Performance is Political
Performance management is usually presented as a technical tool to monitor policies and programmes. Performance indicators are presented as neutral and as having been developed in pursuit of economy, efficiency and effectiveness. According to this approach, if properly conceptualised and constructed, performance indicators illuminate the extent to which agencies or services are achieving goals and provide accountability. In contrast, understanding performance indicators as political requires examination of their social as well as their technical aspects. From this perspective, the effectiveness of an indicator as a means to measure performance is not as important as other roles, such as embedding policy and shaping practice. Accordingly, performance management represents a significant technology of control over social work. It acts as a powerful determinant of which forms of practice are approved by deciding which of them are drawn into the accountability framework and are therefore authorised.
-
Alastalo, M. and Poso, T. (2014) Number of children placed outside the home as an indicator – social and moral implications of commensuration, Social Policy and Administration, 48(7): 721–38. doi: 10.1111/spol.12073
-
Bevan, G. and Hood, C. (2006) What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system, Public Administration, 84(3): 517–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x
-
Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V. and Nudurupati, S. (2012) Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3): 305–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x
-
Clarke, J. (2004) Changing Welfare, Changing States: New Directions in Social Policy, London: Sage.
-
Considine, M. (1994) Public Policy: A Critical Approach, Melbourne: Macmillan.
-
Davis, H., Martin, S. and Downe, J. (2001), The impact of external inspection on local government, https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/impact-external-inspection-local-government
-
De Bruijn, H. (2007) Managing performance in the public sector, Public Administration, 86(3): 863–5.
-
Forster, N. (2005) Maximum Performance: A Practical Guide to leading and Managing People at Work, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
-
Greener, I. (2019) Performance management that works? Improving public services by making us of intrinsic motivation, Social Policy and Administration, 53(1): 99–112. doi: 10.1111/spol.12387
-
Harris, J. (2003) The Social Work Business, London: Routledge.
-
Harris, J. (2014) (Against) Neoliberal social work, Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(1): 7–22. doi: 10.1332/204986014X13912564145528
-
Harris, J. and Unwin, P. (2009) Performance management in modernised social work, in V. White and J. Harris (eds) Modernising Social Work: Critical Considerations, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Henman, P. (2016) Performing the state: the socio-political dimensions of performance management in policy and public services, Policy Studies, 37(6): 499–507. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2016.1144739
-
Hoggett, P. (2000) Social policy and the emotions, in G. Lewis, S. Gewirtz and J. Clarke (eds) Rethinking Social Policy, London: Sage.
-
Hood, C. (1998) The Art of the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Hood, C., Rothstein, H. and Baldwin, R. (2001) The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Humphrey, J. (2002) Joint reviews: retracing the trajectory, decoding the terms, British Journal of Social Work, 32(4): 463–76. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/32.4.463
-
Kloot, L. and Martin, J. (2000) Strategic performance management: a balanced approach to performance management issues in local government, Management Accounting Research, 11(2): 231–51. doi: 10.1006/mare.2000.0130
-
Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P. (2007) Understanding public policy through its instruments, Governance, 20(1): 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
-
Le Galès, P. (2016) Performance measurement as a policy instrument, Policy Studies, 17(6): 508–20.
-
Lewis, J. (2015) The politics and consequences of performance measurement, Policy and Society, 34(1): 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001
-
Lowe, T. and Wilson, R. (2017) Playing the game of outcomes-based performance management. Is gamesmanship inevitable? Evidence from theory and practice, Social Policy and Administration, 51(7): 981–1001. doi: 10.1111/spol.12205
-
Munro, E. (2004) The impact of audit on social work practice, British Journal of Social Work, 34(8): 1075–95. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch130
-
Newman, J. (2000) Beyond the new public management? Modernizing public services, in J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz and E. McLaughlin (eds) New Managerialism, New Welfare?, London: Sage.
-
Newman, J. (2005) Modernising Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.
-
Noordegraaf, M. and Abma, T. (2003) Management by measurement? Public management practices amidst ambiguity, Public Administration, 81(4): 853–71. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00374.x
-
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2011) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Power, M. (2004) Counting, control and calculation: reflections on measuring and management, Human Relations, 57(6): 765–83. doi: 10.1177/0018726704044955
-
Radnor, Z. and McGuire, M. (2004) Performance management in the public sector: fact or fiction?, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3): 245–60. doi: 10.1108/17410400410523783
-
Sanderson, I. (2001) Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in “Modern” Local Government, Public Administration, 79(2): 297–313.
-
Sanderson, I., Bovaird, T., Davis, P., Martin, S. and Foreman, A. (1998) Made to Measure: Evaluation in Practice in Local Government, London: Local Government Management Board.
-
Smith, P. (1995) On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector, International Journal of Public Administration, 18(2–3): 277–310. doi: 10.1080/01900699508525011
-
Talbot, C. (2008) Performance regimes – the institutional context of performance policies, International Journal of Public Administration, 31(14): 1569–91. doi: 10.1080/01900690802199437
-
Tanner, D. (2001a) Partnership in prevention: messages from older people, in V. White and J. Harris (eds) Developing Good Practice in Community Care: Partnership and Participation, London: Jessica Kingsley.
-
Tanner, D. (2001b) Sustaining the self in later life: implications for community-based support, Ageing and Society, 21(3): 255–78. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X01008248
-
Tilbury, C. (2004) The influence of performance measurement on child welfare policy and practice, British Journal of Social Work, 34(2): 225–41. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch023
-
Tilbury, C. (2016) Repositioning prevention in child protection using performance indicators, Policy Studies, 37(6): 583–96. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2015.1110236
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 10 | 10 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 10 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Downloads | 16 | 16 | 2 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk