‘Because like if you feel guilty, then it’s usually a sign’: on the role of emotions in conceptualising infidelity

Author:
Simone Schneider University of Cambridge, UK

Search for other papers by Simone Schneider in
Current site
Google Scholar Close
Article Category:
Research Article
Copyright:
© Author 2025
Online Publication Date:
21 Feb 2025
Pages:
1–19
Publisher:
Bristol University Press
Volume/Issue:
Early View
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1332/26316897Y2025D000000056
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article
Buy article/chapter (
GBP  £25.00
)

Existing research suggests that people employ fluid understandings of infidelity and conceptualise it in relation to, for example, emotional outcomes rather than as a static set of (physical) behaviours. Seeking to explore the underlying mechanisms of this process, this article examines how emotions are negotiated in conceptualisations and meanings of infidelity. This question is investigated through a thematic analysis of 17 semi-structured interviews with young adults in England who experienced, according to their perspective, infidelity. I show that not only what participants did but also how they or their partner felt was invoked in classifying a practice as infidelity. Namely, emotions serve as a cultural repertoire to negotiate infidelity by drawing on internalised feeling rules in relation to genuine, ‘lived’ feelings. However, the presence and absence of feelings are drawn on differently in that emotions are only invoked in conceptualising what is not infidelity – rather than what it is. Against this background, I argue that we need to examine not only when and why people engage in emotion work but equally when they instead engage in assigning a (new) frame to a practice. By showcasing what people say or think about infidelity as well as their lived experiences, this article underlines the need to explore both discourse and practice – and their interplay – in research on infidelity.

  • Ahmed, S. (2004) Collective feelings: or, the impressions left by others, Theory, Culture & Society, 21(2): 25–42. doi: 10.1177/0263276404042133

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ahmed, S. (2008) Sociable happiness, Emotion, Space and Society, 1(1): 10–3. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2008.07.003

  • Ahmed, S. (2014) Cultural Politics of Emotion, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Anderson, E. (2012) The Monogamy Gap. Men, Love, and the Reality of Cheating, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Andreassen, R., Petersen, M.N., Harrison, K. and Raun, T. (eds) (2017) Mediated Intimacies: Connectivities, Relationalities and Proximities, London/New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Barker, M.J., Gill, R. and Harvey, L. (2018) Mediated Intimacy: Sex Advice in Media Culture, Cambridge/Medford, MA: Polity.

  • Barker, M. and Langdridge, D. (eds) (2010) Understanding Non-Monogamies, London/New York: Routledge.

  • Beresford, S. (2016) We’re all same (sex) now? Lesbian (same) sex; consummation; adultery and marriage, Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 12(5): 468–90. doi: 10.1080/1550428x.2015.1104273

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bozoyan, C. and Schmiedeberg, C. (2020) Zufriedenheit in der Partnerschaft und Untreue: Ein Zusammenhang, zwei Richtungen, KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 72: 1–31. doi: 10.1007/s11577-020-00660-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bozoyan, C. and Schmiedeberg, C. (2022) What is infidelity? A vignette study on norms and attitudes toward infidelity, The Journal of Sex Research. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2104194

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2020) Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1): 37–47. doi: 10.1002/capr.12360

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L. and Jenkinson, E. (2023) Doing reflexive thematic analysis, in S. Bager-Charleson and A. McBeath (eds) Supporting Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research, Cham: Springer, pp 19–38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clery, E. (2023) A liberalisation in attitudes?, National Centre for Research, British Social Attitudes 40, https://natcen.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-09/BSA%2040%20Moral%20issues.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Constable, N. (2009) The commodification of intimacy: marriage, sex, and reproductive labor, Annual Review of Anthropology, 38(1): 49–64. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085133

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Coontz, S. (2016) The Way We Never Were. American Families and the Nostalgia Trap, revised edn, New York: Basic Books.

  • Flick, U. (2014) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 5th edn, London: Sage.

  • Guitar, A.E., Geher, G., Kruger, D.J., Garcia, J.R., Fisher, M.L. and Fitzgerald, C.J. (2017) Defining and distinguishing sexual and emotional infidelity, Current Psychology, 36: 434–46. doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9432-4

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harris, C.R. (2002) Sexual and romantic jealousy in heterosexual and homosexual adults, Psychological Science, 13(1): 7–12. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00402

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hayfield, N. and Huxley, C. (2015) Insider and outsider perspectives: reflections on researcher identities in research with lesbian and bisexual women, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2): 91–106. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.918224

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Henline, B.H., Lamke, L.K. and Howard, M.D. (2007) Exploring perceptions of online infidelity, Personal Relationships, 14(1): 113–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00144.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hochschild, A.R. (1979) Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure, American Journal of Sociology, 85(3): 551–75. doi: 10.1086/227049

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hochschild, A.R. (2003) The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Hochschild, A.R. (2012) The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feeling, updated edn, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iacobucci, G. (2021) Hancock resigns after Covid guideline breach and Sajid Javid becomes new health secretary, BMJ, 373: n1649. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1649

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jamieson, L. (2011) Intimacy as a concept: explaining social change in the context of globalisation or another form of ethnocentricism?, Sociological Research Online, 16(4): 151–63. doi: 10.5153/sro.2497

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lloyd, G. (1993) The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy, 2nd edn, London: Routledge.

  • McAnulty, R.D. and Brineman, J.M. (2007) Infidelity in dating relationships, Annual Review of Sex Research, 18(1): 94114. doi: 10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McKeever, N. (2020) Why, and to what extent, is sexual infidelity wrong?, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 101(3): 515–37. doi: 10.1111/papq.12316

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moller, N.P. and Vossler, A. (2015) Defining infidelity in research and couple counseling: a qualitative study, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(5): 487–97. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2014.931314

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morgan, D.H.J. (2014) The sociological significance of affair, in J. Duncombe, K. Harrison, G. Allan and D. Marsden (eds) The State of Affairs: Explorations of Infidelity and Commitment, London/New York: Routledge, pp 15–34.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Munsch, C.L. (2012) The science of two-timing: the state of infidelity research, Sociology Compass, 6(1): 46–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00434.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Norona, J.C., Khaddouma, A., Welsh, D.P. and Samawi, H. (2015) Adolescents’ understandings of infidelity, Personal Relationships, 22(3): 431–48. doi: 10.1111/pere.12088

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pazhoohi, F., Silva, C., Pereira, L., Oliveira, M., Santana, P., Rodrigues, R., et al (2019) Is imagination of the infidelity more painful than actual infidelity?, Current Psychology, 38: 572–8. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9637-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Previti, D. and Amato, P.R. (2004) Is infidelity a cause or a consequence of poor marital quality?, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2): 217–30. doi: 10.1177/0265407504041384

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Roulston, K. (2010) Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice, London: Sage.

  • Shouse, E. (2005) Feeling, emotion, affect, M/C Journal, 8(6). doi: 10.5204/mcj.2443

  • Swidler, A. (1986) Culture in action: symbols and strategies, American Sociological Review, 51(2): 273–86. doi: 10.2307/2095521

  • Swidler, A. (2003) Talk of Love: How Culture Matters, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Thompson, A.E. and O’Sullivan, L.F. (2016) I can but you can’t: inconsistencies in judgments of and experiences with infidelity, Journal of Relationships Research, 7: e3. doi: 10.1017/jrr.2016.1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tonkens, E. (2012) Working with Arlie Hochschild: connecting feelings to social change, Social Politics, 19(2): 194–218. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxs003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • van Hooff, J. (2017) An everyday affair: deciphering the sociological significance of women’s attitudes towards infidelity, The Sociological Review, 65(4): 850–64. doi: 10.1111/1467-954x.12417

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Walker, A. (2017) The Secret Life of the Cheating Wife, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

  • Walters, A.S. and Burger, B.D. (2013) ‘I love you, and I cheated’: investigating disclosures of infidelity to primary romantic partners, Sexuality & Culture, 17: 20–49. doi: 10.1007/s12119-012-9138-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weeks, G.R., Gambescia, N. and Jenkins, R.E. (2003) Treating Infidelity: Therapeutic Dilemmas and Effective Strategies, New York: WW Norton & Company.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weiser, D.A., Lalasz, C.B., Weigel, D.J. and Evans, W.P. (2014) A prototype analysis of infidelity, Personal Relationships, 21(4): 655–75. doi: 10.1111/pere.12056

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weiser, D.A., Shrout, M.R., Thomas, A.V., Edwards, A.L. and Pickens, J.C. (2023) ‘I’ve been cheated, been mistreated, when will I be loved’: two decades of infidelity research through an intersectional lens, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3): 856–98. doi: 10.1177/02654075221113032

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weiss, A. and Burger, P. (2021) Other-serving double standards: people show moral hypercrisy in close relationships, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(11): 3198–218. doi: 10.1177/02654075211022836

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Simone Schneider University of Cambridge, UK

Search for other papers by Simone Schneider in
Current site
Google Scholar Close

ss2633@cam.ac.uk

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3121 3121 95
Full Text Views 74 74 21
PDF Downloads 65 65 22

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Cover Emotions and Society
Emotions and Society