Critical and Radical Social Work
An international journal

‘Something to just be ticked off on a care plan’: organisational professionalism and procedure-based decision-making in practice with children who go on to be adopted

Author: Emma Geddes1
View author details View Less
  • 1 Leeds Beckett University, UK and University of York, , UK
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Over the last decade, at a time when funding for services intended to support families has been dramatically curtailed, successive governments in England and Wales have sought to increase the numbers of children being adopted from care. In light of the central role that children’s social workers play in progressing plans for adoption, this research seeks to investigate 15 practitioners’ experiences of operating within the current context. Evidence of significant tensions in social workers’ accounts of planning for adoption and post-adoption contact under austerity is presented, and Evetts’ distinction between organisational and occupational professionalism is drawn upon to understand the influence of the wider political context on decisions made by practitioners in working with children who go on to be adopted.

  • Ainsworth, F. and Hansen, P. (2011) The experiences of parents of children in care: the human rights issue, Child and Youth Services, 32: 918. doi: 10.1080/0145935X.2011.553578

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Asmussen, K., Masterman, T., McBride, T. and Molloy, D. (2022) Understanding the use of trauma-informed approaches within children’s social care, www.eif.org.uk/report/trauma-informed-care-understanding-the-use-of-trauma-informed-approaches-within-childrens-social-care.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Avery, R.J. (1998) Information disclosure and openness in adoption: state policy and empirical evidence, Child and Youth Services Review, 20(1/2): 5785. doi: 10.1016/S0190-7409(97)00067-4

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bamford, T. (2020) Introduction, in T. Bamford and K. Bilton (eds) Social Work: Past, Present and Future, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Beek, M. (1994) The reality of face-to-face contact after adoption, Adoption and Fostering, 18(2): 3943. doi: 10.1177/030857599401800211

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Biehal, N., Ellison, S., Baker, C. and Sinclair, I. (2010) Belonging and Permanence: Long-Term Outcomes in Foster Care and Adoption, London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bilson, A. and Martin, K.E.C. (2017) Referrals and child protection in England: one in five children referred to Children’s Services and one in nineteen investigated before the age of five, British Journal of Social Work, 47(3): 793811.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bissell, P. and Peacock, M. (2015) Shame and the illegitimacy of dependency, https://www.cost-ofliving.net/shame-the-illegitimacy-of-dependency-under-neoliberalism/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boss, P. (1999) Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief, Massachusetts, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Bowlby, J. (1971) Attachment, Middlesex: Penguin Books Limited.

  • Brayne, H. and Carr, H. (2013) Law for Social Workers: Twelfth Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Broadhurst, K., Mason, C., Bedston, S., Alrouh, B., Morriss, L., McQuarrie, T., Palmer, M., Shaw, M., Harwin, J. and Kershaw, S. (2017) Vulnerable birth mothers and recurrent care proceedings: final summary report, https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/rc-final-summary-report-v1_6.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, R. and Ward, H. (2013) Decision-making within a child’s timeframe, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/upload s/attachment_data/file/200471/Decisionmaking_within_a_child_s_timeframe.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bruer, J.T. (1999) The Myth of the First Three Years: A New Understanding of Early Brain Development and Lifelong Learning, New York: The Free Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bywaters, P. et al. (2020) The child welfare inequalities project: final report, https://pure.hud.ac.uk/ws/files/21398145/CWIP_Final_Report.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Children Act (1989) Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/41/contents. [Accessed 31st May 2022].

  • Churchill, H. (2013) Family support and the coalition: retrenchment, focusing and restructuring, in M. Kilkey and G. Ramia (eds) Social Policy Review 24: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2012, Bristol: Policy Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, V. and Whyte, D. (2017) The Violence of Austerity, London: Pluto Press.

  • Crittendon, P.M. (2016) Raising Parents, Devon: Willan Publishing.

  • Cummins, I. (2018) Poverty, Inequality and Social Work, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Cunningham, J. and Cunningham, S. (2017) Social Policy and Social Work: Second Edition, London: Sage Publications Limited.

  • Davies, M. (1985) The Essential Social Worker: A Guide to Positive Practice, Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

  • Department for Education (2016) Children looked-after (including adoption). Year end 31st March 2016, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/575531/SFR41_2016_Additional_Tables_Text.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Department for Education (2020) Children looked after in England including adoptions, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/children-looked-after-in-england-including-adoption-2020-to-2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Department of Health (2000) Adoption: a new approach, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/adoption-a-new-approach.

  • Doka, K.J. (1999) Disenfranchised grief, Bereavement Care, 18(3): 379. doi: 10.1080/02682629908657467

  • Dominelli, L. (1998) Anti-oppressive practice in context, in R. Adams, L. Dominelli, M. Payne and J. Campling (eds) Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debates, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dominelli, L. (2004) Social Work: Theory and Practice for a Changing Profession, Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Dowd, P. (2019) Foreword, in M. Lavalette (ed) What Is the Future of Social Work?, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Edwards, R. and Gillies, V. (2016) Family policy: the Mods and Rockers, in H. Bochel and M. Powell (eds) The Coalition Government and Social Policy: Restructuring the Welfare State, Bristol: Policy Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evetts, J. (2011) A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities, Current Sociology, 59(4): 40622. doi: 10.1177/0011392111402585

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fawcett, B., Featherstone, B. and Goddard, J. (2004) Contemporary Child Care Policy and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Featherstone, B. (2006) Rethinking family support in the current policy context, British Journal of Social Work, 36: 519. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch226

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Featherstone, B. (2019) Contemporary developments in child protection in England. Reform or reaction?, in M. Lavalette (ed) What Is the Future of Social Work?, Bristol: Policy Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Featherstone, B., Broadhurst, K. and Holt, K. (2012) Thinking systemically, thinking politically: building strong partnerships with children and families in the context of rising inequality, British Journal of Social Work, 42: 61833. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr080

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Featherstone, B., White, S. and Morris, K. (2014a) Reimagining Child Protection: Towards Humane Social Work with Families, Bristol: Policy Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Featherstone, B., Morris, K. and White, S. (2014b) A marriage made in hell: early intervention meets child protection, British Journal of Social Work, 44(7): 173549. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct052

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K. and White, S. (2018a) Protecting Children: A Social Model, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Featherstone, B., Gupta, A. and Mills, S. (2018b) The role of the social worker in adoption – ethics and human rights. An enquiry, www.basw.co.uk/system/files/resources/basw_55505-10_1.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fenton, J. (2014) Can social work education meet the neoliberal challenge head on?, Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(3): 32135. doi: 10.1332/204986014X14074186108718

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferguson, H. (2011) Child Protection Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Ferguson, I. (2019) Mental health social work – the dog that hasn’t barked, in M. Lavalette (ed) What Is the Future of Social Work?, Bristol: Policy Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferguson, G., Featherstone, B. and Morris, K. (2019) Framed to fit? Challenging the domestic abuse ‘story’ in child protection, Critical and Radical Social Work, 8(1): 2540. doi: 10.1332/204986019X15668424450790

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frost, N. and Parton, N. (2009) Understanding Children’s Social Care: Politics, Policy and Practice, London: Sage Publications Limited.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garrett, P.M. (2002) Getting ‘a grip’: New Labour and the reform of the law on child adoption, Critical Social Policy, 22(2): 174202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geddes, E. (2021) ‘Some days it’s like she has died.’ A qualitative exploration of first mothers’ utilisation of artefacts associated with now-adopted children in coping with grief and loss, Qualitative Social Work, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14733250211039008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • George, V. and Wilding, P. (2002) Globalization and Human Welfare, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Gillies, V., Edwards, R. and Horsley, N. (2017) Challenging the Politics of Early Intervention: Who’s ‘Saving’ Children and Why?, Bristol: Policy Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldstein, J., Freud, A. and Solnit, A. (1980) Beyond the Best Interests of the Child, London: Burnet.

  • Gray, M. and Webb, S. (2013) Introduction, in M. Gray and S. Webb (eds) Social Work Theories and Methods: Second Edition, London: Sage Publications Limited, pp 110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gupta, A. and Featherstone, B. (2020) On hope, loss, anger, and the spaces between: reflections of living with/in adoption and the role of the social worker, Child and Family Social Work, 25: 16572. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12674

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, F. and Whyte, N. (1999) Support for birth mothers in a group setting, Adoption and Fostering, 23(4): 418. doi: 10.1177/030857599902300408

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hendrick, H. (2003) Child Welfare: Historical Dimensions, Contemporary Debate, Oxford: Taylor Francis.

  • Henney, S.M., Ayers-Lopez, S., McRoy, R.G. and Grotevant, H.D. (2007) Evolution and resolution: birth mothers’ experiences of grief and loss at different levels of openness, Journal of Social and Personal Relations, 24(6): 87589. doi: 10.1177/0265407507084188

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hicks, S. (2016) Theory and social work: a conceptual review of the literature, International Journal of Social Welfare, 25: 399414. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12215

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howe, D., Sawbridge, P. and Hinings, D. (1992) Half a Million Women: Mothers Who Lose Their Children by Adoption, London: Penguin Group.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howe, D. (1996) Surface and depth in social work practice, in N. Parton (ed) Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work, London: Routledge, pp 7797.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howe, D. (2009) A Brief Introduction to Social Work Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Howe, D. and Feast, J. (2000) Adoption Search and Reunion: The Long-Term Experience of Adopted Adults, London: The Children’s Society.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hughes, B. (1995) Openness and contact in adoption: a child-centred perspective, British Journal of Social Work, 25: 72947.

  • Jones, O. (2012) Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class, London: Verso.

  • Keating, J. (2009) A Child for Keeps: The History of Adoption in England, 1918–45, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Kelly, G. (2000) The survival of long-term foster care, in G. Kelly and R. Gilligan (eds) Issues in Foster Care: Policy, Practice and Research, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd, pp 1239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirton, D. (2013) ‘Kinship by design’ in England: reconfiguring adoption from Blair to the Coalition, Child and Family Social Work, 18(1): 97106. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12027

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirton, D. (2019) Adoption wars: inequality, child welfare and (social) justice, Families, Relationships and Societies, 9(2): 25368. doi: 10.1332/204674319X15492792975248

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klass, D., Silverman, P.R. and Nickman, S. (1996) Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief, London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Krumer-Nevo, M. (2020) Radical Hope: Poverty-Aware Practice for Social Work, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Lavalette, M. (ed) (2019) What Is the Future of Social Work?, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Lawler, S. (2000) Mothering the Self: Mothers, Daughters, Subjects, London: Routledge.

  • Lee, J.S. and Thwaite, J.A. (1997) Open adoption and adoptive mothers: attitudes towards birth mothers, adopted children and parenting, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67(4): 57684. doi: 10.1037/h0080255

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lister, R. (2006) An agenda for children: investing in the future or promoting wellbeing in the present?, in J. Lewis (ed) Children, Changing Families and Welfare States, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp 5168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Logan, J. (1999) Exchanging information post-adoption: views of adoptive parents and birth parents, Adoption and Fostering, 23(3): 2737. doi: 10.1177/030857599902300305

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Logan, J. and Smith, C. (2005) Face-to-face contact post-adoption. Views from the triangles, British Journal of Social Work, 35: 335. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch160

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lonne, B., Harries, M., Featherstone, B. and Gray, M. (2016) Working Ethically in Child Protection, Oxon: Routledge.

  • Memarnia, N., Nolte, L., Norris, C. and Harborne, A. (2015) ‘It felt like it was night all the time’: listening to the experiences of birth mothers whose children have been taking into care or adopted, Adoption and Fostering, 39(4): 30317. doi: 10.1177/0308575915611516

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, T. (2005) Making Sense of Motherhood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Morley, C. and Macfarlane, S. (2014) Critical social work as ethical social work: using critical reflection to research students’ resistance to neoliberalism, Critical and Radical Social Work, 3(2): 33755. doi: 10.1332/204986014X14096553281895

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morris, K. et al. (2018) Social 321 work, poverty and child welfare interventions, Child and Family Social Work, 23(3): 264372. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12414

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morriss, L. (2018) Haunted futures: the stigma of being a mother living apart from her child(ren) as a result of state-ordered court removal, The Sociological Review Monographs, 66(4): 81631. doi: 10.1177/0038026118777448

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Munro, E. (2011) The Munro review of child protection: final report: a child-centred system, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/munro-review-of-child-protection-final-report-a-child-centred-system.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Narey, M. (2011) The Narey Report on Adoption: Our Blueprint for Britain’s Lost Children, London: The Times.

  • Neil, E. (2002) Contact after adoption: the role of agencies in making and supporting plans, Adoption and Fostering, 26(1): 2538. doi: 10.1177/030857590202600105

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neil, E. (2003) Accepting the reality of adoption: birth relatives’ experiences of face-to-face contact, Adoption and Fostering, 27(2): 3243. doi: 10.1177/030857590302700206

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neil, E. (2009) Post-adoption contact and openness in adoptive parents’ minds: consequences for children’s development, British Journal of Social Work, 39: 523. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm087

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neil, E., Beek, M. and Ward, E. (2013) Contact after Adoption: A Follow-up in Later Adolescence, Norwich: University of East Anglia, Centre for Research on the Child and Family.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parton, N. (2005) ‘Every child matters’: the shift to prevention whilst strengthening protection in children’s services in England, Children and Youth Services Review, 28: 97692. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parton, N. (2011) Child protection and safeguarding in England: changing and competing conceptions of risk and their implications for social work, British Journal of Social Work, 41: 85475. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq119

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parton, N. (2014) The Politics of Child Protection: Contemporary Developments and Future Directions, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Patrick, R. (2017) For Whose Benefit? The Everyday Realities of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Payne, M. (2006) What Is Professional Social Work?, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Payne, M. (2014) Modern Social Work Theory, 4 edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Peacock, M., Bissell, P. and Owen, J. (2014a) Dependency denied: health inequalities in the neoliberal era, Social Science and Medicine, 118: 17380. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peacock, M., Bissell, P. and Owen, J. (2014b) Shaming encounters: reflections on contemporary understandings of inequality and health, Sociology, 48(2): 387402. doi: 10.1177/0038038513490353

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Penna, S. and O’Brien, M. (2013) Neoliberalism, in M. Gray and S. Webb (eds) Social Work Theories and Methods, London: Sage Publications Limited.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Quinton, D. and Selwyn, J. (1998) Contact with birth parents after adoption: a response to Ryburn, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 10(14): 114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ridge, T. (2013) ‘We are all in this together?’ The hidden costs of poverty, recession and austerity policies on Britain’s poorest children, Children and Society, 27: 40617. doi: 10.1111/chso.12055

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts, L., Meakings, S., Forrester, D., Smith, A. and Shelton, K. (2017) Care-leavers and their children placed for adoption, Child and Youth Services Review, 79: 35561. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.030

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rowe, J. and Lambert, L. (1973) Children Who Wait: A Study of Children Needing Substitute Families, London: Association of British Adoption Agencies.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ryburn, M. (1994) Contested adoption: the perspective of birth parents, in M. Ryburn (ed) Contested Adoptions: Research, Law, Policy and Practice, Aldershot: Arena.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ryburn, M. (1998) In whose best interests? Post-adoption contact with the birth family, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 10(1): 5370.

  • Sales, S. (2015) Contested attachments: rethinking adoptive kinship in the era of open adoption, Child and Family Social Work, 20: 14958. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12062

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schrecker, T. and Bambra, C. (2015) How Politics Makes Us Sick: Neoliberal Epidemics, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Select Committee on Adoption Legislation (2013) Adoption: post-legislative scrutiny, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldadopt/127/12702.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Selwyn, J., Wrighton, P. and Frazer, L. (2006) More than just a letter: service user perspectives on one local authority postbox service, Adoption and Fostering, 30(2): 617. doi: 10.1177/030857590603000203

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shennan, G. (2020) Practising social work, in T. Bamford and K. Bilton (eds) Social Work: Past, Present and Future, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 97114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shildrick, T. (2018) Poverty Propaganda: Exploring the Myths, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Singh, G. (2019) Anti-oppressive social work, neoliberalism and neoeugenics, in M. Lavalette (ed) What Is the Future of Social Work?, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 99122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender, London: Sage Publications Limited.

  • Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., O’Connor, W., Morrell, G. and Ormston, R. (2014) Analysis in practice, in J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls and R. Ormston (eds) Qualitative Research Practice: Second Edition, London: Sage Publications Limited, pp 270345.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, C. (2018) The Care Crisis Review: Factors Contributing to National Increases in Numbers of Looked after Children and Applications for Care Orders, London: Family Rights Group.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tyler, I. (2013) Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain, London: Zed Books Limited.

  • Unicef (United Nations Children’s Fund) (2017) The united nations convention on the rights of the child, https://www.unicef.org.uk/what-we-do/un-convention-child-rights/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wacquant, L. (2009) Punishing the Poor, Durham and London: Duke University Press.

  • Wastell, D. and White, S. (2012) Blinded by neuroscience: social policy, the family and the infant brain, Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(3): 397414. doi: 10.1332/204674312X656301

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wells, S. (1990) On being a birth mother, Adoption and Fostering, 14(2): 301. doi: 10.1177/030857599001400210

  • Wenham, A. (2016) ‘I know I’m a good mum – no one can tell me different’. Young mothers negotiating a stigmatised identity through time, Families, Relationships and Societies, 5(1): 12744. doi: 10.1332/204674315X14193466354732

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, S., Gibson, M., Wastell, D. and Walsh, P. (2020) Reassessing Attachment Theory in Child Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Wood, K., Featherstone, B. and Gupta, A. (2022) Reordering family practices in an unequal and disorderly world: contemporary adoption and contact in the UK, Families, Relationships and Societies, https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/frs/11/2/article-p192.xml.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1 Leeds Beckett University, UK and University of York, , UK

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 95 95 95
Full Text Views 6 6 6
PDF Downloads 9 9 9

Altmetrics

Dimensions