Parenting apps and the depoliticisation of the parent

Authors:
Stefan Ramaekers KU Leuven, Belgium

Search for other papers by Stefan Ramaekers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Naomi Hodgson Liverpool Hope University, UK

Search for other papers by Naomi Hodgson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

In educational research, digital technology has received considerable attention, and in early childhood studies this has largely focused, understandably, on children. Our concern here is with the figure of the parent and on a specific digital technology – apps designed for parents. While apps can be seen as a digital extension of existing information and advice that has proliferated in the turn to parenting, and exhibits many of the characteristics of the parenting culture – for example, positioning parents as in need of education, drawing predominantly from developmental psychology and neuroscience – the particular affordances of apps draw attention to a more profound shift in how we understand what it means to raise children today, particularly if we reassert the representational – political, pedagogical – dimension of the figure of the parent.

This article considers the implications of parenting apps for the position of the parent in the parent–child relationship. Key focuses in the critical sociological literature on the ‘parenting culture’ and the increasing digitisation of our daily lives are summarised to show how parenting apps can be seen as an extension of the instrumentalisation, scientisation and psychologisation identified therein. A pedagogical-philosophical register is introduced, however, informed by Stanley Cavell’s account of initiation in forms of life and Klaus Mollenhauer’s account of upbringing, that brings out the political aspect of the figure of the parent as a representative figure situated between child and world. With reference to a selection of apps aimed at the period from pregnancy to three years old, we illustrate how, while sharing similarities with the existing sources of information and advice for parents, parenting apps are distinctive due to the personalisation, visualisation and notion of community they offer. Hence, what appears as a politicisation of parents through a sociological lens is seen as a depoliticisation of parents through a pedagogical-philosophical lens.

  • Arendt, H. (2006 [1961]) Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought, London: Penguin.

  • Bouverne-De Bie, M., Roose, R., Verschelden, G., Vanthyne, T. and Vandenbroeck, M. (2006) Van opvoedingsbelofte als maatschappelijke eis naar een maatschappelijk engagement in de opvoeding, In HIG (ed), Van huwelijkscontract naar opvoedingsbelofte, Schaarbeek: Hoger Instituut voor Gezinswetenschappen, pp. 6066.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bristow, J. (2009) Standing up to supernanny, Exeter: Societas Imprint Academic.

  • Bucher, T. (2018) If … then: Algorithmic power and politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cavell, S. (1979) The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Cavell, S. (1990) Conditions handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dahlstedt, M. and Fejes, A. (2014) Family makeover: coaching, confession and parental responsibility, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 22(2): 16988. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2013.812136

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daly, M. (2013) Parenting support: another gender-related policy illusion in Europe?, Women’s Studies International Forum, 41: 2238.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daly, M. and Brady, R. (2015) Parenting support in England: the bedding down of a new policy, Social Policy and Society, 14: 63344. doi: 10.1017/S1474746415000214

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Vos, J. (2012) Psychologisation in times of globalisation, Hove: Routledge.

  • De Vos, J. (2016) The metamorphoses of the brain: Neurologisation and its discontents, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Edwards, R., Gillies, V. and Horsley, N. (2017). Challenging the politics of early intervention: Who’s ‘saving’ children and why, Bristol: Policy Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Faircloth, C., Hoffman, D. and Layne, L. (2013). Parenting in global perspective: Negotiating ideologies of kinship, self and politics, London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friesen, N. (2014) Translator’s introduction. Culture and upbringing in theory and practice. In K. Mollenhauer, Forgotten connections: On culture and upbringing (trans. N. Friesen), Abingdon: Routledge, pp. xvixlx. 

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Furedi, F. (2001) Paranoid parenting: Why ignoring the experts may be best for your child, London: Continuum Press.

  • Furedi, F. and Bristow, J. (2008) Licensed to hug, Civitas.

  • Gillies, V. (2005) Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of “support” and “inclusion” in family policy, Critical Social Policy, 25: 7090. doi: 10.1177/0261018305048968

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gillies, V. (2012) Family policy and the politics of parenting: from function to competence, In M. Richter and S. Andresen (eds), The politicization of parenthood: Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing, Dordrecht: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gillies, V., Edwards, R., and Horsley, N. (2016) Brave new brains: sociology, family and the politics of knowledge, The Sociological Review, 64: 21937. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12374

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hodgson, N. and Ramaekers, S. (2019) Philosophical presentations of raising children: The grammar of upbringing, London: Palgrave.

  • Klett-Davies, M. (ed) (2010) Is parenting a class issue?, Family and Parenting Institute.

  • Knijn, T. and Hopman, M. (2015) Parenting support in the Dutch ‘participation society, Social Policy and Society, 14: 64556. doi: 10.1017/S1474746415000329

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C. and Macvarish, J. (2014) Parenting culture studies, London: Palgrave.

  • Lupton, D. (2013) Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies, Critical Public Health, 23(4): 393403. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2013.794931

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lupton, D. and Williamson, B. (2017) The datafied child: the dataveillance of children and implications for their rights, New Media & Society, 19(5): 78094. doi: 10.1177/1461444816686328

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mackler, S. (2017) Raising a human: an arendtian inquiry into child-rearing in a technological era, Keynote address, Philosophy of Education conference, Seattle, March.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacVarish, J. (2016) Neuroparenting: The expert invasion of family life, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • McIlvenny, P. (2008) A home away from home: mediating parentcraft and domestic space in a reality TV parenting program, Home Cultures: The Journal of Architecture, Design and Domestic Space, 5(2): 14166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mollenhauer, K. (2014 [1983]) Forgotten connections: On culture and upbringing, Edited and translated by N. Friesen, London and New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nadesan, M.H. (2002) Engineering the entrepreneurial infant: brain science, infant development toys, and governmentality, Cultural Studies, 16(3): 40132. doi: 10.1080/09502380210128315

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peters, R. S. (2015 [1959]) Ethics and education, Abingdon: Routledge Revivals.

  • Ramaekers, S. and Suissa, J. (2012) The claims of parenting: Reasons, responsibility, and society, Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Richter, M. and Andresen, S. (eds) (2012) The politicization of parenthood. Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing, Dordrecht: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts‐Holmes, G. and Bradbury, A. (2016) Governance, accountability and the datafication of early years education in England, British Educational Research Journal, 42: 60013, doi: 10.1002/berj.3221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simons, M. (2015) Governing education without reform: the power of the example, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5): 71231. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2014.892660

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R. (2010). Total parenting, Educational Theory, 60: 35769. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2010.00363.x

  • Stiegler, B. (2010) Taking care of youth and the generations, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • Williamson, B. (2014) Reassembling children as data doppelgangers: how databases are making education machine-readable, Paper presented at the Powerful Knowledge conference, 16 May, University of Bristol.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williamson, B. (2016) Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments, Journal of Education Policy, 31(2): 12341. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williamson, B. (2017) Decoding ClassDojo: psycho-policy, social emotional learning and persuasive educational technologies, Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4): 44053. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2017.1278020

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willson, M. (2018) Raising the ideal child? Algorithms, quantification and prediction, Media, Culture & Society, Online First.

Stefan Ramaekers KU Leuven, Belgium

Search for other papers by Stefan Ramaekers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Naomi Hodgson Liverpool Hope University, UK

Search for other papers by Naomi Hodgson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2676 1369 640
Full Text Views 127 24 1
PDF Downloads 124 29 1

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Families, Relationships and Societies
An international journal of research and debate