Adam Smith and the problem of unintended consequences

Author:
Lorenzo Infantino LUISS-Guido Carli, Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Lorenzo Infantino in
Current site
Google Scholar Close
Article Category:
Research Article
Copyright:
© AESP 2020
Online Publication Date:
01 Oct 2020
Pages:
219–236
Publisher:
Bristol University Press
Volume/Issue:
Volume 35: Issue 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1332/251569120X15971433500236
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article
Buy article/chapter (
GBP  £25.00
)

Over the years, libraries have accumulated an enormous number of books concerning the work of Adam Smith. Yet, research covering the methodology adopted by the great Scot occupies very little space. This is probably due to the fact that, while Smith was an all-round scholar, specialisation in research activity has progressively reduced the scope of knowledge of each of us. It is therefore rare to find one researcher covering Smith’s entire opus. If, however, we manage to overcome the barriers of specialisation, it is possible to perceive a common denominator that holds the various phases of Smith’s activity together. This denominator is methodological in nature. From his History of astronomy, Smith set himself the problem of the unintended consequences of intentional human actions. He understood that looking at everything that happens as a direct outcome of human will or divine will prevents us from seeing that there is a ‘third person’ that we must take into account: social interaction – that is to say, the process of co-adaptation of individual plans from which, without any design on our part, our rules and institutions are born. Attention to unintended consequences is present in every one of Smith’s works, and it touches on topics ranging from the origin of moral rules to the formation of the self, and from social cooperation to the delimitation of the sphere of intervention of public power.

  • Aristotle (1933) Metaphysics, London and New York, NY: Heinemann and Putnam.

  • Bay, C. (1958) Structure of Freedom, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Bentham, J. (1907) Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Burke, E. (1951) Reflections on the French Revolution, London: Dent.

  • Durkheim, É. (1964) The Division of Labor in Society, New York, NY: Free Press.

  • Ferguson, A. (1792) Principles of Moral and Political Science, London: Strahan & Cadell.

  • Ferguson, A. (1966) An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Greig, J.Y.T. (2011) The Letters of David Hume, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Guizot, F. (1924) The History of Civilization in Europe, London: Bell.

  • Halevy, É. (1972) The Growth of Philosophical Radicalism, London: Faber & Faber.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1949) Individualism and Economic Order, London: Routledge.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1952) The Sensory Order, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty, London: Routledge.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1967) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, London: Routledge.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1978) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, London: Routledge.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1979) The Counter-Revolution of Science, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1982) Law, Legislation and Liberty, London: Routledge.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1988) The Fatal Conceit, London: Routledge.

  • Hume, D. (1889) The Natural History of Religion, London: Bonner.

  • Hume, D. (1934) A Treatise of Human Nature, London: Dent.

  • Hume, D. (1960) Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, New York, NY: Hafner.

  • Huxley, T.M. (1895) Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays, London: Macmillan.

  • Infantino, L. (1998) Individualism in Modern Thought, London: Routledge.

  • Infantino, L. (2003) Ignorance and Liberty, London: Routledge.

  • Infantino, L. (2008) Individualismo, Mercato e Storia delle Idee, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

  • Infantino, L. (2010) Hayek and the evolutionary tradition against the homo oeconomicus, in W. Butos (ed) The Social Science of Hayek’s ‘The Sensory Order’, Bingley: Emerald.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Infantino, L. (2019) Benjamin Constant: his debts towards Adam Smith, Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 34: 37–59. doi: 10.1332/251569119X15537841204119

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Infantino, L. (2020) Infrasocial Power. Political Dimensions of Human Action, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Mandeville, B. de (1924) The Fable of the Bees, Or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Mill, J.S. (1892) A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, London: Routledge.

  • Millar, J. (1803) An Historical View of the English Government, London: Mawman.

  • Montesquieu, Ch. De (1891) Persian Letters, London: Routledge.

  • Montesquieu, Ch. De (1949) The Spirit of the Laws, New York, NY: Hafner Press.

  • Morrow, G.R. (1923) The significance of the doctrine of sympathy in Hume and Adam Smith, The Philosophical Review, 32: 60–78. doi: 10.2307/2179032

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moscovici, S. (1956) A propos de quelques travaux d’Adam Smith sur l’histoire et la philosophie des sciences, Revue d’Histoire de Sciences et leurs Applications, 9: 1–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1966) La filosofia de la historia de Hegel y la historiología, in Obras Completas (vol 4), Madrid: Revista de Occidente.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Patten, S.N. (1899) The Development of English Thought, New York, NY: Macmillan.

  • Plato (1949) Theaetetus, in Collected Dialogues of Plato, New York, NY: Macmillan.

  • Pollock, F. (1908) Oxford Lectures and Other Essays, London: Macmillan.

  • Popper, K.R. (1963) Science: problems, aims, responsibilities, Proceedings of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22, pp. 938–974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Popper, K.R. (1966) The Open Society and Its Enemies, London: Routledge.

  • Popper, K.R. (1977) The self and its brain, in K.R. Popper and J.C. Eccles (eds) The Self and Its Brain, Berlin and New York, NY: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Popper, K.R. (1979) Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Popper, K.R. (1991) Conjectures and Refutations,, London: Routledge.

  • Popper, K.R. (1999) The Poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge.

  • Popper, K.R. and Lorenz, K. (1985) Die Zukunft Ist Offen Das Altenberger Gespräch Mit Den Texten des Wiener Popper-Symposiums, München: Piper.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Raphael, D.D. and Macfie, A.L. (1976) Introduction, in A. Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Rasmussen, D.C. (2017) The Infidel and the Professor, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Russell, B. (1956) Portraits From Memory and Other Essays, London: George Allen & Unwin.

  • Salomon, A. (1945) Adam Smith as sociologist, Social Research, 12: 22–42.

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1954) History of Economic Analysis, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Scott, W.R. (1937) Adam Smith as Student and Professor, Glasgow: Jackson.

  • Simmel, G. (1908) Soziologie, Leipzig: Duncken & Humblot.

  • Simmel, G. (1910) Hauptprobleme der Philosophie, Leipzig: Göschen Verlagshandlung.

  • Skinner, A.S. (1972) Adam Smith: philosophy and science, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 19: 307–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.1972.tb00527.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Small, A. (1907) Adam Smith and Modern Sociology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Smith, A. (1976a) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Smith, A. (1976b) An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Smith, A. (1977) The Correspondence of Adam Smith, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Smith, A. (1980) Essays On Philosophical Subjects, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Spencer, H. (1860) The social organism, Westminster Review, 17: 90–132.

  • Stewart, D. (1859) The Philosophy of the Active and Moral Powers of Man, Boston, MA: Phillips, Sampson & Co.

  • Stewart, D. (1877) Elements of Philosophy of Human Mind, London: Tegg.

  • Stewart, D. (1980) Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith, in A. Smith (ed) Essays on Philosophical Subjects, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Viner, J. (1927) Adam Smith and laissez faire, Journal of Political Economy, 35: 198–232. doi: 10.1086/253837

  • Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society, New York, NY: Bedminster Press.

  • Wightman, W.P.D. (1980) Introduction, in A. Smith, Essays on Philosophical Subjects, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Windelband, W. (1893) A History of Philosophy, New York, NY: Macmillan.

Lorenzo Infantino LUISS-Guido Carli, Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Lorenzo Infantino in
Current site
Google Scholar Close

l.infantino@rubbettino.it

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 885 560 16
Full Text Views 78 4 0
PDF Downloads 71 4 0

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Cover Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice
Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice