To combat the global problem of unsustainability, absolute reductions in energy use are needed, particularly in the Global North. There is an urgent need for a better understanding of the possible routes for reduction that go beyond abstracted technological solutions or efficiency improvements, as well as a need for a deeper insight into how the potential for reduction is currently framed. We use a citizen survey on perceptions of energy-use reduction as a means of exploring the perceived possibilities for reduction. Four ‘narratives of energy-use reduction’ that circulate among the public are identified: no reduction; price-enabled reduction; technology-enabled reduction; and competence-enabled reduction. We argue that these interlinking narratives are informative in understanding how change is understood amidst the bundle of practices related to energy-use reduction. They highlight the meanings related to energy use and allow us to explore the understandings of how the potential for energy-use reduction is positioned in society, particularly in regard to the notion of minimum consumption. Our findings are useful in providing a more nuanced understanding of the (de)constitution of energy use, and they contribute to identifying possibilities for steering energy use by providing insight into the general understandings of the current levels of energy use.
Adkins, L. and Lehtonen, T.K. (2018) Price: an introduction, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 19(2): 109–16. doi: 10.1080/1600910x.2018.1501588
Bååth, J. (2023) Towards a unified theory of market prices: Turning to pricing in practice, Socio-Economic Review, 21(1): 5–23. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwac010
Barth, E., Moene, K.O.K. and Pedersen, A.W. (2021) Rising inequality in the egalitarian Nordics, in G. Fischer and R. Strauss (eds) Europe’s Income, Wealth, Consumption, and Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197545706.001.0001
Bouzarovski, S., Thomson, H. and Cornelis, M. (2021) Confronting energy poverty in Europe: a research and policy agenda, Energies, 14(4): 858. doi: 10.3390/en14040858
Christensen, T.H., Friis, F., Bettin, S., Throndsen, W., Ornetzeder, M., Skjølsvold, T.M., et al (2020) The role of competences, engagement, and devices in configuring the impact of prices in energy demand response: findings from three smart energy pilots with households, Energy Policy, 137: 111142. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111142
Day, R., Walker, G. and Simcock, N. (2016) Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework, Energy Policy, 93: 255–64. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.019
De Fina, A. (2021) Doing narrative analysis from a narratives-as-practices perspective, Narrative Inquiry, 31(1): 49–71. doi: 10.1075/ni.20067.def
Evans, D. (2011) Thrifty, green or frugal: Reflections on sustainable consumption in a changing economic climate, Geoforum, 42(5): 550–7. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.03.008
Evans, D. (2020) After practice? Material semiotic approaches to consumption and economy, Cultural Sociology, 14(4): 340–56. doi: 10.1177/1749975520923521
Fingrid (2022) Sähkönkulutus laski lokakuussa seitsemän prosenttia [Electricity consumption reduced in October by seven percent], https://www.fingrid.fi/ajankohtaista/tiedotteet/2022/sahkonkulutus-laski-lokakuussa-kahdeksan-prosenttia/.
The Finnish Real Estate Federation (2024) Heating, https://www.kiinteistoliitto.fi/taloyhtio/energia/lammitys/#:~:text=Sosiaali%2D%20ja%20terveysministeriön%20asumisterveysohjeen%20mukainen,pysyä%20alle%2023–24%20asteeen.
Franzosi, R. (1998) Narrative analysis: or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative, Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1): 517–54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.517
Gram-Hanssen, K. (2013) Efficient technologies or user behaviour, which is the more important when reducing households’ energy consumption?, Energy Efficiency, 6(3): 447–57. doi: 10.1007/s12053-012-9184-4
Hand, M., Shove, E. and Southerton, D. (2005) Explaining showering: a discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice, Sociological Research Online, 10(2): 101–13. doi: 10.5153/sro.1100
Heiskanen, E. and Matschoss, K. (2017) Understanding the uneven diffusion of building-scale renewable energy systems: a review of household, local and country level factors in diverse European countries., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75: 580–591. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.027
Heiskanen, E., Jalas, M., Rinkinen, J. and Tainio, P. (2015) The local community as a “low-carbon lab”: Promises and perils., Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 14: 149–164. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.08.001
Hecher, M., Hatzl, S., Knoeri, C. and Posch, A. (2017) The trigger matters: the decision-making process for heating systems in the residential building sector, Energy Policy, 102: 288–306. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.004
The Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland (ARA) (2022) Energy subsidies for households, https://www.ara.fi/fi-FI/Lainat_ja_avustukset/Energiaavustus/Henkiloasiakkaat.
Inês, C., Guilherme, P.L., Esther, M.G., Swantje, G., Stephen, H. and Lars, H. (2020) Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU, Energy Policy, 138: 111212. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111212
Jack, T., Bååth, J., Heinonen, J.T. and Gram-Hanssen, K. (2023) How individuals make sense of their climate impacts in the capitalocene: mixed methods insights from calculating carbon footprints, Sustainability Science, 1–15.
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. and Rehner, R. (2016) Energy justice: a conceptual review, Energy Research & Social Science, 11: 174–82. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004
Jouzi, F., Levänen, J., Mikkilä, M. and Linnanen, L. (2024) To spend or to avoid? A critical review on the role of money in aiming for sufficiency, Ecological Economics, 220: 108190. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108190
Kajoskoski, T. (2024) The role of practical knowledge in keeping existing systems: a qualitative study of Finnish homeowners with oil heating, Consumption and Society, 3(3): 276–95. doi: 10.1332/27528499y2024d000000018
Laakso, S., Castellazzi, E., Matschoss, K. and Rinkinen, J. (2024) Agents of change or victims of transition? Media framings on household roles during the energy crisis, Sustainability Science, 19(3): 739–762. doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01434-w
Lehtonen, T.K. (1999) Any room for aesthetics? Shopping practices of heavily indebted consumers, Journal of Material Culture, 4: 243–62. doi: 10.1177/135918359900400301
Lesic, V., De Bruin, W.B., Davis, M.C., Krishnamurti, T. and Azevedo, I.M. (2018) Consumers’ perceptions of energy use and energy savings: a literature review, Environmental Research Letters, 13(3): 033004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaab92
MacArthur, J.L. (2016) Challenging public engagement: participation, deliberation and power in renewable energy policy, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6: 631–40. doi: 10.1007/s13412-015-0328-7
Matschoss, K., Heiskanen, E., Atanasiu, B. and Kranzl, L. (2013) Energy renovations of EU multifamily buildings: do current policies target the real problems, in Proceedings of the ECEEE, June, pp 1485–1496.
McGookin, C., Gallachóir, B.O. and Byrne, E. (2021) Participatory methods in energy system modelling and planning: a review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151: 111504.
MoE (Ministry of the Environment) (2022) Medium-term climate change policy plan, https://ym.fi/en/medium-term-climate-change-policy-plan.
Morley, J. (2018) Rethinking energy services: The concept of ‘meta-service’ and implications for demand reduction and servicizing policy, Energy Policy, 122: 563–69. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.056
Morley, J., Widdicks, K. and Hazas, M. (2018) Digitalisation, energy and data demand: The impact of Internet traffic on overall and peak electricity consumption, Energy Research & Social Science, 38: 128–37. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.018
Neuendorf, K.A. (2018) Content analysis and thematic analysis, in P. Brough (ed) Advanced Research Methods for Applied Psychology, London: Routledge, pp 211–23.
Rinkinen, J., Shove, E. and Marsden, G. (2020) Conceptualising Demand: A Distinctive Approach to Consumption and Practice, London: Routledge.
Sahakian, M., Rau, H., Grealis, E., Godin, L., Wallenborn, G., Backhaus, J., et al (2021) Challenging social norms to recraft practices: a Living Lab approach to reducing household energy use in eight European countries, Energy Research & Social Science, 72: 101881.
Schatzki, T.R. (2002) The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change, Philadelphia, PN: Penn State University Press.
Schatzki, T.R. (2005) Practice mind-ed orders, in K. Knorr Cetina, T. R. Schatzki and E. Von Savigny (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London: Routledge, pp 50–63.
Schatzki, T. (2016) Sayings, texts and discursive formations, in A. Hui, T. R. Schatzki and E. Shove (eds) The Nexus of Practices, London: Routledge, pp 138–52.
Seyfang, G. and Haxeltine, A. (2012) Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3): 381–400. doi: 10.1068/c10222
Shove, E. (2003) Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality, Oxford: Berg.
Shove, E. (2018) What is wrong with energy efficiency?, Building Research & Information, 46(7): 779–89. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746
Shove, E. (2022) Connecting Practices: Large Topics in Society and Social Theory, Routledge: London.
Shove, E. and Pantzar, M. (2005) Consumers, producers and practices: understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking., Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1): 43–64. doi: 10.1177/1469540505049846
Shove, E. and Southerton, D. (2000) Defrosting the freezer: from novelty to convenience: A narrative of normalization, Journal of Material Culture, 5(3): 301–19. doi: 10.1177/135918350000500303
Shove, E. and Walker, G. (2014) What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand, Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5): 41–58. doi: 10.1177/0263276414536746
Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics Of Social Practice: Everyday Life And How It Changes, London: Sage.
Spurling, N., McMeekin, A., Shove, E., Southerton, D. and Welch, D. (2013) Interventions in practice: re-framing policy approaches to consumer behaviour, University of Manchester, Sustainable Practices Research Group.
Statistics Finland (2020) Energy consumption in households e-publication, Helsinki: Tilastokeskus, https://stat.fi/en/statistics/asen.
Statistics Finland (2022a) Over 1.5 million persons live in rented dwellings, https://stat.fi/en/publication/cktcn27io352g0b62f6u4sky0.
Statistics Finland (2022b) 116f: Dwellings by type of building, occupancy and year of construction, 2021, https://pxweb2.stat.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__asas/statfin_asas_pxt_116f.px/table/tableViewLayout1.
Strengers, Y. (2018) Prices as instruments of demand management: Interpreting the signals, In E. Shove and F. Trentmann (eds) Infrastructures in Practice, London: Routledge, pp 184–96.
Torriti, J. and Ramírez-Mendiola, J.L. (2022) The price is not right! Energy demand, time of use tariffs, values and social practices, ECEEE Summer Study, Hyéres, France, pp 6–11.
Warde, A. (2005) Consumption and theories of practice, Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2): 131–53. doi: 10.1177/1469540505053090
Watson, M., Browne, A., Evans, D., Foden, M., Hoolohan, C. and Sharp, L. (2020) Challenges and opportunities for re-framing resource use policy with practice theories: the change points approach, Global Environmental Change, 62: 102072. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102072
Welch, D. and Warde, A. (2016) How should we understand ‘general understandings’?, in A. Hui, T. R. Schatzki and E. Shove (eds) The Nexus of Practices, London: Routledge, pp 195–208.
Wilson, C., Crane, L. and Chryssochoidis, G. (2015) Why do homeowners renovate energy efficiently? Contrasting perspectives and implications for policy, Energy Research & Social Science, 7: 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.03.002
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 174 | 174 | 105 |
Full Text Views | 17 | 17 | 11 |
PDF Downloads | 24 | 24 | 17 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here