Critical and Radical Social Work
An international journal

Performance is Political

Author: John Harris1
View author details View Less
  • 1 Coventry University, , UK
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Performance management is usually presented as a technical tool to monitor policies and programmes. Performance indicators are presented as neutral and as having been developed in pursuit of economy, efficiency and effectiveness. According to this approach, if properly conceptualised and constructed, performance indicators illuminate the extent to which agencies or services are achieving goals and provide accountability. In contrast, understanding performance indicators as political requires examination of their social as well as their technical aspects. From this perspective, the effectiveness of an indicator as a means to measure performance is not as important as other roles, such as embedding policy and shaping practice. Accordingly, performance management represents a significant technology of control over social work. It acts as a powerful determinant of which forms of practice are approved by deciding which of them are drawn into the accountability framework and are therefore authorised.

  • Alastalo, M. and Poso, T. (2014) Number of children placed outside the home as an indicator – social and moral implications of commensuration, Social Policy and Administration, 48(7): 72138. doi: 10.1111/spol.12073

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bevan, G. and Hood, C. (2006) What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system, Public Administration, 84(3): 51738. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V. and Nudurupati, S. (2012) Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3): 30527. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clarke, J. (2004) Changing Welfare, Changing States: New Directions in Social Policy, London: Sage.

  • Considine, M. (1994) Public Policy: A Critical Approach, Melbourne: Macmillan.

  • Davis, H., Martin, S. and Downe, J. (2001), The impact of external inspection on local government, https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/impact-external-inspection-local-government

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Bruijn, H. (2007) Managing performance in the public sector, Public Administration, 86(3): 8635.

  • Forster, N. (2005) Maximum Performance: A Practical Guide to leading and Managing People at Work, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Greener, I. (2019) Performance management that works? Improving public services by making us of intrinsic motivation, Social Policy and Administration, 53(1): 99112. doi: 10.1111/spol.12387

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, J. (2003) The Social Work Business, London: Routledge.

  • Harris, J. (2014) (Against) Neoliberal social work, Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(1): 722. doi: 10.1332/204986014X13912564145528

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, J. and Unwin, P. (2009) Performance management in modernised social work, in V. White and J. Harris (eds) Modernising Social Work: Critical Considerations, Bristol: Policy Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henman, P. (2016) Performing the state: the socio-political dimensions of performance management in policy and public services, Policy Studies, 37(6): 499507. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2016.1144739

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoggett, P. (2000) Social policy and the emotions, in G. Lewis, S. Gewirtz and J. Clarke (eds) Rethinking Social Policy, London: Sage.

  • Hood, C. (1998) The Art of the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hood, C., Rothstein, H. and Baldwin, R. (2001) The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Humphrey, J. (2002) Joint reviews: retracing the trajectory, decoding the terms, British Journal of Social Work, 32(4): 46376. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/32.4.463

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kloot, L. and Martin, J. (2000) Strategic performance management: a balanced approach to performance management issues in local government, Management Accounting Research, 11(2): 23151. doi: 10.1006/mare.2000.0130

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P. (2007) Understanding public policy through its instruments, Governance, 20(1): 121. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Le Galès, P. (2016) Performance measurement as a policy instrument, Policy Studies, 17(6): 50820.

  • Lewis, J. (2015) The politics and consequences of performance measurement, Policy and Society, 34(1): 112. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lowe, T. and Wilson, R. (2017) Playing the game of outcomes-based performance management. Is gamesmanship inevitable? Evidence from theory and practice, Social Policy and Administration, 51(7): 9811001. doi: 10.1111/spol.12205

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Munro, E. (2004) The impact of audit on social work practice, British Journal of Social Work, 34(8): 107595. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch130

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newman, J. (2000) Beyond the new public management? Modernizing public services, in J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz and E. McLaughlin (eds) New Managerialism, New Welfare?, London: Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newman, J. (2005) Modernising Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.

  • Noordegraaf, M. and Abma, T. (2003) Management by measurement? Public management practices amidst ambiguity, Public Administration, 81(4): 85371. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00374.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2011) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Power, M. (2004) Counting, control and calculation: reflections on measuring and management, Human Relations, 57(6): 76583. doi: 10.1177/0018726704044955

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radnor, Z. and McGuire, M. (2004) Performance management in the public sector: fact or fiction?, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3): 24560. doi: 10.1108/17410400410523783

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sanderson, I. (2001) Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in “Modern” Local Government, Public Administration, 79(2): 297313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sanderson, I., Bovaird, T., Davis, P., Martin, S. and Foreman, A. (1998) Made to Measure: Evaluation in Practice in Local Government, London: Local Government Management Board.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, P. (1995) On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector, International Journal of Public Administration, 18(2–3): 277310. doi: 10.1080/01900699508525011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Talbot, C. (2008) Performance regimes – the institutional context of performance policies, International Journal of Public Administration, 31(14): 156991. doi: 10.1080/01900690802199437

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tanner, D. (2001a) Partnership in prevention: messages from older people, in V. White and J. Harris (eds) Developing Good Practice in Community Care: Partnership and Participation, London: Jessica Kingsley.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tanner, D. (2001b) Sustaining the self in later life: implications for community-based support, Ageing and Society, 21(3): 25578. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X01008248

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tilbury, C. (2004) The influence of performance measurement on child welfare policy and practice, British Journal of Social Work, 34(2): 22541. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch023

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tilbury, C. (2016) Repositioning prevention in child protection using performance indicators, Policy Studies, 37(6): 58396. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2015.1110236

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1 Coventry University, , UK

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 9
Full Text Views 10 10 1
PDF Downloads 16 16 2

Altmetrics

Dimensions