Five: Social interaction and neighbourhood stigma

Restricted access
Get eTOC Alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

This chapter provides a discussion on social interaction and neighbourhood reputation. One of the most striking features of the interviews with residents, who were mainly active within their neighbourhoods, was their allusion to the strength of community ties. Despite the evidence of strong community, it would be a mistake to portray the areas as single communities, socially cohesive and integrated. As communities shrank, residents found it increasingly difficult to exercise informal social control over neighbours’ behaviour and neighbourhood conditions. Community was also made up of myriad social networks and meant different things to different people. Defensiveness caused social networks to shrink and to be less effective in maintaining social norms and standards. Meanwhile, the extent of overlap with networks outside the neighbourhood was limited by poverty, local employment, or worklessness, and by the traditional strength of local social networks.

Ruth Lupton University of Manchester

Search for other papers by Ruth Lupton in
Current site
Google Scholar

Ruth Lupton is a Research Fellow at the ESRC Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Author/Editor details at time of book publication.

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 174 173 5
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 1 1 1



Poverty Street
The dynamics of neighbourhood decline and renewal