Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice

Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions

Authors:
Lisa AraiSocial Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, UK

Search for other papers by Lisa Arai in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Nicky BrittenPeninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, UK

Search for other papers by Nicky Britten in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Jennie PopayInstitute for Health Research, Lancaster University, UK

Search for other papers by Jennie Popay in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Helen RobertsSocial Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London

Search for other papers by Helen Roberts in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mark PetticrewMRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK

Search for other papers by Mark Petticrew in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mark RodgersCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK

Search for other papers by Mark Rodgers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Amanda SowdenCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK

Search for other papers by Amanda Sowden in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

English

In the context of systematic reviews, statistical meta-analysis of findings is not always possible. Where this is the case, or where a review of implementation evidence is required, narrative synthesis of data is typically undertaken. Drawing on recently developed guidance aimed at those undertaking data synthesis – and information on the implementation of domestic smoke detectors – we present findings from a demonstration of the tools and techniques that can be used in a narrative synthesis. The work demonstrates how this process can be made more transparent, and suggests that using the tools and techniques can improve the quality of narrative synthesis.

Lisa AraiSocial Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, UK

Search for other papers by Lisa Arai in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Nicky BrittenPeninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, UK

Search for other papers by Nicky Britten in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Jennie PopayInstitute for Health Research, Lancaster University, UK

Search for other papers by Jennie Popay in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Helen RobertsSocial Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London

Search for other papers by Helen Roberts in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mark PetticrewMRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK

Search for other papers by Mark Petticrew in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mark RodgersCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK

Search for other papers by Mark Rodgers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Amanda SowdenCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK

Search for other papers by Amanda Sowden in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

At the time of writing this article, Lisa Arai and Helen Roberts were based in the Child Health Research and Policy Unit, City University, London.

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 923 873 106
Full Text Views 102 34 5
PDF Downloads 54 22 2

Altmetrics

Dimensions