How the consumption of green public spaces contributes to quality of life: evidence from four Asian cities
Search for other papers by Antonietta Di Giulio in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Marlyne Sahakian in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Manisha Anantharaman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Czarina Saloma in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Rupali Khanna in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Srikanth Narasimalu in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Dunfu Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
While green public spaces have been studied in relation to biodiversity and climate change, and in relation to health and social inclusion, there is a need to further understand how they relate to a broader understanding of human wellbeing. Evidence suggests that public spaces play an important role with a view to happiness and mental health, but further evidence is needed on how people actually use such spaces and how human needs are met – and how this might compare across different contexts. This necessitates to linking conceptually, empirically and practically the consumption of such spaces, the notion of the good life, and the management of such spaces. Towards this aim, this article explores quality of life in relation to green public spaces in four cities of South and Southeast Asia: Chennai, Metro Manila, Shanghai and Singapore. Based on empirical research in these cities, we engage in a comparative analysis to discuss how and in what way ‘going to the park’ as a form of consumption is a satisfier towards meeting ‘Protected Needs’ (Di Giulio and Defila, 2020) such as to live in a livable environment, to develop as a person or to be part of a community. The analysis shows that the practice ‘going to the park’ is linked to the practice ‘making the park’, leading to a discussion on how public policies can further support quality of life in cities. On a theoretical note, the article contributes to the debate about how to conceptually link human needs and social practices.
-
Anantharaman, M., Sahakian, M. and Saloma, C. (in press) Spatializing degrowth in Southern cities: Everyday park-making for (un)communing, Urban Studies.
-
Brand-Correa, L.I. and Steinberger, J.K. (2017) A framework for decoupling human need satisfaction from energy use, Ecological Economics, 141: 43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.019
-
Cloutier, S., Larson, L. and Jambeck, J. (2014) Are sustainable cities ‘happy’ cities? Associations between sustainable development and human well-being in urban areas of the United States, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16: 633–47, doi: 10.1007/s10668-013-9499-0.
-
Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007) Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being, Ecological Economics, 61: 267–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023
-
Defila, R. and Di Giulio, A. (2020) The concept of ‘consumption corridors’ meets society: how an idea for fundamental changes in consumption is received, Journal of Consumer Policy, 43: 315–44, doi: 10.1007/s10603-019-09437-w.
-
Di Giulio, A. and Defila, R. (2020) The ‘good life’ and Protected Needs, in A. Kalfagianni, D. Fuchs and A. Hayden (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Global Sustainability Governance, London: Routledge, pp 100–14, doi: 10.4324/9781315170237.
-
Di Giulio, A. and Defila, R. (2021) Building the bridge between protected needs and consumption corridors, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy (SSPP), 17(1): 117–34, doi: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1907056.
-
Di Giulio, A., Brohmann, B., Clausen, J., Defila, R., Fuchs, D., Kaufmann-Hayoz, R. and Koch, A. (2012) Needs and consumption: a conceptual system and its meaning in the context of sustainability, in R. Defila, A. Di Giulio and R. Kaufmann-Hayoz (eds) The Nature of Sustainable Consumption and How to Achieve it: Results from the Focal Topic ‘From Knowledge to Action – New Paths towards Sustainable Consumption’, Munich: oekom, pp 45–66.
-
Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991) A Theory of Human Need, London: Red Globe Press.
-
Fuchs, D., Sahakian, M., Gumbert, T., Di Giulio, A., Maniates, M., Lorek, S. and Graf, A. (2021) Consumption Corridors: Living Well within Sustainable Limits, London: Routledge.
-
Gough, I. (2017) Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
-
Guillen-Royo, M. (2020) Applying the fundamental human needs approach to sustainable consumption corridors: participatory workshops involving information and communication technologies, Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 16(1): 114–27. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2020.1787311
-
Henderson-Wilson, C., Sia, K.L., Veitch, J., Staiger, P.K., Davidson, P. and Nicholls, P. (2017) Perceived health benefits and willingness to pay for parks by park users: Quantitative and qualitative research, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5): 529, doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050529.
-
Hussain, G., Nadeem, M., Younis, A., Riaz, A., Khan, A.M. and Naveed, S. (2010) Impact of public parks on human life: a case study, Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 47(3): 225–30.
-
Jackson, T., Jager, W. and Stagl, S. (2004) Beyond insatiability: Needs theory, consumption and sustainability, in L. Reisch and I. Røpke (eds) The Ecological Economics of Consumption, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp 79–110, doi: 10.4337/9781845423568.00013.
-
Jennings, V., Larsoin, L. and Yun, J. (2016) Advancing sustainability through urban green space: cultural ecosystem services, equity, and social determinants of health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(2): 196, doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020196.
-
Koch, M., Lindellee, J. and Olsson, J.A. (2021) Beyond the growth imperative and neoliberal doxa: Expanding alternative societal spaces through deliberative citizen forums on needs satisfaction, Real-world Economics Review, 96: 168–83.
-
Konijnendijk, C.C., Annerstedt, M., Nielsen, A.B. and Maruthaveeran, S. (2013) Benefits of Urban Parks: A Systematic Review. A Report for IFPRA, Copenhagen and Alnarp: IFPRA.
-
Kruize, H., van der Vliet, N., Staatsen, B., Bell, R., Chiabai, A., Muiños, G., et al. (2019) Urban green space: creating a triplewin for environmental sustainability, health, and health equity through behavior change, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22): 4403, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224403.
-
Lawrence, R.J., Forbat, J. and Zufferey, J. (2019) Rethinking conceptual frameworks and models of health and natural environments, Health, 23(2): 158–79, doi: 10.1177/1363459318785717.
-
Leporelli, E. and Santi, G. (2019) From psychology of sustainability to sustainability of urban spaces: promoting a primary prevention approach for well-being in the healthy city designing. A waterfront case study in Livorno, Sustainability, 11(3): 760, doi: 10.3390/su11030760.
-
Max-Neef, M.A., Elizalde, A. and Hopenhayn, M. (1991) Development and human needs, in M.A. Max-Neef (ed) Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections, London: Zed Books, pp 13–54.
-
Mittelmark, M.C. and Bauer, G.F. (2017) The meanings of salutogenesis, in M.B. Mittelmark, S. Sagy, M. Eriksson, G.F. Bauer, J.M. Pelikan, B. Lindström and G.A. Espnes (eds) The Handbook of Salutogenesis, Springer OPEN, pp 7–13, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04600-6.
-
Rahman, K.M.A. and Zhang, D. (2018) Analyzing the level of accessibility of public urban green spaces to different socially vulnerable groups of people, Sustainability, 10(11): 3917, doi: 10.3390/su10113917.
-
Ramaswami, A. (2020) Unpacking the urban infrastructure nexus with environment, health, livability, well-being, and equity, One Earth, 2: 120–4. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.003
-
Rao, N.D. and Min, J. (2017) Decent Living Standards: Material Prerequisites for Human Wellbeing, IIASA Working Paper, Laxenburg: IIASA.
-
Robeyns, I. and van der Veen, R.J. (2007) Sustainable Quality of Life: Conceptual Analysis for a Policy-relevant Empirical Specification, Bilthoven, Amsterdam: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency and University of Amsterdam.
-
Sadeghian, M.M. and Vardanyan, Z. (2013) The benefits of urban parks, a review of urban research, Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2(8): 231–37.
-
Sahakian, M. and Anantharaman, M. (2020) What space for public parks in sustainable consumption corridors? Conceptual reflections on need satisfaction through social practices, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1): 128–42, doi: 10.1080/15487733.2020.1788697.
-
Sahakian, M., Anantharaman, M., Saloma, C., Zhang, D., Khanna, R., Narasimalu, S., et al. (2020) Green public spaces in the cities of South and Southeast Asia: protecting needs towards sustainable wellbeing, Journal of Public Space, 5(2): 89–110, doi: 10.32891/jps.v5i2.1286.
-
Schatzki, T. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Schatzki, T. (2001) Social Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Schebella, M.F., Weber, D., Schultz, L. and Weinstein, P. (2019) The wellbeing benefits associated with perceived and measured biodiversity in Australian urban green spaces, Sustainability, 11(3): 802, doi: 10.3390/su11030802.
-
Soper, K. (2006) Conceptualizing needs in the context of consumer politics, Journal of Consumer Policy, 29: 355–72, doi: 10.1007/s10603-006-9017-y.
-
Spurling, N., McMeekin, A., Shove, E., Southerton, D. and Welch, D. (2013) Interventions in Practice: Re-framing Policy Approaches to Consumer Behavior, Manchester: University of Manchester, Sustainable Practices Research Group.
-
Warde, A. (2005) Consumption and theories of practice, Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2): 131–53, doi: 10.1177/1469540505053090.
-
Warde, A., Welch, D. and Paddock, J. (2017) Studying consumption through the lens of practice, in B.H. Margit Keller, T.A. Wilska, M. Truninger (eds) Routledge Handbook on Consumption, London: Routledge, pp. 25–35.
-
Welch, D. (2017) Behaviour change and theories of practice: contributions, limitations and developments, Social Business, 7(3–4): 241–61. doi: 10.1362/204440817X15108539431488
-
Wood, L., Hooper, P., Foster, S. and Bull, F. (2017) Public green spaces and positive mental health: Investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing, Health & Place, 48: 63–71.
-
Urry, J. (1995) Consuming Places, London: Taylor & Francis.
-
Villanueva, K., Badland, H., Hooper, P., Koohsari, M.J., Mavoa, S., Davern, M., et al. (2015) Developing indicators of public open space to promote health and wellbeing in communities, Applied Geography, 57: 112–19, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.003.
Search for other papers by Antonietta Di Giulio in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Marlyne Sahakian in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Manisha Anantharaman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Czarina Saloma in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Rupali Khanna in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Srikanth Narasimalu in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Dunfu Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 742 | 552 | 78 |
| Full Text Views | 565 | 118 | 6 |
| PDF Downloads | 372 | 54 | 4 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk