Understanding brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners: a multi-sectoral review of strategies, skills, and outcomes
Background:
Brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners (BIBS) bridge research and policy or practice, and can elevate the role of evidence in decision making. However, there is limited integration of the literature across different sectors to understand the strategies that BIBS use, the skills needed to carry out these strategies, and the expected outcomes of these strategies.
Aims and objectives:
In this review, we characterise the strategies, skills, and outcomes of BIBS across the literature in education, environmental, health and other relevant sectors.
Methods:
We included 185 conceptual and review papers written in English that included descriptions or conceptualisations of BIBS in the context of knowledge transfer or research use in the education, environmental, health, or other relevant sectors (for example, social services, international development). For each included paper, we extracted and coded information on sector, BIBS strategies, skills, and outcomes.
Findings:
Our review revealed five strategies used by BIBS that were emphasised in the literature. Specifically, 79.5% of papers mentioned facilitating relationships, 75.7% mentioned disseminating evidence, 56.8% mentioned finding alignment, 48.6% mentioned capacity building, and 37.3% mentioned advising decisions as strategies used by BIBS. Additionally, papers described skills and expected outcomes that were common across these strategies as well as those that were unique to specific strategies.
Discussion and conclusions:
We discuss implications of these findings for understanding how BIBS interface with knowledge users and producers as well as directions for future research on BIBS and the professionalisation of BIBS roles.
-
Armstrong, R. et al. (2013) Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan, Implementation Science, 8(1): 121. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-121
-
Bednarek, A.T. et al. (2018) Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives, Sustainability Science, 13(4): 1175–83. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0550-9
-
Berdej, S.M. and Armitage, D.R. (2016) Bridging organisations drive effective governance outcomes for conservation of Indonesia’s marine systems, PLoS One, 11(1): e0147142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147142
-
Bornbaum, C.C., Kornas, K., Peirson, L. and Rosella, L.C. (2015) Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis, Implementation Science, 10(1): 162. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0351-9
-
Buizer, J., Jacobs, K. and Cash, D. (2016) Making short-term climate forecasts useful: linking science and action, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17): 4597–602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900518107
-
Campbell, D., Donald, B., Moore, G. and Frew, D. (2011) Evidence check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy, Evidence & Policy, 7(1): 97–107.
-
Cheng, G. (2001) The shifting information landscape: reinventing the wheel or a whole new frontier for librarians, New Library World, 102(1160–1161): 26–31. doi: 10.1108/03074800110694557
-
Choi, B.C. et al (2005) Can scientists and policymakers work together?, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59(8): 632–37.
-
Cook, C.N., Mascia, M.B., Schwartz, M.W., Possingham, H.P. and Fuller, R.A. (2013) Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary, Conservation Biology, 27(4): 669–78. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12050
-
Cooper, A. (2014) Knowledge mobilisation in education across Canada: a cross-case analysis of 44 research brokering organisations, Evidence & Policy, 10(1): 29–59.
-
Cooper, A. and Shewchuk, S. (2015) Knowledge brokers in education: how intermediary organisations are bridging the gap between research, policy and practice internationally, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(118): n118. doi: 10.14507/epaa.v23.2355
-
Cranley, L.A., Cummings, G.G., Profetto-McGrath, J., Toth, F. and Estabrooks, C.A. (2017) Facilitation roles and characteristics associated with research use by healthcare professionals: a scoping review, BMJ Open, 7(8): e014384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014384
-
Cvitanovic, C., McDonald, J. and Hobday, A.J. (2016) From science to action: principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision making, Journal of Environmental Management, 183(3): 864–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.038
-
Dagenais, C., McSween-Cadieux, E., Somé, P.A. and Ridde, V. (2016) A knowledge brokering programme in Burkina Faso (West Africa): reflections from our experience, Health Systems & Reform, 2(4): 367–72. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1202368
-
DeBray, E., Scott, J., Lubienski, C. and Jabbar, H. (2014) Intermediary organisations in charter school policy coalitions: evidence from New Orleans, Educational Policy, 28(2): 175–206. doi: 10.1177/0895904813514132
-
De Pryck, K. and Wanneau, K. (2017) (Anti)-boundary work in global environmental change research and assessment, Environmental Science & Policy, 77: 203–10.
-
Dobbins, M., Robeson, P., Ciliska, D., Hanna, S., Cameron, R., O’Mara, L., DeCorby, K. and Mercer, S. (2009) A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomised controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies, Implementation Science, 4(1): 23. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-23
-
Duncan, R., Robson-Williams, M. and Edwards, S. (2020) A close examination of the role and needed expertise of brokers in bridging and building science policy boundaries in environmental decision making, Palgrave Communications, 6(1): 1–12. doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0368-9
-
Elueze, I.N. (2015) Evaluating the effectiveness of knowledge brokering in health research: a systematised review with some bibliometric information, Health Information & Libraries Journal, 32(3): 168–81. doi: 10.1111/hir.12097
-
Franks, R.P. and Bory, C.T. (2017) Strategies for developing intermediary organisations: considerations for practice, Families in Society, 98(1): 27–34. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.2017.6
-
Frost, H., Geddes, R., Haw, S., Jackson, C.A., Jepson, R., Mooney, J.D. and Frank, J. (2012) Experiences of knowledge brokering for evidence-informed public health policy and practice: three years of the Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, Evidence & Policy, 8(3): 347–59.
-
Gerber, L.R. and Raik, D. (2018) Conservation science needs new institutional models for achieving outcomes, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(8): 438–39. doi: 10.1002/fee.1951
-
Glegg, S.M. and Hoens, A. (2016) Role domains of knowledge brokering: a model for the healthcare setting, Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 40(2): 115–23. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000122
-
Hering, J.G. (2016) Do we need ‘more research’ or better implementation through knowledge brokering? Sustainability Science, 11(2): 363–69. doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0314-8
-
Hetemäki, L. (2019) The role of science in forest policy: experiences by EFI, Forest Policy and Economics, 105: 10–16.
-
Hoens, A.M., Reid, W.D. and Camp, P.G. (2013) Knowledge brokering: an innovative model for supporting evidence-informed practice in respiratory care, Canadian Respiratory Journal, 20(4): 271–74. doi: 10.1155/2013/121654
-
Jacobs, K., Garfin, G. and Lenart, M. (2005) More than just talk: connecting science and decision making, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(9): 6–21. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.47.9.6-21
-
Khoury, M.J., Gwinn, M., Dotson, W.D. and Schully, S.D. (2012) Knowledge integration at the center of genomic medicine, Genetics in Medicine, 14(7): 643–47. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.43
-
Kirchhoff, C.J., Esselman, R. and Brown, D. (2015) Boundary organisations to boundary chains: prospects for advancing climate science application, Climate Risk Management, 9: 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2015.04.001
-
Kislov, R., Wilson, P. and Boaden, R. (2017) The ‘dark side’ of knowledge brokering, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 22(2): 107–112.
-
Lacey, J., Howden, M., Cvitanovic, C. and Colvin, R.M. (2018) Understanding and managing trust at the climate science–policy interface, Nature Climate Change, 8(1): 22–28. doi: 10.1038/s41558-017-0010-z
-
Langer, L., Tripney, J. and Gough, D.A. (2016) The Science of Using Science: Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision Making, Final report, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education.
-
Lemos, M.C., Kirchhoff, C.J. and Ramprasad, V. (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap, Nature Climate Change, 2(11): 789–94. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1614
-
Lemos, M.C., Kirchhoff, C.J., Kalafatis, S.E., Scavia, D. and Rood, R.B. (2014) Moving climate information off the shelf: boundary chains and the role of RISAs as adaptive organisations, Weather, Climate, and Society, 6(2): 273–85. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00044.1
-
Levin, B. (2013) To know is not enough: research knowledge and its use, Review of Education, 1(1): 2–31. doi: 10.1002/rev3.3001
-
Lomas, J. (2007) The in-between world of knowledge brokering, BMJ, 334(7585): 129–32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE
-
Long, J.C., Cunningham, F.C. and Braithwaite, J. (2013) Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review, BMC Health Services Research, 13(1): 158. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158
-
Louder, E., Wyborn, C., Cvitanovic, C. and Bednarek, A.T. (2021) A synthesis of the frameworks available to guide evaluations of research impact at the interface of environmental science, policy and practice, Environmental Science & Policy, 116(1): 258–65.
-
Lubienski, C., Brewer, T.J. and La Londe, P.G. (2016) Orchestrating policy ideas: philanthropies and think tanks in US education policy advocacy networks, Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1): 55–73. doi: 10.1007/s13384-015-0187-y
-
MacKillop, E., Quarmby, S. and Downe, J. (2020) Does knowledge brokering facilitate evidence-based policy? A review of existing knowledge and an agenda for future research, Policy & Politics, 48(2): 335–53.
-
Mallidou, A.A., Atherton, P., Chan, L., Frisch, N., Glegg, S. and Scarrow, G. (2018) Core knowledge translation competencies: a scoping review, BMC Health Services Research, 18(1): 502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3314-4
-
Meagher, L. and Lyall, C. (2013) The invisible made visible: using impact evaluations to illuminate and inform the role of knowledge intermediaries, Evidence & Policy, 9(3): 409–18.
-
Meyer, M. (2010) The rise of the knowledge broker, Science Communication, 32(1): 118–27. doi: 10.1177/1075547009359797
-
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G. and PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement, PLoS Medicine, 6(7): e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
-
Neal, J.W., Neal, Z.P. and Brutzman, B. (2021) Defining brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners: a systematic review, Evidence & Policy, Open Access, 10.1332/174426420X16083745764324.
