Epistemological deliberation: the challenges of producing evidence-based guidelines on lifestyle habits
Search for other papers by Helena Lagerlöf in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Teun Zuiderent-Jerak in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Morten Sager in
Current site
Google Scholar
Background:
Promotion of healthy behaviour is increasingly highlighted worldwide as a way to improve public health, prevent disease incidence, and decrease long-term costs for healthcare. In Sweden the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) used the well-established format of national guidelines to facilitate a more widespread use of approaches for promotion of healthy lifestyle habits in healthcare.
Aims and objectives:
The aim of this case study was to explore the tensions between public health knowledge and the tenets of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the creation of national guidelines on lifestyle habits.
Methods:
Based on data from interviews with guideline professionals and the collected documents of the national guidelines, we examine how NBHW negotiated the conflicts between public health knowledge and the format of national guidelines. An analytical model based on approaches from the sociology of standardisation is used to explore the ramifications of these negotiations.
Findings:
In line with findings in the sociology of standardisation, we show how conflicts between public health knowledge and the format of national guidelines result in both having to yield on certain points. This, we claim, results in compromise, but perhaps also compromised notions of validity and causality.
Discussion and conclusion:
This case offers important learning about the general compatibility of public health and currently dominant methods of EBM. Important crossroads are outlined, concerning how validity and causality are configured in public health guidelines and how these require extensive epistemological deliberation.
-
Bacchi, C.L. (2009) Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to be?, Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson.
-
Boswell, J. (2018) What makes evidence‐based policymaking such a useful myth? The case of NICE guidance on bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom, Governance, 31(2): 199–214. doi: 10.1111/gove.12285
-
Brown, P. and Calnan, M. (2013) NICE technology appraisals: working with multiple levels of uncertainty and the potential for bias, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 16(2): 281–93. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9376-2
-
Cairney, P. and Oliver, K. (2017) Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?, Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1): 35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x
-
Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J. (2012) Evidence-based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing it Better, New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria, Qualitative Sociology, 13(1): 3–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00988593
-
Davies, P. and Boruch, R. (2001) The Campbell Collaboration: does for public policy what Cochrane does for health, BMJ, 323(7308): 294–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7308.294
-
Dean, E., Lomi, C., Bruno, S., Awad, H. and O’Donoghue, G. (2011) Addressing the common pathway underlying hypertension and diabetes in people who are obese by maximizing health: the ultimate knowledge translation gap, International Journal of Hypertension, 2011, 835805. doi: 10.4061/2011/835805
-
Eckard, N., Nedlund, A.C., Janzon, M. and Levin, L.Å. (2017) Reaching agreement in uncertain circumstances: the practice of evidence-based policy in the case of the Swedish National Guidelines for heart diseases, Evidence & Policy, 13(4): 687–707.
-
Engebretsen, E., Heggen, K., Wieringa, S. and Greenhalgh, T. (2016) Uncertainty and objectivity in clinical decision making: a clinical case in emergency medicine, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 19(4): 595–603. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9714-5
-
Green, J. and Thorogood, N. (2018) Qualitative Methods for Health Research, London: Sage.
-
Greenhalgh, T. and Russell, J. (2009) Evidence-based policymaking: a critique, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2): 304–18. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0085
-
Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Vist, G.E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P. and Schünemann, H.J. (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, BMJ, 336(7650): 924–26. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
-
Kelly, M. and Moore, T. (2011) The judgement process in evidence-based medicine and health technology assessment, Social Theory & Health, 10(1): 1.
-
Kelly, M., Morgan, A., Ellis, S., Younger, T., Huntley, J. and Swann, C. (2010) Evidence based public health: a review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England, Social Science & Medicine, 71(6): 1056–62.
-
Knaapen, L. (2013) Being ‘evidence-based’ in the absence of evidence: the management of non-evidence in guideline development, Social Studies of Science, 43(5): 681–706. doi: 10.1177/0306312713483679
-
Lampland, M. and Star, S.L. (2009) Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
-
McGuire, W.L. (2005) Beyond EBM: new directions for evidence-based public health, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48(4): 557. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2005.0081
-
Moreira, T. (2011) Healthcare rationing in an age of uncertainty: a conceptual model, Social Science & Medicine, 72(8): 1333–41.
-
Moreira, T., May, C. and Bond, J. (2009) Regulatory objectivity in action: mild cognitive impairment and the collective production of uncertainty, Social Studies of Science, 39(5): 665–90. doi: 10.1177/0306312709103481
-
Nevo, I. and Slonim-Nevo, V. (2011) The myth of evidence-based practice: towards evidence-informed practice, British Journal of Social Work, 41(6): 1176–97. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq149
-
Oakley, A. (2002) Social science and evidence-based everything: the case of education, Educational Review (Birmingham), 54(3): 277–86. doi: 10.1080/0013191022000016329
-
Prioriteringscentrum (2017) Nationell Modell för öppna Prioriteringar Inom Hälso- och Sjukvård: ett Verktyg för Rangordning [National Model for Open Priority Setting Within Health Care: A Tool for Ranking] (in Swedish), Linköping: Prioriteringscentrum [National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care].
-
Proposition (1996/97) Prioriteringar Inom Hälso- och Sjukvården [Priorities within Health Care] (In Swedish), Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
-
Rehfuess, E. and Akl, E. (2013) Current experience with applying the GRADE approach to public health interventions: an empirical study, BMC Public Health, 13: 9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-9
-
Richter Sundberg, L., Garvare, R. and Nystrom, M. (2017) Reaching beyond the review of research evidence: a qualitative study of decision making during the development of clinical practice guidelines for disease prevention in healthcare, BMC Health Services Research, 17(1): 344. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2277-1
-
Rose, G., Rose, G., Khaw, K.T., Khaw, K.T., Marmot, M. and Marmot, M. (2008) Rose’s Strategy of Preventive Medicine, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Rychetnik, L., Hawe, P., Waters, E., Barratt, A. and Frommer, M. (2004) A glossary for evidence-based public health, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(7): 538–45. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.011585
-
Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B. and Richardson, W.S. (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t, BMJ, 312(7023): 71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
-
Sager, M. and Eriksson, L. (2015) Objectivities of a post-normal guideline project: the introduction of a guideline for sick-listing practices in Sweden, Evidence & Policy, 11(3): 351–76.
-
Sager, M. and Pistone, I. (2019) Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 25(6): 930–37. doi: 10.1111/jep.13251
-
Sayer, P. (2020) A new epistemology of evidence-based policy, Policy & Politics, 48(2): 241–58.
-
Socialstyrelsen (2011) Nationella Riktlinjer för Sjukdomsförebyggande Metoder [National Guidelines for Methods of Preventing Disease] (in Swedish), Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen [National Board of Health and Welfare].
-
Socialstyrelsen (2018) Nationella Riktlinjer för Prevention och Behandling vid Ohälsosamma Levnadsvanor [National Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Unhealthy Lifestyle Habits] (in Swedish), Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen [National Board of Health and Welfare].
-
Socialstyrelsen (2019) How we draw up the Guidelines, https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/en/regulations-and-guidelines/national-guidelines/how-we-draw-up-the-guidelines/.
-
Stewart, E. and Smith, K.E. (2015) ‘Black magic’ and ‘gold dust’: the epistemic and political uses of evidence tools in public health policymaking, Evidence & Policy, 11(3): 415–37.
-
Timmermans, S. (2003) The Gold Standard: The Challenge of Evidence-based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
-
Timmermans, S. and Berg, M. (1997) Standardization in action: achieving local universality through medical protocols, Social Studies of Science, 27(2): 273–305. doi: 10.1177/030631297027002003
-
Timmermans, S. and Epstein, S. (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization, Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 69–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629
-
Timmermans, S. and Tavory, I. (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis, Sociological Theory, 30(3): 167–86. doi: 10.1177/0735275112457914
-
Van Loon, E. and Bal, R. (2014) Uncertainty and the development of evidence-based guidelines, Valuation Studies, 2(1): 43–64. doi: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142143
-
Wieringa, S., Dreesens, D., Forland, F., Hulshof, C., Lukersmith, S., Macbeth, F., Shaw, B., van Vliet, A. and Zuiderent-Jerak, T. (2018) Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 23(3): 87–91. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844
-
World Health Organization (2013) Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020, Geneva: WHO.
-
Yamada, S., Slingsby, B., Inada, M. and Derauf, D. (2008) Evidence-based public health: a critical perspective, Journal of Public Health, 16(3): 169–72. doi: 10.1007/s10389-007-0156-7
Search for other papers by Helena Lagerlöf in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Teun Zuiderent-Jerak in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Morten Sager in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1145 | 435 | 25 |
| Full Text Views | 61 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 33 | 7 | 0 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk