This paper explores the glitch as a generative problem which is capable of introducing unanticipated possibilities and futures into situations. We understand the glitch as a sociomaterial encounter rather than merely a technical error, and argue that it calls for (re)consideration of here-and-now possible futures through practices of response and repair. Exploring the ways that people seek to respond to glitches, we consider two case studies in which unexpected problems provoke those involved to speculate playfully and practically about new possibilities. In the first case, a malfunctioning ‘Teacherbot’ incites new challenges and pedagogical opportunities in an online learning environment. In the second, Hungarian activists creatively use infrastructural and political problems to make new spaces of protest and to press the government to respond to their concerns. Considering these empirical cases allows us to observe how playful and disruptive dispositions have worked to question the terms of possible futures in the real world, and to unsettle the seemingly given terms of power-relations. Glitches are not a panacea, but they can provide an impetus to act from within situations that are uncertain, and can therefore point to new trajectories and possible futures.
Adkins, L. (2017) Sociology’s archive: Mass-observation as a site of speculative research, in A. Wilkie, M. Savransky and M. Rosengarten (eds) Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, London: Routledge, pp 117–29.
Ahmed, S. (2019) What’s the Use?, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Amsler, S. and Facer, K. (2017) Contesting anticipatory regimes in education: exploring alternative educational orientations to the future, Futures (Learning the Future Otherwise: Emerging Approaches to Critical Anticipation in Education), 94(2017): 6–14, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.01.001.
Barad, K. (2014) Diffracting diffraction: cutting together-apart, Parallax, 20(3): 168–87.
Bayne, S. (2015) Teacherbot: interventions in automated teaching, Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4): 455–67, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020783.
Bayne, S. (2018) Posthumanism: a navigation aid for educators, On Education, 2018(01): www.oneducation.net/no-02-september-2018/posthumanism-a-navigation-aid-for-educators/.
Bear, L. (2016) Afterword: for a new materialist analytics of time, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 34(1): 125–29, doi: 10.3167/ca.2016.340112.
Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Berlant, L. (2011) Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Berlant, L. (2015) The commons: infrastructures for troubling times, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(3): 393–419, doi: 10.1177/0263775816645989.
Boyd, A. and Mitchell, D. (2012) Beautiful Trouble: A Toolbox for Revolution, New York: OR Books.
Candy, S. (2010) The Futures of Everyday Life: Politics and the Design of Experiential Scenarios, PhD thesis, Mānoa: The University of Hawai’i.
Csaky, Zs. (2020) Dropping the democratic façade in Europe and Eurasia, https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2020/dropping-democratic-façade.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, (trans) B. Massumi Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
Deville, J. (2017) Retrocasting: speculating about the origins of money, in A. Wilkie, M. Savransky and M. Rosengarten (eds) Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, London: Routledge, pp 98–110.
Diprose, R. (2017) Speculative research, temporality and politics, in A. Wilkie, M. Savransky and M. Rosengarten (eds) Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, London: Routledge, pp 39–51.
Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013) Speculative Everything Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Edwards, R. (2010) The end of lifelong learning: a post-human condition?, Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(1): 5–17.
Facer, K. (2016) Using the future in education: creating space for openness, hope and novelty, in H.E. Lees and N. Noddings (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Alternative Education, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp 63–78, doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-41291-1_5.
Fisher, M. (2009) Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?, Winchester and Washington: O Books.
Gaboury, J. (2018) Critical unmaking: toward a queer computation, in J. Sayers (ed) The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0cq870wh.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goldhaber, M.H. (1997) The attention economy and the net, First Monday, 2(4): doi: 10.5210/fm.v2i4.519.
Guggenheim, M., Kraftner, B. and Kroll, J. (2017) Creating idiotic speculators: disaster cosmopolitics in the sandbox, in A. Wilkie, M. Savransky and M. Rosengarten (eds) Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, London: Routledge, pp 145–62.
Halberstam, J. (2011) The Queer Art of Failure, Durham, DC: Duke University Press.
Halewood, M. (2017) Situated speculation as a constraint on thought, in A. Wilkie, M. Savransky and M. Rosengarten (eds) Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, London: Routledge, pp 52–64.
Hayles, N.K. (2008) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kanngieser, A. (2016) Experimental Politics and the Making of Worlds, New York: Routledge Books.
Knox, J. (2016) Posthumanism and the Massive Open Online Course: Contaminating the Subject of Global Education, New York: Routledge.
Mallis, J. (2008) Bendito Machine III (Obey His Commands), Zumbakamara, www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9S6lFlyaWA.
Manon, H.S. and Temkin, D. (2011) Notes on glitch, World Picture, 6: Wrong.
Massey, D. (2005) For Space, Los Angeles and London: Sage.
McIlvenny, P. (2017) Refusing what we are: communicating counter-identities and prefiguring social change in social movements, in S. Bagga-Gupta A. Lyngvær Hansen and J. Feilberg (eds) Identity Revisited and Reimagined, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp 41–62.
Menkman, R. (2011) The Glitch Moment(um), Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
Michael, M. (2012) ‘What are we busy doing?’ Engaging the idiot, Science, Technology & Human Values, 37(5): 528–54, doi: 10.1177/0162243911428624.
Moroşanu, R. and Ringel, F. (2016) Time-tricking: a general introduction, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 34(1): 17–21, doi: 10.3167/ca.2016.340103.
O’Gorman, M. (2013) Speculative realism in chains: a love story, Angelaki, 18(1): 31–43.
Osborne, N. (2018) For still possible cities: a politics of failure for the politically depressed, Australian Geographer, 50(2): 1–10 doi: 10.1080/00049182.2018.1530717.
Pedersen, H. (2013) Follow the Judas sheep: materializing post-qualitative methodology in zooethnographic space, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6): 717–31, doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788760.
Pente, P. (2018) Slow motion electric chiaroscuro: an experiment in Glitch-anthropo-scenic landscape art, in J. Jagodzinski (ed) Interrogating the Anthropocene, Palgrave Studies in Educational Futures, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 277–98.
Pierides, D. and Woodman, D. (2012) Object-oriented sociology and organizing in the face of emergency: Bruno Latour, Graham Harman and the material turn, The British Journal of Sociology, 63(4): 662–79.
Porter, L. (2011) The point is to change it, Planning Theory & Practice, 12(4): 477–80, doi: 10.1080/14649357.2011.626296.
Prior, N. (2008) Putting a glitch in the field: Bourdieu, actor network theory and contemporary music, Cultural Sociology, 2(3): 301–19, doi: 10.1177/1749975508095614.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Rivers, N. and Söderlund, L. (2016) Speculative usability, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(1): 125–46.
Ross, J. (2017) Speculative method in digital education research, Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2): 214–29.
Sacks, H. (1986) Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations, Poetics, 15(1): 127–38.
Savransky, M. (2017) The wager of an unfinished present, in A. Wilkie, M. Savransky and M. Rosengarten (eds) Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, London: Routledge, pp 25–38.
Savransky, M., Wilkie, A. and Rosengarten, M. (2017) The lure of possible futures: on speculative research, in A. Wilkie, M. Savransky and M. Rosengarten (eds) Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, London and New York: Routledge, pp 1–18.
Scheiring, G. (2019) Dependent development and authoritarian state capitalism: democratic backsliding and the rise of the accumulative state in Hungary, Geoforum, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.011.
Selwyn, N. (2016) Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
St Pierre, E.A., Jackson, A.Y. and Mazzei, L.A. (2016) New empiricisms and new materialisms: conditions for new inquiry, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2): 99–110, doi: 10.1177/1532708616638694.
Stengers, I. (2005) The cosmopolitical proposal, in B. Latour and P. Wiebel (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, pp 994–1003.
Stengers, I. (2010) Cosmopolitics I, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Székely és szórvány szituacionisták (2019) Az „szszsz” nyilatkozata a rabszolgatörvényről, Merce, https://merce.hu/2019/01/03/az-szszsz-nyilatkozata-a-rabszolgatorvenyrol/.
Vavarella, E. (2015) Art, error, and the interstices of power, Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 7(2): 7–17, doi: 10.7559/citarj.v7i2.135.
Watson, M.C. (2014) Derrida, Stengers, Latour, and subalternist cosmopolitics, Theory, Culture & Society, 31(1): 75–98, doi: 10.1177/0263276413495283.
Whitehead, A. (1978) Process and Reality, New York: The Free Press.
Wilkie, A., Michael, M. and Plummer-Fernandez, M. (2015) Speculative method and twitter: bots, energy and three conceptual characters, The Sociological Review, 63(1): 79–101, doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12168.
Wilkie, A., Savransky, M. and Rosengarten, M. (2017) Speculative Research : The Lure of Possible Futures, London: Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9781315541860.
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1112 | 590 | 43 |
Full Text Views | 46 | 9 | 1 |
PDF Downloads | 75 | 16 | 1 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here