| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 7357 | 6286 | 392 |
| Full Text Views | 187 | 158 | 5 |
| PDF Downloads | 177 | 139 | 7 |
| EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Beyond sovereignty as authority: the multiplicity of European approaches to digital sovereignty
Search for other papers by Daniel Lambach in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Linda Monsees in
Current site
Google Scholar
Digital Sovereignty is core to many contemporary debates on the regulation of digital technology, securing supply chains and strengthening the digital economy. In this paper, we focus on the European debates and policies around this project. We argue that the notion of digital sovereignty should be understood more as an overarching economic, societal and geopolitical project, rather than a project aimed at achieving any kind of political sovereignty or autarky in the digital sector. We arrive at this conclusion by analysing European policy documents and commentaries from various stakeholders for two cases: platform governance and semiconductors. The case of platform governance shows how the EU and its member states struggle to extend their regulatory power over the ‘data monopolies’ of the major Silicon Valley companies. The other is semiconductors, where the EU has kick-started several projects to improve the competitiveness of European manufacturers in a highly integrated global market. These examples demonstrate two things: a) that the pursuit of digital sovereignty does have some impact on the Internet (platform regulation) but also extends to other technological fields beyond it (semiconductors) and b) that digital sovereignty is not only a regulatory or technological project but also an economic, societal and geopolitical one.
-
Alam, S., Chu, I., Lohokare, S. and Saito, S. (2020) Globality and complexity of the semiconductor ecosystem – Accenture and GSA study, https://www.gsaglobal.org/globality-and-complexity-of-the-semiconductor-ecosystem/.
-
Atal, M.R. (2021) The Janus faces of Silicon Valley, Review of International Political Economy, 28(2): 336–50. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2020.1830830
-
Bellanger, P. (2014) La Souveraineté Numérique, Paris: Éditions Stock.
-
Bellanova, R., Carrapico, H. and Duez, D. (2022) Digital/sovereignty and European security integration: an introduction, European Security, 31(3): 337–55. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2022.2101887
-
Bendiek, A. and Stürzer, I. (2022) Advancing European Internal and External Digital Sovereignty: The Brussels Effect and the EU-US Trade and Technology Council, Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
-
Bietti, E. (2022) A genealogy of digital platform regulation, SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3859487
-
Bradford, A. (2020) The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Bundesregierung (2020) Together for Europe’s recovery: programme for Germany’s Presidency of the Council of the European Union (1 July to 31 December 2020): Council of the European Union.
-
Bundesverband der deutschen Industrie (2020) Europas Dgitale Souveränität Nachhaltig Stärken, Berlin: Bundesverband der deutschen Industrie.
-
Burwell, F.G. and Propp, K. (2020) The European Union and the search for digital sovereignty: building ‘Fortress Europe’ or preparing for a new world? Atlantic Council.
-
Cartwright, M. (2020) Internationalising state power through the internet: Google, Huawei and geopolitical struggle, Internet Policy Review, 9(3).
-
Celeste, E. (2021) Digital sovereignty in the EU: challenges and future perspectives, in F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste and J. Quinn (eds) Data Protection Beyond Borders: Transatlantic Perspectives on Extraterritoriality and Sovereignty, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp 211–28.
-
Chander, A. and Sun, H. (2021) Sovereignty 2.0: University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper 2021/041.
-
Chenou, J.M. (2014) From cyber-libertarianism to neoliberalism: internet exceptionalism, multi-stakeholderism, and the institutionalisation of internet governance in the 1990s, Globalizations, 11(2): 205–23. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2014.887387
-
Christakis, T. (2020) ‘European Digital Sovereignty’: Successfully Navigating Between the ‘Brussels Effect’ and Europe’s Quest for Strategic Autonomy, Grenoble: Multidisciplinary Institute on Artificial Intelligence/Grenoble Alpes Data Institute.
-
Christou, G., Croft, S., Ceccorulli, M. and Lucarelli, S. (2010) European union security governance: putting the ‘security’ back in, European Security, 19(3): 341–59. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2010.526109
-
Couture, S. and Toupin, S. (2019) What does the notion of ‘sovereignty’ mean when referring to the digital?, New Media & Society, 21(10): 2305–22. doi: 10.1177/1461444819865984
-
Dewey, J. (1999) The Public and Its Problems, Athens: Swallow Press.
-
Drake, W.J., Cerf, V.G. and Kleinwächter, W. (2016) Internet Fragmentation: An Overview, Geneva: World Economic Forum.
-
Economist (2020) Who will benefit most from the data economy?, The Economist, https://www.economist.com/special-report/2020/02/20/who-will-benefit-most-from-the-data-economy, (Accessed: 20 Feb 2020).
-
Eriksson, J. and Giacomello, G. (2006) The information revolution, security, and international relations: (IR)relevant theory?, International Political Science Review, 27(3): 221–44. doi: 10.1177/0192512106064462
-
European Commission (2020) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC, Brussels: European Commission, COM (2020) 825, 15 December 2020, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?qid=1608117147218&uri=COM%3A2020%3A825%3AFIN.
-
European Commission (2021) Declaration of the industrial alliance for processors and semiconductor technologies, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/alliance-processors-and-semiconductor-technologies.
-
European Commission (2022a) Data Act: commission proposes measures for a fair and innovative data economy. Press release, 23 February 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_1113.
-
European Commission (2022b) Alliance on processors and semiconductor technologies. Shaping Europe’s digital future. 2022, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/alliance-processors-and-semiconductor-technologies.
-
European Commission (2022c) European chips act: factsheet. Shaping Europe’s digital future, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/european-chips-act-factsheet.
-
European Institute of Innovation & Technology (2020) European digital infrastructure and data sovereignty. A policy perspective.
-
European Union (2020) Joint declaration on processors and semiconductor technologies, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/joint-declaration-processors-and-semiconductor-technologies.
-
Ezell, S. (2020) An Allied Approach to Semiconductor Leadership. Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, Washington DC: Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, https://itif.org/publications/2020/09/17/allied-approach-semiconductor-leadership.
-
Farrand, B. and Carrapico, H. (2022) Digital sovereignty and taking back control: from regulatory capitalism to regulatory mercantilism in EU cybersecurity, European Security, 31(3): 435–53. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2022.2102896
-
Farrell, H. (2003) Constructing the international foundations of E-Commerce: the EU-US safe harbor arrangement, International Organization, 57(2): 277–306. doi: 10.1017/s0020818303572022
-
Fischer, D. (2022) The digital sovereignty trick: why the sovereignty discourse fails to address the structural dependencies of digital capitalism in the global south, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. doi: 10.1007/s41358-022-00316-4
-
Floridi, L. (2020) The fight for digital sovereignty: what it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU, Philosophy & Technology, 33(3): 369–78. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6
-
Flyverbom, M., Deibert, R. and Matten, D. (2019) The governance of digital technology, big data, and the internet: new roles and responsibilities for business, Business & Society, 58(1): 3–19. doi: 10.1177/0007650317727540
-
Gesellschaft für Informatik (2020) Schlüsselaspekte Digitaler Souveränität.
-
Gillespie, T. (2010) The politics of ‘platforms’, New Media & Society, 12(3): 347–64. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342738
-
Glasze, G., Cattaruzza, A., Douzet, F., Dammann, F., Bertran, M.G., Bômont, C., Braun, M., Danet, D., Desforges, A., Géry, A., et al. (2022) Contested spatialities of digital sovereignty, Geopolitics. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2022.2050070
-
Goodkind, N. (2021) Biden administration sounds the alarm on the semiconductor crisis, Fortune Magazine, https://fortune.com/2021/07/16/biden-administration-sounds-the-alarm-on-the-semiconductor-crisis/, (Accessed: 17 Jul 2021).
-
Guzzini, S. (ed) (2013) The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Hobbs, C. (2020) Europe’s Digital Sovereignty: From Rulemaker to Superpower in the Age of US-China Rivalry, London: European Council on Foreign Relations.
-
Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M. and Dabrock, P. (2021) Data sovereignty: a review, Big Data & Society, 8(1). doi: 10.1177/2053951720982012
-
Jiang, M. (2010) Authoritarian informationalism: China’s approach to internet sovereignty, SAIS Review of International Affairs, 30(2): 71–89. doi: 10.1353/sais.2010.0006
-
Kagermann, H. and Wilhelm, U. (2020) European Public Sphere: Gestaltung der digitalen Souveränität Europas. acatech IMPULS, München acatech.
-
Katzenbach, C. (2021) Die Governance sozialer Medien, in J.H. Schmidt and M. Taddicken (eds) Handbuch Soziale Medien, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
-
Kleinhans, J.P. (2021) The Lack of Semiconductor Manufacturing in Europe. Why the 2nm fab is a Bad Investment, Berlin: Stiftung Neue Verantwortung Policy Brief, March 2021.
-
Kleinhans, J.P. and Baisakova, N. (2020) The Global Semiconductor Value Chain: A Technology Primer for Policy Makers, Berlin: Stiftung Neue Verantwortung, https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/the_global_semiconductor_value_chain.pdf.
-
Lambach, D. (2020) The territorialization of cyberspace, International Studies Review, 22(3): 482–506. doi: 10.1093/isr/viz022
-
Lambach, D. and Oppermann, K. (2022) Narratives of digital sovereignty in German political discourse, Governance. doi: 10.1111/gove.12690
-
Litvinenko, A. (2021) Re-defining borders online: Russia’s strategic narrative on internet sovereignty, Media and Communication, 9(4): 5–15. doi: 10.17645/mac.v9i4.4292
-
Madiega, T. (2020) Digital Sovereignty for Europe, Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/de/document/EPRS_BRI(2020)651992.
-
Mathews, J.A. and Cho, D.S. (2000) Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Miailhe, N. (2018) The geopolitics of artificial intelligence: the return of empires?, Politique étrangère, (3): 105–17. doi: 10.3917/pe.183.0105
-
Miller, J., Keohane, D. and Kana, I. (2021) Car manufacturing hit by global semiconductor shortage, Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/e264fd41-7ee9-4fba-be3c-21446298efd9, (Accessed: 8 Jan 2021).
-
Monsees, L. and Lambach, D. (2022) Digital sovereignty, geopolitical imaginaries, and the reproduction of European identity, European Security, 31(3): 377–94. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2022.2101883
-
Monsees, L., Liebetrau, T., Austin, J.L., Leander, A. and Srivastava, S. (2023) Transversal politics of big tech, International Political Sociology, 17(1): olac020. doi: 10.1093/ips/olac020
-
Mueller, M. (2020) Against sovereignty in cyberspace, International Studies Review, 22(4): 779–801. doi: 10.1093/isr/viz044
-
Nye, J.S. (2014) The Regime Complex for Managing Global Cyber Activities, Global Commission on Internet Governance Paper Series, No. 1, http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12308565.
-
Nyman, J. and Burke, A. (eds) (2016) Ethical Security Studies: A New Research Agenda, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Pasquale, F. (2016) Two narratives of platform capitalism, Yale Law & Policy Review, 35: 309–19.
-
Pearson, G.L. and Brattain, W.H. (1955) History of semiconductor research, Proceedings of the IRE, 43(12): 1794–806. doi: 10.1109/jrproc.1955.278042
-
Peterson, J. and Sharp, M. (1998) Technology Policy in the European Union, Houndmills: Macmillan.
-
Poell, T., Nieborg, D. and van Dijck, J. (2019) Platformisation, Internet Policy Review, 8(4).
-
Pohle, J. and Thiel, T. (2019) Digitale Vernetzung und Souveränität: Genealogie eines Spannungsverhältnisses, in I. Borucki and W.J. Schünemann (eds) Internet und Staat: Perspektiven auf eine komplizierte Beziehung, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp 57–80.
-
Pohle, J. and Thiel, T. (2020) Digital sovereignty, Internet Policy Review, 9(4).
-
Popiel, P. (2022) Regulating datafication and platformization: Policy silos and tradeoffs in international platform inquiries, Policy & Internet, 14(1): 28–46.
-
Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Casolari, F., Morley, J., Taddeo, M. and Floridi, L. (2021) Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: an analysis of statements and policies, Internet Policy Review, 10(3).
-
Rone, J. (2021) The return of the state? Power and legitimacy challenges to EU’s regulation of online disinformation, in B. Haggart, N. Tusikov and J.A. Scholte (eds) Power and Authority in Internet Governance: Return of the State, Cham: Routledge, pp 171–94.
-
Ruohonen, J. (2021) The treachery of images in the digital sovereignty debate, Minds and Machines, 31: 439–56. doi: 10.1007/s11023-021-09566-7
-
Sahin, K. and Barker, T. (2021) Europe’s Capacity to Act in the Global Tech Race: Charting a Path for Europe in Times of Major Technological Disruption, Berlin: German Council on Foreign Relations.
-
Schneider, N. (2022) Governable stacks against digital colonialism, tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 20(1): 19–36. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v20i1.1281
-
Strategic Forum (2019) Strengthening strategic value Chains for a future-ready EU industry. Report of the strategic forum for important projects of common European interest, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/37824.
-
Striphas, T. (2015) Algorithmic culture, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5): 395–412. doi: 10.1177/1367549415577392
-
van Dijck, J. (2020) Governing digital societies: private platforms, public values, Computer Law & Security Review, 36. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105377
-
von der Leyen, U. (2022) Statement by President von der Leyen on the European Chips Act, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_22_866.
-
Zeng, J., Stevens, T. and Chen, Y. (2017) China’s solution to global cyber governance: unpacking the domestic discourse of ‘internet sovereignty’, Politics & Policy, 45(3): 432–64. doi: 10.1111/polp.12202
Search for other papers by Daniel Lambach in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Linda Monsees in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 7357 | 6286 | 392 |
| Full Text Views | 187 | 158 | 5 |
| PDF Downloads | 177 | 139 | 7 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk