Buchanan and Wagner pointed to an asymmetry in the political rewards of deficits and surpluses, with the former being preferable to the latter. They assigned the rise of this asymmetry to the popularization of Keynesian ideas. We test both claims by relying on the historical reputation surveys of US presidents since 1948. Historical reputations have long been something presidents have cared about, and they constitute a reliable way to assess whether their reputations suffer or gain from having run deficits. We find evidence that the size of deficits tends to be associated with greater presidential scores and that this effect is stronger in more recent surveys, when Keynesian ideas were more popular.
Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1994) The Political Economy of Budget Deficits, No. 4637, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. nber.org/papers/w4637
Alesina, A., Favero, C. and Giavazzi, F. (2020) Austerity: When It Works and When It Doesn’t, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Alesina, M.A., Ciminelli, G., Furceri, D. and Saponaro, G. (2021) Austerity and Elections, Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Arias, E. and Stasavage, D. (2019) How large are the political costs of fiscal austerity?, The Journal of Politics, 81(4): 1517–22. doi: 10.1086/704781
Bateman, B.W. (2005) Scholarship in deficit: Buchanan and Wagner on John Maynard Keynes, History of Political Economy, 37(2): 185–90. doi: 10.1215/00182702-37-2-185
Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2008) How do budget deficits and economic growth effect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries, American Economic Review, 98(5): 2203–20. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.5.2203
Buchanan, J.M. and Wagner, R.E. (1977) Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Bureau of the Census (1975) Bicentennial Edition: Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census.
Christopoulos, D.K. and Tsionas, E.G. (2003) Testing the Buchanan–Wagner hypothesis: European evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests, Public Choice, 115(3): 439–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1024213614689
Cole, H.L. and Ohanian, L.E. (2004) New Deal policies and the persistence of the Great Depression: a general equilibrium analysis, Journal of Political Economy, 112(4): 779–816. doi: 10.1086/421169
C-Span (2017) 2017 Presidential Historians Survey, https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2017/?page=overall.
Curry, J.L. and Morris, I.L. (2010) The contemporary presidency explaining presidential greatness: the roles of peace and prosperity?, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40(3): 515–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2010.03784.x
Folsom, B.W. (2009) New Deal or Raw Deal? How FDR’s Economic Legacy has Damaged America, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Galofré-Vilà, G. et al. (2021) Austerity and the rise of the Nazi Party, The Journal of Economic History, 81(1): 81–113.
Garmon, F. Jr, Geloso, V. and Magness, P. (2020) Divided government and the bias against presidential restraint, The Social Science Journal, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/03623319.2020.1819093
Geloso, V. and Pender, C. (2023) The myth of wartime prosperity: evidence from the Canadian experience, Social Science Quarterly. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13252
Gordon, R.J. (2016) The Rise and Fall of American Growth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hall, G.J. and Sargent, T.J. (2014) Fiscal discriminations in three wars, Journal of Monetary Economics, 61: 148–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.09.002
Higgs, R. (1992) Wartime prosperity? A reassessment of the US economy in the 1940s, The Journal of Economic History, 52(1): 41–60. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700010251
Howell, W.G. and Moe, T.M. (2016) Relic: How Our Constitution Undermines Effective Government—and Why We Need a More Powerful Presidency, New York, NY: Basic Books.
Hübscher, E., Sattler, T. and Wagner, M. (2021) Voter responses to fiscal austerity, British Journal of Political Science, 51(4): 1751–60.
Johnston, L. and Williamson, S.H. (2021) What was the U.S. GDP then?, Measuringworth, www.measuringworth.org/usgdp/.
Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.
Kruse, K.M. and Zelizer, J.E. (2019) Fault Lines: A History of the United States Since 1974, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Lindert, P. and Williamson, J.G. (2016) Unequal Gains: American Growth and Inequality Since 1700, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Murphy, R. (2009) The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Great Depression and the New Deal, Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing.
Nichols, C. (2012) The presidential ranking game: critical review and some new discoveries, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42(2): 275–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03966.x
Peltzman, S. (1992) Voters as fiscal conservatives, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2): 327–61. doi: 10.2307/2118475
Ponticelli, J. and Voth, H.J. (2020) Austerity and anarchy: budget cuts and social unrest in Europe, 1919–2008, Journal of Comparative Economics, 48(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2019.09.007
Rottinghaus, B., Eady, G. and Vaughn, J. (2020) Presidential greatness in a polarized era: results from the latest Presidential Greatness Survey, PS: Political Science & Politics, 53(3): 413–20, doi: 10.1017/S1049096520000177.
Simonton, D.K. (1986) Presidential greatness: the historical consensus and its psychological significance, Political Psychology, 7(2): 259–83. doi: 10.2307/3791125
Subrick, J.R. (2007) Did Buchanan and Wagner misrepresent Keynes?, History of Political Economy, 39(4): 735–9. doi: 10.1215/00182702-2007-038
Taylor, J.E. and Neumann, T.C. (2016) Recovery spring, faltering fall: March to November 1933, Explorations in Economic History, 61: 54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.eeh.2016.03.003
Taylor, M.Z. (2012) An economic ranking of the US presidents, 1789–2009: a data-based approach, PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(4): 596–604.
Uscinski, J.E. and Simon, A. (2011) Partisanship as a source of presidential rankings, White House Studies, 11(1): 1–14.
US Department of the Treasury (2021) Historical debt outstanding, https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/historical-debt-outstanding/historical-debt-outstanding.
Vedder, R. and Gallaway, L. (2001) Rating presidential performance, in J.V. Denson (ed) Reassessing the Presidency: The Rise of the Executive State and the Decline of Freedom, Auburn, AL: Mises Institute. pp 1–31.
Whaples, R. (1995) Where is there consensus among American economic historians? The results of a survey on forty propositions, The Journal of Economic History, 55(1): 139–54. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700040602
Woods, T.E. (2004) The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 284 | 284 | 128 |
Full Text Views | 69 | 69 | 9 |
PDF Downloads | 130 | 130 | 17 |