Gender equality in prison reform in Spain: how a gender-biased, closed policy system prevents real change

Authors:
Ana Ballesteros-PenaComplutense University of Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Ana Ballesteros-Pena in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
María BusteloComplutense University of Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by María Bustelo in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

This article aims to understand what happens when gender equality policies cross prison walls – a challenging domain that has traditionally been invisibilised and ignored in the scholarship on gender and politics. By analysing the formulation and post-adoption phases in Spain, four main conclusions are drawn: first, the formulation phase has been highly impacted by the absence of the feminist movement and gender experts, resulting in the adoption of traditional views about the nature and needs of women; second, the lack of knowledge about, or disagreement with, the goals of the public policies activates forms of resistance that block attempts to advance; third, the ideas included in policy documents can be ‘fixed’ in the implementation phase and can eventually shape future courses of action; and, finally, the persistent absence of the feminist movement in the post-adoption phase results in the lack of opportunities to change the course of action towards a more transformative path.

  • Almeda, E. (2002) Correct and Punish: The Yesterday and Today of Women’s Prisons, Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra.

  • Andalusian Ombudsman (2006) Women Deprived of Liberty in Penitentiary Centers of Andalusia, Seville: Andalusian Ombudsman.

  • Ballesteros-Pena, A. (2017) Re-domesticity and female imprisonment in the Spanish penitentiary system: respect modules, Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 102(2): 26185.  doi: 10.5565/rev/papers.2338

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ballesteros-Pena, A. (2018 [2017]) Responsibilisation and female imprisonment in contemporary penal policy: ‘Respect Modules’ (‘Módulos de Respeto’) in Spain, Punishment and Society, 20(4): 45876. doi: 10.1177/1462474517710241

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ballesteros-Pena, A. and Bustelo, M. (2021) Gender equality policies confined: adopted and implemented frames in the criminal justice system in Spain, paper presented at the ECPR (European Consortium for Political Research) General Conference, 30 August–3 September.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barañí Team (2001) Gypsy Women and Criminal System, Madrid: Metyel.

  • Barañí Team (2007) Notes on the situation of the Roma community in Spanish society. Myths and realities that influence the criminalisation of gypsy women, in E. Almeda and E. Bodelón (eds) Women and Punishment: A Socio-legal and Gender Approach, Madrid: Dykinson, pp 16384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bardach, E. (1977) The Implementation Game: What Happens after a Bill Becomes a Law, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Bloom, B., Owen, B. and Covington, S. (2003) Gender-Responsive Strategies: Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders, NIC Publication No. 018017, Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bosworth, M. (1999) Engendering Resistance: Agency and Power in Women’s Prisons, Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • Bosworth, M. (2000) Confining femininity: a history of gender, power and imprisonment, Theoretical Criminology, 4(3): 26584. doi: 10.1177/1362480600004003002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bustelo M. and Ortbals C.D. (2007) The evolution of Spanish state feminism: a fragmented landscape, in J. Outshoorn and J. Kantola (eds) Changing State Feminism, Women’s Policy Agencies Confront Shifting Institutional Terrain, New York: Palgrave, pp 20133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carlen, P. (1983) Women’s Imprisonment: A Study in Social Control, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Carlen, P. and Worrall, A. (2004) Analysing Women’s Imprisonment, London: Willan Publishing.

  • Corston, J. (2007) The Corston Report: A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System, London: Home Office.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Covington, S.S. and Bloom, B.E. (2007) Gender responsive treatment and services in correctional settings, Women & Therapy, 29(3–4): 933. doi: 10.1300/J015v29n03_02

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Del Val, C. and Viedma, A. (eds) (2012) Condemned to Inequality: System of Penitentiary Discrimination Indicators, Barcelona: Icaria.

  • De Miguel Calvo, E. (2016) Women, drug use and imprisonment. An intersectional approach, Política y Sociedad, 53(2): 52949.

  • Derthick, M. (1972) New Towns In-Town: Why a Federal Program Failed, Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

  • Dombos, T., Krizsán, A., Verloo, M. and Zentai, V. (2012) Critical frame analysis: a comparative methodology for the QUING Project, CPS working paper. http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00006845/01/cps-working-paper-critical-frame-analysis-quing-2012.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Engeli, I. and Mazur, A. (2018) Taking implementation seriously in assessing success: the politics of gender equality policy, European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1–2): 11129. doi: 10.1332/251510818X15282097548558

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foucault, M. (1979) Vigilar y Castigar, Madrid: Siglo XXI.

  • Gea, M.J., Domínguez, M. and Sádaba, I. (2014) A Shared Conviction: A Case Study on Penal Control, Madrid: Tierradenadie editores.

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (1989) Sexism and the Female Offender, Aldershot: Gower.

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and Russell, J. (2018) Women and penal reform: two steps forwards, three steps backwards?, The Political Quarterly (London. 1930), 89(2): 22736. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12508

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, L. (2010) Offending Women: Power, Punishment, and the Regulation of Desire, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001) Punishment in Disguise: Criminal Governance and Federal Imprisonment of Women in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hannah-Moffat, K. and Shaw, M. (2000) An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women’s Imprisonment in Canada, Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heidensohn, F.M. (1985) Women and Crime, London: Macmillan.

  • Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Lombardo, E., Meier, P. and Verloo, M. (2013) Policy making, in G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola and S. L. Weldon (eds) The Oxford University Press Handbook on Gender and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 677700.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manzanos, C. and Balmaseda, J. (2003) Situation of Women in Prisons in the Basque Country, Donostia-San Sebastián: Basque Government.

  • Mazur, A.G. (2017) Toward the systematic study of feminist policy in practice: an essential first step, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(1): 6483. doi: 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198210

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McBride, D. and Mazur, M.G. (2010) The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCorkel, J. (2004) Criminally dependant? Gender, punishment, and the rhetoric of welfare reform, Social Politics, 11(3): 386410. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxh042

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MIP Project (Mujer, integración y prisión) (2005) Mujeres, Integración y Prisión, Barcelona: Aurea Editores.

  • Miranda, M.J. and Martín, M.T. and Vega, C. (eds) (2005) Offenses and Borders, Madrid: Editorial Complutense.

  • Owen, B., Wells, J. and Pollock, J. (2017) In Search of Safety: Confronting Inequality in Women’s Imprisonment, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Player, E. (2014) Women in the criminal justice system: the triumph of inertia, Criminology & Criminal Justice, 14(3): 27697.

  • Pressman, J.L. and Wildavsky, A. (1973) Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ribas, N., Almeda, E. and Bodelón, E. (2005) Tracking the Invisible Foreign Women in Prisons, Barcelona: Anthropos.

  • Ruiz-García, M. and Castillo-Algarra, J. (2014) Experiences of foreign women in Spanish prisons, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(8): 58799.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Squires, J. (2005) Is mainstreaming transformative? Theorizing mainstreaming in the context of diversity and deliberation, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12(3): 36688. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxi020

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TFFSW (Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women) (1990) Report of the Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women – Creating Choices, Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Urra Grimal, D. (2017) Transgression behind bars: factors of vulnerability in Barcelona’s prison system, Athenea Digital, 17(2): 175200. doi: 10.5565/rev/athenea.1803

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Valenzuela-Vela, L. and Alcázar-Campos, A. (2020) Gendered carceral logics in social work: the blurred boundaries in gender equality policies for imprisoned and battered women in Spain, Affilia, 35(1): 7388. doi: 10.1177/0886109919889035

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Valiente, C. (1995) The power of persuasion: the Instituto de la Mujer in Spain, in D.M. Stetson and A.G. Mazur (eds) Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 22136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verloo, M. (2005) Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe. A frame analysis approach, The Greek Review of Social Research, 117(Special issue: ‘Differences in the framing of gender inequality as a policy problem across Europe’), pp 1134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verloo, M. and Lombardo, E. (2007) Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: introducing a critical frame analysis approach, in M. Verloo (ed) Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, Budapest: Central European University Press, pp 2151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walby, S. (2005) Gender mainstreaming: productive tensions in theory and practice, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12(3): 32143. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxi018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woodward, A.E. (2015) Travels, triangles and transformations, Tijdschrift Voor Gender Studies, 18(1): 518. doi: 10.5117/TVGN2015.1.WOOD

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yagüe, C. (2006) Mothers in Prison: History of Women’s Prisons through Their Maternal Side, Granada: Comares.

  • Yagüe, C. (2012) Gender policies and prison in Spain, in C. del Val and A. Viedma (eds) Condemned to Inequality: System of Penitentiary Discrimination Indicators, Barcelona: Icaria, pp 2959.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Ana Ballesteros-PenaComplutense University of Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Ana Ballesteros-Pena in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
María BusteloComplutense University of Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by María Bustelo in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 476 476 61
Full Text Views 450 450 121
PDF Downloads 408 408 90

Altmetrics

Dimensions