Gender and democratic resilience against autocratisation: the case of Romania’s ‘gender identity’ bill

Author:
Cristina Chiva University of Salford, UK

Search for other papers by Cristina Chiva in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

This article argues that, given the centrality of gender for recent processes of autocratisation, it has become imperative to understand and theorise the conditions underpinning democratic resilience against opposition to gender equality. I conceptualise democratic resilience as the outcome of critical actors’ efforts to represent marginalised groups in the face of threats to existing gender equality rights. The case study is Romania’s 2020 ‘gender identity’ bill, which would have prohibited discussion of ‘gender’ within the educational system but was eventually ruled unconstitutional. I identify two key causal mechanisms through which civil society organisations were able to shape this outcome: framing, which emphasised the bill’s non-compliance with democratic norms and constitutional principles; and learning, which prompted a reflection by the two key institutional actors, that is, the president and the Constitutional Court, as to the importance of core democratic principles for politics and society in post-communist Romania.

  • Accept Association, AIRE (Advice on Individual Rights in Europe) Centre, Centre for Reproductive Rights, ILGA-Europe (International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association – European Region) and Transgender Europe (2020) Written submission in the matter of the constitutionality of Article 7(1)(e) of Law 87/2020 before the Constitutional Court of Romania, https://reproductiverights.org/joint-submission-to-the-constitutional-court-of-romania-regarding-the-constitutionality-of-article-71e-of-law-87-2020/, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Asociaţia Accept (2020) Memoriu către președintele româniei, www.acceptromania.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Memoriu-AP.pdf, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ayoub, P.M. (2016) When States Come Out: Europe’s Sexual Minorities and the Politics of Visibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beach, D. (2017) Process-tracing methods in social science, in  Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics,  Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bermeo, N. (2016) On democratic backsliding, Journal of Democracy, 27(1): 519. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0012

  • Boese, V.A., Edgell, A.B., Hellmeier, S., Maerz, S.F. and Lindberg, S.I. (2021) How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process, Democratization, 28(5): 885907. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brodeală, E. (2017) The changing status of women as others in the Romanian Constitution, ICL Journal, 11(4): 54164.

  • Brodeală, E. and Epure, G. (2022) Nature versus nurture: ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ before the Romanian Constitutional Court: a critical analysis of decision 907/2020 on the unconstitutionality of banning gender perspectives in education and research, European Constitutional Law Review, 17(4): 72452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Camera Deputaților (2019) Propunere legislativă pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii educaţiei naţionale nr.1/2011 [Legislative proposal for amending Act 1/2011 on National Education], Record No. Pl-x 617/2019, www.cdep.ro/pls/proiecte/upl_pck2015.proiect?idp=18210, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Celis, K. (2008) Studying women’s substantive representation in legislatures: when representative acts, contexts and women’s interests become important, Representation, 44(2): 11123. doi: 10.1080/00344890802079516

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Celis, K. (2009) Substantive representation of women (and improving it): what it is and should be about?, Comparative European Politics, 7(1): 95113. doi: 10.1057/cep.2008.35

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chamber of Deputies (2003) Constitution of Romania, www.cdep.ro/pls/dic/site.page?id=371, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

  • Chiva, C. (2018) Gender, Institutions and Political Representation: Reproducing Male Dominance in Europe’s New Democracies, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chriţoiu, A. (2019) The convoluted gender policy processes in Romania: institutional disarray and activist resilience, in A. Krizsán and C. Roggeband (eds) Gendering Democratic Backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Agenda, Budapest: Central European University Press, pp 16199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collier, D. (2011) Understanding process tracing, PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4): 82330.

  • Comisia Camerei Deputaţilor pentru învăţământ, știinţă, tineret și sport (2020) Raport asupra propunerii legislative pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii educației naționale nr.1/2011 (Plx. 617/2019), www.cdep.ro/comisii/invatamant/pdf/2020/rp617_19.pdf, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Comisia Senatului pentru învat̆ a̧ m̆ ânt, știinţă, tineret și sport (2020) Raport suplimentar asupra propunerii legislative pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii educației naționale nr.1/2011, https://senat.ro/legis/PDF/2020/20L087S1.PDF, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corrêa, S. (ed) (2021) Anti-gender Politics in Latin America, Rio de Janeiro: Sexuality Policy Watch, https://sxpolitics.org/GPAL/uploads/E-book-Resumos-completo.pdf, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curtea Constituţională a României (2020) Decizia No. 907 din 16 decembrie 2020, www.cdep.ro/proiecte/2019/600/10/7/dcc.617.PDF, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

  • Erzeel, S. and Rashkova, E. (2023) The substantive representation of social groups: towards a new comparative research agenda, European Journal of Politics and Gender, 6(3): 43351. doi: 10.1332/251510821X16635712428686

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission (2019) Special Eurobarometer 493: discrimination in the European Union, https://available europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2251,  (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Falleti, T.G. and Lynch, J.F. (2009) Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis, Comparative Political Studies, 42(9): 114366. doi: 10.1177/0010414009331724

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ilonszki, G. and Vajda, A. (2019) Women’s substantive representation in decline: the case of democratic failure in Hungary, Politics & Gender, 15(2): 24061.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krizsán, A. and Roggeband, C. (2019) Gendering Democratic Backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Agenda, Budapest: Central European University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krizsán, A. and Roggeband, C. (2021) Politicizing Gender and Democracy in the Context of the Istanbul Convention, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kuhar, R. and Paternotte, D. (eds) (2017) Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilising Against Equality, London: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Levitsky, S. and Way, L.A. (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lührmann, A. (2021) Disrupting the autocratization sequence: towards democratic resilience, Democratization, 28(5): 101739.

  • Mărgărit, D. (2019) LGBTQ rights, conservative backlash and the constitutional definition of marriage in Romania, Gender, Place & Culture, 26(11): 157087.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Munteanu, T. (2020) Senatorii din Comisia drepturilor omului habar n-au ce-au votat în legea care interzice identitatea de gen, www.vice.com/ro/article/y3zwbv/comisia-drepturilor-omului-nu-stie-ce-e-identitatea-de-gen, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norocel, O.C. and Băluţă, I. (2021) Retrogressive mobilisation in the 2018 ‘referendum for family’ in Romania, Problems of Post-communism, 110. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2021.1987270

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Otopeanu, C. (2020) Cum își justifică inițiativa senatorul care a propus legea privind identitatea de gen: ‘Sunt 114 genuri inventate’, www.libertatea.ro/stiri/initiatorul-modificarilor-legii-educatiei-privind-identitatea-de-gen-sunt-114-genuri-inventate-3038261, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Popescu, A.L. (2020) Cum a ajuns senatorul Lungu să interzică ideologia genului în scoli, https://romania.europalibera.org/a/cum-a-ajuns-senatorul-lungu-sa-interzica-ideologia-genului-in-scoli-/30679736.html, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pora, A. (2020) Parlamentul interzice teoriile despre identitatea de gen, https://romania.europalibera.org/a/parlamentul-interzice-teoriile-despre-identitatea-de-gen-reac%C8%9Bii-de-la-poli%C8%9Bia-g%C3%A2ndirii-la-e-ca-%C3%AEn-evul-mediu-/30675861.html, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Președintele României (2020) Sesizare de neconstituționalitate asupra Legi pentru modificarea Art. 7 din Legea Educației naționale No. 1/2011, www.cdep.ro/proiecte/2019/600/10/7/959A.PDF, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schedler, A. (ed) (2006) Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Boulder, CO: L. Rienner.

  • Școala Națională de Studii Politice și Administrative (2020) Poziția SNSPA față de adoptarea de către Parlamentul României a măsurilor ce interzic informațiile despre identitatea de gen în școli și universitățI, http://snspa.ro/pozitia-snspa-fata-de-adoptarea-de-catre-parlamentul-României-a-masurilor-ce-interzic-informatiile-despre-identitatea-de-gen-in-scoli-si-universitati/,   (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Selejan-Guţan, B. and Tănăsescu, E.S. (2022) The role of precedents and case-based reasoning in the case law of the Romanian Constitutional Court, in M. Florczak-Wątor (ed) Constitutional Law and Precedent: International Perspectives on Case-Based Reasoning, London: Routledge, pp 185208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Senatul României (2020) Official transcript of the plenary debate held on 16 June 2020, www.senat.ro/PAGINI/Stenograme/Stenograme2020/20.06.16.pdf, (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verloo, M. (ed) (2018) Varieties of Opposition to Gender Equality in Europe, London: Routledge.

  • Verloo, M. and Paternotte, D. (2018) The feminist project under threat in Europe, Politics and Governance, 6(3): 15. doi: 10.17645/pag.v6i3.1736

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waldner, D. (2012) Process tracing and causal mechanisms, in H. Kincaid (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp 6584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zakaria, F. (1997) The rise of illiberal democracy, Foreign Affairs, 76(6): 2243. doi: 10.2307/20048274

Cristina Chiva University of Salford, UK

Search for other papers by Cristina Chiva in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3677 1825 26
Full Text Views 2044 24 5
PDF Downloads 842 33 6

Altmetrics

Dimensions