Problems in protections for working data subjects: the social relations of data production

Author:
Phoebe V. MooreUniversity of Essex School of Business, UK and International Labour Organization, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Phoebe V. Moore in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

‘Problems in protections for working data subjects: the social relations of data production’ argues that existing AI and data and privacy regulation do not sufficiently provide protections from harm in the context of data extraction and mining. This is because the approaches taken are individualist in relational positioning and do not take into account differences across data subject types. The argument updates legal philosophical arguments rooted in propertarian and identitarian assumptions for how data harms can be prevented, arguing that what is needed is a discussion of the social relations of data production and the portrayal of a constellation of power relations rather than identifying a data subject as suspended in midair.

  • Abraha, H. (2022) EU member states’ use of art 88 gdpr. talk for algorithms at work, Oxford Law Faculty, (Accessed: 3 Mar 2022).

  • Adams-Prassl, J. (2020) What if your boss was an algorithm? The rise of artificial intelligence at work, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 41(1): 12346.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ajunwa, I. (2020) The ‘black box’ at work, Big Data & Society, 7(2): 16. doi: 10.1186/s40537-019-0278-0

  • Aloisi, A. and De Stefano, V. (2022) Your Boss is an Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence, Platform Work and Labour, Oxford: Hart Publishing Bloomsbury.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andrew, J. and Baker, M. (2021) The General Data Protection Regulation in the age of surveillance capitalism, Journal of Business Ethics, 168: 56578. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04239-z

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bloom, P. (2019) Monitored: Business and Surveillance in a Time of Big Data, London: Pluto Press.

  • Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2007) The New Spirit of Capitalism, London: Verso.

  • Braidotti, R. (2014) Writing as a nomadic subject, Comparative Critical Studies, 11(2–3): 16384. doi: 10.3366/ccs.2014.0122

  • Cornell Legal Information Institute (2022a) Definition of natural person, open access to law, Retrieved from www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_person.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cornell Legal Information Institute (2022b) Definition of artificial person, open access to law, Retrieved from www.law.cornell.edu/wex/artificial_person.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cornell Legal Information Institute (2022c) Definition of consent, open access to law, Retrieved from www.law.cornell.edu/wex/consent.

  • De Stefano, V. (2022) AI and digital tools in workplace management and evaluation: An assessment of the EU’s legal framework, European Parliamentary Research Service, Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA) PE 729.516 May 2022, Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/729516/EPRS_STU(2022)729516_EN.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission (EC) (2021) AI act draft proposal for a regulation of the european parliament and of the council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts {SEC(2021) 167 final} – {SWD(2021) 84 final} – {SWD(2021) 85 final} (Brussels, 21 April 2021), Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power, Critical Inquiry, 8(4): 77795. doi: 10.1086/448181

  • GDPR (2020) Article 4.1: Definitions, Retrieved from https://gdpr.eu/article-4-definitions/.

  • Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Q. Hoare and G.N. Smith (trans and ed) New York: International Publishers.

  • Hayles, N.K. (2017) Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Unconscious, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Kennedy, H., Poell, T. and van Dijck, J. (2015) Data and agency, Big Data & Society, 3(1–2).

  • Köchling, A. and Wehner, M.C. (2020) Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development, Business Research, 13(3): 795848.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lazzarato, M. (2021) Capital Hates Everyone: Fascism or Revolution, California, USA: semiotext(e).

  • Lordon, F. (2014) Willing Slaves of Capital, London and New York: Verso.

  • Moore, P.V. (2010) The International Political Economy of work and Employability, London: Palgrave Macmillan, International Political Economy Series.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore, P.V. (2020) Data Subjects, Digital Surveillance, AI and the Future of Work, Brussels: European Parliament Science and Technology Office. Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2020)656305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Neil, C. (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction, New York: Crown.

  • OECD (1980) Guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data, Retrieved from www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/oecdguidelinesontheprotectionofprivacyandtransborderflowsofpersonaldata.htm#part1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pakes, A. (2020) data protection impact assessments: guide for union representatives. prospect, Retrieved from https://d28j9ucj9uj44t.cloudfront.net/uploads/2020/12/prospect-dpia-workers-guide.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pasquale, F. (2016) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

  • Purtova, N. (2021) From knowing by Name to Personalisation: meaning of identification under the GDPR, Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3849943 or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3849943.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pybus, J., Cote, M. and Blanke, T. (2015) Hacking the social life of Big Data, Big Data & Society, 2(2): 110, Retrieved from doi: 10.1177/2053951715616649.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • The Economist (2017) The world’s most valuable resources is no longer oil but data, 6 May 2017, Retrieved from www.economist.com/leaders/2017/05/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-resource-is-no-longer-oil-but-data.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trzaskowski, J. (2021) Your Privacy Is Important to Us! - Restoring Human Dignity in Data-Driven Marketing, Copenhagen: Ex Tuto Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Dijck, J. (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology, Surveillance and Society, 12(2): 197208. doi: 10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Veale, M. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2021) Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence act, Computer Law Review International, Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/38p5f.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Viljoen, S. (2021) Democratic data: a relational theory for data governance, Yale Law Journal, 12(2): 573654.

  • Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power, London: Profile Books Ltd.

Phoebe V. MooreUniversity of Essex School of Business, UK and International Labour Organization, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Phoebe V. Moore in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 414 414 10
Full Text Views 13 13 1
PDF Downloads 19 19 1

Altmetrics

Dimensions