A vignette study analysing factors influencing attributions of responsibility to victims and perpetrators of intimate partner violence against women
Search for other papers by Carmen M. Leon in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Eva Aizpurua in
Current site
Google Scholar
Evidence shows that blaming attitudes towards victims of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) are widespread, creating a social climate that condones this form of violence. The aim of the current study is to analyse the potential impact of multiple factors surrounding the scenario and some personal and attitudinal characteristics of the respondents on the responsibility attributed to victims and perpetrators of IPVAW. To achieve this, a factorial survey design in which each respondent (N = 1,007; 51.1% women) received a unique vignette describing a hypothetical case of IPVAW was implemented in an online survey conducted in Spain. We found that most respondents (78.9%) indicated that the victim was not at all responsible for her own victimisation, whereas 73.7 per cent indicated that the perpetrator was very responsible for his own behaviour. Our results also show the prominent role that attitudes, as opposed to many characteristics of the abuse, play in evaluations of victim blame (that is, sexist beliefs and acceptability of IPVAW). Our findings reveal some persistence of victim-blaming attitudes despite years of public awareness and education efforts in Spain.
-
Antai, D. and Antai, J. (2009) Collective violence and attitudes of women toward intimate partner violence: evidence from the Niger Delta, BMC International Health and Human Rights, 9: 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-9-1
-
Araújo, V. and Gatto, M.A.C. (2022) Can conservatism make women more vulnerable to violence?, Comparative Political Studies, 55: 122–53. doi: 10.1177/00104140211024313
-
Auspurg, K. and Hinz, T. (2015) Factorial Survey Experiments, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Auspurg, K., Hinz, T. and Walzenbach, S. (2019) Are factorial survey experiments prone to survey mode effects?, in P. Lavrakas, M. Traugott, C. Kennedy, A. Holbrook, E. de Leeuw and B. West (eds) Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques That Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp 371–92.
-
Blood, R.O., Jr. and Wolfe, D.M. (1960) Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Family Living, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
-
Bosch-Fiol, E. and Ferrer-Pérez, V.A. (2012) Nuevo mapa de los mitos sobre la violencia de género en el siglo XXI, Psicothema, 24: 548–54.
-
Campregher, J. and Jeglic, E.L. (2016) Attitudes toward juvenile sex offender legislation: the influence of case-specific information, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 25: 466–82. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2016.1153558
-
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2020) Macroencuesta de violencia contra la mujer 2019, https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/macroencuesta2015/pdf/Macroencuesta_2019_estudio_investigacion.pdf.
-
Centro Reina Sofía (2021) Barómetro juventud y género 2021. Ideas, representaciones y experiencias de una realidad compleja, https://www.adolescenciayjuventud.org/publicacion/barometro-juventud-genero-2021/.
-
Dülmer, H. (2016) The factorial survey: design selection and its impact on reliability and internal validity, Sociological Methods & Research, 45(2): 304–47. doi: 10.1177/0049124115582269
-
Eigenberg, H. and Policastro, C. (2016) Blaming victims in cases of interpersonal violence: attitudes associated with assigning blame to female victims, Women & Criminal Justice, 26: 37–54. doi: 10.1080/08974454.2014.997417
-
Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N. and Araya, T. (2000) Development and validation of Swedish classical and modern sexism scales, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41: 307–14. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00203
-
European Commission (2010) Special Eurobarometer 344: Domestic violence against women, https://www.frauenrechte.de/images/downloads/hgewalt/ebs_344_en.pdf.
-
European Commission (2016) Special Eurobarometer 449: Gender-based violence, https://data.europa.eu/euodp/data/dataset/S2115_85_3_449_ENG.
-
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014) Violence against women: an EU-wide survey. Results at a glance, https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-vaw-survey-at-a-glance-oct14_en.pdf.
-
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2017) Second European Union minorities and discrimination survey. Main results, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8320df02-da39-11e7-a506-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-search.
-
Ferrer-Pérez, V.A. and Bosch-Fiol, E. (2014) Gender violence as a social problem in Spain: attitudes and acceptability, Sex Roles, 70: 506–21. doi: 10.1007/s11199-013-0322-z
-
Ferrer-Pérez, V.A., Bosch-Fiol, E., Ferreiro-Basurto, V., Delgado-Alvarez, C. and Sánchez-Prada, A. (2020) Comparing implicit and explicit attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women, Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 1–16.
-
Flood, M. and Pease, B. (2009) Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women, Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 10: 125–42. doi: 10.1177/1524838009334131
-
Gonzalo, A. (2009) La aplicación de la ley de medidas de protección integral contra la violencia de género [The enforcement of the Act on Comprehensive Protection Measures Against Gender Violence], Participación Educativa, 11: 105–9.
-
Gracia, E. (2022) Public attitudes toward partner violence against women, in F. Maggino (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Cham: Springer.
-
Gracia, E. and Lila, M. (2015) Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women in the EU, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
-
Gracia, E. and Tomás, J.M. (2014) Correlates of victim-blaming attitudes regarding partner violence against women among the Spanish general population, Violence Against Women, 20: 26–41. doi: 10.1177/1077801213520577
-
Gracia, E., Lila, M. and Santirso, F.A. (2020) Attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a systematic review, European Psychologist, 25: 104–21. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000392
-
Harrison, L.A. and Abrishami, G. (2004) Dating violence attributions: do they differ for in-group and out-group members who have a history of dating violence?, Sex Roles, 51: 543–50. doi: 10.1007/s11199-004-5464-6
-
Heath, E.G. and Sperry, K. (2020) A religious paradox: can priming ideas of God reduce rape victim blame?, Sex Roles. doi: 10.1007/s11199-020-01163-9
-
Herrera, M.C., Expósito, F., Moya, M. and Houston, D. (2012) ‘Having it all’: women’s perception of impact of female promotion on threat of domestic violence, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15: 670–9. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n2.38878
-
Ivert, A.K., Merlo, J. and Gracia, E. (2017) Country of residence, gender equality and victim blaming attitudes about partner violence: a multilevel analysis in EU, European Journal of Public Health, 28: 559–64. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx138
-
Koepke, S., Eyssel, F. and Bohner, G. (2014) ‘She deserved it’: effects of sexism norms, type of violence, and victim’s pre-assault behavior on blame attributions toward female victims and approval of the aggressor’s behavior, Violence Against Women, 20: 446–64. doi: 10.1177/1077801214528581
-
Krosnick, J.A. (1991) Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3): 213–36. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350050305
-
León, C.M. (2020) Actitudes y Creencias Asociadas a la Violencia de Género en España, RUIdeRA: Doctoral dissertation, University of Castilla-La Mancha.
-
Martín-Fernández, M., Gracia, E. and Lila, M. (2018) Assessing victim-blaming attitudes in cases of intimate partner violence against women: development and validation of the VB-IPVAW scale, Psychosocial Intervention, 27: 133–43. doi: 10.5093/pi2018a18
-
Megías, J.L., Toro-García, V. and Carretero-Dios, H. (2018) The acceptance of myths about intimate partner violence against women (AMIVAW) scale: development and validation in Spanish and English, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42: 44–61. doi: 10.1177/0361684317742638
-
Niemi, L. and Young, L. (2016) When and why we see victims as responsible: the impact of ideology on attitudes toward victims, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42: 1227–42. doi: 10.1177/0146167216653933
-
Parent, M.C. and Moradi, B. (2010) Confirmatory factor analysis of the conformity to feminine norms inventory and development of an abbreviated version: the CFNI-45, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34: 97–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01545.x
-
Peters, J. (2008) Measuring myths about domestic violence: development and initial validation of the domestic violence myth acceptance scale, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16: 1–21. doi: 10.1080/10926770801917780
-
Sánchez-Prada, A., Delgado-Alvarez, C., Bosch-Fiol, E., Ferreiro-Basurto, V. and Ferrer-Perez, V.A. (2020) Measurement of supportive attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women among a Spanish-speaker sample, PLoS One, 15: Ke0241292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241392
-
Snyder, M. and Ickes, W. (1985) Personality and social behavior, in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edn, New York: Random House, pp 883–948.
-
Sorenson, S.B. and Taylor, C.A. (2005) Female aggression toward male intimate partners: an examination of social norms in a community-based sample, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29: 78–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00170.x
-
Stefanelli, A. and Lukac, M. (2020) Subjects, trials, and levels: statistical power in conjoint experiments. SocArXiv spkcy, Center for Open Science. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/spkcy
-
Taylor, C.A. and Sorenson, S.B. (2005) Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context, Sex Roles, 53: 573–89. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-7143-7
-
Vives-Cases, C., La Parra-Casado, D., Gil-González, D. and Caballero, P. (2018) Acceptability of violence against women among the Roma population in Spain, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–18. doi: 10.1177/0886260518807910
-
Waltermaurer, E. (2012) Public justification of intimate partner violence: a review of the literature, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13: 167–75. doi: 10.1177/1524838012447699
-
Wandrei, M.L. (2000) Professional psychologists’ conceptualization of intimate partner violence, Psychotherapy, 37: 270–83. doi: 10.1037/h0087788
-
Weingarten, C.A. (2016) Intimate Partner Violence and Victim Blaming, (Unpublished Master’s dissertation), Chicago, IL: DePaul University.
-
Witte, T.H., Schroeder, D.A. and Lohr, J.M. (2006) Blame for intimate partner violence: an attributional analysis, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25: 647–67. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.6.647
-
Witte, T.H., Kopkin, M.R. and Hollis, S.D. (2015) Is it dating violence or just ‘drunken behaviour’? Judgments of intimate partner violence when the perpetrator is under the influence of alcohol, Substance Use & Misuse, 50: 1421–26. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1018539
-
Worden, A.P. and Carlson, B.E. (2005) Attitudes and beliefs about domestic violence: results of a public opinion survey. II Beliefs about causes, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20: 1219–43. doi: 10.1177/0886260505278531
-
World Health Organization (2021) Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256.
Supplementary Materials
- Supplementary_AppendixS1.docx (DOC 23 KB)
Search for other papers by Carmen M. Leon in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Eva Aizpurua in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1514 | 1120 | 198 |
| Full Text Views | 366 | 344 | 29 |
| PDF Downloads | 327 | 308 | 29 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk