In this article, we offer an analysis of the gender gap in political ambition that takes personality and other canonical predictors of levels of ambition into account simultaneously. We use original large-N survey data from Britain. We find that the gender gap in nascent ambition is robust to the inclusion of measures of personality alongside traditional socio-economic predictors of political ambition. Second, we find that increased extraversion is related to higher levels of nascent ambition, but only for women. Third, we find that personality does not drive any move from intending to run for office to actually doing so.
Allen, P. (2013) Gendered candidate emergence in Britain: why are more women councillors not becoming MPs?, Politics, 33(3): 147–59. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12017
Allen, P. and Cutts, D. (2017) Aspirant candidate behaviour and progressive political ambition, Research & Politics, 4(1): 1–9 2053168017691444 .
Allen, P. and Cutts, D. (2018) An analysis of political ambition in Britain, The Political Quarterly, 89(1): 73–81. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12457
Blais, J. and Pruysers, S. (2017) The power of the dark side: personality, the Dark Triad, and political ambition, Personality and Individual Differences, 113: 167–72. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.029
Clarke, N., Jennings, W., Moss, J. and Stoker, G. (2018) The Good Politician: Folk Theories, Political Interaction, and the Rise of Anti-politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Costa, T., Jr, Terracciano, A. and McCrae, R.R. (2001) Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2): 322. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
Crowder-Meyer, M. and Lauderdale, B.E. (2014) A partisan gap in the supply of female potential candidates in the United States, Research & Politics, 1(1): 1–7 2053168014537230 .
Dietrich, B.J., Lasley, S., Mondak, J.J., Remmel, M.L. and Turner, J. (2012) Personality and legislative politics: the Big Five trait dimensions among US state legislators, Political Psychology, 33(2): 195–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00870.x
Dynes, A.M., Hassell, H.J. and Miles, M.R. (2019) The personality of the politically ambitious, Political Behavior, 41(2): 309–36. doi: 10.1007/s11109-018-9452-x
Eagly, A.H. and Carli, L.L. (2007) Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders, Harvard, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Eagly, A.H. and Wood, W. (1999) The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles, American Psychologist, 54(6): 408. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
Gerber, A.S., Huber, G.A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C.M. and Ha, S.E. (2010) Personality and political attitudes: relationships across issue domains and political contexts, American Political Science Review, 104(1): 111–33. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000031
Gerber, A.S., Huber, G.A., Doherty, D. and Dowling, C.M. (2011) The Big Five personality traits in the political arena, Annual Review of Political Science, 14: 265–87. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051010-111659
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, J. and Swann, W.B., Jr (2003) A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains, Journal of Research in Personality, 37: 504–28. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Kanthak, K. and Woon, J. (2015) Women don’t run? Election aversion and candidate entry, American Journal of Political Science, 59(3): 595–612. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12158
Kenny, M. (2013) Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Springer.
Lawless, J.L. and Fox, R.L. (2005) It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawless, J.L. and Fox, R.L. (2010) It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maestas, C.D., Fulton, S., Maisel, L.S. and Stone, W.J. (2006) When to risk it? Institutions, ambitions, and the decision to run for the US House, American Political Science Review, 100(2): 195–208. doi: 10.1017/S0003055406062101
McCrae, R.R. and Costa, T. (2003) Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective, New York: Guilford Press.
McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T., Jr. (1996) Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model, In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives, New York: Guilford, pp. 51–87.
McDermott, M.L. (2016) Masculinity, Femininity, and American Political Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mondak, J.J. (2010) Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oliver, S. and Conroy, M. (2018) Tough enough for the job? How masculinity predicts recruitment of city council members, American Politics Research, 46(6): 1094–122. doi: 10.1177/1532673X17729719
Pruysers, S. and Blais, J. (2018) A little encouragement goes a (not so) long way: an experiment to increase political ambition, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 39(3): 384–95. doi: 10.1080/1554477X.2018.1475793
Pruysers, S. and Blais, J. (2019) Narcissistic women and cash-strapped men: who can be encouraged to consider running for political office, and who should do the encouraging?, Political Research Quarterly, 72(1): 229-242. 1065912918786040 .
Schneider, M.C., Holman, M.R., Diekman, A.B. and McAndrew, T. (2016) Power, conflict, and community: how gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition, Political Psychology, 37(4): 515–31. doi: 10.1111/pops.12268
Shames, S.L. (2017) Out of the Running: Why Millennials Reject Political Careers and Why It Matters, New York, NY: NYU Press.
Weisberg, Y.J., DeYoung, C.G. and Hirsh, J.B. (2011) Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five, Frontiers in Psychology, 2: 178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 225 | 225 | 22 |
Full Text Views | 55 | 55 | 1 |
PDF Downloads | 53 | 53 | 3 |