Academic research on technical advice to policy commonly focuses on social and related policy areas such as health, education and crime (Oliver et al. 2014) and disciplinary advice from science disciplines (Jasanoff 1994; Millstone and van Zwanenberg 2001). Little or no prior research in the social sciences have explored engineering expertise in policy domains where such advice is critical (e.g. energy policy).
We aim to establish ‘engineering advice’ as a new domain of inquiry by showing how civil servants view it as distinctive (from ‘science advice’), important and similar to policy making – implying it can clash or complement it.
18 qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of officials across a UK ministry were conducted by the authors (all but one of whom were civil servants) in 2012. The qualitative data were thematically coded to address the study aims.
A majority of officials spontaneously identified engineering expertise as both distinctive and important for their work. There was clear evidence that it both complemented and clashed with policymaking.
We identified a range of interactions that imply a need to consider styles of management internal deployment of experts within policy organisations as well as the implications for policy making and engineering expertise given the way practices overlap. Further research on the ontological, epistemological nature of engineering as it relates to policy making is needed if governments and therefore society are to fully benefit from engineering advice.
Boutellier, R., Ullman, F., Schreiber, J. and Naef, R. (2008) Impact of office layout on communication in a science-driven business, R&D Management, 38(4): 372–91.
Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jäger, J. and Mitchell, R.B. (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14): 8086–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231332100
Collins, B. (2013) Engineering policy: evidence, advice and execution, in R. Doubleday and J. Wilsdon (eds) Future Directions for Scientific Advice in Whitehall, pp 73–8, http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/47848/.
Cooper, A.C. (2016) Exploring the scope of science advice: social sciences in the UK government, Palgrave Communications, 2(16044): 1–9.
Cooper, A.C.G. (2017a) Building a socio-technical energy research community: theory, practice and impact, Energy Research & Social Science, 26: 115–20.
Cooper, A. C. G. (2017b) Building physics into the social: enhancing the policy impact of energy studies and energy social science research, Energy Research & Social Science, 26: 80–6.
Doubleday, R. and Wilsdon, J. (eds) (2013) Future directions for scientific advice in Whitehall, http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/47848/ (Accessed: August 2015).
Gluckman, P. (2014) Policy: the art of science advice to government, Nature 507(7491): 163–5. doi: 10.1038/507163a
Greenhalgh, T. and Russell, J. (2009) Evidence-based policymaking: a critique, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2): 304–18. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0085
Head, B.W. (2010) Reconsidering evidence-based policy: key issues and challenges, Policy and Society, 29(2): 77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001
Holstein, J. and Gubrium, J. (1995) The Active Interview, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, doi: 10.4135/9781412986120.
Irving, G.L., Ayoko, O.B. and Ashkanasy, N.M. (2019) Collaboration, physical proximity and serendipitous encounters: avoiding collaboration in a collaborative building, Organization Studies, 0170840619856913.
Jasanoff, S. (1994) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, new edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2013) The science of science advice, in R. Doubleday and J. Wilsdon (eds), Future Directions for Scientific Advice in Whitehall, pp 62–8, http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/47848/.
Kabo, F.W. (2016) A model of potential encounters in the workplace: the relationships of homophily, spatial distance, organizational structure, and perceived networks, Environment and Behavior, doi: 10.1177/0013916516658501.
Kattirtzi, M. (2016) Providing a ‘challenge function’: government social researchers in the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (2010–2015), Palgrave Communications, 2: 16064. doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.64
Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M. and Thomas, C.J. (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges, Sustainability Science, 7(1): 25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Li, W.-M., Zhu, H.-P., Tu, J. and Xia, Y. (2009) Operational bridge responses due to road surface profile spectral excitations, Tumu Jianzhu yu Huanjing Gongcheng/Journal of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 31(1): 72–76+88.
Lowe, P., Phillipson, J. and Wilkinson, K. (2013) Why social scientists should engage with natural scientists, Contemporary Social Science, 8(3): 207–22. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2013.769617
Marvulli, L. (2017) Towards sustainable consumption: an ethnographic study of knowledge work and organisational action in public policy development and implementation, PhD thesis, Cardiff University, http://orca.cf.ac.uk/105518/ (Accessed Sep 2019).
Maxwell, K.B. (2014) Getting there from here, Nature Climate Change, 4(11): 936–7. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2413
Millstone, E. and van Zwanenberg, P. (2001) Politics of expert advice: lessons from the early history of the BSE saga, Science and Public Policy, 28(2): 99–112. doi: 10.3152/147154301781781543
Mintrom, M. and Norman, P. (2009) Policy entrepreneurship and policy change, Policy Studies Journal, 37(4): 649–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
Nicolini, D. (2009) Articulating practice through the interview to the double, Management Learning, 40(2): 195–212. doi: 10.1177/1350507608101230
Nutley, S.M., Walter, I. and Davies, H.T.O. (2007) Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services, Bristol: Policy Press.
Oliver, K. and Cairney, P. (2019) The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics, Palgrave Communications, 5(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0199-0
Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J. and Thomas, J. (2014) A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers, BMC Health Services Research, 14(1): 2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
Oreszczyn, S. (2005) GM crops in the United Kingdom: precaution as process, Science and Public Policy, 32(4): 317–24. doi: 10.3152/147154305781779434
Page, E.C. (2003) The civil servant as legislator: law making in British administration, Public Administration, 81(4): 651–79. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00366.x
Page, E.C. (2010) Bureaucrats and expertise: elucidating a problematic relationship in three tableaux and six jurisdictions, Sociologie du Travail, 52(2): 255–73. doi: 10.4000/sdt.13902
Parkhurst, J.O. (2017) The Politics of Evidence: from Evidence-based Policy to the Good Governance of Evidence, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Pielke, R.A. (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sanderson, I. (2002) Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making, Public Administration, 80(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00292
Schenkel, R. (2010) The challenge of feeding scientific advice into policy-making, Science 330(6012): 1749–51. doi: 10.1126/science.1197503
Schmidt, J.A. (2014) Engineering as willing, in P.E. Michelfelder, D.E. Goldberg, N. McCarthy, and D.P. Michelfelder (eds) Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process, Dordrecht: Springer.
Schwach, V. et al. (2007) Policy and knowledge in fisheries management: a policy brief, ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 64(4): 798–803. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm020
Shove, E. (1998) Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings, Energy Policy, 26(15): 1105–12. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00065-2
Sovacool, B.K. (2014) Diversity: energy studies need social science, Nature News 511(7511): 529. doi: 10.1038/511529a
Sovacool, B.K., Ryan, S.E., Stern, P.C., Janda, K., Rochlin, G., Spreng, D., Pasqualetti, M., Wilhite, H. and Lutzenhiser, L. (2015) Integrating social science in energy research, Energy Research & Social Science, 6: 95–9.
Spruijt, P., Knol, A.B., Vasileiadou, E., Devilee, J., Lebret, E. and Petersen, A.C. (2014) Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: a literature review, Environmental Science & Policy, 40: 16–25.
Stanley, M. (2000) How to be a Civil Servant, London: Politico’s Publishing Ltd.
Stevens, A. (2010) Telling policy stories: an ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK, Journal of Social Policy, 40(02): 237–55. doi: 10.1017/S0047279410000723
Weale, A. (2001) Science advice, democratic responsiveness and public policy, Science and Public Policy, 28(6): 413–21. doi: 10.3152/147154301781781237
Whitaker, E.M. and Atkinson, P. (2019) Authenticity and the interview: a positive response to a radical critique, Qualitative Research, 1468794118816885.
Wilkinson, K. (2011) Organised chaos: an interpretive approach to evidence-based policy making in Defra, Political Studies, 59(4): 959–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00866.x
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 521 | 416 | 54 |
Full Text Views | 230 | 31 | 0 |
PDF Downloads | 178 | 17 | 0 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here