Hayek, Arrow, and the Problems of Democratic Decision–Making
Search for other papers by Peter J. Boettke in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Peter T. Leeson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Both Hayek and Arrow provide arguments about the inability of the vote process to yield a coherent social choice. Hayek demonstrated that planning is incompatible with democracy; its coherence requires dictatorship. Arrow demonstrated that voting fails to produce rational social choices; social rationality can be assured only when there is a single will. In both, the substitution of a single will for the many wills is ruled as incompatible with a free society. Because market socialism relies upon either the existence of a meaningful, stable social welfare function or democratic decision-making to allocate resources, the complementary arguments of Hayek and Arrow imply that market socialism requires dictatorship to achieve coherence.
Search for other papers by Peter J. Boettke in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Peter T. Leeson in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 411 | 275 | 36 |
| Full Text Views | 14 | 8 | 1 |
| PDF Downloads | 9 | 8 | 0 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk