The social challenges of not eating meat: how social interactions shape the role of meat in everyday food practices
Search for other papers by Morten Wendler in
Current site
Google Scholar
It is widely acknowledged that to tackle global climate change, meat consumption needs to be reduced substantially, especially in wealthy nations, such as Denmark. A number of studies inspired by theories of practice have investigated various aspects of food practices and meat consumption, including their trajectories and material basis. However, the role of social interactions in organising food practitioners’ performances is still somewhat under-investigated. This article seeks to make up for this by showing some of the ways food practices are contingent on social interactions between practitioners.
The article investigates how the organisation of the performances of food practitioners are produced and reproduced through social interactions with other practitioners and what this means for the role of meat and animal products. This is done through an analysis of data from 27 interviews with young Danes who have reduced or are in the process of reducing their meat consumption and four network focus groups. The analysis shows how procedures, engagements and understandings tied to meat are established and contested through social interactions. This is used to show how differences in arrangements of social encounters provide very different terms for a construction of a mainly plant-based diet as normal. Finally, in the discussion, I argue that arrangements of social encounters can, in a similar way to material arrangements, induce and prefigure certain types of performances, and I discuss the implications of the results for intervention efforts aimed at reducing meat consumption.
-
ASA (American Sociological Association) (2018) Code of ethics, https://www.asanet.org/wp-content/uploads/asa_code_of_ethics-june2018.pdf.
-
Biermann, G. and Rau, H. (2020) The meaning of meat: (Un)sustainable eating practices at home and out of home, Appetite, 153(October): 104730, doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104730.
-
Brons, A. and Oosterveer, P. (2017) Making sense of sustainability: a practice theories approach to buying food, Sustainability, 9(3): 467, doi: 10.3390/su9030467.
-
Brons, A., Oosterveer, P. and Wertheim-Heck, S. (2020) Feeding the melting pot: Inclusive strategies for the Multi-ethnic city, Agriculture and Human Values, 37(4): 1027–40, doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10031-x.
-
Browne, A.L. (2016) Can people talk together about their practices? Focus groups, humour and the sensitive dynamics of everyday life, Area, 48(2): 198–205, doi: 10.1111/area.12250.
-
Burningham, K. and Venn, S. (2020) Are lifecourse transitions opportunities for moving to more sustainable consumption?, Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(1): 102–21, doi: 10.1177/1469540517729010.
-
Christensen, T.H. and Røpke, I. (2010) Can practice theory inspire studies of ICTs in everyday life?, in B. Bräuchler and J. Postill (eds) Theorising Media and Practice, New York, NY: Berghahn Books, pp 233–56, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qd3vc.16.
-
CONCITO (2019) Klimavenlige Madvaner [Climate friendly food habits], https://concito.dk/sites/concito.dk/files/media/document/Klimavenlige%20madvaner%202019_rev2.pdf.
-
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2): 219–45, doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363.
-
Fuentes, M. and Fuentes, C. (2021) Reconfiguring food materialities: Plant-based food consumption practices in antagonistic landscapes, Food, Culture & Society, (April): 1–20, doi: 10.1080/15528014.2021.1903716.
-
Groth, M.V., Fagt, S. and Brøndsted, L. (2001) Social determinants of dietary habits in Denmark, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 55(11): 959–66, doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601251.
-
Halkier, B. (2017a) Practice theoretically inspired focus groups: socially recognizable performativity?, in R.S. Barbour and D.L. Morgan (eds) A New Era in Focus Group Research, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 389–410, doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_18.
-
Halkier, B. (2017b) Normalising convenience food? The expectable and acceptable places of convenient food in everyday life among young Danes, Food, Culture & Society, 20(1): 133–51, doi: 10.1080/15528014.2016.1243768.
-
Halkier, B. (2020) Social interaction as key to understanding the intertwining of routinized and culturally contested consumption, Cultural Sociology, 14(4): 399–416, doi: 10.1177/1749975520922454.
-
Halkier, B. (2022) Mundane normativity and the everyday handling of contested food consumption, Consumption & Society, 1(1): 51–66, doi: 10.1332/YTEA5659.
-
Hielkema, M.H. and Lund, T.B. (2021) Reducing meat consumption in Meat-loving Denmark: exploring willingness, behavior, barriers and drivers, Food Quality and Preference, 93(October): 104257, doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104257.
-
House, J. (2019) Modes of eating and phased routinisation: Insect-based food practices in the Netherlands, Sociology, 53(3): 451–67, doi: 10.1177/0038038518797498.
-
Jönsson, H., Michaud, M. and Neuman, N. (2021) What is commensality? A critical discussion of an expanding research field, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12): 6235, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126235.
-
Keller, M., Halkier, B. and Wilska, T.A. (2016) Policy and governance for sustainable consumption at the crossroads of theories and concepts: policy and governance for sustainable consumption at the crossroads of theories and concepts, Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(2): 75–88, doi: 10.1002/eet.1702.
-
Laakso, S., Niva, M., Eranti, V. and Aapio, F. (2021) Reconfiguring everyday eating: Vegan challenge discussions in social media, Food, Culture & Society, (April): 1–22, doi: 10.1080/15528014.2021.1882796.
-
Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries of Denmark (2020) Statens kantiner bliver grønnere [The state cantinas is becoming more sustainable], https://fvm.dk/nyheder/nyhed/nyhed/statens-kantiner-bliver-groennere/.
-
Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries of Denmark (2021) The official dietary guidelines: Good for health and climate, https://foedevarestyrelsen.dk/english/Food/The_dietary_recommendations/Pages/default.aspx.
-
Mylan, J. (2018) Sustainable consumption in everyday life: a qualitative study of UK consumer experiences of meat reduction, Sustainability, 10(7): 2307, doi: 10.3390/su10072307.
-
Mylan, J. and Southerton, D. (2018) The social ordering of an everyday practice: the case of laundry, Sociology, 52(6): 1134–51, doi: 10.1177/0038038517722932.
-
Neuman, N. (2019) On the engagement with social theory in food studies: cultural symbols and social practices, Food, Culture & Society, 22(1): 78–94, doi: 10.1080/15528014.2018.1547069.
-
O’Neill, K.J., Clear, A.K., Friday, A. and Hazas, M. (2019) ‘Fractures’ in food practices: Exploring transitions towards sustainable food, Agriculture and Human Values, 36(2): 225–39, doi: 10.1007/s10460-019-09913-6.
-
Paddock, J. (2017) Household consumption and environmental change: rethinking the policy problem through narratives of food practice, Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1): 122–39, doi: 10.1177/1469540515586869.
-
Plessz, M., Dubuisson-Quellier, S., Gojard, S. and Barrey, S. (2016) How consumption prescriptions affect food practices: assessing the roles of household resources and life-course events, Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(1): 101–23, doi: 10.1177/1469540514521077.
-
Rapley, T. (2014) Sampling strategies in qualitative research, in U. Flick (ed) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, London: SAGE, pp 49–63, doi: 10.4135/9781446282243.n4.
-
Schatzki, T.R. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Schatzki, T.R. (2019) Social Change in a Material World, 1st edn, New York: Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9780429032127.
-
Shove, E. (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(6): 1273–85, doi: 10.1068/a42282.
-
Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes, London: SAGE.
-
Spaargaren, G., Oosterveer, P. and Loeber, A. (2013) Sustainability transitions in food consumption, retail and production, in G. Spaargaren, P. Oosterveer and A. Loeber (eds) Food Practices in Transition: Changing Food Consumption, Retail and Production in the Age of Reflexive Modernity, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–34, doi: 10.4324/9780203135921.
-
Tavory, I. and Timmermans, S. (2014) Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/A/bo18785947.html.
-
Thorslund, C.A.H. and Lassen, J. (2017) Context, orders of worth, and the justification of meat consumption practices: meat consumption practices, Sociologia Ruralis, 57(December): 836–58, doi: 10.1111/soru.12143.
-
Torkkeli, K., Mäkelä, J. and Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2022) Adjusting the coordination of parental foodwork practices, Cultural Sociology, 0(0): 1–22.
-
Twine, R. (2014) Vegan killjoys at the table: contesting happiness and negotiating relationships with food practices, Societies, 4(4): 623–39, doi: 10.3390/soc4040623.
-
Twine, R. (2018) Materially constituting a sustainable food transition: the case of vegan eating practice, Sociology, 52(1): 166–81, doi: 10.1177/0038038517726647.
-
Warde, A. (2005) Consumption and theories of practice, Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2): 131–53, doi: 10.1177/1469540505053090.
-
Warde, A. (2016) The Practice of Eating, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Wendler, M. and Halkier, B. (forthcoming) Dietary transition requires work: exploring the practice-transition processes of young Danish meat reducers, Food, Culture and Society.
-
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T. et al. (2019) Food in the anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems, The Lancet, 393(10170): 447–92, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.
Search for other papers by Morten Wendler in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 573 | 573 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 315 | 315 | 29 |
| PDF Downloads | 254 | 254 | 23 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk