Lack of consensus, dispersion of political power and public debt: evidence from a sample of developed countries

Authors:
Mohamed Mansour University of Paris-Dauphine, Tunisia

Search for other papers by Mohamed Mansour in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Eric Kamwa Université de Lorraine, France

Search for other papers by Eric Kamwa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

The aim of this article is to study empirically the relationship between political governance and public debt by testing a number of hypotheses. We examine the effects of the dispersion of power on public debt with an econometric study carried out on a sample of 13 developed countries using macroeconomic and political data covering the period 1996–2012. It is found that the lack of consensus between political parties in a government coalition and the dispersion of power within the government are factors explaining the increase in public debt.

  • Alesina, A. and Drazen, A. (1991) Why are stabilizations delayed?, American Economic Review, 81(5): 117088.

  • Amorim, N.O. and Cox, G.W. (1997) Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties, American Journal of Political Science, 41(1): 14974. doi: 10.2307/2111712

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Axelrod, R. (1970) Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics, Chicago, IL: Markham Publishing Company.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Banzhaf, J. (1965) Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis, Rutgers Law Review, 19: 31743.

  • Borrelli, S.A. and Royed, T.J. (1995) Government strength and budget deficits in advanced democracies, European Journal of Political Research, 28(2): 22560. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00811.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buchanan, J.M. (1958) Public Principles of Public Debt: A Defense and Restatement, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

  • Clark, W.R. and Matt, G. (2006) Rehabilitating Duverger’s theory: testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effect of electoral laws, Comparative Political Studies, 39(6): 679708. doi: 10.1177/0010414005278420

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coleman, J.S. (1971) Control of collectivities and the power of a collectivity to act, in B. Lieberman (ed) Social Choice, New York: Gordon and Breach, pp 269300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cox, G.W. (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems, New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • De Hann, J., Sturm, J.E. and Beekhuis, G. (1999) The weak government thesis: some new evidence, Public Choice, 101: 16376. doi: 10.1023/A:1018326917813

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.

  • Duverger, M. (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, London: Methuen & Co.

  • Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M. (1998) The Measurement of Voting Power. Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holler, M. and Nurmi, H. (2013) Power, Voting, and Voting Power: 30 Years After, Verlag: Springer.

  • Holler, M.J. and Owen, G. (2001) Power Indices and Coalition Formation, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

  • Huber, G., Kocher, M. and Sutter, M. (2003) Government strength, power dispersion in governments and budget deficits in OECD-countries. A voting power approach, Public Choice, 116 (3–4): 33350. doi: 10.1023/A:1024860709516

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979) Effective number of parties. A measure with application to West Europe, Comparative Political Studies, 12(1): 327. doi: 10.1177/001041407901200101

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laver, M. and Shepsle, K.A. (1996) Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leiserson, A. (1966) Coalitions in Politics: A Theoretical Empirical Study, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Ordeshook, P.C. and Shvetsova, O.V. (1994) Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties, American Journal of Political Science, 38(1): 10023. doi: 10.2307/2111337

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1999) Political economics and macroeconomic policy, in J.B. Taylor and M. Woodford (eds) Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 1, 1st edn, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp 1397482.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Persson, T., Rolland, G. and Tabellini, G. (2000) Comparative politics and public finance, Journal of Political Economy, 108(6): 112161. doi: 10.1086/317686

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Riker, W.H. (1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Roubini, N. and Sachs, J. (1989a) Government spending and budget deficits in the industrial countries, Economic Policy, 4(8): 99132. doi: 10.2307/1344465

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roubini, N. and Sachs, J. (1989b) Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies, European Economic Review, 33(5): 90338. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(89)90002-0

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saalfeld, T. and Zohlnhöfer, R. (2014) From ‘dream team’ to ‘marriage of convenience’? An introduction, German Politics, 23(4): 23750. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2014.982548

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M. (1954) A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system, American Political Science Review, 48: 78792. doi: 10.2307/1951053

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Singer, M. and Stephenson, L. (2009) The political context and Duverger’s theory: evidence at the district level, Electoral Studies, 28(3): 48091. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.06.002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spolaore, E. (1993) Policy Making System and Economic Efficiency: Coalition Governments Versus Majority Governments, unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sutter, M. (2003) The political economy of fiscal policy: an experimental study on the strategic use of deficits, Public Choice, 116: 31332. doi: 10.1023/A:1024842401703

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M.S. (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Volkerink, B. and De Haan, J. (2001) Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: new evidence, Public Choice, 109(3–4): 22142. doi: 10.1023/A:1013048518308

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Mohamed Mansour University of Paris-Dauphine, Tunisia

Search for other papers by Mohamed Mansour in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Eric Kamwa Université de Lorraine, France

Search for other papers by Eric Kamwa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 567 508 35
Full Text Views 435 427 32
PDF Downloads 258 246 13

Altmetrics

Dimensions