| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1920 | 748 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 2487 | 2456 | 137 |
| PDF Downloads | 478 | 439 | 86 |
| EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Technological sovereignty in Germany: techno-industrial policy as a form of economic statecraft?
Search for other papers by Philipp Staab in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Marc Pirogan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Dominik Piétron in
Current site
Google Scholar
Technological sovereignty has emerged as a prominent topic, with states positioning themselves to ensure security and economic competitiveness. However, German economic policy rarely involved strategic government interventions and industrial policies due to its deep-rooted adherence to ordoliberalism. In response to the influence of foreign big tech companies and growing economic competition from China, the German state is now formulating a strategic techno-industrial policy agenda, advocating interventions for the preservation of sovereignty. This article analyses the proposed agenda using an inductive process-tracing approach (Trampusch and Palier, 2016) and document analysis (Bowen, 2009) of strategy papers, policy documents and selected media reports. Drawing on the concepts of structural power (Strange, 2004 [1988]) and economic statecraft (Weiss and Thurbon, 2021), we argue that Germany’s pursuit of technological sovereignty represents a distinctive form of (geo-)economically motivated statecraft, primarily directed at enhancing commercial competitiveness rather than prioritising security. However, we identify limitations to this approach where the regulatory regime and institutional legacy, both at the national and EU levels, impede strategic government interventions in the economy, thus constraining the pursuit of technological sovereignty.
-
Alvarez, S. (2021) Regierung muss Cyberagentur neu aufstellen, Wirtschaftswoche, https://www.wiwo.de/politik/deutschland/cybersicherheit-regierung-muss-cyberagentur-neu-aufstellen-/27170612.html.
-
Beyer, J. (2004) Leaving tradition behind: Deutsche Bank, Allianz and the dismantling of, Deutschland AG, in M. Nollert, H. Scholtz and P. Ziltener (eds) Wirtschaft in soziologischer Perspektive: Diskurs und empirische Analysen, Münster:Lit Verlag, pp 177–92.
-
Block, F. (2008) Swimming against the current: the rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States, Politics & Society, 36(2): 169–206. doi: 10.1177/0032329208318731
-
BMBF [Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung] (2018) Eckpunktepapier der Agentur zur Förderung von Sprunginnovationen, https://www.bmbf.de/bmbf/shareddocs/downloads/files/eckpunkte-der-agentur-zur-foer-g-von-sprunginnovationen_final.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
-
BMBF [Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung] (2021) Technologisch souverän die Zukunft gestalten. BMBF-Impulspapier zur technologischen Souveränität, https://www.bmbf.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/de/bmbf/5/24032_Impulspapier_zur_technologischen_Souveraenitaet.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4.
-
BMBF [Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung] (2022) Stark-Watzinger: Wir wollen die SPRIND auf die nächste Stufe heben. Pressemitteilung: 21/2022, https://www.bmbf.de/bmbf/shareddocs/pressemitteilungen/de/2022/03/140322-SPRIND.html.
-
BMF [Bundesministerium der Finanzen] (2021) Zukunftsfonds, https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Standardartikel/Themen/Internationales_Finanzmarkt/zukunftsfonds.html.
-
BMF [Bundesministerium der Finanzen] (2022) Beteiligungsbericht des Bundes 2021, https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Downloads/Broschueren_Bestellservice/beteiligungsbericht-des-bundes-2021.html.
-
BMWi [Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie] (2019a, 5 February) National Industrial Strategy 2030: Strategic guidelines for a German and European industrial policy.
-
BMWi [Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie] (2019b, 29 November) Industrial Strategy 2030: Guidelines for a German and European industrial policy.
-
BMWi [Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie] (2021) Schriftliche Frage an die Bundesregierung im Monat September 2021 Frage Nr. 269, https://annachristmann.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/210922_Antwort_SF_Abfluss-Zukunftsfonds_Christmann.pdf.
-
BMWK [Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz] (2022a) Cloud-IPCEI in den Startlöchern: 26 deutsche Unternehmen und 750 Millionen Euro Förderung, https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Pressemitteilungen/2022/04/20220408-cloud-ipcei-in-den-startlochern.html.
-
BMWK [Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz] (2022b) Bundeswirtschaftsministerium legt Entwurf zur Verschärfung des Wettbewerbsrechts vor, https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Meldung/2022/20220920-bmwk-legt-entwurf-zur-verscharfung-des-wettbewerbsrechts-vor.html.
-
Bowen, G.A. (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2): 27–40. doi: 10.3316/qrj0902027
-
Braun, B., Gabor, D. and Hübner, M. (2018) Governing through financial markets: towards a critical political economy of Capital Markets Union, Competition & Change, 22(2): 101–16. doi: 10.1177/1024529418759476
-
Buest, R., Kranawetter, M., Petri, G., Haynes, T., Buschek, A., MacLellan, S., Hoeppe, A., Cannon, N. and Heiser, J. (2021) Market Trends: Europe Aims to Achieve Digital Sovereignty With GAIA-X, Gartner Research.
-
Bundeskartellamt (2021) Proceeding against Google based on new rules for large digital players (Section 19a GWB), https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2021/25_05_2021_Google_19a.html?nn=3591568.
-
Chazan, G. (2016) German angst over Chinese M&A, Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/e0897e24-598e-11e6-8d05-4eaa66292c32.
-
Crespi, F., Caravella, S., Menghini, M. and Salvatori, C. (2021) European technological sovereignty: an emerging framework for policy strategy, Inter Economics, 56(6): 348–54. doi: 10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6
-
Ebner, A. and Täube, F.A. (2010) Dynamics and challenges of innovation in Germany, in A. López-Claros (ed) The Innovation for Development Report 2009–2010, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp 183–97.
-
EFI [Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation] (2021) Report on Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany, https://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Assets/Gutachten/2021/EFI_Report_2021.pdf.
-
Espinoza, J. (2021) Breton accuses US commerce secretary of campaigning for Big Tech, Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/d80c0c3a-460b-47b9-bab3-dfb114a40dd1.
-
European Commission (2005) Staatliche Beihilfe Nr. N 34/2005 - Deutschland High-Tech Gründerfonds, C(2005)585 fin, https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/197706/197706_518160_27_2.pdf.
-
European Commission (2021) Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery, European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/ip_21_1884/IP_21_1884_EN.pdf.
-
Farrell, H. and Newman, A.L. (2019) Weaponized interdependence: how global economic networks shape state coercion, International Security, 44(1): 42–79. doi: 10.1162/isec_a_00351
-
Federal Foreign Office (2021) Speech by Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock on the occasion of her inauguration at the Federal Foreign Office, https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/newsroom/news/baerbock-handover/2500506.
-
Gawer, A. (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework, Research Policy, 43(7): 1239–49. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
-
Grüner, S. (2014) Ensuring economic growth and socioeconomic stabilization: industrial policy in West Germany, 1950–1975, in C. Grabas and A. Nützenadel (eds) Industrial Policy in Europe after 1945: Wealth, Power and Economic Development in the Cold War, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 86–112.
-
Haggart, B. (2019) Taking knowledge seriously: towards an international political economy theory of knowledge governance, in B. Haggart, K. Henne and N. Tusikov (eds) Information, Technology and Control in a Changing World: Understanding Power Structures in the 21st Century, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp 25–51.
-
Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Hargadon, A.B. and Kenney, M. (2012) Misguided policy? Following venture capital into clean technology, California Management Review, 54(2): 118–39. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2012.54.2.118
-
Haskel, J. and Westlake, S. (2018) Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Heuberger, S. (2021) Chef der Innovationsagentur Sprind: “Die Kanzlerin sagte mir: ‘Halte durch, schmeiß nicht hin!’”, Gründerszene, https://www.businessinsider.de/gruenderszene/podcast-gruenderszene/podcast-so-geht-startup-89-sprind-rafael-laguna-de-la-vera-a/.
-
Holzki, L. (2022) Fremde Welten: Start-ups und Bundeswehr, Handelsblatt.
-
KfW [Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau] (2020) KfW Venture Capital Studie 2020, https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-Studien-und-Materialien/KfW-Venture-Capital-Studie-2020.pdf.
-
Lütz, S. (1993) Die Steuerung Industrieller Forschungskooperation, Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
-
March, C. and Schieferdecker, I. (2021) Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky, CESifo Working Papers, 9139.
