Knowledge Brokerage: The Musical: an analogy for explaining the role of knowledge brokers in a university setting
Background:
Knowledge brokers in higher education are described as requiring a broad range of skills and characteristics, leading to both role conflict and ambiguity. Although existing studies report broad concepts regarding the role of knowledge brokers, the activities that they actually perform to broker knowledge are not systematically reported or impact evaluated.
Aims and objectives:
This paper aims to summarise the current literature on the role of knowledge brokers and describe this role in a higher education context. In an exploratory study, as two knowledge brokers we recorded our activities within a school of health in a large university setting using the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) categories over a period of nine months. Using this report, we use the analogy of a musical to translate the role of knowledge broker. Considering the knowledge brokerage roles of musical director, set designer, choreographer, costume designer and sound and lighting, we discuss the impact of knowledge brokerage activities on actors relaying their knowledge story to an end-user audience. Knowledge brokers in the higher education context primarily perform activities in four areas: know your cast and crew; train your cast and crew; rehearse and review; and provide hands-on support.
Key conclusions:
Understanding the role of knowledge brokers may be enhanced by using the analogy of a musical. Due to the diverse nature of these roles, it is recommended that knowledge brokerage in higher education is performed in teams, where knowledge brokers can utilise different skill sets to facilitate their work.
-
Bayley, E. and Phipps, D. (2019) Building the concept of research impact literacy, Evidence & Policy, 15(4): 597–606.
-
Bornbaum, C.C., Kornas, K., Peirson, L. and Rosella, L.C. (2015) Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in Health-related settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis, Implementation Science, 10: 162. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0351-9
-
Chan, J., Paletz, S.B.F. and Schunn, C.D. (2012) Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty, Memory and Cognition, 40(8): 1352–65. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0227-z
-
Chew, S., Armstrong, N. and Martin, G. (2013) Institutionalising knowledge brokering as a sustainable knowledge translation solution in healthcare: how can it work in practice? Evidence & Policy, 9(3): 335–51.
-
CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research) (2010) More about knowledge translation, http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/39033.html.
-
Cramm, H., Short, B. and Donnelly, C.A. (2016) Knowledge translation and occupational therapy: a survey of Canadian university programs, Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 4(4): 1–11. doi: 10.15453/2168-6408.1196
-
Currie, G. and White, L. (2012) Inter-professional barriers and knowledge brokering in an organizational context: the case of healthcare, Organization Studies, 33(10): 1333–61. doi: 10.1177/0170840612457617
-
Gholami, J. et al. (2013) Knowledge translation in Iranian universities: need for serious interventions, Health Research Policy and Systems, 11: 43. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-43
-
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P. and Kyriakidou, O. (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations, Milbank Quarterly, 82(4): 581–629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
-
Harvey, G., Marshall, R.J., Jordan, Z. and Kitson, A.L. (2015) Exploring the hidden barriers in knowledge translation: a case study within an academic community, Qualitative Health Research, 25(11): 1506–17. doi: 10.1177/1049732315580300
-
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D. and Goering, P. (2004) Organizational factors that influence university-based researchers’ engagement in knowledge transfer activities, Science Communication, 25(3): 246–59. doi: 10.1177/1075547003262038
-
Kislov, R., Wilson, P. and Boaden, R. (2017) The ‘dark side’ of knowledge brokering, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 22(2): 107–112. doi: 10.1177/1355819616653981
-
Lightowler, C. and Knight, C. (2013) Sustaining knowledge exchange and research impact in the social sciences and humanities: investing in knowledge broker roles in UK universities, Evidence & Policy, 9(3): 317–34.
-
Lomas, J. (2007) The in-between world of knowledge brokering, BMJ, 334(7585): 129–32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE
-
MacKillop, E., Quarmby, S. and Downe, J. (2020) Does knowledge brokering facilitate evidence based policy? A review of existing knowledge and an agenda for future research, Policy & Politics, 48(2): 335–53.
-
Martinelli, A., Meyer, M. and von Tunzelmann, M. (2008) Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3): 259–83. doi: 10.1007/s10961-007-9031-5
-
Meyer, M. (2010) The rise of the knowledge broker, Science Communication, 32(1): 118–27. doi: 10.1177/1075547009359797
-
Newman, K., DeForge, R., Van Eerd, D., Mok, Y.W. and Cornelissen, E. (2020) A mixed methods examination of knowledge brokers and their use of theoretical frameworks and evaluative practices, Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1): 34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0545-8
-
Phipps, D. and Morton, S. (2013) Qualities of knowledge brokers: reflections from practice, Evidence & Policy, 9(2): 255–65.
-
Powell, B.J., Waltz, T.J., Chinman, M.J., Damschroder, L.J., Smith, J.L., Matthieu, M.M., Proctor, E.K. and Kirchner, J.E. (2015) A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project, Implementation Science, 10(21): 14. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0201-1
-
Stetler, C.B., Damschroder, L.J., Helfrich, C.D. and Hagedorn, H.J. (2011) A guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation, Implementation Science, 6: 99. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-10
-
Szulanski, G., Ringov, D. and Jensen, R.J. (2016) Overcoming stickiness: how the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty, Organization Science, 27(2): 304–22. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2016.1049
-
Traynor, R., DeCorby, K. and Dobbins, M. (2014) Knowledge brokering in public health: a tale of two studies, Public Health, 128(6): 533–44. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.01.015
-
Van Kammen, J., de Savigny, D. and Sewankambo, N. (2006) Using knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policy-making: the need for support structures, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(8): 608–12. doi: 10.2471/BLT.05.028308
-
Waltz, T.J., Powell, B.J., Matthieu, M.M., Damschroder, L.J., Chinman, M.J., Smith, J.L., Proctor, E.K. and Kirchner, J.E. (2015) Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study, Implementation Science, 10(109): 8. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0190-0
-
Ward, V. (2017) Why, whose, what and how? A framework for knowledge mobilisers, Evidence & Policy, 13(3): 477–97.
-
Ward, V., House, A. and Hamer, S. (2009) Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain?, Evidence & Policy, 5(3): 267–79.
-
Waring, J., Clarke, J. and Vickers, R. (2019) A comparative ethnographic study of collective knowledge brokering across the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries in applied health research, Evidence & Policy, 17(1): 1–20.
-
Williams, P. (2002) The competent boundary spanner, Public Administration, 80(1): 103–24. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00296
-
Wye, L., Cramer, H., Carey, J., Anthwal, R., Rooney, J., Robinson, R., Beckett, K., Farr, M., le May, A. and Baxter, H. (2019) Knowledge brokers or relationship brokers? The rote of an embedded knowledge mobilisation team, Evidence & Policy, 15(2): 277–92.
-
Yin, R. (2012) Case study methods, in H. Cooper (ed) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, vol 2, Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 22 | 22 | 2 |
| PDF Downloads | 24 | 24 | 2 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk