Data labour as alienated or liberated labour? Proposals for radical economic change from the Silicon Valley in the light of technological reification

Author:
Jörg NowakUniversidade de Brasilia, Brazil

Search for other papers by Jörg Nowak in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

This article delivers a critical analysis of the proposal to pay wages or royalties to data providers for any form of provision of digital data. It has been developed primarily by researchers of the Microsoft research department. The proposal to create mediators of individual data as trade unions of data providers aims at economic inclusion of everyday users of computers and smartphones. The article analyses the shortcomings of the proposal which does not consider the issue that many workers are obliged to provide data at their workplaces, and the problem of increasing digital tracking of workers’ productive activities. Furthermore, the proposal to pay wages for everyday activities lacks any strategy or vision to create more meaningful and satisfying work relations.

  • Altman, S. (2016) Moving forward on basic income, 31 May, www.ycombinator.com/blog/moving-forward-on-basic-income/.

  • Arrieta-Ibarra, I., Goff, L., Jiménez-Hernandéz, D., Lanier, J. and Weyl, E.G. (2018) Should we treat data as labor? Moving beyond ‘Free’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108: 3842. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20181003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Autor, D. (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3): 330. doi: 10.1257/jep.29.3.3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Azhar, S. (2021) Consumption, capital and class in digital space: the political economy of pay-per-click business models, Rethinking Marxism, 33(2): 196216. doi: 10.1080/08935696.2020.1750196

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barbrook, R. and Cameron, A. (1996) The Californian ideology, Science as Culture, 6(1): 4472. doi: 10.1080/09505439609526455

  • Caraway, B. (2011) Audience labour in the new media environment: a marxian revisiting of the audience commodity, Media, Culture & Society, 33(5): 693708. doi: 10.1177/0163443711404463

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chamberlain, J.A. (2018) Undoing Work, Rethinking Community. A Critique of the Social Function of Work, Ithaca and London: ILR Press.

  • Federici, S. (1973) Wages Against Housework, Bristol: Power of Women Collective/Falling Wall Press.

  • Federici, S. (2012) Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, Brooklyn/Oakland: Common Notions/PM Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisher, E. (2015) The dialectics of prosumption in the digital age, in O. Frayssé and M. O’Neil (eds) Digital Labour and Prosumer Capitalism, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 12544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frayssé, O. (2015) Is the concept of rent relevant to a discussion of surplus value in the digital world?, in C. Fuchs and E. Fisher (eds) Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 17287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fuchs, C. (2014) Digital Labour and Karl Marx, New York: Routledge.

  • Galbraith, J.K. (1952) American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, New York City: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Gorz, A. (1999) Re-Claiming Work. Beyond the Wage-Based Society, Cambridge: Polity.

  • Graeber, D. (2018) Bullshit Jobs: A Theory, New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • Guo, E. (2021) Universal basic income is here – it just looks different from what you expected, 7 May, www.technologyreview.com/2021/05/07/1024674/ubi-guaranteed-income-pandemic/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hughes, C. (2018) Fair Shot. Rethinking Inequality and How We Earn, New York: St Martin’s Press.

  • Jhally, S. and Livant, B. (1986) Watching as working: the valorization of audience consciousness, Journal of Communication, 36(3): 12443. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01442.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Karatzogianni, A. and Matthews, J. (2020) Platform ideologies: ideological production in digital intermediation platforms and structural effectivity in the ‘sharing economy’, Television/New Media, 21(1): 95114. doi: 10.1177/1527476418808029

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lanier, J. and Weyl, E.G. (2018) A blueprint for a better digital society, Harvard Business Review, 26 September, https://hbr.org/2018/09/a-blueprint-for-a-better-digital-society.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marcuse, H. (1955) Eros and Civilization: Philosophical Inquiry Into Freud, Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Marx, K. (1978) Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844, in R. Tucker (ed) The Marx-Engels Reader, New York: W.W. Norton, pp 66125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore, P. (2018) The Quantified Self in Precarity: Work, Technology and What Counts, London: Palgrave.

  • Moore, P. and Taylor, P.A. (2009) Exploitation of the self in Community-based software production: workers’ freedoms or firm foundations?, Capital and Class, 97: 99120. doi: 10.1177/030981680909700106

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morozov, E. (2014) To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist, London: Penguin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plantin, J.C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P.N. and Sandvig, C. (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook, New Media and Society, 20(1): 293310. doi: 10.1177/1461444816661553

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Posner, E.A. (2021) The rise of the labor-antitrust movement, CPI Columns, 16, www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/the-rise-of-the-labor-antitrust-movement/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Posner, E.A. and Weyl, E.G. (2018) Radical Markets. Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ritzer, G. (1995) The McDonaldization of Society, Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.

  • Schaupp, S. (2022) Cybernetic proletarianization: spirals of devaluation and conflict in digitalized production, Capital and Class, 46(1): 131. doi: 10.1177/03098168211017614

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smythe, D.W. (1977) Communications: blindspot of western Marxism, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1(3): 127.

  • Terranova, T. (2000) Free labor. Producing culture for the digital economy, Social Text 63, 18(2): 3358. doi: 10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Toffler, A. (1980) The Third Wave, New York: Bantam Books.

  • Zuboff, S. (2015) Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization, Journal of Information Technology, 30: 7589. doi: 10.1057/jit.2015.5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zuboff, S. (2019a) Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action, New Labor Forum, 28(1): 1029. doi: 10.1177/1095796018819461

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zuboff, S. (2019b) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, London: Profile Books.

Jörg NowakUniversidade de Brasilia, Brazil

Search for other papers by Jörg Nowak in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 621 621 26
Full Text Views 26 26 2
PDF Downloads 33 33 2

Altmetrics

Dimensions