-
Markl, V. (2018) Eine nationale Daten- und Analyseinfrastruktur als Grundlage digitaler Souveränität, Informatik Spektrum, 41(6): 433–9. doi: 10.1007/s00287-018-01136-z
-
May, C. (1996) Strange fruit: Susan Strange’s theory of structural power in the international political economy, Global Society, 10(2): 167–89. doi: 10.1080/13600829608443105
-
Mazzucato, M. (2015) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, London: Anthem Press.
-
Mazzucato, M. (2018) The entrepreneurial state: socializing both risks and rewards, Real-World Economics Review, 84: 201–17.
-
Mertens, D. and Thiemann, M. (2019) Building a hidden investment state? The European Investment Bank, national development banks and European economic governance, Journal of European Public Policy, 26(1): 23–43. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1382556
-
Pohle, J. and Thiel, T. (2020) Digital sovereignty, Internet Policy Review, 9(4).
-
Quack, S. and Djelic, M.L. (2005) Adaptation, recombination, and reinforcement: the story of antitrust and competition law in Germany and Europe, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp 255–81.
-
Roland Berger (2018) Venture capital: Treibstoff für Innovationen, Wachstum und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_treibstoff_venture_capital.pdf.
-
Schneider, E. (2022) Germany’s industrial strategy 2030, EU competition policy and the Crisis of New Constitutionalism (Geo-)political economy of a contested paradigm shift, New Political Economy, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2022.2091535
-
Schroeder, W. (2017) ‘Industrie 4.0 und der Rheinische Kooperative Kapitalismus’, WISO Direkt, 3/2017.
-
Shonfield, A. (1965) Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public & Private Power, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
SIPRI [Stockholm International Peace Research Institute] (2022) World military expenditure passes $2 trillion for first time, https://sipri.org/media/press-release/2022/world-military-expenditure-passes-2-trillion-first-time.
-
Soskice, D. (1997) German technology policy, innovation, and national institutional frameworks, Industry and Innovation, 4(1): 75–96. doi: 10.1080/13662719700000005
-
Staab, P., Sieron, S. and Piétron, D. (2022) Counter-hegemonic neoliberalism: making sense of EU platform regulation, Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, forthcoming.
-
Startupdetector (2022) Startupdetector Report 2021, https://startupdetector.de/reports/startupdetector-report-2021.pdf?mc_cid=5486e61681&mc_eid=17798bd11e.
-
Strange, S. (1989) Toward a theory of transnational empire, in W. Väth (ed) Political Regulation in the ‘Great Crisis’, Berlin: edition sigma, pp 25–42.
-
Strange, S. (2004 [1988]) States and Markets, 2nd edn, London/New York: Continuum.
-
The German Presidency of the EU Council (2020) Together for Europe’s recovery: programme for Germany’s Presidency of the Council of the European Union (1 July to 31 December 2020). Council of the European Union.
-
Thurbon, E. (2016) Developmental Mindset: The Revival of Financial Activism in South Korea, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
-
Thurbon, E. and Weiss, L. (2019) Economic statecraft at the frontier: Korea’s drive for intelligent robotics, Review of International Political Economy, 28(1): 103–27. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1655084
-
Trampusch, C. and Palier, B. (2016) Between X and Y: how process tracing contributes to opening the black box of causality, New Political Economy, 21: 437–54. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2015.1134465
-
Weaver, C. (2022) Congress passes $280bn Chips and Science Act, Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/d1e5bb5d-da09-488b-8430-a05d8016a95f.
-
Weber, S. (2017) Data, development, and growth, Business and Politics, 19(3): 397–423. doi: 10.1017/bap.2017.3
-
Weiss, L. (2014) America Inc.? Innovation and Enterprise in the National Security Sate, Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
-
Weiss, L. and Thurbon, E. (2021) Developmental state or economic statecraft? Where, why and how the difference matters, New Political Economy, 26(3): 472–89. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2020.1766431
-
Zysman, J. (1983) Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Search for other papers by Philipp Staab in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Marc Pirogan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Dominik Piétron in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1920 | 748 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 2487 | 2456 | 137 |
| PDF Downloads | 478 | 439 | 86 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk