Many mainstream visions of sustainable societies assume that ‘green’ products will come to replace existing ones, reducing the footprint of consumption and enabling daily life to continue relatively undisturbed. However, several sustainable consumption studies have demonstrated that product substitution is not necessarily a straightforward process. This article asks whether the increased consumption of plant-based ‘mylk’, which is marketed as a more sustainable option compared to dairy milk, can be understood as a case of sustainable consumption via product substitution. The study applies a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey with secondary qualitative data from the Mass Observation Archive. We find that while the consumption of mylk has increased and that of milk decreased, this cannot be characterised as a straightforward case of substitution. Many people consume mylk alongside milk, rather than cutting milk consumption entirely. Rising mylk consumption requires the engagement of new, sometimes conflicting, meanings around health and the environment. In addition, a range of situational factors constitute unequal mylk consumption in society, and provisioning systems present important drivers and barriers that shape mylk consumption. Overall, our account suggests that moving towards sustainable consumption is not a simple process of product substitution as mylk is often consumed in addition to milk, and as this process requires adjustments in practices and meanings, unfolds unevenly within society, and is shaped by production systems rather than just demand.
Akenji, L. (2014) Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism, Journal of Cleaner Production, 63: 13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.022
Atkins, P.J. (2005) Fattening children or fattening farmers? School milk in Britain, 1921–1941, The Economic History Review, 58(1): 57–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00298.x
Bayliss, K. and Fine, B. (2020) A Guide to the Systems of Provision Approach: Who Gets What, How and Why, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bellarby, J., Tirado, R., Leip, A., Weiss, F., Lesschen, J.P. and Smith, P. (2013) Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe, Global Change Biology, 19(1): 3–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02786.x
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction, London and New York: Routledge.
Brył, P. (2018) Organic food online shopping in Poland, British Food Journal, 120(5): 1015–27.
Büchs, M. and Schnepf, S.V. (2013) Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households’ home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions, Ecological Economics, 90: 114–23.
Büchs, M. and Mattioli, G. (2021) Trends in air travel inequality in the UK: From the few to the many?, Travel Behaviour and Society, 25: 92–101.
Busch, G., Weary, D.M., Spiller, A. and von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2017) American and German attitudes towards cow-calf separation on dairy farms, Plos One, 12(3): e0174013.
Chaiton, M., Papadhima, I., Schwartz, R., Cohen, J.E., Soule, E.K., Zhang, B. et al. (2020) Product substitution after a real world menthol ban: a cohort study, Tobacco Regulatory Science, 6(3): 205–212. doi: 10.18001/TRS.6.3.5
Cohen, M.J. and Murphy, J. (2001) Consumption, environment and public policy, in M.J. Cohen and J. Murphy (eds) Exploring Sustainable Consumption: Environmental Policy and the Social Sciences, Amsterdam: Pergamon, pp 3–20.
Courage, F. (2019) Using the mass observation project: a case study in the practice of reusing data, Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 15: 32–40.
DEFRA (2017) Family Food 2015, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/family-food-statistics.
Fuentes, C. and Fuentes, M. (2017) Making a market for alternatives: marketing devices and the qualification of a vegan milk substitute, Journal of Marketing Management, 33(7–8): 529–55. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2017.1328456
Geels, F.W. (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective, Research Policy, 39(4): 495–510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
Geels, F.W., McMeekin, A., Mylan, J. and Southerton, D. (2015) A critical appraisal of sustainable consumption and production research: the reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions, Global Environmental Change, 34: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.013
Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C. and Dijkman, J. et al. (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Godin, L. and Sahakian, M. (2018) Cutting through conflicting prescriptions: how guidelines inform ‘healthy and sustainable’ diets in Switzerland, Appetite, 130: 123–33. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.004
Gössling, S., Ceron, J.P., Dubois, G. et al. (2009) Hypermobile travellers, in S. Gössling and P. Upham (eds) Climate Change and Aviation, London: Earthscan, pp 131–50.
Haas, R., Schnepps, A., Pichler, A. et al. (2019) Cow milk versus plant-based milk substitutes: a comparison of product image and motivational structure of consumption, Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(18): 5046.
Harmon, M.E. (2019) Have product substitution carbon benefits been overestimated? A sensitivity analysis of key assumptions, Environmental Research Letters, 14(6): 065008. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e95
Haustein, S. and Jensen, A.F. (2018) Factors of electric vehicle adoption: a comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(7): 484–96. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1398790
Hess, D.J. and Sovacool, B.K. (2020) Sociotechnical matters: reviewing and integrating science and technology studies with energy social science, Energy Research & Social Science, 65: 101462.
Hobson, K. (2013) ‘Weak’ or ‘strong’ sustainable consumption? Efficiency, degrowth, and the 10 Year Framework of Programmes, Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 31(6): 1082–98. doi: 10.1068/c12279
IPCC (2019) Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl.
Ivanova, D. and Wood, R. (2020) The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability, Global Sustainability, 3: e18. doi: 10.1017/sus.2020.12
Koch, F., Heuer, T., Krems, C. et al. (2019) Meat consumers and non-meat consumers in Germany: a characterisation based on results of the German National Nutrition Survey II, Journal of Nutritional Science, 7(Jun 7): e27.
Laakso, S., Niva, M., Eranti, V. and Aapio, F. (2022) Reconfiguring everyday eating: Vegan Challenge discussions in social media, Food, Culture and Society, 25(2): 268–89. doi: 10.1080/15528014.2021.1882796
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lonkila, A. and Kaljonen, M. (2021) Promises of meat and milk alternatives: an integrative literature review on emergent research themes, Agriculture and Human Values, 38(3): 625–39. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10184-9
Lorek, S. and Fuchs, D. (2013) Strong sustainable consumption governance: Precondition for a degrowth path?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 38: 36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.008
Lucas, K., Mattioli, G., Verlinghieri, E. and Guzman, A. (2016) Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 169(6): 353–65. doi: 10.1680/jtran.15.00073
Malek, L. and Umberger, W.J. (2021) How flexible are flexitarians? Examining diversity in dietary patterns, motivations and future intentions, Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3 (December 2021): 100038.
Mass Observation Archive (2019) Summer 2019 Directive, http://www.massobs.org.uk/images/Summer_2019_Directive_final.pdf.
Mattioli, G., Roberts, C., Steinberger, J.K. and Brown, A. (2020) The political economy of car dependence: a systems of provision approach, Energy Research & Social Science, 66: 101486.
McCarthy, K.S., Parker, M., Ameerally, A. , Drake, S.L. and Drake, M.A. (2017) Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: what are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?, Journal of Dairy Science, 100(8): 6125–38. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12519
Middlemiss, L. (2018) Sustainable Consumption: Key Issues, London: Routledge.
Middlemiss, L., Ambrosio-Albalá, P., Emmel, N., Gillard, R., Gilbertson, J., Hargreaves, T., Mullen, C., Ryan, T., Snell, C., Tod, A. et al. (2019) Energy poverty and social relations: a capabilities approach, Energy Research and Social Science, 55: 227–35. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.002
Mintel (2019) Milking the vegan trend: a quarter (23%) of Brits use plant-based milk, https://www.mintel.com/press-centre/food-and-drink/milking-the-vegan-trend-a-quarter-23-of-brits-use-plant-based-milk.
Morris, C., Mylan, J. and Beech, E. (2019) Substitution and food system de-animalisation: the case of non-dairy milk, The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 25: 42–58.
Mylan, J., Morris, C., Beech, E. and Geels, F. W. (2019) Rage against the regime: niche-regime interactions in the societal embedding of plant-based milk, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31: 233–47. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.001
Neff, R.A., Edwards, D., Palmer, A., Ramsing, R., Righter, A. and Wolfson, J. (2018) Reducing meat consumption in the USA: a nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours, Public Health Nutrition, 21(10): 1835–44. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017004190
O’Neill, K.J., Clear, A.K., Friday, A. and Hazas, M. (2019) ‘Fractures’ in food practices: Exploring transitions towards sustainable food, Agriculture and Human Values, 36(2): 225–39.
Otomo, Y. (2014) The gentle cannibal: the rise and fall of lawful milk, The Australian Feminist Law Journal, 40(2): 215–28. doi: 10.1080/13200968.2014.1008097
Ozaki, R., Shaw, I. and Dodgson, M. (2013) The coproduction of ‘sustainability’: Negotiated practices and the prius, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(4): 518–41.
Pfeiler, T.M. and Egloff, B. (2018) Examining the ‘veggie’ personality: results from a representative German sample, Appetite, 120: 246–55. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.005
Poore, J. and Nemecek, T. (2018) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers, Science, 360(6392): 987–92. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216
Salmivaara, L., Niva, M., Silfver, M. and Vainio, A. (2022) How vegans and vegetarians negotiate eating-related social norm conflicts in their social networks, Appetite, 175 (1 August 2022): 106081.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice. Everyday Life and How it Changes, London: SAGE.
Sigrin, B., Pless, J. and Drury, E. (2015) Diffusion into new markets: evolving customer segments in the solar photovoltaics market, Environmental Research Letters, 10(8): 084001. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084001
Simon, D.R. (2013) Meatonomics: How the Rigged Economics of the Meat and Dairy Industries Are Encouraging You to Consume Way More Than You Should and How to Eat Better, Live Longer, and Spend Smarter. Newburyport, MA: Conari Press.
Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L. et al. (2018) Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits, Nature, 562(7728): 519–25. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
Spurling, N., McMeekin, A., Shove, E., Southerton, D. and Welch, D. (2013) Interventions in Practice: Re-framing Policy Approaches to Consumer Behavior, University of Manchester, Sustainable Practices Research Group.
Stewart, F. (2022) Friends with benefits: how income and peer diffusion combine to create an inequality ‘trap’ in the uptake of low-carbon technologies, Energy Policy, 163 (April 2022): 112832.
Tsakiridou, E., Tsakiridou, H., Mattas, K. and Arvaniti, E. (2010) Effects of animal welfare standards on consumers’ food choices, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C — Food Economics, 7(2–4): 234–44.
Uprichard, E., Nettleton, S. and Chappell, P. (2013) ‘Food hates’ over the life course: An analysis of food narratives from the UK Mass Observation Archive, Appetite, 71: 137–43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.003
Vassileva, I. and Campillo, J. (2017) Adoption barriers for electric vehicles: Experiences from early adopters in Sweden, Energy, 120: 632–41. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.119
Wiley, A.S. (2011) Milk for ‘growth’: Global and local meanings of milk consumption in China, India, and the United States, Food and Foodways, 19(1–2): 11–33. doi: 10.1080/07409710.2011.544159
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S. et al. (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems, The Lancet, 393(10170): 447–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 399 | 399 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 387 | 387 | 72 |
PDF Downloads | 276 | 276 | 49 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here