Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice

Principles and related strategies for spinal cord injury research partnership approaches: a qualitative study

Authors: Femke Hoekstrahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-652X1, Heather L. Gainforth1, and SCI Guiding Principles Consensus Panel
View author details View Less
  • 1 University of British Columbia, , Canada
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Background:

Conducting and/or disseminating research in partnership with potential research users is a popular approach to conducting useful and relevant research. Despite calls for guidance to support these research partnerships, evidence-based tools and resources remain limited.

Aims and objectives:

This study aimed to explore principles and related strategies for conducting and/or disseminating spinal cord injury (SCI) research in partnership with the SCI community, in order to gain insight into ways to support SCI research partnerships.

This qualitative study included ten semi-structured interviews with SCI research partnership champions. The interviews focused on participants’ experiences with SCI research projects that are conducted or disseminated in partnership, and related principles and strategies to work in research partnerships.

Participants mainly talked about principles related to: (1) the relationship between researchers and research users (for example, respect each other, avoid tokenism); (2) co-production of knowledge (for example, research user engagement early and throughout); and (3) meaningful engagement (for example, allowing flexibility). Examples of related strategies included attending collaborative conferences, research user engagement in refinement of research questions, training in research methods, and hiring people with SCI as part of the research team.

Key conclusions:

This qualitative study presents research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions). This study can provide guidance for other researchers and research users who want to engage in (SCI) research partnerships. The findings of this study could be used to inform the development of evidence-based tools and resources to support future research partnerships.

  • Brizay, U., Golob, L., Globerman, J., Gogolishvili, D., Bird, M., Rios-Ellis, B., Rourke, S.B. and Heidari, S. (2015) Community-academic partnerships in HIV-related research: a systematic literature review of theory and practice, Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(1): 19354. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.1.19354

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Camden, C., Shikako-Thomas, K., Nguyen, T., Graham, E., Thomas, A., Sprung, J., Morris, C. and Russell, D.J. (2015) Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts, Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(15): 1390400. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.963705

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carey, R.N., Connell, L.E., Johnston, M., Rothman, A.J., de Bruin, M., Kelly, M.P. and Michie, S. (2019) Behavior change techniques and their mechanisms of action: a synthesis of links described in published intervention literature, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53(8): 693707.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Moissac, D., Bowen, S., Botting, I., Graham, I.D., MacLeod, M., Harlos, K., Songok, S.G. and Bohémier, M. (2019) Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews, Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(73). doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drahota, A., Meza, R.D., Brikho, B., Naaf, M., Estabillo, J.A., Gomez, E.D., Vejnoska, S.F., Dufek, S., Stahmer, A.C. and Aarons, G.A. (2016) Community-academic partnerships: a systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research, Milbank Quarterly, 94(1): 163214. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12184

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gagliardi, A.R., Berta, W., Kothari, A., Boyko, J. and Urquhart, R. (2016) Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review, Implementation Science, 11(38), doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0399-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gainforth, H.L., Baxter, K., Baron, J., Michalovic, E., Caron, J.G. and Sweet, S.N. (2019) RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016, Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1): 39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0434-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gainforth, H.L., Hoekstra, F., McKay, R., McBride, C.B., Sweet, S.N., Martin, K.A., Ginis, Anderson, K., Chernesky, J., Clarke, T., Forwell, S., Maffin, J., McPhail, L.T., Mortenson, W.B., Scarrow, G., Schaefer, L., Sibley, K.M., Athanasopoulos, P. and Willms, R. (2021) Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 102(4): 65663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glasgow, R.E., Lichtenstein, E. and Marcus, A.C. (2003) Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition, American Journal of Public Health, 93(8): 126167. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Green, L.W., Ottoson, J.M., García, C. and Hiatt, R.A. (2009) Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health, Annual Review of Public Health, 30(1): 15174. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grimshaw, J.M., Eccles, M. P., Lavis, J.N., Hill, S.J. and Squires, J.E. (2012) Knowledge translation of research findings, Implementation Science, 7(1): 50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hagger, M. and Hardcastle, S. (2014) Interpersonal style should be included in taxonomies of behavior change techniques, Frontiers in Psychology, 5(254). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00254

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hahn, D.L., Hoffmann, A.E., Felzien, M., LeMaster, J.W., Xu, J. and Fagnan, L.J. (2017) Tokenism in patient engagement, Family Practice, 34(3): 29095.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardcastle, S.J. (2016) Commentary: interpersonal style should be included in taxonomies of behavior change techniques, Frontiers in Psychology, 7(894). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00894

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoekstra, F. and Gainforth, H.L. (2021) An interview study among spinal cord injury research partnership champions, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N5R4H.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoekstra, F., Mrklas, K.J., Sibley, K.M., Nguyen, T., Vis-Dunbar, M., Neilson, C.J., Crockett, L.K., Gainforth, H.L. and Graham, I.D. (2018) A review protocol on research partnerships: a coordinated multicenter team approach, Systematic Reviews, 7(217), doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0879-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoekstra, F., Mrklas, K.J., Khan, M., McKay, R.C., Vis-Dunbar, M., Sibley, K.M., Nguyen, T., Graham, I.D., SCI Guiding Principles Consensus Panel and Gainforth, H.L. (2020) A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature, Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1): 51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hsieh, H.F. and Shannon, S.E. (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 127788. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jull, J., Giles, A. and Graham, I.D. (2017) Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge, Implementation Science, 12(1): 150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kothari, A., McCutcheon, C. and Graham, I.D. (2017) Defining integrated knowledge translation and moving forward: a response to recent commentaries, International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(5): 299300. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.15

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mairs, K., McNeil, H., McLeod, J., Prorok, J.C. and Stolee, P. (2013) Online strategies to facilitate health-related knowledge transfer: a systematic search and review, Health Information & Libraries Journal, 30(4): 26177. doi: 10.1111/hir.12048

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morris, Z.S., Wooding, S. and Grant, J. (2011) The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12): 51020. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nguyen, T. et al. (2020) How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field, Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1): 35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Noonan, V.K., Wolfe, D.L., Thorogood, N.P., Park, S.E., Hsieh, J.T. and Eng, J.J. (2014) Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review, Spinal Cord, 52(8): 57887. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.62

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oborn, E., Barrett, M. and Racko, G. (2013) Knowledge translation in healthcare: incorporating theories of learning and knowledge from the management literature, Journal of Health Organization and Management, 27(4): 41231. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2012-0004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Poucher, Z.A., Tamminen, K.A., Caron, J.G. and Sweet, S.N. (2019) Thinking through and designing qualitative research studies: a focused mapping review of 30 years of qualitative research in sport psychology, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1): 16386. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2019.1656276

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Powell, C. (2003) The Delphi technique: myths and realities, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4): 37682. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salsberg, J., Parry, D., Pluye, P., Macridis, S., Herbert, C.P. and Macaulay, A.C. (2015) Successful strategies to engage research partners for translating evidence into action in community health: a critical review, Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 191856, doi: doi: 10.1155/2015/191856.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slattery, P., Saeri, A.K. and Bragge, P. (2020) Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews, Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1): 17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, B. and McGannon, K.R. (2018) Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1): 10121. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sparkes, A.C. and Smith, B. (2014) Qualitative Research Methods in Sport, Exercise and Health: From Process to Product, London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sweet, S.N., Michalovic, E., Baxter, K., Baron, J. and Gainforth, H.L. (2020) RE-AIMing conferences: a reach, effectiveness, and maintenance evaluation of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016, Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(1): 12335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. and Craig, J. (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6): 34957. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tracy, S.J. (2010) Qualitative quality: eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research, Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10): 83751. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383121

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tricco, A.C., Zarin, W., Rios, P., Nincic, V., Khan, P.A., Ghassemi, M., Diaz, S., Pham, B., Straus, S.E. and Langlois, E.V. (2018) Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review, Implementation Science, 13(1): 31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0717-x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woodill, G. and Willi, V. (2006) Independent Living and Participation in Research: A Critical Analysis, Toronto: Centre for Independent Living in Toronto (CILT).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1 University of British Columbia, , Canada

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 25
Full Text Views 6 6 0
PDF Downloads 5 5 0

Altmetrics

Dimensions