On classical liberalism and democratic optimism: James M. Buchanan and Elinor Ostrom

Author:
Marianne JohnsonUniversity of Wisconsin Oshkosh, USA

Search for other papers by Marianne Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

We recently marked the 60th anniversary of the book that established the field of public choice – The Calculus of Consent by James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock. It was also the 30th anniversary of Elinor Ostrom et al’s ‘Covenants with and without a sword’, in which she demonstrated the capacity of individuals for self-governance without submission to an external authority. This article considers these two foundational works as a starting point from which to explore the intellectual tradition of ‘democratic optimism’ in public choice. The Buchanan/Ostrom legacy is an unshakable faith in the capacity of individuals for self-governance, a significant departure from more orthodox thinking that presumed the necessity of a social planner to oversee, coordinate and enforce collective actions. Their work also illustrates the importance of questioning the assumptions of economic models and modes of thought. Examination of antecedent assumptions is useful not only for understanding the depth and complexity of economic and political choices, but also for thinking about the history of the economics discipline, the viability of research programmes and the ‘danger of self-evident truths’.

  • Aligica, P.D. and Boettke, P.J. (2011) The two social philosophies of Ostroms’ institutionalism, The Policy Studies Journal, 39(1): 2949. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.0000395.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Backhaus, J. and Wagner, R.E. (2005) From continental public finance to public choice: mapping continuity, History of Political Economy, 37(Annual Supplement): 31432. doi: 10.1215/00182702-37-Suppl_1-314

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Backhouse, R. (2017) Paul A. Samuelson: Founder of Modern Economics, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Bell, D. (2014) What is liberalism?, Political Theory, 42(6): 682715. doi: 10.1177/0090591714535103

  • Boettke, P.J. (2010) Is the only form of ‘reasonable regulation’ self regulation? Lessons from Lin Ostrom on regulating the commons and cultivating citizens, Public Choice, 143: 28391. doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9622-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boettke, P.J. (2014) What should classical liberal political economists do?, Constitutional Political Economy, 25: 11024. doi: 10.1007/s10602-014-9155-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boettke, P.J. and Kroencke, J. (2020) The real purpose of the program: a case study in James M. Buchanan’s efforts at academic entrepreneurship to ‘save the books’ in economics, Public Choice, 183: 22745. doi: 10.1007/s11127-020-00798-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boettke, P.J. and Marciano, A. (2015) The past, present and future of Virginia political economy, Public Choice, 163: 5365. doi: 10.1007/s11127-014-0162-6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boettke, P.J. and Marciano, A. (2020) The Soul of Classical Political Economy: James M. Buchanan from the Archives, Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boettke, P.J., Lemke, J. and Palagashvili, L. (2013) Riding in cars with boys: Elinor Ostrom’s adventures with police, Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(4): 40725. doi: 10.1017/S1744137413000118

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1980) The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1988) Is public choice immoral? The case for the ‘Nobel’ lie, Virginia Law Review, 74(2): 17989. doi: 10.2307/1073142

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, W. (2019) In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West, New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1949) The pure theory of government finance: a suggested approach, Journal of Political Economy, 57(6): 496505. doi: 10.1086/256880

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buchanan, J.M. (1951) Knut Wicksell on marginal cost pricing, Southern Economic Journal, 18(2): 1738. doi: 10.2307/1054301

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1952a) Federal grants and resource allocation, Journal of Political Economy, 60(3): 20817. doi: 10.1086/257209

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1952b) Wicksell on fiscal reform: comment, American Economic Review, 42(4): 599602.

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1960) Review: the theory of public finance: a study in public economy by Richard A. Musgrave, Southern Economic Journal, 26(3): 2348. doi: 10.2307/1054956

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buchanan, J.M. (1962) Politics, policy, and the Pigouvian margins, Economica, 29(February): 1728. doi: 10.2307/2601517

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1968) The Demand and Supply of Public Goods, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1975) The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Buchanan, J.M. (2000) The soul of classical liberalism, The Independent Review, 5(1): 11119.

  • Buchanan, J.M. (2003) Public Choice: The Origins and Development of a Research Program, Fairfax: Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University, https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/publicchoicesociety.org-assets/content/general/PublicChoiceBooklet.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buchanan, J.M. (2007) Economics from the Outside In, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.

  • Buchanan, J.M. (2020) A note on the pure theory of public expenditure, in P.J. Boettke and A. Marciano (eds) The Soul of Classical Political Economy: James M. Buchanan from the Archives, Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center, pp 1722.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buchanan, J.M. (2020) Chicago School thinking: old and new, in P.J. Boettke and A. Marciano (ed) The Soul of Classical Political Economy: James M. Buchanan from the Archives, Fairfax: The Mercatus Center, George Mason University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buchanan, J.M. and Samuels, W.J. (1975) On some fundamental issues in political economy: an exchange of correspondence, Journal of Economic Issues, 9(1): 1538. doi: 10.1080/00213624.1975.11503251

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (2004 [1962]) The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

  • Burgin, A. (2012) The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Great Depression, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Cherrier, B. and Fleury, J.B. (2017) Economists’ interest in collective decision after World War II: a history, Public Choice, 172: 2344. doi: 10.1007/s11127-017-0410-7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cole, D. and McGinnis, M. (2015) Introduction, in D. Cole and M. McGinnis (eds) Lin Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy, Vol 2, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daniels, W.M. (1899) The Elements of Public Finance, New York: H. Holt.

  • Dekker, E. and Kuchař, P. (2021) The Ostrom workshop: artisanship and knowledge commons, Revue d’Economie Politique, 131(4): 63764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Desmarais-Tremblay, M. (2017) Musgrave, Samuelson, and the crystallization of the standard rationale for public goods, History of Political Economy, 49(1): 5992. doi: 10.1215/00182702-3777158

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Viti de Marco, A. (1888) Il Carattere Teorico Dell ‘Economia Finazaris, Rome.

  • De Viti de Marco, A. (1936) First Principles of Public Finance, E. Pavio Marget (trans), New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.

  • Eusepi, G. and Wagner, R.E. (2013) Tax prices in a democratic polity: the continuing relevance of Antonio de Viti de Marco, History of Political Economy, 45(1): 99121. doi: 10.1215/00182702-1965204

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fleury, J.B. and Marciano, A. (2018a) The making of a constitutionalist: James Buchanan on education, History of Political Economy, 50(3): 51148. doi: 10.1215/00182702-7023458

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fleury, J.B. and Marciano, A. (2018b) The sound of silence: a review essay of Nancy MacLean’s Democracy in Chains, Journal of Economic Literature, 56(4): 1492537. doi: 10.1257/jel.20181502

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gardner, R. and Ostrom, E. (1991) Rules and games, Public Choice, 70(May): 12149. doi: 10.1007/BF00124480

  • Grandjean, J. (2021) James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock on the weaknesses of majority voting: a triptych, Œconomia, 11(1): 4976.

  • Hofstadter, R. (1964) The paranoid style in American politics, Harpers Magazine, November: 7786.

  • Innset, O. (2020) Reinventing Liberalism: The Politics, Philosophy and Economics of Early Neoliberalism (1920–1947), New York: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, M. (2014) James M. Buchanan, Chicago, and post war public finance, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 36(4): 47997. doi: 10.1017/S1053837214000571

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, M. (2018) Rules versus authorities, Public Choice, 175: 21928. doi: 10.1007/s11127-018-0544-2

  • Johnson, M. (2020) Where economics went wrong: Chicago’s abandonment of classical liberalism, Journal of Economic Literature, 58(3): 74976. doi: 10.1257/jel.20191583

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, M. (2022) Two ‘two Ostrom’ problems, History of Political Economy, 54(5): 6996. doi: 10.1215/00182702-10085629

  • Kelman, S. (1987) Public choice and public spirit, Public Interest, 80: 934.

  • Kingdon, J.W. (1999) America the Unusual, New York: Worth Publishers.

  • Knight, F.H. (1946) Review: freedom under planning, Journal of Political Economy, 54(5): 4514. doi: 10.1086/256402

  • Lindahl, E. (1919) Die Gerechtigkeit Besteuerung, Lund.

  • MacLean, N. (2017) Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America, New York: Viking.

  • Marciano, A. (2013) Why market failures are not a problem: James Buchanan on market imperfections, voluntary cooperation, and externalities, History of Political Economy, 45(2): 22354. doi: 10.1215/00182702-2082694

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marciano, A. (2015) Buchanan and pro-social behaviors: why ethics is necessary, Œconomia, 5(3): 295311.

  • Marciano, A. (2020) Buchanan, popular myths, and the social responsibility of economists, Southern Economic Journal, 86(4): 161329. doi: 10.1002/soej.12429

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marciano, A. (2021a) Buchanan’s Samaritan’s dilemma, ProMarket, 26 September, www.promarket.org/2021/09/26/buchanan-samaritan-dilemma-economic-history/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marciano, A. (2021b) Retrospectives James Buchanan: clubs and alternative welfare economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(3): 24356. doi: 10.1257/jep.35.3.243

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGinnis, M.D. and Ostrom, E. (2012) Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, public administration, and polycentricity, Public Administration Review, 72(1): 1525. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02488.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Medema, S.G. (2011) Public choice and the notion of creative communities, History of Political Economy, 43(1): 22546. doi: 10.1215/00182702-2010-049

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Medema, S.G. (forthcoming) It’s fundamental: welfare theorems, market failures, and the emergence of public expenditure theory in the turn from ‘public finance’ to ‘public economics’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, W.C. (1988) Virginia, Rochester, and Bloomington: twenty-five years of public choice and political science, Public Choice, 56: 10119. doi: 10.1007/BF00115751

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mueller, D.C. (2014) Constraining leviathan, Constitutional Political Economy, 25(1): 88102. doi: 10.1007/s10602-014-9154-2

  • Musgrave, R.A. (1941) The planning approach in public economy: a reply, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 55(2): 31924. doi: 10.2307/1882066

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Musgrave, R.A. (1959) The Theory of Public Finance, New York: McGraw Hill.

  • Ostrom, E. (1968) Some postulated effects of learning on constitutional behavior, Public Choice, 5: 87104. doi: 10.1007/BF01718686

  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ostrom, E. (2000) The danger of Self-evident truths, PS: Political Science and Politics, 33(1): 3344. doi: 10.1017/S1049096500055451

  • Ostrom, E. (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems, American Economic Review, 100(3): 64172. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostrom, E. (2011) Honoring James Buchanan, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 80: 3703. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.04.002

  • Ostrom, E. (2016) The comparative study of public economics, American Economist, 61(1): 91107. doi: 10.1177/0569434515626858

  • Ostrom, E. and Ostrom, V. (1965) A behavioral approach to the study of intergovernmental relations, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 359(May): 13746. doi: 10.1177/000271626535900115

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostrom, E., Walker, J. and Gardner, R. (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible, American Political Science Review, 86(2): 40417. doi: 10.2307/1964229

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostrom, V. (1997) The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerabilities of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Samuelson, P.A. (1969) Pure theory of public expenditure and taxation, in J. Margolis and H. Gutton (eds) Public Economics: An Analysis of Public Production and Consumption and Their Relations to the Private Sector, New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp 98123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sax, E. (1887) Grundlegung der Theoretischen Staatswissenschaft, Vienna.

  • Simons, H.C. (1936) Rules versus authority in monetary policy, Journal of Political Economy, 44(1): 130. doi: 10.1086/254882

  • Simons, H.C. (1948) Economic Policy for a Free Society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Tollison, R. (1999) Foreword, in J.M. Buchanan and G. Tullock The Calculus of Consent, Carmel, IN: Liberty Fund.

  • Wicksell, K. (1896) Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen, Jena: Gustav Fisher.

  • Wicksell, K. (1967) A new principle of just taxation, in R. Musgrave and A. Peacock (eds) Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp 72118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Marianne JohnsonUniversity of Wisconsin Oshkosh, USA

Search for other papers by Marianne Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 330 330 107
Full Text Views 298 298 44
PDF Downloads 214 214 78

Altmetrics

Dimensions