-
Neal, Z.P., Neal, J.W., Lawlor, J.A. and Mills, K.J. (2015) Small worlds or worlds apart? Using network theory to understand the research-practice gap, Psychosocial Intervention, 24(3): 177–84. doi: 10.1016/j.psi.2015.07.006
-
Newman, K., Fisher, C. and Shaxson, L. (2012) Stimulating demand for research evidence: what role for capacity building?, Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 43(5): 17–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00358.x
-
Newman, J. and Head, B. (2015) Beyond the two communities: a reply to Mead’s ‘why government often ignores research’, Policy Sciences, 48(3): 383–93. doi: 10.1007/s11077-015-9226-9
-
Olejniczak, K., Raimondo, E. and Kupiec, T. (2016) Evaluation units as knowledge brokers: testing and calibrating an innovative framework, Evaluation, 22(2): 168–89. doi: 10.1177/1356389016638752
-
One Earth (2020) Navigating the science-action labyrinth, 2(4): 297–99.
-
Pielke Jr., R.A. (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Pitt, R., Wyborn, C., Page, G., Hutton, J., Sawmy, M.V., Ryan, M. and Gallagher, L. (2018) Wrestling with the complexity of evaluation for organisations at the boundary of science, policy, and practice, Conservation Biology, 32(5): 998–1006. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13118
-
Posner, S.M. and Cvitanovic, C. (2019) Evaluating the impacts of boundary-spanning activities at the interface of environmental science and policy: a review of progress and future research needs, Environmental Science & Policy, 92: 141–51.
-
Robeson, P., Dobbins, M. and DeCorby, K. (2008) Life as a knowledge broker in public health, Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada, 29(3): 79–82.
-
Rose, D.C., Mukherjee, N., Simmons, B.I., Tew, E.R., Robertson, R.J., Vadrot, A.B., Doubleday, R. and Sutherland, W.J. (2017) Policy windows for the environment: tips for improving the uptake of scientific knowledge, Environmental Science & Policy, 113: 47–54.
-
Sarkki, S., Heikkinen, H.I., Komu, T., Partanen, M., Vanhanen, K. and Lépy, É. (2020) How boundary objects help to perform roles of science arbiter, honest broker, and issue advocate, Science and Public Policy, 47(2): 161–71. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scz055
-
Sharples, J. and Sheard, M. (2015) Developing an evidence-informed support service for schools: reflections on a UK model, Evidence & Policy, 11(4): 577–87.
-
Shaxson, L., Bielak, A., Ahmed, I., Brien, D., Conant, B., Fisher, C. and Phipps, D. (2012) Expanding our understanding of K*(Kt, KE, Ktt, KMb, KB, KM, etc.), a concept paper emerging from the K* Conference held in UNU-INWEH Hamilton, ON, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235930863_Expanding_our_understanding_of_K_KTKEKTTKMbKBKM_etc_A_concept_paper_emerging_from_the_K_conference_held_in_Hamilton_Ontario_Canada.
-
Sin, C.H. (2008) The role of intermediaries in getting evidence into policy and practice: some useful lessons from examining consultancy–client relationships, Evidence & Policy, 4(1): 85–103.
-
Taylor, J.S., Verrier, M.C. and Landry, M.D. (2014) What do we know about knowledge brokers in paediatric rehabilitation? A systematic search and narrative summary, Physiotherapy Canada, 66(2): 143–52. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2012-71
-
Taylor, M. and Doerfel, M.L. (2003) Building interorganisational relationships that build nations, Human Communication Research, 29(2): 153–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00835.x
-
Thuy, P.T., Campbell, B.M., Garnett, S., Aslin, H. and Hoang, M.H. (2010) Importance and impacts of intermediary boundary organisations in facilitating payment for environmental services in Vietnam, Environmental Conservation, 37(1): 64–72. doi: 10.1017/S037689291000024X
-
Topp, L., Mair, D., Smillie, L. and Cairney, P. (2018) Knowledge management for policy impact: the case of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre, Palgrave Communications, 4(1): 87. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0143-3
-
Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B. and Leeuwis, C. (2013) New roles of science in society: different repertoires of knowledge brokering, Science and Public Policy, 40(3): 354–65. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs114
-
Van Eerd, D., Newman, K., DeForge, R., Urquhart, R., Cornelissen, E. and Dainty, K.N. (2016) Knowledge brokering for healthy aging: a scoping review of potential approaches, Implementation Science, 11(1): 140. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0504-5
-
van Enst, W.I., Runhaar, H.A. and Driessen, P.P. (2016) Boundary organisations and their strategies: three cases in the Wadden Sea, Environmental Science & Policy, 55(3): 416–23. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.016
-
Van Kammen, J., de Savigny, D. and Sewankambo, N. (2006) Using knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policymaking: the need for support structures, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(8): 608–12. doi: 10.2471/BLT.05.028308
-
Ward, V., House, A. and Hamer, S. (2009) Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evidence & Policy, 5(3): 267–79.
-
Yanovitzky, I. and Weber, M.S. (2019) News media as knowledge brokers in public policymaking processes, Communication Theory, 29(2): 191–212. doi: 10.1093/ct/qty023
-
Zidarov, D., Thomas, A. and Poissant, L. (2013) Knowledge translation in physical therapy: from theory to practice, Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(18): 1571–77. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.748841
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 43 | 43 | 43 |
| Full Text Views | 43 | 43 | 5 |
| PDF Downloads | 30 | 30 | 5 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk