Rethinking research on social harms in an algorithmic context

Authors:
Terhi EskoUniversity of Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Terhi Esko in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Riikka KouluUniversity of Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Riikka Koulu in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

In this paper we suggest that theoretically and methodologically creative interdisciplinary research can benefit the research on social harms in an algorithmic context. We draw on our research on automated decision making within public authorities and the current on-going legislative reform on the use of such in Finland. The paper suggests combining socio-legal studies with science and technology studies (STS) and highlights an organisational learning perspective. It also points to three challenges for researchers. The first challenge is that the visions and imaginaries of technological expectations oversimplify the benefits of algorithms. Secondly, designing automated systems for public authorities has overlooked the social and collective structures of decision making, and the citizen’s perspective is absent. Thirdly, as social harms are unforeseen from the perspective of citizens, we need comprehensive research on the contexts of those harms as well as transformative activities within public organisations.

  • Cohen, J. (2019) Between Truth and Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Esko, T. and Koulu, R., manuscript under review.

  • Eubanks, V. (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor, New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • Eyert, F., Irgmaier, F. and Ulbricht, L. (2022) Extending the framework of algorithmic regulation: the Uber case, Regulation & Governance, 16(1): 2344, doi: 10.1111/rego.12371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hyysalo, S. (2010) Health Technology Development and Use: From Practice-Bound Imagination to Evolving Impacts, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jasanoff, S. (2015) Imagined and invented worlds, in S. Jasanoff and N. Kim (eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp 32141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jussila, J., Sillanpää, V., Lehtonen, T., Helander, N. and Frank, L. (2019) An activity theory perspective on creating a new digital government service in Finland, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, doi: 10.24251/hicss.2019.354.

  • Koulu, R. (2021) Crafting digital transparency: implementing legal values into algorithmic design, Critical Analysis of Law, 8(1), https://cal.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cal/article/view/36281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miettinen, R. and Paavola, S. (2014) Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling, Automation in Construction, 43: 8491, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0926580514000612. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rantala, K., Tyni, S., Koskenniemi, L., Liimatainen, A. and Kääriäinen, H. (2017) Tutkintavankien Olot ja Oikeuksien Toteutuminen’, HY: Kriminologian ja Oikeuspolitiikan Instituutti, Tutkimuksia 4/2017, [Remand Prisoners’ Circumstances and Rights, Research Papers 4/2017], Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy, https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/tutkintavankien-olot-ja-oikeuksien-toteutuminen.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stewart, J. and Hyysalo, S. (2008) Intermediaries, users and social learning in technological innovation, International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3): 295325, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23551641_Intermediaries_users_and_social_learning_in_technological_innovation. doi: 10.1142/S1363919608002035

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ulbricht, L. and Yeung, K. (2022) Algorithmic regulation: a maturing concept for investigating regulation of and through algorithms, Regulation & Governance, 16(1): 322, doi: 10.1111/rego.12437.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, M.A. (2021) Rethinking how technologies harm, The British Journal of Criminology, 61(3): 62747.

  • Yeung, K. (2017) Algorithmic regulation: a critical interrogation, Regulation & Governance, 12(4): 50523, doi: 10.1111/rego.12158.

Terhi EskoUniversity of Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Terhi Esko in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Riikka KouluUniversity of Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Riikka Koulu in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 396 396 7
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Downloads 7 7 0

Altmetrics

Dimensions