COVID-19-related social lockdowns had profound consequences in all aspects of social life, yet technology’s role in mediating relationships during lockdown has received little attention. Drawing on a survey of 565 young adults in the UK, we used mixed methods to explore (a) differences in technology use by people in serious romantic relationships (cohabiting vs. living apart together), casual relationships or single; and (b) how COVID-19 influenced long-term, serious relationships. For participants in a serious relationship, technology was used as a strategy to facilitate ongoing communication, enabling partners to achieve ‘intimacy from afar’. Qualitative analysis revealed five reasons (more free time, navigating lockdown restrictions, greater boredom, desire for love and miscellaneous) for online dating profile usage changes. People in serious relationships perceived deeper intimate bonds, boundary issues, less physical intimacy, difficulty with lockdown separation and greater negative impact because of COVID-19. Limitations and implications are discussed.
Bergdall, A.R., Kraft, J.M., Andes, K., Carter, M., Hatfield-Timajchy, K. and Hock-Long, L. (2012) Love and hooking up in the new millennium: communication technology and relationships among urban African American and Puerto Rican young adults, Journal of Sex Research, 49(6): 570–82, doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.604748.
Bevan, J.L. (2017) Liking, creeping, and password sharing: romantic jealousy experience and expression on social media, in N. Punyanunt-Carter and J.S. Wrench (eds) The Impact of Social Media in Modern Romantic Relationships, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp 165–81.
Bratan, T., Aichinger, H., Brkic, N., Rueter, J., Apfelbacher, C. and Loss, J. (2020) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ongoing health research: an ad hoc survey among investigators in Germany, BMJ Open, 11(12): e049086, doi: 10.1101/2020.08.14.20174888.
Carter, J. and Duncan, S. (2018) Reinventing Couples: Tradition, Agency and Bricolage, New York, NY: Springer.
Cascalheira, C.J. (2020) COVID-19 & sextech analyses, Open Science Framework, doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U27YE.
Costa, E., Esteve-Del-Valle, M. and Hagedoorn, B. (2022) Scalable co-presence: WhatsApp and the mediation of personal relationships during the COVID-19 lockdown, Social Media + Society, 8(1): 20563051211069053.
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2005) Mixed methods research: developments, debates, and dilemmas, in R.A. Swanson and E.F. Holton III (eds) Research in Organizations: Foundations and Methods of Inquiry, New York, NY: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, pp 315–26.
Dainton, M. and Stafford, L. (1993) Routine maintenance behaviors: a comparison of relational type, partner similarity and sex differences, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2): 255–71, doi: 10.1177/026540759301000206.
Duran, R.L., Kelly, L. and Rotaru, T. (2011) Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection, Communication Quarterly, 59(1): 19–36, doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.541336.
Drouin, M. and McDaniel, B.T. (2019) Technology interference in couple and family relationships, in A. Attrill-Smith, C. Fullwood, M. Keep and D.J. Kuss (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Cyberpsychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198812746.013.8.
Fritz, C.O., Morris, P.E. and Richler, J.J. (2012) Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141: 2–18, doi: 10.1037/a0024338.
Garfin, D.R. (2020) Technology as a coping tool during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic: implications and recommendations, Stress and Health, 36(4): 555–9, doi: 10.1002/smi.2975.
George, D. and Mallery, P. (2003) Using SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 4th edn, New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Gobbi, G., Atkin, T., Zytynski, T., Wang, S., Askari, S., Boruff, J., Ware, M., Marmorstein, N., Cipriani, A., Dendukuri, N. and Mayo, N. (2019) Association of cannabis use in adolescence and risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidality in young adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis, JAMA Psychiatry, 76(4): 426–34, doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4500.
Haskey, J. (2005) Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: having a partner who usually lives elsewhere and living apart together (LAT), Population Trends, Winter: 35–45.
Hazarika, J.B. and Das, S. (2020) Paid and unpaid work during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study of the gendered division of domestic responsibilities during lockdown, Journal of Gender Studies, Advance online publication, 1–11, doi: 10.1080/09589236.2020.1863202.
Hobbs, M., Owen, S. and Gerber, L. (2017) Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy, Journal of Sociology, 53(2): 271–84, doi: 10.1177/1440783316662718.
Hertlein, K.M. and Ancheta, K. (2014) Advantages and disadvantages of technology in relationships: findings from an open-ended survey, The Qualitative Report, 19(22): 1–11.
Hsieh, H.F. and Shannon, S.E. (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277–88, doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
Jin, B. and Peña, J.F. (2010) Mobile communication in romantic relationships: mobile phone use, relational uncertainty, love, commitment, and attachment styles, Communication Reports, 23(1): 39–51, doi: 10.1080/08934211003598742.
Labor, J.S. and Latosa, A.C. (2022) Locked down queer love: intimate queer online relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Gender Studies, 31(6): 770–81, doi: 10.1080/09589236.2021.1979482.
Laliker, M.K. and Lannutti, P.J. (2014) Remapping the topography of couples’ daily interactions: electronic messages, Communication Research Reports, 31(3): 262–71, doi: 10.1080/08824096.2014.924336.
Lee, A.R., Son, S.M. and Kim, K.K. (2016) Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue: a stress perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, 55(A): 51–61, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.011.
Lehmiller, J., Garcia, J., Gesselman, A. and Mark, K. (2020) Less sex, but more sexual diversity: changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, Leisure Sciences, Advanced online publication, 1–10, doi: 10.1080/01490400.2020.1774016.
Levin, I. (2004) Living apart together: a new family form, Current Sociology, 52(2): 223–40, doi: 10.1177/0011392104041809.
Loving, T.J. and Slatcher, R.B. (2013) Romantic relationships and health, in J.A. Simpson and L. Campbell (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 617–37.
Luetke, M., Hensel, D., Herbenick, D. and Rosenberg, M. (2020) Romantic relationship conflict due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in intimate and sexual behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(8): 747–62, doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2020.1810185.
Maes, C. and Vandenbosch, L. (2022) Physically distant, virtually close: adolescents’ sexting behaviors during a strict lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic, Computers in Human Behavior, 126: 107033. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107033
McCormack, M. and Ogilvie, M.F. (2020) Keeping couples together when apart, and driving them apart when together: exploring the impact of smartphones on relationships in the UK, in A. Abela, S. Piscopo and S. Vella (eds) Couple Relationships in a Global Context: Understanding Love and Intimacy across Cultures, New York: Springer, pp 245–59.
McDaniel, B.T. and Coyne, S.M. (2016) ‘Technoference’: the interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1): 85–98, doi: 10.1037/ppm0000065.
Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M.L., Russo, V., Zito, M. and Cortese, C.G. (2020) Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: an investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale, Sustainability, 12(15): 5911, doi: 10.3390/su12155911.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (n.d.) How can we determine whether two processes produce the same proportion of defectives?, US Department of Commerce, www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section3/prc33.htm.
Panzeri, M., Ferrucci, R., Cozza, A. and Fontanesi, L. (2020) Changes in sexuality and quality of couple relationship during the COVID-19 lockdown, Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 565823, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565823.
Parent, M.C. (2012) Handling item-level missing data: simpler is just as good, The Counseling Psychologist, 41(4): 568–600, doi: 10.1177/0011000012445176.
Pasteels, I., Lyssens-Danneboom, V. and Mortelmans, D. (2017) A life course perspective on living apart together: meaning and incidence across Europe, Social Indicators Research, 130(2): 799–817. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1189-x
Pieh, C., O´ Rourke, T., Budimir, S. and Probst, T. (2020) Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown, PLoS One, 15(9): e0238906, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238906.
Pietromonaco, P.R. and Collins, N.L. (2017) Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health, American Psychologist, 72(6): 531–42, doi: 10.1037/amp0000129.
Pietromonaco, P.R. and Overall, N.C. (2021) Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships, American Psychologist, 76(3): 438–50, doi: 10.1037/amp0000714.
R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.1.3), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/.
Roberts, J.A. and David, M.E. (2016) My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners, Computer in Human Behavior, 4(1): 134–41, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058.
Roseneil, S., Crowhurst, I., Hellesund, T., Santos, A.C. and Stoilova, M. (2020) The Tenacity of the Couple-Norm: Intimate Citizenship Regimes in a Changing Europe, London: UCL Press.
Rosenfeld, M.J. and Thomas, R.J. (2012) Searching for a mate: the rise of the internet as a social intermediary, American Sociological Review, 77(4): 523–47, doi: 10.1177/0003122412448050.
Rossi, R., Socci, V., Talevi, D., Mensi, S., Niolu, C., Pacitti, F., Di Marco, A., Rossi, A., Siracusano, A. and Di Lorenzo, G. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11: 790, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00790.
RStudio Team (2021) RStudio: Integrated development environment for R (1.4.1106) [Windows 10], RStudio, PBC, http://www.rstudio.com/.
Saltzman, L.Y., Hansel, T.C. and Bordnick, P.S. (2020) Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health, Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1): S55–57. doi: 10.1037/tra0000468
Su, H. (2016) Constant connection as the media condition of love: where bonds become bondage, Media, Culture & Society, 38(2): 232–47, doi: 10.1177%2F0163443715594037.
Sumter, S.R. and Vandenbosch, L. (2019) Dating gone mobile: demographic and personality-based correlates of using smartphone-based dating applications among emerging adults, New Media & Society, 21(3): 655–73, doi: 10.1177/1461444818804773.
Ting, D.S.W., Carin, L., Dzau, V. and Wong, T.Y. (2020) Digital technology and COVID-19, Nature Medicine, 26(4): 459–61, doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5.
Twenge, J.M., Sherman, R.A. and Wells, B.E. (2015) Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes, 1972–2012, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8): 2273–85, doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0540-2.
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L.D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J. et al. (2019) Welcome to the tidyverse, Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43): 1686, doi: 10.21105/joss.01686.
Wignall, L. (2022) Kinky in the Digital Age, New York: Oxford University Press.
Wignall, L., Portch, E., McCormack, M., Owens, R., Cascalheira, C.J., Attard-Johnson, J. and Cole, T. (2021) Changes in sexual desire and behaviors among UK young adults during social lockdown due to COVID-19, The Journal of Sex Research, 58(8): 976–85. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1897067
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 922 | 663 | 23 |
Full Text Views | 618 | 266 | 9 |
PDF Downloads | 573 | 230 | 17 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here