meisner, C. (2023) Platform governance at the margins: social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility, Media, Culture and Society, 45(2), 285–304.
-
Edwards, L. and Veale, M. (2017) Slave to the algorithm? Why a ‘right to an explanation’ is probably not the remedy you are looking for, Duke Law & Technology Review, 16, 18.
-
Edwards, R. and Ugwudike, P. (2023) Governing Families: Problematising Technologies in Social Welfare and Criminal Justice, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
-
Edwards, R., Gillies, V., and Gorin, S. (2022) Problem-solving for problem-solving: data analytics to identify families for service intervention, Critical Social Policy, 42(2), 265–84.
-
Esfandiari, M. and Yao, J. (2022) Sharenting as a double-edged sword: evidence from Iran, Information, Communication and Society, 1–19.
-
Eslami, M., Krishna Kumaran, S.R., Sandvig, C., and Karahalios, K. (2018) Communicating algorithmic process in online behavioral advertising. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
-
Eslami, M., Vaccaro, K., Lee, M.K., Elazari Bar On, A., Gilbert, E., and Karahalios, K. (2019) User attitudes towards algorithmic opacity and transparency in online reviewing platforms. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
-
Eslami, M., Karahalios, K., Sandvig, C., Vaccaro, K., Rickman, A., Hamilton, K., and Kirlik, A. (2016) First I ‘like’ it, then I hide it: folk theories of social feeds. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
-
Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K., Sandvig, C. (2015) ‘I always assumed that I wasn’t really that close to [her]’ Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
-
Espinoza-Rojas, J., Siles, I., and Castelain, T. (2023) How using various platforms shapes awareness of algorithms, Behaviour and Information Technology, 42(9), 1422–33.
-
Etter, M. and Albu, O.B. (2021) Activists in the dark: social media algorithms and collective action in two social movement organizations, Organization, 28(1), 68–91.
-
Eubanks, V. (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
-
Faircloth, C. (2013) Militant Lactivism? Attachment Parenting and Intensive Motherhood in the UK and France (Vol. 24), Oxford: Berghahn Books.
-
Flensburg, S. and Lomborg, S. (2023) Datafication research: mapping the field for a future agenda, New Media & Society, 25(6), 1451–69.
-
Fotopoulou, A. (2021) Conceptualising critical data literacies for civil society organisations: agency, care, and social responsibility, Information, Communication and Society, 24(11), 1640–57.
-
Fotopoulou, A. and O’Riordan, K. (2017) Training to self-care: fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer, Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68.
-
Fouquaert, T. and Mechant, P. (2022) Making curation algorithms apparent: a case study of ‘Instawareness’ as a means to heighten awareness and understanding of Instagram’s algorithm, Information, Communication and Society, 25(12), 1769–89.
-
Franceschelli, M. (2023) Life-course transitions and global migration: conceptual reflections on the biographical trajectories of young African migrants in Italy, in C. Cameron, A. Koslowski, A. Lamont, and P. Moss (eds) Social Research for Our Time, London: UCL Press.
-
Friedman, B. and Hendry, D.G. (2019) Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
-
Gadamer, H.-G. (2013) Truth and Method, London: A&C Black.
-
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
-
Gillespie, T. (2014) The relevance of algorithms, Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, 167(2014), 167.
-
Gillespie, T. (2017) Governance of and by platforms, SAGE Handbook of Social Media, 254–78.
-
Goggin, G. and Ellis, K. (2020) Privacy and digital data of children with disabilities: scenes from social media sharenting, Media and Communication, 8(4), 218–28.
-
Gran, A.-B., Booth, P., and Bucher, T. (2021) To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide? Information, Communication and Society, 24(12), 1779–96.
-
Green, L. and Holloway, D. (2019) Introduction: problematising the treatment of children’s data, Media International Australia, 170(1), 22–26.
-
Grill, G. and Andalibi, N. (2022) Attitudes and folk theories of data subjects on transparency and accuracy in emotion recognition, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), 1–35.
-
Grondin, J. (2015) The hermeneutical circle, A Companion to Hermeneutics, 299–305.
-
Gruber, J., & Hargittai, E. (2023) The importance of algorithm skills for informed Internet use. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 20539517231168100.
-
Gruber, J., Hargittai, E., Karaoglu, G., and Brombach, L. (2021) Algorithm awareness as an important internet skill: the case of voice assistants. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1770–88.
-
Gün, C.S. and Şenol, S. (2019) How parents of children with cancer seek information through online communities: a netnography study, Journal of Pediatric Research, 6(2).
-
Haider, J. and Sundin, O. (2019) Invisible Search and Online Search Engines: The Ubiquity of Search in Everyday Life, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
-
Hallinan, B. and Striphas, T. (2016) Recommended for you: the Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture, New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–37.
-
Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., Sandvig, C., and Eslami, M. (2014) A path to understanding the effects of algorithm awareness, in CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 631–42.
-
Hamilton, P. (2020) Black Mothers and Attachment Parenting: A Black Feminist Analysis of Intensive Mothering in Britain and Canada, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Hanna, A. and Bender, E. (2023) AI causes real harm. Let’s focus on that over the end-of-humanity hype, Scientific American [online] 12 August, Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-need-to-focus-on-ais-real-harms-not-imaginary-existential-risks/
-
Hargittai, E., Gruber, J., Djukaric, T., Fuchs, J., and Brombach, L. (2020) Black box measures? How to study people’s algorithm skills, Information, Communication and Society, 23(5), 764–75.
-
Hartley, J.M., Sørensen, J.K., and Mathieu, D. (eds) (2023) Datapublics: The Construction of Publics in Datafied Democracies, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Hasebrink, U. and Domeyer, H. (2012) Media repertoires as patterns of behaviour and as meaningful practices: a multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments, Participations, 9(2), 757–79.
-
Hays, S. (1998) The fallacious assumptions and unrealistic prescriptions of attachment theory: a comment on ‘Parents’ socioemotional investment in children’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(3), 782–90.
-
Heidegger, M. (2010) Being and Time, New York: Suny Press.
-
Hepp, A. and Couldry, N. (2023) Necessary entanglements: reflections on the role of a ‘materialist phenomenology’ in researching deep mediatization and datafication, Sociologica, 17(1), 137–53.
-
Hern, M. (2024) Tech firms must ‘tame’ algorithms under Ofcom child safety rules, The Guardian [online] 8 May, Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/media/article/2024/may/08/tech-firms-must-tame-algorithms-under-ofcom-child-safety-rules
-
Hine, C. (2020) Strategies for reflexive ethnography in the smart home: autoethnography of silence and emotion, Sociology, 54(1), 22–36.
-
Hodkinson, P. and Das, R. (2021) New Fathers, Mental Health and Digital Communication, New York: Springer.
-
Hodkinson, P. and Brooks, R. (2023) Caregiving fathers and the negotiation of crossroads: journeys of continuity and change, The British Journal of Sociology, 74(1), 35–49.
-
Holiday, S., Norman, M.S., and Densley, R.L. (2022) Sharenting and the extended self: self-representation in parents’ Instagram presentations of their children, Popular Communication, 20(1), 1–15.
-
Holvoet, S., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Hudders, L., and Herrewijn, L. (2022) Predicting parental mediation of personalized advertising and online data collection practices targeting teenagers, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 66(2), 213–34.
-
Iser, W. (1974) The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction From Bunyan to Beckett, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
-
Jacobsen, B.N. (2021) Regimes of recognition on algorithmic media, New Media & Society, 14614448211053555.
-
Jang, J., Dworkin, J., and Hessel, H. (2015) Mothers’ use of information and communication technologies for information seeking, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 221–7.
-
Jenkins, M.C. and Moreno, M.A. (2020) Vaccination discussion among parents on social media: a content analysis of comments on parenting blogs, Journal of Health Communication, 25(3), 232–42.
-
Joginder Singh, S., Mohd Azman, F.N.S., Sharma, S., and Razak, R.A. (2021) Malaysian parents’ perception of how screen time affects their children’s language, Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 588–96.
-
Johnson, S.A. (2014) ‘Maternal devices’, social media and the self-management of pregnancy, mothering and child health, Societies, 4(2), 330–50.
-
Jorge, A., Marôpo, L., Coelho, A.M., and Novello, L. (2022) Mummy influencers and professional sharenting, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 166–82.
-
Kamleitner, B. and Mitchell, V. (2019) Your data is my data: a framework for addressing interdependent privacy infringements, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 38(4), 433–50.
-
Kapsch, P.H. (2022) Exploring user agency and small acts of algorithm engagement in everyday media use, Media International Australia, 183(1), 16–29.
-
Karizat, N., Delmonaco, D., Eslami, M., and Andalibi, N. (2021) Algorithmic folk theories and identity: how TikTok users co-produce knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–44.
-
Kaun, A. (2021) Ways of seeing digital disconnection: a negative sociology of digital culture, Convergence, 27(6), 1571–83.
-
Kaun, A. (2022) Suing the algorithm: the mundanization of automated decision-making in public services through litigation, Information, Communication and Society, 25(14), 2046–62.
-
Kennedy, H. (2018) Living with data: aligning data studies and data activism through a focus on everyday experiences of datafication, Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 2018(1), 18–30.
-
Kennedy, H., Oman, S., Taylor, M., Bates, J., and Steedman, R. (2021) Public Understanding and Perceptions of Data Practices: A Review of Existing Research, Sheffield: Living With Data, University of Sheffield, Available from: https://livingwithdata.org/project/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/living-with-data-2020-review-of-existing-research.pdf
-
Kennedy, H. and Hill, R.L. (2018) The feeling of numbers: emotions in everyday engagements with data and their visualisation. Sociology, 52(4), 830–48.
-
Kim, H.J. and Cameron, G.T. (2011) Emotions matter in crisis: the role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response, Communication Research, 38(6), 826–55.
-
Kim, J., Giroux, M., and Lee, J.C. (2021) When do you trust AI? The effect of number presentation detail on consumer trust and acceptance of AI recommendations, Psychology & Marketing, 38(7), 1140–55.
-
Kitchin, R. (2014) Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts, Big Data & Society, 1(1), 2053951714528481.
-
Kitchin, R. (2019) Thinking critically about and researching algorithms, in D. Beer (ed) The Social Power of Algorithms, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 14–29.
-
Kitzie, V. (2018) ‘I pretended to be a boy on the internet’: navigating affordances and constraints of social networking sites and search engines for LGBTQ+ identity work, First Monday, 23(7), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i7.9264
-
Klawitter, E. and Hargittai, E. (2018) ‘It’s like learning a whole other language’: the role of algorithmic skills in the curation of creative goods, International Journal of Communication, 12, 3490–510.
-
Kline, K. (2020) Ecstatic parenting: the ‘shareveillant’ and archival subject and the production of the self in the digital age, Ethics and Education, 15(4), 464–75.
-
Knobel, M. and Lankshear, C. (2014) Studying new literacies, Journal of Adolescent and Adult literacy, 58(2), 97–101.
-
Kotliar, D.M. (2021) Who gets to choose? On the socio-algorithmic construction of choice, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(2), 346–75.
-
Kress, G. (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age, London: Routledge.
-
Kubb, C. and Foran, H.M. (2020) Online health information seeking by parents for their children: systematic review and agenda for further research, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e19985.
-
Kühn, T. and Witzel, A. (2000) School-to-work transition, career development and family planning – methodological challenges and guidelines of a qualitative longitudinal panel study, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).
-
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system, Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208.
-
Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. (1998) Critical Literacy and New Technologies.
-
Lavorgna, A., Ugwudike, P. and Sanchez-Benitez, Y. (2022) Harms of digital capital: social harm analysis of online public resistance and information pollution, Justice, Power and Resistance, 5(3), 249–69.
-
Leaver, T. (2017) Intimate surveillance: normalizing parental monitoring and mediation of infants online, Social media + society, 3(2), 2056305117707192.
-
Leaver, T. (2020) Balancing privacy: sharenting, intimate surveillance, and the right to be forgotten, in the Routledge companion to digital media and children, in L. Green, D. Holloway, K. Stevenson, T. Leaver, and L. Haddon (eds) The Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Children, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C., Macvarish, J., and Faircloth, C. (2014) Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting, Parenting Culture Studies, 25–50.
-
Lee, E.J. (2008) Living with risk in the age of ‘intensive motherhood’: maternal identity and infant feeding, Health, Risk and Society, 10(5), 467–77.
-
Lehaff, J. (2022) When news use feels wrong: four reactions to misalignments between feeling rules and feeling responses, Journalism Studies, 23(8), 932–50.
-
Leighton, J.P. (2017) Using Think-Aloud Interviews and Cognitive Labs In Educational Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Leonardi, P.M. (2008) Indeterminacy and the discourse of inevitability in international technology management, Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 975–84.
-
Le-Phuong Nguyen, K., Harman, V., and Cappellini, B. (2017) Playing with class: middle-class intensive mothering and the consumption of children’s toys in Vietnam, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(5), 449–56.
-
Liao, T. and Tyson, O. (2021) ‘Crystal is creepy, but cool’: mapping folk theories and responses to automated personality recognition algorithms, Social Media + Society, 7(2), 20563051211010170.
-
Lim, S.S. (2019) Transcendent Parenting: Raising Children in the Digital Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Litt, E. and Hargittai, E. (2016) The imagined audience on social network sites, Social Media + Society, 2(1), 2056305116633482.
-
Livingstone, S. (2004) Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies, The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14.
-
Livingstone, S. (2008) Engaging with media – a matter of literacy? Communication, Culture and Critique, 1(1), 51–62.
-
Livingstone, S. (2018) Reframing media effects in terms of children’s rights in the digital age, in D. Lemish, A. Jordan, and V. Rideout (eds) Children, Adolescents, and Media, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 19–27.
-
Livingstone, S. (2023) What’s the best we can expect of media literacy? From protectionism to human rights and flourishing. Media@ LSE, Available from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2023/12/13/whats-the-best-we-can-expect-of-media-literacy-from-protectionism-to-human-rights-and-flourishing/
-
Livingstone, S. and Lunt, P. (2011) The implied audience of communications policy making: regulating media in the interests of citizens and consumers, in V. Nightingale (ed) The Handbook of Media Audiences, Oxford: Blackwell, 169–89.
-
Livingstone, S. and Das, R. (2013) The end of audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amid the uncertainties of use, in J. Hartley, J. Burgess, and A. Bruns (eds) A Companion to New Media Dynamics, Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 104–21.
-
Livingstone, S. and Blum-Ross, A. (2020) Parenting For a Digital Future: How Hopes and Fears About Technology Shape Children’s Lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., and Nandagiri, R. (2021) Data and privacy literacy: the role of the school in educating children in a datafied society, in R. Ammicht Quinn, M. Friedwald, J. Heesen, N. Krämer, and I. Stapf (eds) Aufwachsen in Überwachten Umgebungen: Interdisziplinäre Positionen zu Privatheit und Datenschutz in Kindheit und Jugend, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
-
Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., Nandagiri, R., Milosevic, T., Zdrodowska, A., Mascheroni, G., et al (2020) The datafication of childhood: examining children’s and parents’ data practices, children’s right to privacy and parents’ dilemmas, AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. doi: 10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11136.
-
Lomborg, S. and Mortensen, M. (2017) Users across media: an introduction, Convergence, 23(4), 343–51.
-
Lomborg, S. and Kapsch, P.H. (2020) Decoding algorithms, Media, Culture and Society, 42(5), 745–61.
-
Lomborg, S., Kaun, A., and Scott Hansen, S. (2023) Automated decision-making: toward a people-centred approach, Sociology Compass, 17(8), e13097.
-
Lupinacci, L. (2022) Phenomenal algorhythms: the sensorial orchestration of ‘real-time’ in the social media manifold, New Media & Society, 14614448221109952.
-
Lupton, D. (2017) ‘It just gives me a bit of peace of mind’: Australian women’s use of digital media for pregnancy and early motherhood, Societies, 7(3), 25.
-
Lupton, D. (2020) Caring dataveillance: women’s use of apps to monitor pregnancy and children, in L. Green, D. Holloway, K. Stevenson, T. Leaver, and L. Haddon (eds) The Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Children, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 393–402.
-
Maalsen, S. (2023) Algorithmic epistemologies and methodologies: algorithmic harm, algorithmic care and situated algorithmic knowledges, Progress in Human Geography, 47(2), 197–214.
-
Madge, C. and O’Connor, H. (2006) Parenting gone wired: empowerment of new mothers on the internet? Social and Cultural Geography, 7(2), 199–220.
-
Mager, A. (2012) Algorithmic ideology: how capitalist society shapes search engines, Information, Communication and Society, 15(5), 769–87.
-
Mankekar, P. (1999) Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of Television, Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
-
Marjanovic, O., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., and Vidgen, R. (2021) Algorithmic pollution: making the invisible visible, Journal of Information Technology, 36(4), 391–408.
-
Markham, A. (2021) The limits of the imaginary: challenges to intervening in future speculations of memory, data, and algorithms, New Media and Society, 23(2), 382–405.
-
Martens, M., De Wolf, R., Berendt, B., and De Marez, L. (2023) Decoding algorithms: exploring end-users’ mental models of the inner workings of algorithmic news recommenders, Digital Journalism, 11(1), 203–25.
-
Marwick, A.E. and boyd, d. (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience, New Media and Society, 13(1), 114–33.
-
Marvin, C. (1988) When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century, Oxford University Press, USA.
-
Mascheroni, G. (2020) Datafied childhoods: contextualising datafication in everyday life, Current Sociology, 68(6), 798–813.
-
Mascheroni, G. (2024) A new family member or just another digital interface? Smart speakers in the lives of families with young children, Human-Machine Communication, 7(1), 3.
-
Mascheroni, G. and Holloway, D. (2019) The quantified child: discourses and practices of dataveillance in different life stages, in O. Erstad, R. Flewitt, B. Kümmerling-Meibauer, and Í.S. Pereira (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Digital Literacies in Early Childhood, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 354–65.
-
Mascheroni, G., Cino, D., Amadori, G., and Zaffaroni, L.G. (2023) (Non-)sharing as a form of maternal care? The ambiguous meanings of sharenting for mothers of 0-to-8-year-old children, Italian Sociological Review, 13(1), 111–30.
-
Mathews, A.S. and Barnes, J. (2016) Prognosis: visions of environmental futures, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22(S1), 9–26.
-
Mathieu, D. (2023) Deconstructing the notion of algorithmic control over datapublics, The Construction of Publics in Datafied Democracies, 27.
-
Mathieu, D. and Vengerfeldt, P.P. (2020) The data loop of media and audience: how audiences and media actors make datafication work, MedieKultur: Journal of Media & Communication Research, 36(69), https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.121178
-
May, V. (2012) Are we really saying farewell to family? A response to Edwards and Gillies’ ‘Farewell to family?’, Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(3), 415–21.
-
Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. (2013) Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
-
McCosker, A. (2017) Data literacies for the postdemographic social media self, First Monday, 22(10), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i10.7307
-
Metcalf, J., Moss, E., Watkins, E. A., Singh, R., and Elish, M.C. (2021) Algorithmic impact assessments and accountability: the co-construction of impacts, in Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp 735–46.
-
Mihailidis, P. (2018) Civic Media Literacies: Re-Imagining Human Connection in an Age of Digital Abundance, Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.
-
Milan, S. (2018) Political agency, digital traces, and bottom-up data practices, International Journal of Communication; Special Section: ‘Digital Traces in Context’, 12, 507–25.
-
Milan, S. and Treré, E. (2019) Big data from the South (s): beyond data universalism, Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–35.
-
Mische, A. (2009) Projects and possibilities: researching futures in action, Sociological Forum, 24(3), 694–704.
-
Mitchell, S.J., See, H.M., Tarkow, A.K., Cabrera, N., McFadden, K.E., and Shannon, J.D. (2007) Conducting studies with fathers: challenges and opportunities, Applied Development Science, 11(4), 239–44.
-
Moe, H. and Ytre-Arne, B. (2022) The democratic significance of everyday news use: using diaries to understand public connection over time and beyond journalism, Digital Journalism, 10(1), 43–61.
-
Moe, H., Lindtner, S., and Ytre-Arne, B. (2023) Polarisation and echo chambers? Making sense of the climate issue with social media in everyday life, Nordicom Review, 44(1), 23–43.
-
Mollen, A. and Dhaenens, F. (2018) Audiences’ coping practices with intrusive interfaces: researching audiences in algorithmic, datafied, platform societies, The Future of Audiences: A Foresight Analysis of Interfaces and Engagement, 43–60.
-
Morgan, D. (2011) Rethinking Family Practices, New York: Springer.
-
Morris, M. (1988) Banality in cultural studies, Discourse, 10(2), 3–29.
-
Moser, C., Den Hond, F., and Lindebaum, D. (2022) What humans lose when we let AI decide, MIT Sloan Management Review, 63(3), 12–14.
-
Mudliar, P. (2024) Representing the adarsh biometric balak or the ideal biometric child: locating poor children’s care work in the Aadhaar welfare state, Information, Communication & Society, 1–18.
-
Nader, K. and Lee, M.K. (2022) Folk theories and user strategies on dating apps: how users understand and manage their experience with algorithmic matchmaking, in M. Smits (ed) Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future. iConference 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13192, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96957-8_37
-
Naeini, P.E., Bhagavatula, S., Habib, H., Degeling, M., Bauer, L., Cranor, L.F., and Sadeh, N. (2017) Privacy expectations and preferences in an IoT world, Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2017), 12–14 July, 2017, Santa Clara, California.
-
Neale, B. (2015) Time and the lifecourse: perspectives from qualitative longitudinal research, in Researching the Lifecourse, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 25–42.
-
Neff, G. and Nagy, P. (2018) Agency in the digital age: using symbiotic agency to explain human–technology interaction, in Z. Papacharissi (ed) A Networked Self and Human Augmentics, Artificial Intelligence, Sentience, New York: Routledge, pp 97–107.
-
Nielsen, R.K. (2016) News media, search engines and social networking sites as varieties of online gatekeepers, in C. Peters and M. Broersma (eds) Rethinking Journalism Again, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 93–108.
-
Nilsen, A. (2023) The future as a topic in biographical life course approaches, in A. Nilsen (ed) Biographical Life Course Research: Studying the Biography-History Dynamic, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp 97–121.
-
Noble, S.U. (2013) Google search: hyper-visibility as a means of rendering black women and girls invisible, InVisible Culture (19), Available from: https://ivc.lib.rochester.edu/google-search-hyper-visibility-as-a-means-of-rendering-black-women-and-girls-invisible/
-
Noble, S.U. (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, New York: New York University Press.
-
O’Connor, H. and Madge, C. (2004) ‘My mum’s thirty years out of date’, Community, Work and Family, 7(3), 351–69.
-
Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. and Neubaum, G. (2021) What do we know about algorithmic literacy? The status quo and a research agenda for a growing field, New Media & Society, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231182662
-
OFCOM (2024) Adult Media Use and Attitudes, OFCOM: London
-
Pangrazio, L. (2016) Reconceptualising critical digital literacy, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–74.
-
Pangrazio, L. and Selwyn, N. (2019) ‘Personal data literacies’: a critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data, New Media and Society, 21(2), 419–37.
-
Pangrazio, L., and Selwyn, N. (2021) Towards a school-based ‘critical data education’, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 29(3), 431–48.
-
Pangrazio, L. and Sefton-Green, J. (2020) The social utility of ‘data literacy’, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 208–20.
-
Papa, V. and Ioannidis, N. (2023) Reviewing the impact of Facebook on civic participation: the mediating role of algorithmic curation and platform affordances, The Communication Review, 26(3), 277–99.
-
Park, H.W. and Park, S. (2024) The filter bubble generated by artificial intelligence algorithms and the network dynamics of collective polarization on YouTube: the case of South Korea, Asian Journal of Communication, 1–18.
-
Parsania, V.S., Kalyani, F., and Kamani, K. (2016) A comparative analysis: DuckDuckGo vs. Google search engine, GRD Journals-Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering, 2(1), 12–17.
-
Pasquinelli, M. (2009) Google’s PageRank algorithm: a diagram of cognitive capitalism and the rentier of the common intellect, Deep Search: The Politics of Search Beyond Google, 152–62.
-
Patra, R., Barassi, V., and Scharenberg, A. (2023) AI errors, their human rights impacts and the role of mainstream media in Europe, ECREA 2022 Ninth European Communication Conference, 19 October 2022 to 22 October 2022, Aarhus University, Denmark.
-
Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S.M., and Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019) The social media life of climate change: platforms, publics, and future imaginaries, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(2), e569.
-
Peng, Y. (2022) Gendered division of digital labor in parenting: a qualitative study in urban China, Sex Roles, 86(5-6), 283–304.
-
Pentzold, C., Kaun, A., and Lohmeier, C. (2020) Imagining and instituting future media: introduction to the special issue, Convergence, 26(4), 705–15.
-
Picone, I., Kleut, J., Pavlíčková, T., Romic, B., Møller Hartley, J., and De Ridder, S. (2019) Small acts of engagement: reconnecting productive audience practices with everyday agency, New Media & Society, 21(9), 2010–28.
-
Plunkett, L.A. (2019) Sharenthood: Why We Should Think Before We Talk About Our Kids Online, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
-
Polizzi, G. (2023) Internet users’ utopian/dystopian imaginaries of society in the digital age: theorizing critical digital literacy and civic engagement, New Media and Society, 25(6), 1205–26.
-
Polizzi, G., D’Arcy, J., Harris, R., Barrera, P., Yates, S., and Yeoman, F. (2024) Exploring Challenges and Best Practice in Media Literacy: A UK Regional Case Study Approach, Liverpool: Digital Media and Society Institute, Available from: https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/media/livacuk/humanitiesampsocialsciences/documents/Digital,Inclusion,and,Media,Literacy,Policy,Projects,Final,Report.pdf
-
Pronzato, R. and Markham, A.N. (2023) Returning to critical pedagogy in a world of datafication, Convergence, 29(1), 97–115.
-
Quadagno, J.S. (1999) Aging and the Life Course: An Introduction to Social Gerontology, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill College.
-
Rader, E. (2017) Examining user surprise as a symptom of algorithmic filtering, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 72–88.
-
Rader, E. and Gray, R. (2015) Understanding user beliefs about algorithmic curation in the Facebook news feed. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
-
Radway, J.A. (1984) Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature, Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.
-
Reisdorf, B.C. and Blank, G. (2021) Algorithmic literacy and platform trust, Handbook of Digital Inequality, 341.
-
Ribbens McCarthy, J., Woodthorpe, K., and Almack, K. (2023) The aftermath of death in the continuing lives of the living: extending ‘bereavement’ paradigms through family and relational perspectives, Sociology, 57(6), 1356–74.
-
Rieder, B. and Sire, G. (2014) Conflicts of interest and incentives to bias: a microeconomic critique of Google’s tangled position on the Web. New Media & Society, 16(2), 195–211.
-
Rose, N. (1998) Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood, Cambridge University Press.
-
Ruckenstein, M. (2023) The Feel of Algorithms, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
-
Sage, A., Carpenter, D., Sayner, R., Thomas, K., Mann, L., Sulzer, S., … Sleath, B. (2018) Online information-seeking behaviors of parents of children with ADHD, Clinical Pediatrics, 57(1), 52–6.
-
Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., and Langbort, C. (2014) Auditing algorithms: research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms, Data and Discrimination: Converting Critical Concerns into Productive Inquiry, 22, 4349–57.
-
Sankin, A. (2023) How certain algorithms to improve the human condition have failed, The Markup, 7 December, Available from: https://themarkup.org/2023/12/07/how-certain-algorithms-to-improve-the-human-condition-have-failed
-
Schlesinger, M.A., Flynn, R.M., and Richert, R.A. (2019) Do parents care about TV? How parent factors mediate US children’s media exposure and receptive vocabulary, Journal of Children and Media, 13(4), 395–414.
-
Schrøder, K.C. (2011) Audiences are inherently cross-media: audience studies and the cross-media challenge, CM Komunikacija i Mediji, 6(18), 5–27.
-
Schwartz, S.A. and Mahnke, M.S. (2021) Facebook use as a communicative relation: exploring the relation between Facebook users and the algorithmic news feed, Information, Communication & Society, 24(7), 1041–56.
-
Seaver, N. (2017) Algorithms as culture: some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems, Big Data & Society, 4(2), 2053951717738104.
-
Seaver, N. (2019a) Captivating algorithms: recommender systems as traps, Journal of Material Culture, 24(4), 421–36.
-
Seaver, N. (2019b) Knowing algorithms, in J. Vertesi, D. Ribes, C. DiSalvo, Y. Loukissas, L. Forlano, D.K. Rosner, S.J. Jackson, and H.R. Shell (eds) digitalSTS : A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, pp 412–22.
-
Shin, D. and Park, Y.J. (2019) Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance, Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 277–84.
-
Shin, D., Kee, K.F., and Shin, E.Y. (2022) Algorithm awareness: why user awareness is critical for personal privacy in the adoption of algorithmic platforms, International Journal of Information Management, 65, 102494.
-
Shin, J. and Valente, T. (2020) Algorithms and health misinformation: a case study of vaccine books on Amazon, Journal of Health Communication, 25(5), 394–401.
-
Shome, R. and Hegde, R. (2002) Culture, communication, and the challenge of globalization, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 172–89.
-
Siibak, A. and Traks, K. (2019) The dark sides of sharenting, Catalan Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies, 11(1), 115–21.
-
Siles, I. (2023) Living with Algorithms: Agency and User Culture in Costa Rica, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
-
Siles, I., Valerio-Alfaro, L., and Meléndez-Moran, A. (2022) Learning to like TikTok … and not: algorithm awareness as process, New Media & Society, 14614448221138973.
-
Siles, I., Espinoza-Rojas, J., Naranjo, A., and Tristán, M.F. (2019) The mutual domestication of users and algorithmic recommendations on Netflix, Communication, Culture and Critique, 12(4), 499–518.
-
Siles, I., Segura-Castillo, A., Solís, R., and Sancho, M. (2020) Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: enacting data assemblages in the global South, Big Data and Society, 7(1), 2053951720923377.
-
Silverstone, R. (2013) Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley and Sons.
-
Singh, S., Mohd Azman, F.N.S., Sharma, S., and Razak, R.A. (2021) Malaysian parents’ perception of how screen time affects their children’s language, Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 588–96.
-
Skeggs, B. (2014) Values beyond value? Is anything beyond the logic of capital ? The British Journal of Sociology, 65(1), 1–20.
-
Skilling, K. and Stylianides, G.J. (2020) Using vignettes in educational research: a framework for vignette construction, International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 43(5), 541–56.
-
Snyder, I.A. and Beavis, C. (2004) Doing Literacy Online: Teaching, Learning and Playing in an Electronic World, New York: Hampton Press.
-
Striphas, T. (2015) Algorithmic culture, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 395–412.
-
Swart, J. (2021) Experiencing algorithms: how young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection on social media, Social media + Society, 7(2), 20563051211008828.
-
Swart, J. (2023) Tactics of news literacy: how young people access, evaluate, and engage with news on social media, New Media & Society, 25(3), 505–21.
-
Swart, J., Peters, C., and Broersma, M. (2019) Sharing and discussing news in private social media groups: the social function of news and current affairs in location-based, work-oriented and leisure-focused communities, Digital Journalism, 7(2), 187–205.
-
Tarrant, A., Way, L., and Ladlow, L. (2023) ‘Oh sorry, I’ve muted you!’: issues of connection and connectivity in qualitative (longitudinal) research with young fathers and family support professionals, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(3), 263–76.
-
Tavernor, R. (2019) Liking visuals and visually liking on Facebook: from starving children to satirical saviours, Global Humanitarianism and Media Culture, 224.
-
Thorson, K. (2020) Attracting the news: algorithms, platforms, and reframing incidental exposure, Journalism, 21(8), 1067–82.
-
Threadgold, S. (2012) ‘I reckon my life will be easy, but my kids will be buggered’: ambivalence in young people's positive perceptions of individual futures and their visions of environmental collapse, Journal of Youth Studies, 15(1), 17–32.
-
Toff, B. and Nielsen, R.K. (2018) ‘I just google it’: folk theories of distributed discovery, Journal of Communication, 68(3), 636–57.
-
Ugwudike, P. (2022) Predictive algorithms in justice systems and the limits of tech-reformism, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 11(1), 85–99.
-
Van Couvering, E. (2008) The history of the Internet search engine: navigational media and the traffic commodity, in A. Spink and M. Zimmer (eds) Web Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, New York: Springer, pp 177–206.
-
Van Dalen, A. (2023) Algorithmic Gatekeeping for Professional Communicators: Power, Trust, and Legitimacy, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
-
van der Nagel, E. (2018) ‘Networks that work too well’: intervening in algorithmic connections, Media International Australia, 168(1), 81–92.
-
van Deursen, A.J. and van Dijk, J.A. (2015) Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: a longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population, Information, Communication and Society, 18(7), 782–97.
-
Van Deursen, A.J., Helsper, E.J., and Eynon, R. (2016) Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS), Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 804–23.
-
Van Dijck, J. (2013) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology, Surveillance and Society, 12(2), 197–208.
-
Vincent, C. (2017) ‘The children have only got one education and you have to make sure it’s a good one’: parenting and parent–school relations in a neoliberal age, Gender and Education, 29(5), 541–57.
-
Wagner, M.C. and Boczkowski, P.J. (2021) Angry, frustrated, and overwhelmed: the emotional experience of consuming news about President Trump, Journalism, 22(7), 1577–93.
-
Walker Rettberg, J. (2014) Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to See and Shape Ourselves, London: Springer Nature.
-
Wall, G. (2022) Being a good digital parent: representations of parents, youth and the parent–youth relationship in expert advice, Families, Relationships and Societies, 11(3), 340–55.
-
Welbers, K. and Opgenhaffen, M. (2018) Social media gatekeeping: an analysis of the gatekeeping influence of newspapers’ public Facebook pages, New Media & Society, 20(12), 4728–47.
-
Williamson, B. and Eynon, R. (2020) Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–35.
-
Williamson, B., Bayne, S., and Shay, S. (2020) The datafication of teaching in higher education: critical issues and perspectives, Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 351–65.
-
Williamson, B., Komljenovic, J., and Gulson, K. (eds) (2023) World Yearbook of Education 2024: Digitalisation of Education in the Era of Algorithms, Automation and Artificial Intelligence, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
-
Willson, M. (2017) Algorithms (and the) everyday, Information, Communication and Society, 20(1), 137–50.
-
Wilson, T. (2018) Consumption, Psychology and Practice Theories: A Hermeneutic Perspective, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Wong, Y.N., Jones, R., Das, R., and Jackson, P. (2023) Conditional trust: citizens’ council on data-driven media personalisation and public expectations of transparency and accountability, Big Data & Society, 10(2), 20539517231184892.
-
Wood, S. (2024) Impact of Regulation on Children’s Digital Lives, Digital Futures Commission, 5Rights Foundation, Available from: https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/123522/1/Impact_of_regulation_on_children_DFC_Research_report_May_2024.pdf
-
Ytre-Arne, B. (2023) Media Use in Digital Everyday Life, Leeds: Emerald Publishing.
-
Ytre-Arne, B. and Moe, H. (2018) Approximately informed, occasionally monitorial? Reconsidering normative citizen ideals. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(2), 227–46.
-
Ytre-Arne, B. and Das, R. (2021) Audiences’ communicative agency in a datafied age: interpretative, relational and increasingly prospective, Communication Theory, 31(4), 779–97.
-
Ytre-Arne, B. and Moe, H. (2021) Folk theories of algorithms: understanding digital irritation, Media, Culture and Society, 43(5), 807–24.
-
Zakharova, I. and Jarke, J. (2024) Care-ful data studies: or, what do we see, when we look at datafied societies through the lens of care? Information, Communication & Society, 1–14.
-
Zhao, L. (2023) Filter bubbles? Also protector bubbles! Folk theories of Zhihu algorithms among Chinese gay men, Social Media + Society, 9(2), 20563051231168647.
-
Zimmer, M. (2008) The gaze of the perfect search engine: Google as an infrastructure of dataveillance, in A. Spink and M. Zimmer (eds) Web Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, New York: Springer, pp 77–99.
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 11846 | 11846 | 33 |
| Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk