Tensions and polarities in the autonomy of family carers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in France

View author details View Less
  • 1 Conservatoire National des Arts et Metiers, , France
  • | 2 Buc-Ressources, , France
  • | 3 Fepem, , France
  • | 4 Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales, , France
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

This article analyses the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on ‘monetised’ family carers’ understanding of their own autonomy in a long-term care relation at home. The reduction or suspension of medico-social service deteriorated the situation of family carers of frail older people or people with disability. We develop and apply an analytical grid of 15 interviews of monetised family carers about the reorganisation of care systems and their situation as carers. We identify three types of understandings of autonomy among family carers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: preventive autonomy; health protection autonomy; and supported autonomy.

  • Boyle, G. (2008) Autonomy in long-term care: a need, a right or a luxury?, Disability & Society, 23(4): 299310. doi: 10.1080/09687590802038795

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, K. (2009) In(ter)dependent lives, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11(2): 11730. doi: 10.1080/15017410902830553

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collopy, B. (1988) Autonomy in long term care: some crucial distinctions, The Gerontologist, 28(Suppl): 1017. doi: 10.1093/geront/28.Suppl.10

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collopy, B., Dubler, N. and Zuckerman, C. (1990) The ethics of home care: autonomy and accommodation, The Hasting Center Report, 1(2): 116. doi: 10.2307/3562626

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dares (2018) Les services à la personne en 2016 – L’activité se stabilise [Personal and domestic services in 2016 – activity stabilises], Dares Résultats, 17, https://dares.travail-emploi.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/pdf/2018-017.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Direction de la Recherche, des Etudes, de l’Evaluation et des Statistiques (DREES) (2019) Les proches aidants des personnes âgées, les chiffres clef, https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2020-08/2019_infographie_aidants_des_personnes_agees_0.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frericks, P., Jensen, P.H. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (2014) Social rights and employment rights related to family care: family care regimes in Europe, Journal of Aging Studies, 29(1): 6677. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giraud, O. (2019) Moral economy or institutionalized employment relations? Conflicting categories in the regulation of remunerated family care work, as a new form of atypical employment in France, communication to the 2019 EspaNet Conference, Stream 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giraud, O., Petiau, A., Trenta, A., Touahria-Gaillard, A. and Rist, B. (2019) Rémunération et statut des aidants – Parcours, transactions familiales et types d’usage des dispositifs d’aide [Remuneration and status of carers – pathways, family transactions and types of use of support schemes], report to the CNSA, Paris, www.cnsa.fr/recherche-et-innovation/resultats-de-recherche/remunerations-et-statuts-des-aidants-et-des-aidantes

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glucksmann, M. (2005) Shifting boundaries and interconnections: extending the ‘total social organization of labour’, The Sociological Review, 53(2_suppl): 1936. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00570.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jenkins, R. (2000) Categorization: identity, social process and epistemology, Current Sociology, 3(48): 725. doi: 10.1177/0011392100048003003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Le Bihan, B., Da Roit, B. and Sopadzhiyan, A. (2019) The turn to optional familialism through the market: long-term care, cash-for-care, and caregiving policies in Europe, Social Policy & Administration, 53(4): 57995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petiau, A. and Rist, B. (2019) Dilemmes moraux et conflictualités autour des frontières du care entre aidé.e.s et aidant.e.s rémunéré.e.s [Moral dilemmas and conflictualities around the boundaries of care between paid and unpaid carers], Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, 1: 13357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pullman, D. (1999) The ethics of autonomy and dignity in long-term care, Canadian Journal on Aging, 18(1): 2646. doi: 10.1017/S0714980800009612

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raffass, T. (2017) Demanding activation, Journal of Social Policy, 46(2): 34965. doi: 10.1017/S004727941600057X

  • Rawls, J. (1990) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Sen, A. (2001) Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Tidiane Diallo, C. and Leroux, I. (2020) L’aide et L’action Sociale en France – Perte D’autonomie, Handicap, Protection de L’enfance et Insertion [Social Assistance and Services in France – Disability, Child Protection and Integration], Paris: Drees.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Touahria-Gaillard, A. and Trenta, A. (2019) La rémunération des aidants profanes dans les politiques du handicap et du vieillissement: entre enrôlement et libre choix des proches de personnes dépendantes [The remuneration of lay carers in disability and ageing policies: between enrolment and free choice for relatives of dependent persons], Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, 1: 199215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care, New York: Routledge.

  • Ungerson, C. (1997) Give them the money: is cash a route to empowerment?, Social Policy and Administration, 31(1): 4553. doi: 10.1111/1467-9515.00036

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ungerson, C. (1999) Personal assistants and disabled people: an examination of a hybrid form of work and care, Work, Employment & Society, 13(4): 583600. doi: 10.1177/09500179922118132

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ungerson, C. (2004) Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on ‘cash for care’ schemes, Aging & Society, 24(2): 189212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ungerson, C. and Yeandle, S. (eds) (2007) Cash for Care Systems in Developed Welfare States, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • 1 Conservatoire National des Arts et Metiers, , France
  • | 2 Buc-Ressources, , France
  • | 3 Fepem, , France
  • | 4 Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales, , France

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2 2 2
PDF Downloads 2 2 2

Altmetrics

Dimensions