Experience, knowledge and evidence: a comparison of research relations in health and anthropology

Author:
Christopher McKevitt Division of Health and Social Care Research, School of Medicine, King's College London, UK

Search for other papers by Christopher McKevitt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Patient and public involvement in health research has been promoted by the United Kingdom's Department of Health and its research funding agencies for at least a decade. The policy rhetoric through which it is promoted is based on the idea that patients’ experiential knowledge can be harnessed to improve the quality and relevance of health research. This paper uses the comparative case of post-colonial critiques of anthropology to propose ways of thinking about the implicit and explicit claims underpinning assumptions about experiential knowledge. It focuses on three areas of debate: insider knowledge, and authenticity; objectivity/subjectivity; and ethical and political engagement.

Christopher McKevitt Division of Health and Social Care Research, School of Medicine, King's College London, UK

Search for other papers by Christopher McKevitt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 663 436 123
Full Text Views 22 9 3
PDF Downloads 24 14 8

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice