Shifting roles, changing relations: considerations when doing ethnographic research with multiple families
When conducting ethnographic research, a family researcher becomes involved in the personal lives of the participants. This raises a number of concerns for the researcher when establishing relationships with family members. Drawing on qualitative data from research on children’s intra-familial privacy in Turkey, this article aims to increase awareness of several cultural aspects that may have an impact on how researchers build rapport with family members in Turkey. It reflects on a set of key considerations when doing ethnographic research with multiple families. These include the cultural struggles for children when addressing the researcher (in kinship terms such as ‘elder sister’), negotiation of the researcher’s role through participant observational activities, the changing display of family over time, the researcher’s over-involvement in family issues, and adapting to family cultures when working with families from different sociocultural and socioeconomic backgrounds.
-
Akyıl, Y. (2012) Family Values Transmission in A Changing Turkey, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Keene, NH: Antioch University New England.
-
Boyden, J. and Ennew, J. (1997) Children in Focus: A Manual for Experiential Learning in Participatory Research with Children, Stockholm: Rädda Barnen.
-
Burawoy, M. (2009) The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
-
Charmaz, K. and Belgrave, L.L. (2012) Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis, in J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein, A.B. Marvasti and K.D. McKinney (eds) The Sage Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 347–65.
-
Christensen, P. (2004) Children‘s participation in ethnographic research: issues of power and representation, Children and Society, 18(2): 165–76. doi: 10.1002/chi.823
-
Corsaro, W.A. (2018) The Sociology of Childhood, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Corsaro, W.A. and Molinari, L. (2008) Entering and observing in children’s worlds: a reflection on a longitudinal ethnography of early education in Italy, in P. Christensen and A. James (eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, London: Falmer Press.
-
Çelen, N. and Çok, F. (2007) Turkey, in J.J. Arnett (ed) International Encyclopaedia of Adolescence: Volume I A-J index, New York: Routledge.
-
Daly, K.J. (2007) Qualitative Methods for Family Studies and Human Development, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Davies, C.A. (2002) Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others, London: Routledge.
-
Descartes, L. (2007) Rewards and challenges of using ethnography in family research, Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36(1): 22–39. doi: 10.1177/1077727X07303488
-
Emiroğlu, S. (2012) Classification of relatives’ names in Turkish dictionaries, Journal of Turkish Studies, 7(4): 1691–710.
-
Ergun, A. and Erdemir, A. (2010) Negotiating insider and outsider identities in the field: ‘insider’ in a foreign land; ‘outsider’ in one’s own land, Field Methods, 22(1): 16–38. doi: 10.1177/1525822X09349919
-
Evans-Pritchard, E.E. (1973) Some reminiscences and reflections on fieldwork, Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 4(1): 1–12.
-
Fetterman, D.M. (2010) Ethnography Step by Step, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Finch, J. (2007) Displaying families, Sociology, 41(1): 65–81. doi: 10.1177/0038038507072284
-
Fine, G. (1979) Small groups and culture creation: the idioculture of little league baseball teams, American Sociological Review, 44(5): 733–45. doi: 10.2307/2094525
-
Fine, G.A. and Sandstrom, K.L. (1988) Knowing Children: Participant Observation with Minors, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Floridi, L. (2011) The Philosophy of Information, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Gabb, J. (2010) Home truths: ethical issues in family research, Qualitative Research, 10(4): 461–78. doi: 10.1177/1468794110366807
-
Goh, E. and Göransson, К. (2011) Doing ethnographic research in Chinese families: reflections on methodological concerns from two Asian cities, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, (September 2011): 265–81.
-
Göransson, K. (2011) Ethnographic family research: predicaments and possibilities of doing fieldwork on intergenerational relations in Singapore, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(6): 903–18.
-
Hall, S.M. (2014) Ethics of ethnography with families: a geographical perspective, Environment and Planning, 46: 2175–94. doi: 10.1068/a130077p
-
Jamieson, L. and Milne, S. (2012) Children and young people’s relationships, relational processes and social change: reading across worlds, Children’s Geographies, 10(3): 265–78.
-
Jamieson, L., Simpson, R. and Lewis, R. (2011) Introduction, in Researching Families and Relationships: Reflections on Process, Houndsmill: Palgrave MacMillan, pp 1–18.
-
Jordan, A.B. (2006) Make yourself at home: the social construction of research roles in family studies, Qualitative Research, 6(2): 169–85. doi: 10.1177/1468794106062708
-
Mayall, B. (2008) Conversations with children: working with generational issues, in P. Christensen and A. James (eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, London: Falmer Press, pp 109–124.
-
Notko, M., Jokinen, K., Malinen, K., Harju-Veijola, M., Kuronen, M. and Pirskanen, H. (2013) Encountering ethics in studying challenging family relations, Families, Relationships and Societies, 2(3): 395–408. doi: 10.1332/204674313X665085
-
Palys, T. (2008) Purposive sampling in L.M. Given (ed) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Vol 2, Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp 697–98.
-
Pole, C. (2007) Researching children and fashion: an embodied ethnography, Childhood, 14(1): 67–84. doi: 10.1177/0907568207072530
-
Punch, S. (2002) Research with children: the same or different from research with adults?, Childhood, 9(3): 321–41.
-
Sunar, D. (2003) Change and continuity in the Turkish middle-class family, in E. Özdalga and R. Liljestrom (eds) Autonomy and Dependence in Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective, Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute, pp 2–16.
-
Sunar, D. and Fişek, G.O. (2005) Contemporary Turkish families, in U. Gielen and J. Roopnarine (eds) Families in Global Perspective, Boston, MA: Pearson, pp 169–83.
-
Ward, K. (2006) The bald guy just ate an orange. Domestication, work and home, in T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie and K.J. Ward (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology, Berkshire: Open University Press, pp 145–64.
-
Weisner, T.S. (2014) Why qualitative and ethnographic methods are essential for understanding family life, in S.M. McHale, P. Amato and A. Booth (eds) Emerging Methods in Family Research, New York: Springer, pp 163–78.
-
Whitehead, T.L. (2005) Basic classical ethnographic research methods: secondary data analysis, fieldwork, observation/participant observation, and informal and semi-structured interviewing, [draft], 17 July, Ethnographically Informed Community and Cultural Assessment Research Systems (EICCARS) Working Paper Series, https://tony-whitehead.squarespace.com/s/Classical-Basic-Ethnographic-Methods-58ez.pdf.
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 36 | 36 | 2 |
| PDF Downloads | 29 | 29 | 2 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk