| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2695 | 1655 | 144 |
| Full Text Views | 816 | 407 | 2 |
| PDF Downloads | 688 | 334 | 4 |
| EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Breaking the Overton Window: on the need for adversarial co-production
Search for other papers by Elliott Aidan Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Irene Hardill in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Matthew T. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Daniel Nettle in
Current site
Google Scholar
Co-production has emerged as one of the key concepts in understanding knowledge-policy interactions and is associated with involvement, for example, of users of public services in their design and delivery. At a time of permacrisis, the need for transformative evidence-based policymaking is urgent and great. This is particularly important in highly distressed ‘left-behind’ communities targeted by the UK Government for Levelling Up, which constitutes an attempt to improve the infrastructural, economic, social and health outcomes of less affluent parts of the UK. Often, policymakers regard the transformative policies capable of addressing these crises as beyond the ‘Overton Window’, which describes a range of policies in the political centre that are acceptable to the public (Lehman, 2010). This window of opportunity can shift to encompass different policies, but movement is slow and policymakers generally believe that significant change lies outside. In this article, we build on recent debates in Evidence & Policy on co-production by outlining an embryonic approach to overcoming this Overton Window-based roadblock in evidence-based policymaking: adversarial co-production, which involves working with opponents of evidence-based policy to develop means of persuading potential beneficiaries to support introduction. This emerging approach has been deployed in examination of public preferences with regard to welfare reform, but can be applied to a wide range of policy areas. We outline briefly the history of co-production, before setting out the process by which adversarial co-production was developed. We then describe the impact of adversarial co-production on public preferences on basic income (BI). This enables us to set out challenges and opportunities for those with an interest in addressing our crises, serving to stimulate genuine debate on longstanding assumptions about the limits of evidence-based policy and public opinion.
-
Adelle, C., Pereira, L., Gorgens, T. and Losch, B. (2019) Making sense together: the role of scientists in the coproduction of knowledge for policy making, Science and Public Policy, 47(1): 56–66. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scz046
-
adversarial collaborations will improve behavioral science, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(1): 1–18. doi: 10.1037/mac0000004
-
Bandola-Gill, J., Grek, S. and Tichenor, M. (2023a) The rise of the reflexive expert? Epistemic, care-ful and instrumental reflexivity in global public policy, Online first, Global Social Policy. doi: 10.1177/14680181221145382
-
Bandola-Gill, J., Arthur, M. and Leng, R.I. (2023b) What is co-production?, Evidence & Policy, 19(2): 275–98. doi: 10.1332/174426421X16420955772641
-
Bentley, G.R. (2020) Don’t blame the BAME: ethnic and structural inequalities in susceptibilities to COVID-19, American Journal of Human Biology, 32(5): e23478. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23478
-
Berry, C. (2021) ‘A mood in the air … like 1945’: democratic Socialism and the post-Corbyn Labour Party, Political Quarterly, 92(2): 255–63. doi: 10.1111/1467-923x.12991
-
Boviard, T. (2007) Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services, Public Administration Review, 67(5): 846–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
-
Burn-Murdoch, J. (2022) Britain and the US are poor societies with some very rich people, Financial Times, 16 September. https://www.ft.com/content/ef265420-45e8-497b-b308-c951baa68945.
-
Calvert, J. and Arbuthnott, G. (2021) Failures of State: The Inside Story of Britain’s Battle with Coronavirus, London: Mudlark
-
Chambers, J.M. et al. (2022) Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations, Global Environmental Change, 72: 102422. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422
-
Clark, C.J., Costello, T., Mitchell, G. and Tetlock, P.E. (2022) Keep your enemies close:
-
Cowan, R. (2020) Universal Basic Income, Hansard, 13 October, 682, c.74WH, https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2020-10-13/debates/7A1CA905-D357-4748-AB52-54E8D4EB5809/UniversalBasicIncome.
-
CPI (Centre for Public Impact) (2018) A Brief Introduction to Evidence-Informed Policy, London: CPI, https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/assets/documents/CPI-A-brief-intro-to-Evidence-informed-policymaking.pdf.
-
Crerar, P. (2023) Rachel Reeves rules out wealth tax if Labour wins next election, The Guardian, 27 August, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/aug/27/rachel-reeves-rules-out-wealth-tax-if-labour-wins-next-election.
-
Dowding, K. (2020) It’s the Government, Stupid: How Governments Blame Citizens for Their Own Policies, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
-
Fisher, W.R. (1987) Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
-
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810503
-
Fotaki, M. (2015) Co-production under the financial crisis and austerity: a means of democratizing public services or a race to the bottom? Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4): 433–38. doi: 10.1177/1056492615579790
-
Gopal, D.P. and Issa, R. (2021) What is needed for Universal Basic Income?, British Journal of General Practice, 71(710): 398. doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X716861
-
Greve, B. (2020) Myths, Narratives and Welfare States: The Impact of Stories on Welfare State Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
-
Hamilton, L., Yorgun, M. and Wright, A. (2021) ‘People nowadays will take everything they can get’: American perceptions of basic income usage, Journal of Policy Practice & Research, 3: 77–95. doi: 10.1007/s42972-021-00035-0
-
Hardill, I. and Baines, S. (2009) Personal reflections on Knowledge Transfer and changing UK research priorities, Twenty-First Century Society, 4(1): 83–96. doi: 10.1080/17450140802648389
-
Hardill, I. and Mills, S. (2013) Enlivening evidence-based policy through embodiment and emotions, Contemporary Social Science, 8(3): 321–32. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2013.770909
-
Hardill, I., Moss, O., Wheatley, D. and Speed, E. (2022) The Impact of COVID-19 on Methodological Innovation, Newcastle: ESRC.
-
Hennessey, P. (2022) A Duty of Care: Britain Before and After Covid, London: Allen Lane.
-
Hochschild, J.L. (1995) Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Hornikx, J. (2007) Is anecdotal evidence more persuasive than statistical evidence?, Studies in Communication Sciences, 7(2): 151–64.
-
Johnson, M.T., Johnson, E.A. and Nettle, D. (2023) Are ‘red wall’ constituencies really opposed to progressive policy? Examining the impact of materialist narratives for Universal Basic Income, British Politics, 18: 104–27. doi: 10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z
-
Johnson, M.T., Johnson, E.A., Reed, H. and Nettle, D. (2022) Can the ‘downward spiral’ of material conditions, mental health and faith in government be stopped? Evidence from surveys in ‘red wall’ constituencies, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Online first. doi: 10.1177/13691481221146886
-
Kara, S. and Khoo, S.M. (2020) Researching in the Age of COVID-19, Bristol: Policy Press, https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/search?f_0=title&q_0=Researching+in+the+Age+of+COVID-19&type_0=book.
-
Kupferschmidt, K. and Cohen, J. (2020) Can China’s COVID-19 strategy work elsewhere?, Science, 367(6482):1061–62 doi: 10.1126/science.367.6482.1061
-
Lehman, J. (2010) The Overton Window of political possibility, Mackinac Center for Public Policy, 8 April, https://www.mackinac.org/12481.
-
Maier, M., Bartoš, F., Stanley, T.D., Shanks, D.R., Harris, A.J.L. and Wagenmakers, E.J. (2022) No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(31): e2200300119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200300119
-
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R. and Kahneman, D. (2001) Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration, Psychological Science, 12(4): 269–75. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00350
-
Mercier, H. and Landemore, H. (2012) Reasoning is for arguing: understanding the successes and failures of deliberation, Political Psychology, 33(2): 243–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00873.x
-
Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2):57–74. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x10000968
-
Mercier, H., Trouche, E., Yama, H., Heintz, C. and Girotto, V. (2015) Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning, Thinking & Reasoning, 21(3): 341–55. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2014.981582
-
Miller, C.A. and Wyborn, C. (2020) Co-production in global sustainability: histories and theories, Environmental Science and Policy, 113: 88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016
-
Morgan, S.E., Cole, H.P., Shuttmann, T. and Piercy, L. (2002) Stories or statistics? Farmers’ attitudes toward messages in an agricultural safety campaign, Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 8(22): 225-39. doi: 10.13031/2013.8427
-
Mouffe, C. (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?, Social Research, 66(3): 745–58.
-
O’Grady, C. (2023) Harvard behavioral scientist faces research fraud allegations, Science, 21 June. doi: 10.1126/science.adj3539, https://www.science.org/content/article/harvard-behavioral-scientist-aces-research-fraud-allegations.
-
Peirson, C. (2021) The Next Welfare State? UK Welfare after COVID-19, Bristol: Policy Press. doi: 10.51952/9781447361213
-
Penn Arts & Science (2022) Adversarial collaboration project, Penn Arts & Sciences, https://web.sas.upenn.edu/adcollabproject/.
-
Piff, P.K., Wiwad, D., Robinson, A.R., Aknin, L.B., Mercier, B. and Shariff, A. (2020) Shifting attributions for poverty motivates opposition to inequality and enhances egalitarianism, Nature Human Behaviour, 4: 496–505. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0835-8
-
Redman, S., Greenhalgh, T., Adedokun, L., Staniszewska, S., Denegri, S. et al (2021) Co-production of knowledge: the future, British Medical Journal, 372: n434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n434
-
Shapiro, I. (2002) Why the poor don’t soak the rich, Daedalus, 131(1): 118–27, https://www.amacad.org/publication/why-poor-dont-soak-rich.
-
Shove, E. (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(6): 1273–85. doi: 10.1068/a42282
-
Stone, D. (2011) Policy Paradox; The Art of Political Decision Making, New York: W.W. Norton, https://wwnorton.com/books/Policy-Paradox.
-
Swedlow, B. (2012) Cultural coproduction of four states of knowledge, Science, Technology & Human Values, 37(3): 151–79. doi: 10.1177/0162243911405345
-
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
-
Tremblay, S., Castiglione, S., Audet, L.A., Desmarais, M., Horace, M. and Peláez, S. (2021) Conducting qualitative research to respond to COVID-19 challenges: reflections for the present and beyond, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20: 1–8. doi: 10.1177/16094069211009679
-
Trouche, E., Johansson, P., Hall, L. and Mercier, H. (2016) The selective laziness of reasoning, Cognitive Science, 40(8): 2122–36. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12303
-
Trouche, E., Sander, E. and Mercier, H. (2014) Arguments, more than confidence, explain the good performance of reasoning groups, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5): 1958–71. doi: 10.1037/a0037099
-
Turnbull, N. (2022) Permacrisis, The Conversation, 11 November. https://theconversation.com/permacrisis-what-it-means-and-why-its-word-of-the-year-for-2022-194306.
-
Uberoi, E. and Johnston, N. (2022) Political Disengagement in the UK, Westminster: House of Commons Library, https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7501/.
-
Wiles, R., Crow, G. and Pain, H. (2011) Innovation in qualitative research methods: a narrative review, Qualitative Research, 11(5): 587–604. doi: 10.1177/1468794111413227
Search for other papers by Elliott Aidan Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Irene Hardill in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Matthew T. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Daniel Nettle in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2695 | 1655 | 144 |
| Full Text Views | 816 | 407 | 2 |
| PDF Downloads | 688 | 334 | 4 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk