Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice

Overlaying structure and frames in policy networks to enable effective boundary spanning

Authors:
Evelyne de Leeuw Centre for Health Equity Research, Training and Evaluation UNSW, Division of Population Health South Western Sydney Local Health District, a member of the Ingham Institute, Australia

Search for other papers by Evelyne de Leeuw in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Jennifer Browne La Trobe University, Australia

Search for other papers by Jennifer Browne in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Deborah Gleeson La Trobe University, Australia

Search for other papers by Deborah Gleeson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

The literature on the evidence-policy nexus has been dominated in recent years by technocratic approaches such as ‘knowledge translation’. Attention is beginning to return, however, to political science for its insights into the distribution of power, which are key to understanding how policy is made, particularly in the health sphere. Policy network theory, which suggests that policy outcomes are shaped by the interactions between actors in a network, points to the configuration of networks as an important focus of study. However, policy outcomes also depend on the agency of the actors themselves; actors who use language to frame issues in certain ways in order to create change. While ‘policy networks’ and ‘policy frames’ have each received attention, there is a need for analytical tools which allow us to examine the interaction between network structure and frames. The paper describes a novel approach to aligning network structure and frames, which we tested using a single policy case study analysing submissions to a specific policy process. Overlaying policy frames with a network map, we were able to identify ‘boundary spanners’ who could connect the agendas of different parts of the network. We explain our analytic approach and the technical tools available to support it, and encourage researchers interested in the interface between evidence and policy to build on this approach.

Evelyne de Leeuw Centre for Health Equity Research, Training and Evaluation UNSW, Division of Population Health South Western Sydney Local Health District, a member of the Ingham Institute, Australia

Search for other papers by Evelyne de Leeuw in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Jennifer Browne La Trobe University, Australia

Search for other papers by Jennifer Browne in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Deborah Gleeson La Trobe University, Australia

Search for other papers by Deborah Gleeson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 981 562 30
Full Text Views 100 40 12
PDF Downloads 66 31 3

Altmetrics

Dimensions

You are not currently authorised to access the full text of this chapter or article.
Access options
To access the full chapter or article then please choose one of the options below.
Purchase
Pay to access content (PDF download and unlimited online access)
Other access options
Redeem Token
Institutional Login
Log in via Open Athens or Shibboleth. Please contact your librarian if you need any help.
Login with Institutional Access
Personal Login
Login to your BUP account with your individual credentials.
Login with BUP account

Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here