Taxation of sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages is considered a key policy for improving population-level nutrition. Implementation is influenced by the way evidence is used and framed in public debates. At this time, no sugar tax has been implemented in Germany.
This study aims to deepen the understanding of the political dynamics that influence the adoption of sugar taxes by analysing the use of evidence in the German media debate on sugar taxation and comparing its findings with analyses from other countries.
In 114 German newspaper articles, published between 01/2018 and 03/2019, we analysed the use and framing of evidence with an abductive thematic analysis approach. We compared our findings with analyses on the framing around sugar taxation from Mexico, the US and the UK.
Evidence was a salient component of the German debate. As in the comparison countries, evidence was used by both tax proponents and opponents but framed differently, for example, regarding problem definitions. However, the German debate relied more strongly on examples from other countries and less on economic arguments.
Our findings suggest that German tax proponents should proactively consider economic arguments and counter spurious arguments made by tax opponents. Researchers should be aware of their work’s potential international spillover effects, and public health advocates should correct expectations regarding the evidence on, and health effects of, isolated measures against obesity. To deepen the understanding of the German policy process, further research should involve social media, public documents and stakeholder networks.
The Supplementary material is available here: doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19165748.
Akin-Onitolo, A. and Hawkins, B. (2021) Framing tobacco control: the case of the Nigerian tobacco tax debates, Health Policy and Planning, 37(1): 22–32. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab095
Backholer, K., Sarink, D., Beauchamp, A., Keating, C., Loh, V., Ball, K., Martin, J. and Peeters, A. (2016) The impact of a tax on Sugar-sweetened beverages according to Socio-economic position: a systematic review of the evidence, Public Health Nutrition, 19(17): 3070–84. doi: 10.1017/S136898001600104X
Bandy, L.K., Scarborough, P., Harrington, R.A., Rayner, M. and Jebb, S.A. (2020) Reductions in sugar sales from soft drinks in the UK from 2015 to 2018, BMC Medicine, 18(1): 20. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1477-4
Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bes-Rastrollo, M., Sayon-Orea, C., Ruiz-Canela, M. and Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A. (2016) Impact of sugars and sugar taxation on body weight control: a comprehensive literature review, Obesity, 24(7): 1410–26. doi: 10.1002/oby.21535
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buckton, C.H., Fergie, G., Leifeld, P. and Hilton, S. (2019) A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the ‘sugar tax’ debate before and after the announcement of the soft drinks industry levy, BMC Public Health, 19(1): 490. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6799-9
Buckton, C.H., Patterson, C., Hyseni, L., Katikireddi, S.V., Lloyd-Williams, F., Elliott-Green, A., Capewell, S. and Hilton, S. (2018) The palatability of Sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: a content analysis of newspaper coverage of the UK sugar debate, PLoS ONE, 13(12): e0207576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207576
Carriedo Lutzenkirchen, A.A. (2018) A Policy Analysis of the 2014 Mexican Soda Tax, PhD thesis, London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Charmaz, K. (2014) The logic of grounded theory coding practices and initial coding, in K. Charmaz (ed) Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn, London: Sage, pp 109–37.
Effertz, T. (2017) Die Auswirkungen der Besteuerung von Lebensmitteln auf Ernährungsverhalten, Körpergewicht und Gesundheitskosten in Deutschland [The effects of food taxes on dietary patterns, body weight and health costs in Germany], https://adipositas-gesellschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Studie-gesunde-MwSt.pdf.
Entman, R.M. (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Ettelt, S. and Hawkins, B. (2018) Scientific controversy, issue salience, and e-cigarette regulation: a comparative study of policy debates in Germany and England, European Policy Analysis, 4(2): 255–74. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1039
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, and WHO (2019) The state of food security and nutrition in the world: safeguarding against economic slowdowns and downturns, http://www.fao.org/3/ca5162en/ca5162en.pdf.
Fernandez, M.A. and Raine, K.D. (2019) Insights on the influence of sugar taxes on obesity prevention efforts, Current Nutrition Reports, 8(4): 333–39. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-00282-4
Fooks, G.J., Williams, S., Box, G. and Sacks, G. (2019) Corporations’ use and misuse of evidence to influence health policy: a case study of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation, Globalization and Health, 15(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0425-y
Greenhalgh, T. and Russell, J. (2006) Reframing evidence synthesis as rhetorical action in the policy making drama, Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé, 1(2): 34–42.
Greenhalgh, T. and Russell, J. (2009) Evidence-based policymaking: a critique, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2): 304–18. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0085
Hawkins, B. and Ettelt, S. (2019) The strategic uses of evidence in UK E-cigarettes policy debates, Evidence & Policy, 15(4): 579–96.
Hawkins, B. and Holden, C. (2013) Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market, Critical Policy Studies, 7(1): 53–71. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2013.766023
Hawkins, B., Holden, C. and Mackinder, S. (2020) The Battle for Standardised Cigarette Packaging in Europe, 1st edn, Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
Hawkins, B. and Parkhurst, J. (2015) The ‘good governance’ of evidence in health policy, Evidence & Policy, 12(4): 575–92.
Hilton, S., Buckton, C.H., Patterson, C., Katikireddi, S.V., Lloyd-Williams, F., Hyseni, L., Elliott-Green, A. and Capewell, S. (2019) Following in the footsteps of tobacco and alcohol? Stakeholder discourse in UK newspaper coverage of the soft drinks industry levy, Public Health Nutrition, 22(12): 2317–28. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019000739
Kingdon, J.W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn, New York: Longman.
Koon, A.D., Hawkins, B. and Mayhew, S.H. (2016) Framing and the health policy process: a scoping review, Health Policy and Planning, 31(6): 801–16. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv128
Lauber, K., Ralston, R., Mialon, M., Carriedo, A. and Gilmore, A.B. (2020) Non-communicable disease governance in the era of the sustainable development goals: a qualitative analysis of food industry framing in WHO consultations, Globalization and Health, 16(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0531-5
McCambridge, J., Mialon, M. and Hawkins, B. (2018) Alcohol industry involvement in policymaking: a systematic review, Addiction, 113(9): 1571–84. doi: 10.1111/add.14216
Moerschel, K.S. (2020) MSc Project Report: Media Coverage of Sugar Taxation in Germany: A Qualitative Framing Analysis, MSc thesis, London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Moerschel, K.S., von Philipsborn, P., Hawkins, B. and McGill, E. (2021) Concepts of responsibility in the German media debate on sugar taxation: a qualitative framing analysis, European Journal of Public Health, doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab200.
Niederdeppe, J., Gollust, S.E., Jarlenski, M.P., Nathanson, A.M. and Barry, C.L. (2013) News coverage of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: pro- and anti-tax arguments in public discourse, American Journal of Public Health, 103(6): e92–e98. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300812
Nixon, L., Mejia, P., Cheyne, A., Wilking, C., Dorfman, L. and Daynard, R. (2015a) ‘We’re part of the solution’: evolution of the food and beverage industry’s framing of obesity concerns between 2000 and 2012, American Journal of Public Health, 105(11): 2228–36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302819
Nixon, L., Mejia, P., Cheyne, A. and Dorfman, L. (2015b) Big Soda’s long shadow: news coverage of local proposals to tax sugar-sweetened beverages in Richmond, El Monte and Telluride, Critical Public Health, 25(3): 333–47. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2014.987729
O’Brien, B.C., Harris, I.B., Beckman, T.J., Reed, D.A. and Cook, D.A. (2014) Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations, Academic Medicine, 89(9): 1245–51.
Petticrew, M., Katikireddi, S.V., Knai, C., Cassidy, R., Hessari, N.M., Thomas, J. and Weishaar, H. (2017) ‘Nothing can be done until everything is done’: the use of complexity arguments by food, beverage, alcohol and gambling industries, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(11): 1078–83. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207644
Purtle, J., Langellier, B. and Lê-Scherban, F. (2018) A case study of the Philadelphia sugar-sweetened beverage tax policymaking process, Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 24(1): 4–8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000563
Rein, M. and Schön, D. (1996) Frame-critical policy analysis and Frame-reflective policy practice, Knowledge and Policy, 9(1): 85–104. doi: 10.1007/BF02832235
Rowbotham, S., McKinnon, M., Marks, L. and Hawe, P. (2019) Research on media framing of public policies to prevent chronic disease: a narrative synthesis, Social Science and Medicine, 237: 112428. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112428
Saldaña, J. (2016) First cycle coding methods, in J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd edn, London: Sage, pp 67–210.
Schaller, K. and Mons, U. (2018) Steuer auf zuckerhaltige Getränke und Einflussnahme der Industrie zur Verhinderung regulatorischer Maßnahmen, Ernahrungs Umschau, 65(2): M82–M89.
Scheufele, D.A. (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects, Journal of Communication, 49(1): 103–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Scott, C. and Nixon, L. (2018) The shift in framing of food and beverage product reformulation in the United States from 1980 to 2015, Critical Public Health, 28(5): 606–18. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2017.1332756
The GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators (2017) Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years, New England Journal of Medicine, 377(1): 13–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362
Thomas-Meyer, M., Mytton, O. and Adams, J. (2017) Public responses to proposals for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages: a thematic analysis of online reader comments posted on major UK news websites, PLoS ONE, 12(11): e0186750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186750
Weiss, C.H. (1979) The many meanings of research utilization, Public Administration Review, 39(5): 426–31. doi: 10.2307/3109916
World Cancer Research Fund (2020) Health-related food taxes, https://policydatabase.wcrf.org/level_one?page=nourishing-level-one#step2=2%23step3=315.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2015) Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/149782/1/9789241549028_eng.pdf.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2016) Fiscal policies for diet and the prevention of noncommunicable diseases, http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/fiscal-policies-diet-prevention/en/.
Wright, A., Smith, K.E.K.E. and Hellowell, M. (2017) Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies, BMC Public Health, 17(1): 583. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z
Zatonski, M., Hawkins, B. and McKee, M. (2018) Framing the policy debate over spirits excise tax in Poland, Health Promotion International, 33(3): 515–24.
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 726 | 688 | 46 |
Full Text Views | 695 | 651 | 15 |
PDF Downloads | 384 | 336 | 8 |