| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2676 | 1369 | 640 |
| Full Text Views | 127 | 24 | 1 |
| PDF Downloads | 124 | 29 | 1 |
| EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Parenting apps and the depoliticisation of the parent
Search for other papers by Stefan Ramaekers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Naomi Hodgson in
Current site
Google Scholar
In educational research, digital technology has received considerable attention, and in early childhood studies this has largely focused, understandably, on children. Our concern here is with the figure of the parent and on a specific digital technology – apps designed for parents. While apps can be seen as a digital extension of existing information and advice that has proliferated in the turn to parenting, and exhibits many of the characteristics of the parenting culture – for example, positioning parents as in need of education, drawing predominantly from developmental psychology and neuroscience – the particular affordances of apps draw attention to a more profound shift in how we understand what it means to raise children today, particularly if we reassert the representational – political, pedagogical – dimension of the figure of the parent.
This article considers the implications of parenting apps for the position of the parent in the parent–child relationship. Key focuses in the critical sociological literature on the ‘parenting culture’ and the increasing digitisation of our daily lives are summarised to show how parenting apps can be seen as an extension of the instrumentalisation, scientisation and psychologisation identified therein. A pedagogical-philosophical register is introduced, however, informed by Stanley Cavell’s account of initiation in forms of life and Klaus Mollenhauer’s account of upbringing, that brings out the political aspect of the figure of the parent as a representative figure situated between child and world. With reference to a selection of apps aimed at the period from pregnancy to three years old, we illustrate how, while sharing similarities with the existing sources of information and advice for parents, parenting apps are distinctive due to the personalisation, visualisation and notion of community they offer. Hence, what appears as a politicisation of parents through a sociological lens is seen as a depoliticisation of parents through a pedagogical-philosophical lens.
-
Arendt, H. (2006 [1961]) Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought, London: Penguin.
-
Bouverne-De Bie, M., Roose, R., Verschelden, G., Vanthyne, T. and Vandenbroeck, M. (2006) Van opvoedingsbelofte als maatschappelijke eis naar een maatschappelijk engagement in de opvoeding, In HIG (ed), Van huwelijkscontract naar opvoedingsbelofte, Schaarbeek: Hoger Instituut voor Gezinswetenschappen, pp. 60–66.
-
Bristow, J. (2009) Standing up to supernanny, Exeter: Societas Imprint Academic.
-
Bucher, T. (2018) If … then: Algorithmic power and politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Cavell, S. (1979) The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy, New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Cavell, S. (1990) Conditions handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Dahlstedt, M. and Fejes, A. (2014) Family makeover: coaching, confession and parental responsibility, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 22(2): 169–88. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2013.812136
-
Daly, M. (2013) Parenting support: another gender-related policy illusion in Europe?, Women’s Studies International Forum, 41: 223–8.
-
Daly, M. and Brady, R. (2015) Parenting support in England: the bedding down of a new policy, Social Policy and Society, 14: 633–44. doi: 10.1017/S1474746415000214
-
De Vos, J. (2012) Psychologisation in times of globalisation, Hove: Routledge.
-
De Vos, J. (2016) The metamorphoses of the brain: Neurologisation and its discontents, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Edwards, R., Gillies, V. and Horsley, N. (2017). Challenging the politics of early intervention: Who’s ‘saving’ children and why, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Faircloth, C., Hoffman, D. and Layne, L. (2013). Parenting in global perspective: Negotiating ideologies of kinship, self and politics, London: Routledge.
-
Friesen, N. (2014) Translator’s introduction. Culture and upbringing in theory and practice. In K. Mollenhauer, Forgotten connections: On culture and upbringing (trans. N. Friesen), Abingdon: Routledge, pp. xvi–xlx.
-
Furedi, F. (2001) Paranoid parenting: Why ignoring the experts may be best for your child, London: Continuum Press.
-
Furedi, F. and Bristow, J. (2008) Licensed to hug, Civitas.
-
Gillies, V. (2005) Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of “support” and “inclusion” in family policy, Critical Social Policy, 25: 70–90. doi: 10.1177/0261018305048968
-
Gillies, V. (2012) Family policy and the politics of parenting: from function to competence, In M. Richter and S. Andresen (eds), The politicization of parenthood: Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing, Dordrecht: Springer.
-
Gillies, V., Edwards, R., and Horsley, N. (2016) Brave new brains: sociology, family and the politics of knowledge, The Sociological Review, 64: 219–37. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12374
-
Hodgson, N. and Ramaekers, S. (2019) Philosophical presentations of raising children: The grammar of upbringing, London: Palgrave.
-
Klett-Davies, M. (ed) (2010) Is parenting a class issue?, Family and Parenting Institute.
-
Knijn, T. and Hopman, M. (2015) Parenting support in the Dutch ‘participation society, Social Policy and Society, 14: 645–56. doi: 10.1017/S1474746415000329
-
Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C. and Macvarish, J. (2014) Parenting culture studies, London: Palgrave.
-
Lupton, D. (2013) Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies, Critical Public Health, 23(4): 393–403. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2013.794931
-
Lupton, D. and Williamson, B. (2017) The datafied child: the dataveillance of children and implications for their rights, New Media & Society, 19(5): 780–94. doi: 10.1177/1461444816686328
-
Mackler, S. (2017) Raising a human: an arendtian inquiry into child-rearing in a technological era, Keynote address, Philosophy of Education conference, Seattle, March.
-
MacVarish, J. (2016) Neuroparenting: The expert invasion of family life, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
McIlvenny, P. (2008) A home away from home: mediating parentcraft and domestic space in a reality TV parenting program, Home Cultures: The Journal of Architecture, Design and Domestic Space, 5(2): 141–66.
-
Mollenhauer, K. (2014 [1983]) Forgotten connections: On culture and upbringing, Edited and translated by N. Friesen, London and New York: Routledge.
-
Nadesan, M.H. (2002) Engineering the entrepreneurial infant: brain science, infant development toys, and governmentality, Cultural Studies, 16(3): 401–32. doi: 10.1080/09502380210128315
-
Peters, R. S. (2015 [1959]) Ethics and education, Abingdon: Routledge Revivals.
-
Ramaekers, S. and Suissa, J. (2012) The claims of parenting: Reasons, responsibility, and society, Dordrecht: Springer.
-
Richter, M. and Andresen, S. (eds) (2012) The politicization of parenthood. Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing, Dordrecht: Springer.
-
Roberts‐Holmes, G. and Bradbury, A. (2016) Governance, accountability and the datafication of early years education in England, British Educational Research Journal, 42: 600–13, doi: 10.1002/berj.3221.
-
Simons, M. (2015) Governing education without reform: the power of the example, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5): 712–31. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2014.892660
-
Smith, R. (2010). Total parenting, Educational Theory, 60: 357–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2010.00363.x
-
Stiegler, B. (2010) Taking care of youth and the generations, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
-
Williamson, B. (2014) Reassembling children as data doppelgangers: how databases are making education machine-readable, Paper presented at the Powerful Knowledge conference, 16 May, University of Bristol.
-
Williamson, B. (2016) Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments, Journal of Education Policy, 31(2): 123–41. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758
-
Williamson, B. (2017) Decoding ClassDojo: psycho-policy, social emotional learning and persuasive educational technologies, Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4): 440–53. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2017.1278020
-
Willson, M. (2018) Raising the ideal child? Algorithms, quantification and prediction, Media, Culture & Society, Online First.
Search for other papers by Stefan Ramaekers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Naomi Hodgson in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2676 | 1369 | 640 |
| Full Text Views | 127 | 24 | 1 |
| PDF Downloads | 124 | 29 | 1 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk