Including economic perspectives and evidence in Campbell reviews to inform policy and practice: a critical review of current approaches

Authors:
Ian Shemilt Campbell & Cochrane Economics Methods Group; and Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Search for other papers by Ian Shemilt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Miranda Mugford Campbell & Cochrane Economics Methods Group; and Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Search for other papers by Miranda Mugford in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

This paper evaluates current approaches to incorporating economic perspectives and evidence into systematic reviews, using 31 of the 33 reviews completed under the editorial control of The Campbell Collaboration. Of these, 74% incorporated economic perspectives, and 26% attempted to incorporate economic evidence by collecting and summarising data on resource use, costs and/or cost-effectiveness from primary studies. We conclude that while most Campbell reviews incorporate an economic dimension that is of potential utility to end users, the scope and quality of current approaches is limited.

Ian Shemilt Campbell & Cochrane Economics Methods Group; and Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Search for other papers by Ian Shemilt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Miranda Mugford Campbell & Cochrane Economics Methods Group; and Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Search for other papers by Miranda Mugford in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Corresponding author.

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 236 149 8
Full Text Views 4 2 0
PDF Downloads 2 0 0

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice