Global Discourse
An interdisciplinary journal of current affairs

The ends of perpetual crisis

Author: Janet Roitman1
View author details View Less
  • 1 The New School, , USA
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

We now live in perpetual crisis: ‘an age of crisis’, ‘times of crisis’, ‘chronic crisis’ and so on. These expressions seem to merely describe a state of affairs, but they are foundational claims. The concept of crisis qualifies a world: it determines what gets to count as an event and what gets inscribed as history in the ongoing stream of competing phenomena. Crisis is a naturalising category that subsumes specificity. It has colonised the life-worlds of communities across the globe and become foundational to knowledge production despite its Christian-European genealogy. Analyses that attempt to gain insights by elucidating discourses of crisis, or how people use the term ‘crisis’, and the experience of crisis, or how people narrate crisis, disregard the constitutive questions that make crisis a primary means of qualifying the observable world. Asking those constitutive questions has political import because they raise the long-standing problem of representation – of the Other, of alterity, of language and of experience. The problem of representation has been a central topic of epistemology and the principal subject of critique in the social sciences and humanities. It should not be ignored, and it compels us to ask: what becomes of the concept of crisis when we problematise practices of representation?

  • Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, K. (2008) Periodization and Sovereignty. How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fabian, J. (1983) Time and the Other. How Anthropology Makes its Objects, New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Foucault, M. (1970) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York: Random House.

  • Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge, New York: Tavistock.

  • Koselleck, R. (1988 [1959]) Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society, Hamburg and New York: Berg Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rabinow, P. and Stavrianakis, A. (2019) Inquiry after Modernism, Berkeley, CA: ARC Press.

  • Roitman, J. (2014) Anti-crisis, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Roitman, J. (2021a) Adjacency and succession, Feschschrift: Paul Rabinow. Special Issue of HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 11(2): 7626. doi: 10.1086/716846

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roitman, J. (2021b) Framing the crisis: COVID-19, Arena Online,

  • Said, E. (1979) Orientalism, New York: Vintage Books.

  • 1 The New School, , USA

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 18 18 18
Full Text Views 14 14 4
PDF Downloads 16 16 5